Mrdanishequbal
Welcome!
editHello, Mrdanishequbal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Mrdanishequbal/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
@Vanderwaalforces: Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
Thank you for your response and for pointing out the concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest. I sincerely apologize for not addressing this earlier and appreciate the opportunity to clarify my position.
I understand the importance of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies and assure you that my intention is to contribute factually accurate and neutral content to the encyclopedia. I recognize that as someone with knowledge of Danish Equbal's work, I must be especially careful to adhere strictly to neutrality and verifiability in my contributions.
Here are the steps I propose to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards:
Full Disclosure: I will fully disclose any potential conflict of interest in the relevant discussion pages to ensure transparency with the Wikipedia community. Seeking Consensus: I will actively seek feedback from other editors to ensure the content is balanced and free from bias, and I will make edits based on the community's feedback. Third-party Sources: I commit to using only reliable, independent third-party sources to verify the content and will ensure all claims are supported by these sources, not by my personal knowledge or experiences. I understand the reasons for the decline of my unblock request and respect the community's standards and policies. I am committed to learning from this experience and hope to contribute positively under the guidance and oversight of more experienced editors.
Thank you for considering this response. I am open to further guidance on how I can align my contributions with Wikipedia's values and standards.
June 2024
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 16:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Mrdanishequbal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, :I am writing to contest the speedy deletion of the page I created about Danish Equbal under the tags G11 and U5. I believe that this deletion may have been a misunderstanding regarding the intent and substance of the article, and I wish to clarify a few points to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia's encyclopedic standards: :Not Promotional: The intent of the article is to provide a factual, neutral biography of Danish Equbal, a notable entrepreneur in the Indian real estate sector. The content was structured to highlight his educational background, career achievements, and contributions to the field, not to promote his business ventures. I will revise the article to ensure it strictly adheres to a neutral point of view and further distances from promotional language. :Encyclopedic Relevance: Danish Equbal's work in transforming real estate investment through technology and data analytics represents a significant contribution to the industry. His innovative approaches and the recognitions he has received are documented in the hope of contributing valuable information to those researching real estate investment strategies or industry leaders. :Compliance with Wikipedia's Goals: The article aims to share knowledge and information about a figure who has made substantive contributions to his field, which is in line with Wikipedia's goal of being a comprehensive encyclopedia. It does not serve as a web hosting service or a platform for unwarranted promotion. :To address the concerns, I am committed to revising the article to ensure it meets Wikipedia's neutrality requirements and more clearly establishes the notability of Danish Equbal without any promotional tone. I believe that with appropriate modifications, the content can serve as a valuable informational resource for the Wikipedia community. :I appreciate the opportunity to address these concerns and hope for a chance to improve the article to meet the required standards.
Decline reason:
This is an undeletion request, not an unblock request. Declined. Cabayi (talk) 07:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mrdanishequbal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I apologize for the confusion in my previous communication. I understand now that my request was mistakenly framed as an undeletion appeal rather than an unblock request. Thank you for your guidance, and I am now submitting a proper unblock request as per the recommended guidelines. I am requesting an unblock because I believe the original intent of the article about Danish Equbal was to contribute valuable, encyclopedic content about a notable figure in the real estate sector, not to serve promotional purposes. I acknowledge that the initial wording may have appeared promotional, and I am committed to revising the article to align strictly with Wikipedia's neutrality and notability standards. Here are the steps I intend to take upon unblocking: Reassess Content: Thoroughly review the content to remove any promotional tone. Enhance Notability: Strengthen the section that establishes Danish Equbal’s notability by citing significant achievements and independent, reliable sources. Ensure Neutrality: Rewrite the article to adhere strictly to a neutral point of view, ensuring that it reads as factual and balanced, without any promotional language. I appreciate the opportunity to correct these issues and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. Please consider this request to unblock and allow for the necessary revisions to ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you for considering my request.
Decline reason:
No. You aren't going to be unblocked to continue that. Nor have you discussed your obvious conflict of interest. Yamla (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Yamla: Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
Thank you for your response and for pointing out the concerns regarding a potential conflict of interest. I sincerely apologize for not addressing this earlier and appreciate the opportunity to clarify my position.
I understand the importance of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies and assure you that my intention is to contribute factually accurate and neutral content to the encyclopedia. I recognize that as someone with knowledge of Danish Equbal's work, I must be especially careful to adhere strictly to neutrality and verifiability in my contributions.
Here are the steps I propose to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards:
Full Disclosure: I will fully disclose any potential conflict of interest in the relevant discussion pages to ensure transparency with the Wikipedia community. Seeking Consensus: I will actively seek feedback from other editors to ensure the content is balanced and free from bias, and I will make edits based on the community's feedback. Third-party Sources: I commit to using only reliable, independent third-party sources to verify the content and will ensure all claims are supported by these sources, not by my personal knowledge or experiences. I understand the reasons for the decline of my unblock request and respect the community's standards and policies. I am committed to learning from this experience and hope to contribute positively under the guidance and oversight of more experienced editors.
Thank you for considering this response. I am open to further guidance on how I can align my contributions with Wikipedia's values and standards.