User talk:Mr RD/Archive 3

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 9

March 2014

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Marketing, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

  This is just to say you thank you for all those reviews you have put in my articles.Cheers! Ashishlohorung (talk) 01:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Internshala has been accepted

 
Internshala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ThaddeusB (talk) 23:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Uroyoán Walker

Hello Mr RD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Uroyoán Walker, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:36, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intercultural Open University Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Beautiful Women Wake Up Early

Hello Mr RD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Beautiful Women Wake Up Early, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: WP:CSD#A7 does not apply for films. You will have to consider PROD or AfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the Hizkias Assefa tags

Hello, I just wanted to check in with you on the tags you posted on the article I posted on Hizkias Assefa. I just wanted to make clear that I am certainly not Hizkias, nor am I employed by him, and although I have met him once (full disclosure) I would not even consider him an acquaintance. So, to be clear, this is in no way sponsored by him - I just thought someone of his caliber should be on here. I welcome your feedback, and have not removed the tags as yet, as I want to chat about your concerns prior to taking action that could be perceived as unjustified.

Ronnyspock (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear Ronnyspock, I have removed the tags put up by me. Still I would request you to review the page and try to make the page more neutral avoiding WP:PEACOCK. Mr RD 14:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear Mr RD Thank you, and roger wilco. 2601:8:3700:234:9589:6342:1F9B:7994 (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Gulab Kothari was accepted

 
Gulab Kothari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arijit Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Pioneer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Middle East Eye

Sorry but I missed the deletion nomination for this page which I created. How do I get the page back so I can edit and add importance. The Middle East Eye is a journalistic endeavor headed by the former editor of a major UK newspaper and its stories are now being cited in major media. Surely there are far less important subjects here? What do I need to do? Susan belt74 (talk) 19:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Dear Susan belt74, please refer Wikipedia:Deletion policy. For requesting deletion review over the page, please go through WP:BIODEL. Cheers, Mr RD 19:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Mr RD left you a message on Wikipedia

Regarding the The Talking Propellerheads page, the explanation is that the band was around for 20 years and documented in a humorous way the decline of the Minicomputer industry. I will go with whatever your decision is on inclusion or not. Thank you for your consideration and quick response. Thefink49 Thefink49 (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Dear Thefink49, my doubt is only regarding the notability of the band. If you think you can prove the notability of the band, please go ahead and challenge the speedy deletion. For more information regarding notability of bands please see wp:band. Cheers Mr RD 15:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Mike Aho Comments

Hi Mr RD, thank you for your comments on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Aho Have managed to add a fair number of citations though I will keep looking for more. With pre year 2000 content am finding it's not so easy to find ideal citations. When you have time, could you possible have another look at the page. Many thanks. Dstocker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstocker (talkcontribs) 16:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mr RD/draft 2

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KJ Discuss? 15:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Durga Charan Panigrahi has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Durga Charan Panigrahi. Thanks! Logical1004 (talk) 10:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durga Charan Panigrahi (November 5)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Logical1004 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Logical1004 (talk) 10:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 
Hello! Mr RD, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Logical1004 (talk) 10:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Durga Charan Panigrahi has been accepted

 
Durga Charan Panigrahi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CutestPenguinHangout 17:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mr RD. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Robson Gracie

Re: this edit. He doesn't need to meet the WP:GNG, he meets WP:MANOTE and WP:ANYBIO. Please remove your erroneous tag. Bellerophon talk to me 17:10, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Irish Car Rentals. —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Irish Car Rentals

 

A tag has been placed on Irish Car Rentals, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:G11 violation. Another spam article by the author of other fine spam articles, such as Khon Kaen MICE City, BioScale Inc., and Baer & Bosch Auctioneers

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 22:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)