MiG
Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
---|
Cleanup |
Categories |
Create an article |
Referencing |
Stubs |
Deletion |
Polishing |
Translation into English |
Images |
Controversy |
To-do lists |
Disambiguation |
More |
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
Hi. This may look a bit messy, but I'm trying to turn this page into a repository of wikitools and links for personal use. If you have suggestions about this or comments of a more general nature, feel free to drop a line below! -- MiG 11:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Godiva device
editYou may be interested to know that I've created an article on the Godiva device (as mentioned in the criticality accident article). -- MightyWarrior 23:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! The sources you found form an interesting read as well :) -- MiG 09:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Your naming
editMig you can copy this And you could consider making a sub-page for this. User:MiG/whatever search that and make the page It's completely "legit".
- PS. I love migs especially this one! Peacekeeper II, too lazy to log on since -06 16:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
For your question ...
editOn WP-fr, you must go to fr:Wikipédia:Demande de renommage de compte utilisateur/Usurpation and write your question. Regards Stef48 (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Bit surprised to find your answer all the way over here :) Thanks! -- MiG (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
MiG@svwiki
editHi! MiG@svwiki is now usurped for you --Rosp (talk) 15:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- You'll need to delete your global account at m:SRU if you want to have sv:User:MiGx moved to sv:User:MiG. MiCkE —Preceding comment was added at 17:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I assume 'deleting my global account' sounds scarier than it actually is... -- MiG (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Lets hope so :-). I've now moved sv:User:MiGx to sv:User:MiG, so you can now go ahead and re-unify your account. MiCkE 13:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- It turned out to be quite painless, duly appreciated! -- MiG (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Lets hope so :-). I've now moved sv:User:MiGx to sv:User:MiG, so you can now go ahead and re-unify your account. MiCkE 13:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I assume 'deleting my global account' sounds scarier than it actually is... -- MiG (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
editHello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation pages only include information which leads to WP pages, not general information about abbreviations. So until there's an article about "Pro Memoriam" it doesn't belong on the page. PamD (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
It warrants an article, hadn't even heard of it until recently. Might want to return it within brackets. -- MiG (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Pittsburgh FPC
editFYI: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pittsburgh at dawn. Thank you for your suggestion at PPR. Feel free to sign as co-nominator. Jujutacular talk 04:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Done. -- MiG (talk) 07:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Pittsburgh dawn city pano.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
|
Name
editSeen this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.211.77.194 (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wasn't aware of that, thanks! -- MiG (talk) 20:56, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
editHi MiG,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Pittsburgh dawn city pano.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 22, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-04-22. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! It's been nearly two years, completely forgot about this one. Has the photographer been notified? -- MiG (talk) 10:23, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, at roughly the same time you were. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
A note
editthat I mentioned your username in a discussion on ANI, since the big orange box says to notify and etc. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm curious. What's that about? -- MiG (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, MiG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, MiG. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, MiG. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)