Madscotinengland

Welcome!

Hello, Madscotinengland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Roleplayer 16:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Welsh devolution referendum, 2011

Do we need the absolute numbers as well as the percentages? I was thinking of changing the table to add columns in order to tidy it up, but it would be more in line with past practice - Welsh devolution referendum, 1997 - simply to use the percentages. Views? Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Not knowing the first result was looking at how close it could be but with the results coming through I would tend to agree to remove the figures! --User:madscotinengland Madscotinengland (talk) 12:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

OK - I'm very impressed by the speed with which you're putting the results up! Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Joys of paternity leave with and waiting for baby to come! Something to help the day go by! Any changes you do make, especially with formatting to make it more athestically pleasing would be very much welcome! Madscotinengland (talk) 12:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm out this afternoon, so I'll leave it in your capable hands for the time being. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much - enjoy your afternoon out and about! Madscotinengland (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Red Nose Day 2011

Hello

I liked the majority of your improvements to the page but that seemed unnecessary and your change to the presenters list overly complicated. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oracle 45 (talk • contribs) 09:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

thanks for the feedback - in all honesty I've had very little to do with the presenters list - it was moved from the main Comic Relief wiki so not sure about it to be honest! it's looking like quite a good article now though - lots of people contributing valuable suggestions Madscotinengland (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of First Glasgow Route List

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Glasgow Route List requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. C. 22468 (talk) 12:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish National Entitlement Card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attendance Allowance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Madscotinengland (talk) 16:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Ta Bot!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glasgow City Council elections concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glasgow City Council elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Glasgow City Council elections

Hello Madscotinengland. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Glasgow City Council elections.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glasgow City Council elections}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Madscotinengland. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Balgray railway station

Hello, Madscotinengland,

Thank you for creating Balgray railway station.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Reviewed during NPP. Pretty clearly does not meet wp:notability. The SNG explicitly says that rail stations are not presumed notable and so must establish notability under GNG. Suggest merging into the rail line article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

North8000 (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Madscotinengland. Thank you for your work on Balgray railway station. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your wqrk. Pretty clearly does not meet wp:notability. The SNG explicitly says that rail stations are not presumed notable and so must establish notability under GNG. Suggest merging into the rail line article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

@North8000: If you compare the rest of the line, there is a rail station page for each train station. For that reason, all articles along the train line need to have the consistency applied. This was acknowledged by other commenters. Madscotinengland (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

That just means that any others that don't establish GNG should be merged or deleted. That aside, why not spend your time developing/building a nice article on the overall line, including sections on the stations? Instead of investing your time on articles whose existence violates wP:Notability. Either way thanks for your work! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)