Welcome!

Hello, Maxbaby01, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Charter

edit

Hi. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation, you're right -- it only discusses 'private' charters. However, these charter services (e.g., Funjet Vacations) do not actually offer flights. They purchase seats in bulk from other airlines (see their website: https://www.funjetinsider.com/charter-flights/). Since these companies are not airlines, it is not appropriate to include them on airport pages. Please do not include them again -- I have removed from from the MSP airport page. Thanks for your concern. ConnectedEquality (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

KMSP-TNCM | Delta | Resumption of Service

edit

Hey,

I see that you added Deltas MSP-SXM route back onto the wikipedia.. I don’t see anything regarding that. Do you had a source of info? Balloonchaser (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

For me it’s showing that it’s a one (1) stop layover flight at KATL. Please check your source again. Balloonchaser (talk) 23:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Maxbaby01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mexico City International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 01:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Arnoboro (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, I will get admins involved and you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PlaneCeiling912 (talk) 00:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Airline Market Share

edit

Hi there! I wanted to address the recent edits to the MSP airport page. They are considered regional affiliates, are they not? It skews the market share away from airlines such as Southwest and Sun Country when you consider the regional affiliates as separate airlines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raine004 (talkcontribs) 15:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

You could have given me the chance to cite this before you undid my edit. Maxbaby01 (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Undoing a single edit and adding a source isn't a significant burden, and editors aren't required to tag unsourced material or contact other editors prior to reverting the addition of unsourced material. DonIago (talk) 13:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

MSP-TYS Allegiant resumption

edit

If it is a seasonal route then it needs to say seasonal in front of it. Lucthedog2 (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are correct. Thank you for correcting it. Maxbaby01 (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Lucthedog2 (talk) 15:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. VenFlyer98 (talk) 19:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thank you for the info. 2601:447:C683:9220:7171:C3F4:A991:7E24 (talk) 00:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 15:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No it does not. If you keep reverting my edits I will report you as causing an edit war. Maxbaby01 (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Beware of the boomerang. You are the one removing valid references... The Banner talk 17:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 17:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am not "vandalizing" Wikipedia. These are references that are no longer needed. Have you looked at them? Maxbaby01 (talk) 15:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. When a source is outdated, update them. Do not remove them outright because you do not like them. The Banner talk 15:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. VenFlyer98 (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your help. Maxbaby01 (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport

edit

Why did you restore an edit based on an unreliable source? Please see WP:SIMPLEFLYING. The Banner talk 01:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you would look at the reference. It was updated to a new source. 96.67.179.97 (talk) 12:17, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Simpleflying is not the source. Stop reverting the edit. Maxbaby01 (talk) 12:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
It still uses simpleflying. And that is a source that should not be used at all. The Banner talk 12:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's now from "Aeroroutes". Maxbaby01 (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
| [[Aeroméxico]] | [[Mexico City International Airport|Mexico City]] (resumes March 30, 2025)<ref> https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/241023-amns25phx </ref> | <ref name="AeroméxicoRoutes">{{cite web |title=Flight Schedule |url= https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/241023-amns25phx |url-status=live |archive-url= https://simpleflying.com/aeromexico-new-boeing-737-max-8-mexico-city-phoenix/ |archive-date=October 19, 2024 |access-date=October 19, 2024}}</ref> Still contains a link to simpleflying. The Banner talk 16:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply