LoopZilla

Number of admins 851

Archives

I started out as N12345n but have changed to LoopZilla. LoopZilla 09:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thank you very much for all your hard work today at the ICA London Feminist Film Wiki-a-thon, and for continuing to improve the new articles after the event. Edwardx (talk) 19:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Oldcaves (talk) 15:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neave Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Utica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

East London meetups

Hi,I am sitting in an almost empty Waitrose Café, Canary Wharf, on a Wednesday evening. I wandered around looking for a suitable place for a meet up: Unfortunately the Starbucks outside the library shuts at 7:00 pm. I think this place would be fine - almost empty, reasonable price with free coffee if you buy something (i.e. a cake?). After all the talk on WMUK list I thought it would be better to do something. What I would suggest is perhaps an East London meetup on the last Wednesday of the month, starting wed 24 June. What do you think? Leutha (talk) Leutha (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Great! But I am busy Wednesdays and Thursdays. Could get there on a Wednesday by 7:30pm... Gordo (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Done! LoopZilla (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• User:LoopZilla/Ivan Pope may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 16:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! LoopZilla, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 16:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Sid Briskin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sid Briskin. Since you had some involvement with the Sid Briskin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Nescio vos (talk) 21:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivan Pope and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

More Ivan Pope

Hi, User:LoopZilla -- as an old-timer from the early Internet days, I'm also frustrated that we can't find more on Ivan Pope. I just spent about two hours trying to track down older books that might say something about him, but have generally failed. I also dug through some of my very elderly "how to use this new thing called the Internet" books (dated 1993 and 1994), but they are US-based and don't include 3W magazine or anything else that Pope was involved in. I did a virtual cruise of the British Library's collection, but they don't seem to have gathered Zines. I say let's just toss this thing out into mainspace and hope that someone else has access to early archives. (BTW, archive.org was a bust as well.) I'll add a comment on the talk page that we are indeed fishing for help and hope that the article stays around to gather attention. It's a long shot, but I can't come up with anything else. LaMona (talk) 22:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Pope has been accepted

Ivan Pope, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15a}} to your friends' talk pages.

Help decide the future of Wikimania

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Refugee Council Archive

I have created a page on the Wikimedia UK wiki where we can develop this event: wmuk:Projects in incubation/Refugee Council Archive. If you have not done so already you will need to create your account on the WMUK wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Thryduulf (talk) 01:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. LoopZilla (talk) 12:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania results

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thank you for everything you did to make the Black Cultural Archives day a success. We couldn't have done it without you. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

WIR A+F

	Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the virtual worldwide online event hosted by Women in Red. March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Africa Centre, London

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A-WA (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A-WA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016

As a past contributor, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Contacting Editors from the Ada Lovelace Editathons

Hi LoopZilla,

I hope you don’t mind me contacting you via your talk page. I’m a new Editor to Wikipedia, part of a small research team based at the University of Birmingham in the UK. I’m getting in touch as we’re trying to contact all the Editors who were involved in the Ada Lovelace Editathons in Oxford or London. If you have been, or still are, involved in editing, whatever the scale of your involvement, we would be very grateful for the opportunity to talk to you about your experiences. In the first instance, we’ve set up a short (10 minute) survey, which you can access via my User Talk Pages. If you are interested in helping with our research project, please can you drop me a line?

Thanks, RuthPage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikimeet 107

Lovely to meet you in London yesterday - thanks for being so welcoming at my first meetup! Zeromonk (talk) 07:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Very nice to meet you too! LoopZilla (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Ada Lovelace Day 2016 - Booking links now live

Ada Lovelace in 1852

Hi LoopZilla

Just to let you know that the booking links for Ada Lovelace Day 2016 are now live.

Should you still wish to come then please book a place through the MyEd & Eventbrite links on the event page below:

• Book a place at ALD16

Any problems then let me know. Hope to see you there.

Very best regards, Stinglehammer (talk) 18:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Warner Estate

Hello! Your submission of Warner Estate at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Please also take a look at how I reorganized the article and make sure the cites are in place. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. LoopZilla (talk) 08:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Warner Estate

On 18 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Warner Estate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Warner Estate provided social housing in East London for over 110 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Warner Estate. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Warner Estate), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LoopZilla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Bexley Hospital

On 14 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bexley Hospital, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at Bexley Hospital, the patients looked after the farm animals, maintained the grounds, and did the cleaning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bexley Hospital. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bexley Hospital), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello at last I have joined wikipedia!

Marjenta (talk) 21:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome, newbie. LoopZilla (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

George Francis Hardy

Not stalking you, but my notifications showed that there was a new link to Edwardes Square, which I started in 2014. Edwardx (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Kool..... LoopZilla (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Museum in Docklands Jan2005.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Museum in Docklands Jan2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Bendy Bus 12.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bendy Bus 12.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for George Francis Hardy

On 21 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George Francis Hardy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that George Francis Hardy was an actuary, Egyptologist, and amateur astronomer whose scientific methods and calculations contributed to all three fields? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George Francis Hardy. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, George Francis Hardy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Ah, well done! – Fayenatic London 13:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

A Kingsley Hall Book Club spinoff! LoopZilla (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Arthur Broome

On 29 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur Broome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Reverend Arthur Broome was one of the founders of the RSPCA and, as guarantor for the society's debts, went to debtors' prison when it declared bankruptcy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Broome. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arthur Broome), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LoopZilla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Gustavus Murray has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, LoopZilla. Gustavus Murray, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for The Doctor (painting)

On 30 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Doctor (painting), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Luke Fildes' painting The Doctor (detail pictured) was used to promote state-run healthcare in Britain and to campaign against it in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Doctor (painting). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Doctor (painting)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year

I wish you a fantastic new year 😀. I hope to see you one day at meet up maybe Whispyhistory (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year! Hope to see you at the London Wikimeet! LoopZilla (talk) 09:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

I'll be there Whispyhistory (talk) 11:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Gustavus Murray

On 18 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gustavus Murray, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1858, the obstetrician Gustavus Murray claimed to be able to identify the parts of a fetus, including each vertebra, through an abdominal examination of a pregnant woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gustavus Murray. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gustavus Murray), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of B&R Samizdat Express for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B&R Samizdat Express is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B&R Samizdat Express until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 15:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LoopZilla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

"Geroge Davis is innocent" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geroge Davis is innocent. Since you had some involvement with the Geroge Davis is innocent redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 14:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jack Santa Maria

The article Jack Santa Maria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NAUTHOR Cannot find any press coverage for him or his books, no reviews either, no claims of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Heron Quays

Just to let you know, the distance you inserted way back in 2005 (I think) for "moving" Heron Quays DLR station is definitely out, if only because 200 metres north is almost exactly where Canary Wharf DLR is! Since CW DLR dates from 1991, Heron Quays cannot possibly have moved in 2001! I have just re-edited the Wikipedia article myself :) best, Sunil060902 (talk) 14:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jo Marks

The article Jo Marks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP notability issue. Only sources are 2 external links focusing on the company (has a page), not on its founder.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe McNeill (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)