Lee S. Svoboda
This user may have left Wikipedia. Lee S. Svoboda has not edited Wikipedia since 23 August 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
You may call me Lee, but please realize this is my last name(see my user page).
Welcome, newcomer!
Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:
- First, take a look at the Wikipedia Tutorial, and perhaps dabble a bit in the test area.
- When you have some free time, take a look at the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. They can come in very handy!
- Remember to use a neutral point of view!
- If you need any help, feel free to post a question at the Help Desk
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.
You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.
Best of luck, and have fun!
ClockworkTroll 02:52, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
The Secret Garden -- thanks
editThank you for your work over The Secret Garden article. The summary is what was needed in there. Thanks again. Przepla 22:40, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Blocking
editIPs get blocked because of vandalism. If someone using your IP prior to you was blocked, then you should have sent me an email and I would have removed it. CryptoDerk 23:09, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
You're welcome. :-) Someone just blocked 64.12.117.13, though we sometimes don't block IP addresses from AOL (which that one is) since it's very easy for the vandal to just change his IP address, plus too many innocent people come in from the same addresses... Evercat 03:53, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Second Rate
editI just put it there because, if it did deserve an article, that was about the worst starting point ever. However, if you do want to improve it or list it on Pages Needing Attention, feel free to do so. --Bart133 17:32, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Greek pronunciation
editListen to media:greek_pronunciation_example.ogg to find out how the words αντίο, δωμάτιο, χώρα are pronounced in modern Greek. Etz Haim 21:49, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Kaliningrad
editYeah, they have some information well worth translating. Why is this a wacky recommendation, by the way? :)
Unrelated: A fellow Dvorak typer, wow! —Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 15:24, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
Dvorak
editI don't think so. I use standard Russian layout for Cyrillic, and never heard of anything else. I'm using Dvorak when typing English, though. Can't say it helped me much in improving my typing speed, but it's too late to go back to QWERTY now :)—Ëzhiki (erinaceus amurensis) 20:01, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
Hobbits and Men
editThank you for correcting that particularly awful mistake on the Hobbit articles. (I never have much liked those movie infoboxes, but I admit to being biased.) It pains me just to know it was there in the first place (and that I didn't catch it). I suppose, technically, Sam is a man, just not a Man... -Aranel ("Sarah") 00:22, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
Template:Userbox
editWhoa....are you going to replace all 2500 occurances of this template across the namespace? xaosflux Talk/CVU 07:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Disregard, the space threw me, since you were only working on Userbox_wikipedia, not just Userbox. xaosflux Talk/CVU 08:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the userboxes on my page :) .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 14:15, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
RE: No links to userbox wikipedia
editAs the person who re-linked most of those, I would like to point out that there are two that are still on the list. Both seem to use subpages for the userboxes. Should I just not sweat it, or would you please tell me how to re-link those? Lee S. Svoboda 21:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your work on that btw, I know form doing a batch myself how tedious and boring it can be, your efforts are great! I looked at this, however on the subpages they use for babel, they have been updated, I am not sure why the wiki still shows them up, but it seems they don't use them, so I would just do your best to ignore them ;) Ian13ID:540053
Happy Crimbo!
editHave a Proper and Merry Crimbo. File:Pressie.gif, in fact here is a pressie from the Doctor to you. Ho. Ho. Ho! File:Unclecrimbo.gif Dr. McCrimbo 22:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
user 1
editDue to current discussion, Template:Userbox, Template:Userbox-2, Template:Userbox-r and Template:Userbox-m will remain at their current location until dispute is resolved. Please don't revert any redirects yet though. Discuss here. Sorry about this Ian13ID:540053 22:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikisource
editHi Lee, There is a welcome for you on your WS talk page. Happy New year. 212.140.157.210 20:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
ArbCom vote
editHi Lee. Could I ask you where I have made "bad deletions"? I try to be very careful with my delete button, so I was surprised to see that as a reason. [[Sam Korn]] 18:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I presume, with your reference to redirects, that you were referring to WP:RFC/KM. I can see why you could consider this a "bad" deletion, though it was undertaken in good faith and with the intention of soothing the dispute. It failed utterly, sadly. [[Sam Korn]] 22:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for voting!
editHello there! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to vote on my arbitration commitee nomination. Although it was not successful, I appreciate the time you spent to read my statement and questions and for then voting, either positively or negativly. Again, thank you! Páll (Die pienk olifant) 22:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Murderer vs. Murderess
editDidn't see my edit as being controversial. My last edit, which was of the East Jerusalem site (an obvious controversial subject), I had done just as you had stated and first wrote something in on the 'talk' page and my edit there still stands. In this case I didn't forsee the controversy of editing out the "ess" form of murderer. I think we are still several degrees away from a case of "vandelism" though.--158.81.251.201 18:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Apparently I haven't been assuming good faith enough. What you actually changed it to was 'murder' which is simply grammatically wrong. I should have realized you meant 'murderer' and simply added 'er', which I just did. My apoligies. Lee S. Svoboda tɑk 20:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
re: CSD template on Template:WPFF IndexCheck — Sorry about that, I hope that explains it better ☺ — CuaHL 23:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I like how if i create a nonsesne artile it floats my without anyone noticing and never ever gets deleted
editThanks for experimenting with the page I like how if i create a nonsesne artile it floats my without anyone noticing and never ever gets deleted on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Aecis Mr. Mojo risin' 23:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- I see. I was already wondering about it, since it was so out of sync with your other edits. The next time you come across a talk page like that, it's probably better to use {{db-talk}}, {{db-test}} or {{db-vand}} on the talk page itself. Sorry about the accusation. Aecis Mr. Mojo risin' 19:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Svoboda name
editEven though I've read your comment on how you made your name, each time I see it, I get this impulse to ask if you're related to Dave Svoboda in Pittsburgh, a friend of my brother's. Go figure. -Fuzzy 03:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
european flag
editby bathroom toal ofcurce i mean the thing that you use to seep your self after a bath,corect spelling-syntax-or whatever.I din't exacly have souces(on the internet).But i can remember when it was proposed to be very badly welkomed in the press.When poepol wher asked, they were rather chocked.--Ruber chiken 20:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
you can read the warm reseaval of the flag on the links alredy on the page.(next to the picture "This new flag's comfy, love")BBC News | On Koolhaas' proposal--Ruber chiken 21:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Please watch out what you are reverting
editJust a heads up, and this is probably accidental, but you have reverted pages to actually reinclude vandalism after it was removed, see this and this. Please be careful. -- Steel 23:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- I will try. And yes, it was accidental (though it didn't matter with that persistant vandal there). But that doesn't matter to my action either. Lee S. Svoboda tɑk 23:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Mistakes happen to the best of us. Don't worry too much about it. -- Steel 23:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Pennnsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts
editYour recent edit to Pennnsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Hippie edits--moved references to Romanticism and Transcendentalism
editHi Lee. I've not deleted the sentence, rather I've moved it around a bit lately to enhance clarity. Are these topics particular interests of yours? Founders4 21:12, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Lee S. Svoboda. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Lee S. Svoboda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Lee S. Svoboda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)