Mwarhurst1

Welcome!

Hello, Mwarhurst1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu/unep/document/assessing-global-land-use-balancing-consumption-sustainable-supply.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply

Hello Mwarhurst1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Assessing Global Land Use: Balancing Consumption with Sustainable Supply for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 16:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Mwarhurst1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mwarhurst1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Land Footprint was accepted

Land Footprint, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Land Footprint

The article Land Footprint has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

duplicates land footprint

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

COI issues

Hello User:Mwarhurst1, I hope this note finds you well. For WP:COI issues, please do not resort to WP:OUTTING on a talk page, even when accused by another user of WP:POV WP:ADVOCACY. I note that your inaccurate accusation promoted the user to write a detailed autobiography of their relationship to the subject. Please feel free to discuss genuine concerns in Talk:Hydraulic_fracturing_in_the_United_Kingdom#Conflict_of_Interest. Please feel free to respond to this note either here on your page or on my own at User_talk:LutherBlissetts. Kind regards, Luther Blissetts (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Finsbury Park station, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please do not cite web forums for your sources. SK2242 (talk) 21:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Dormskirk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Royal Victoria Patriotic Building, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Your edit summary "referencing recent academic studies" - please reference the academic studies concerned using citations in the form required by WP:CITE. Dormskirk (talk) 16:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)