Welcome MrCEOedit |
Keep up the great editing that you have been making, including those to the Sheen Estevez article! |
You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.. Signing your name is important on talk pages because it helps people get in touch with you. Also remember to indent each of your comments using : so that other users can follow the flow of discussions As well as editing wikipedia you could also think about taking part in many other essential activities that make wikipedia a friendly place. For example you could welcome new users to wikipedia or you could try mediating discussions between other users. There are loads of other options at the Wikipedia:Community Portal. |
Some links to get you started in the community:
|
If you have any questions or just want to chat then leave a message on my talk page and I'll answer as soon as possible. Happy editing, Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 12:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
My Sig
editI used to, but I believe it should be simple! Computerjoe's talk 10:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Civility support
editWhat if we had a civility investigation organization with 1 administrator and 2 normal users who can investigate civility disputes and post the results?--MrCEO 22:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- MrCEO, I had a similar idea and suggested it on the Concordia proposal board, the only response I got was from ComputerJoe who didn't seem very interested and only expressed past failure. I have very little faith in the effectiveness of Concordia. And the ARBCOMM is a last resort and not a place that specializes in civility. I think a civility support team is a great idea. It will provide people, who are having trouble with other users, with a place to go to get consultation and independent opinions about any ongoing incivility. Of course this team should have no power other than to look, give their opinions on civility, make suggestions, and make notices to any wikipedia members who are behaving in an uncivil manner. Perhaps we should create a new group and let concordia wither away as it seems to be doing. Please let me know what you think. --ElectricEye (talk) 20:54, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
You have mail
editYou have a reply waiting for you at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Admin coaching The Transhumanist 19:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Concordia is currently trying to relaunch. I, and all the members of the ex-council, wish to welcome new members to the group. We are a group who aim to promote remaining civil, in an environment where messages can easily be interpretated wrongly.
Help out now!
edit- Try and help people remain civil! Talk to them, and help them in any way possible. Do not be afraid to use the talk page.
- Give people the Civility Barnstar.
- Make and spread some Wikitokens so people know there are people to help if they want assistance.
- Add banners or logos to your userpage to show your support.
- Suggest some ideas! Add 'em to the talk page.
We are a community, so can only work though community contributions and support. It's the helping that counts.
Decision Making
editThe council expired one month ago, but due to the current position of the group the current council will remain until the position of the group can be assessed, and whether it would be sensible to keep Concordia going. For most decisions, however, it will be decided by all who choose to partake in discussions. I am trying to relaunch because of the vast amounts of new members we have received, demonstrating that the aims are supported.
If you wish to opt of of further talk-page communications, just let us know here.
- Ian¹³/t 20:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC). Kindly delivered by MiszaBot.
Civility
editHi, I noticed you have written material on and shown an interest in civility on wikipedia. I have created a poll page to gauge community feelings on how civility is managed in practice currently at Wikipedia:Civility/Poll, so input from as many people as possible is welcomed. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)