Larry Gooce

Talk page of Larry Gooce. Feel free to leave your thoughts.

June 2022

Thank you for contributing to the article Draft:Austin Rethabile Mothapo. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 01:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@Kuru ok thanks !❤️ Larry Gooce(talk) 04:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Palm Tree Record

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Palm Tree Record requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Veggies (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@Veggies Yes, I would be happy to see this article deleted as I would like to state that I've done big mistake creating this page. I would also like other articles of Palm Tree Records to be deleted speedily so. Larry Gooce(talk) 21:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft articles

Hello, Larry Gooce,

Please do not say in your edit summary that a draft has received AFC approval if you never submitted the draft for review so it hasn't been approved. It's misleading and anyone who looks at the page history can see that it is untrue. This doesn't help your reputation on Wikipedia or help other editors trust your word. Please consider submitting your drafts for actual AFC review, it can help you write a stronger article. The goal of AFC is to help get articles in shape so they won't be tagged for speedy deletion if they are moved to the main space of the project. It can be difficult to accept criticism on your work but they are actually trying to improve it and prevent it from being deleted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Waggy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lil Waggy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mooonswimmer 18:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Uncle Waffles (June 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: We've been through this half a dozen times.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Larry Gooce! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Stevence SA per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stevence SA. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit _(blether) 11:30, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

appeal for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Larry Gooce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked for abusing the account while there's nothing wrong I have done from the day I created this account. I have created article with reliable sources, which I believe that they have made positive impact to people who really needed to know more about this people and places I have written. since I've been blocked those articles I created myself has been I don't know moved or deleted something like that. I have been contributing to this encyclopedia because I committed to myself that I want to write articles, correct grammars , fix spellings and more. I would really appreciate it if I get unblocked so that I can continue contributing (writing) more articles about well known people and more , thanks ! Larry Gooce(talk) 14:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts but haven't addressed this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Larry Gooce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know this account of Steven SA , yes SA might mean South Africa a country I live in and as my address might show that there's a link to this account , I would like to make it clear to you that I don't have any link to this account. lLarry Gooce(talk) 17:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Our logs show that you are the same person. And accepting your own unblock request is amusing but pointless. It won't actually unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I don't know this account of Steven SA , yes SA might mean South Africa a country I live in and as my address might show that there's a link to this account , I would like to make it clear to you that I don't have any link to this account. l[[User:Larry Gooce|Larry Gooce]]([[User talk:Larry Gooce|talk]]) 17:19, 19 June 2022 (UTC) |accept = everyone deserves a second chance. ([[User talk:Larry Gooce|talk]])}}

Appeal for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Larry Gooce (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for the action of creating this account after "Stevence SA, I will not repeat the same mistake I made. I want to be unblocked so I can continue working from where I've left, being blocked has taught me to be sure about the actions I take in this encyclopedia. After being unblocked, I will continue to write articles and fix grammar and spellings. I would appreciate it if I get another chance so I could make this encyclopedia a better site for all, Thank you Larry Gooce(talk) 16:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You just edited an unblock request of yours pretending to be an admin, accepting the request. Not only am I rejecting this, you've lost talk page access. Go request an unblock on your main account. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.