MMMcMaster

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello MMMcMaster, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Gerry Reid have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Sophia Hutchins listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sophia Hutchins. Since you had some involvement with the Sophia Hutchins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Count Count (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MMMcMaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have no relation to KBQ430 other than IP address, I am under total edit block

Accept reason:

No longer blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Try editing again - as far as I can tell, you're not blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

• IP block is still in effect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMMcMaster (talk • contribs) 23:55, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Felix Collins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Russell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Canadian Senate expenses scandal

Hello, I've replied to your protection request here. Airplaneman ✈ 04:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Ricketts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baie Verte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MMMcMaster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

References

Just a reminder that when you're adding content to an article, as you did at Sherry Gambin-Walsh, it is not sufficient to reference it to just the URL of a web page — the complete citation details, including the title of the news article, the name of the media outlet and the date on which they published it, all have to be present inside the reference tags. The reason for this is that if the web link ever dies, we need all of that information in order to be able to recover the reference — so we need all of the citation details, not just a naked weblink. (See the references in Belinda Cornish for an example of what I'm talking about if you're unclear.) Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

"But look, this other article is doing it wrong too" is not an excuse. References have to be to the full citation details, not just to a bare URL — and if you can find other articles that are doing it wrong, that just means those articles need to be fixed too. Bearcat (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Your addition to Alison Coffin has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Humber-Gros Morne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deer Lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Renata Ford

The article Renata Ford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not independently notable as an unelected candidate, per WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – bradv🍁 06:36, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, I'm No1lakersfan. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Alex Morgan have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 00:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South East Bight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monkstown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ashlyn Harris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 23:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MMMcMaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize for my actions, I have a long history of constructive editing to Wikipedia (see my edit history) and am therefore requesting a temporary suspension instead of indefinite

Decline reason:

Your unblock request doesn't even come remotely close to addressing your offensive actions. I mean, I don't see how it could, but you didn't even try. We can do without your hatred, homophobia, and vandalism. Go troll someplace else, your actions clearly demonstrate we can't unblock you. Yamla (talk) 01:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this user previously was hit by an autoblock on Kbq430. Although they claimed at the time they had no relationship with that blocked editor, the overlap in editing is almost complete. They are clearly the same person and were trying to mislead us. They were blocked for a string of highly inappropriate edits there, including outright racism. Given the continued hatred spouted here, I can only conclude the original account was not compromised and this person was simply evading their block. I therefore upgrade this block to a sockblock. --Yamla (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

• I deny the sockpuppet accusation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMMcMaster (talk • contribs)

Sockpuppetry was confirmed. --Yamla (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)