User talk:Le Deluge/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Le Deluge. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2018 Asian Games events
A tag has been placed on Category:2018 Asian Games events requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 03:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Women's volleyball in Mongolia
A tag has been placed on Category:Women's volleyball in Mongolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 22:55, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Women's footballers in Mali
A tag has been placed on Category:Women's footballers in Mali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 22:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Category:Bette Davis has been nominated for discussion
Category:Bette Davis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: August 2017
| ||||||
Category:April (band) has been nominated for discussion
Category:April (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:Amorphis has been nominated for discussion
Category:Amorphis, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:5 Seconds of Summer has been nominated for discussion
Category:5 Seconds of Summer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:Footgolf has been nominated for discussion
Category:Footgolf, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Le Deluge! Please tell me why these categories make sense and please ping me back in a response, thanks. Savvyjack23 (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Caribbean people of North American descent
- North American people of North American descent
- Antigua and Barbuda people of North American descent
- Belizean people of North American descent
- Guatemalan people of North American descent
- Haitian people of North American descent
- Honduran people of North American descent
Category:Cambodian cultural organisations has been nominated for discussion
Category:Cambodian cultural organisations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Clean-up categories from July 2018
A tag has been placed on Category:Clean-up categories from July 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Clean-up categories from August 2018
A tag has been placed on Category:Clean-up categories from August 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Clean-up categories from January 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2027 in Europe
A tag has been placed on Category:2027 in Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2028 in Europe
A tag has been placed on Category:2028 in Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2017
| ||||||
Category:British Overseas Territory Wikipedians has been nominated for discussion
Category:British Overseas Territory Wikipedians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2017
| ||||||
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:930s in Indonesia
A tag has been placed on Category:930s in Indonesia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 17:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
User:Le Deluge/categories
Hello! I came across User:Le Deluge/categories and just wanted to ask if you think this 4-year-old list still has value, or if perhaps you would be willing to delete it. It duplicates Special:WantedCategories to some degree, and most of the categories it links to currently exist, are empty, or have been deleted. The last scenario is the one that concerns me slightly, just in terms of so many redlinks potentially encouraging recreation of categories that were deleted at WP:CFD. I will defer to whatever you choose to do, of course, but just thought I would mention it to you. Cheers, -- Black Falcon (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Friendly ping. -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Le Deluge. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2017
| ||||||
Nomination for deletion of Template:Navseasoncats2
Template:Navseasoncats2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2017
| ||||||
Category:Youth organizations disestablished in the 1960s has been nominated for discussion
Category:Youth organizations disestablished in the 1960s, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:Youth organizations by date of disestablishment has been nominated for discussion
Category:Youth organizations by date of disestablishment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who contribute to 3D Warehouse has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedians who contribute to 3D Warehouse, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 07:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedian econometricians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedian econometricians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 09:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2018
| ||||||
Category:2016 Open d'Orléans has been nominated for discussion
Category:2016 Open d'Orléans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Category
You have retarded with your edit categories Hus12345 (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Animals described in the 1720s
A tag has been placed on Category:Animals described in the 1720s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HighFlyingFish (talk) 06:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Species described in the 1720s
A tag has been placed on Category:Species described in the 1720s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HighFlyingFish (talk) 06:47, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Species described in 1729
A tag has been placed on Category:Species described in 1729 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. HighFlyingFish (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2018
| ||||||
Category:Zaporozhian Cossacks has been nominated for discussion
Category:Zaporozhian Cossacks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thank you
for pointing me at Category:Military monuments and memorials, I'll look and mull it over. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
For adding the deletion tag on the category. I've never "emptied" a category before (there was only one misplaced item in it) and didn't know the procedure. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
What's your problem, mate?
Sometimes it is harder to assume good faith than others, and I must admit I appear to be experiencing one of those periods at the moment as regards your recent edits. Can you explain why you first of all deleted the category? I would like to know your reasoning for each item why you considered it did not qualify as a spectacle. Thank you. Leutha (talk) 10:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Leutha: Where to begin? Probably with you reading WP:CATEGORIZATION. It's not a question of whether they are a spectacle or not, it's whether it's an appropriate category. It fails on a very narrow technical ground from the start, as category names are always plurals (so Category:Churches and Category:French people rather than "Church" and "French person") - which immediately runs into problems in this case as there's an ambiguity with the things you read with. But more generally - it's a very vague concept, and you end up lumping together things which aren't natural bedfellows, when they are probably best categorised with more specific categories. The category system isn't a system of metatags, trying to describe every aspect of an article, it's more like a card index in a library. So would you search for the London 2012 opening ceremony under "Olympic Opening Ceremonies" or "Spectacles"? If you maybe spend more time moving around the category hierarchy rather than just looking at it as metatags on an article, you'll get a better feel for that kind of thing. There's a bit of an art to categorisation, the ideal category is maybe 30-200 members so is neither too vague nor a WP:SMALLCAT; conversely ideally an article only wants 2-5 categories. That's not to say some articles have many more, but it's kinda overkill.
To be honest, the category system is pretty comprehensive by now, to the extent that if you're unfamiliar with it you should be a bit cautious about creating new ones unless it's continuing an existing year series (Category:1362 books as part of Category:Books by year) or country series (eg Category:Electric power in Jamaica based on other members of Category:Electric power by country). It's useful to use WP:HOTCAT to scan for possible categories that might have slightly different phrasing to the one you're contemplating, and also just have a look around the nearby hierarchy. If nothing else, you need to do that anyway to identify possible categories with which to categorise the category - not only is it important in its own right to plug a new category into the hierarchy to allow people to find it and allow bot maintenance, but it makes you think about how it works as a category. Does that make sense? Le Deluge (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC) - Thank you for your response. A simple apology would have sufficed, but your the condescending tone fails to hide the fact that you have not responded to the central issue: that you removed items from a category and then proposed it for speedy deletion on the grounds that it was empty. This is deceitful. Your suggestions and admonitions and repeated suggestions that I am a novice as regards categories simply serve as camouflage, and I shall not bother responding to them. Rather it seems that you are the person who is unfamiliar with the concept of the spectacle, particularly as developed in French Film theory. I am happy to apologise for using the singular form of the noun rather than the plural, this was simply a mistake. Perhaps you too could consider admitting that you have erred. Leutha (talk) 18:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1060s disestablishments by country
A tag has been placed on Category:1060s disestablishments by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 22:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Specialist police agencies of India has been nominated for discussion
Category:Specialist police agencies of India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Category:Specialist police agencies of Australia has been nominated for discussion
Category:Specialist police agencies of Australia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)