Narthring

Welcome!

Hello, Narthring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DS (talk) 21:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: US Census Population

Hi. The census data that I used in the Texola, Oklahoma article and similar articles came from the U.S. Census Bureau's official site. Here's the link: http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/index.htm. --Acntx (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC).

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Midtown Oklahoma City Southeastern tribes Seminole Bunch, Oklahoma Macon, Georgia Lake Hefner Deep Deuce North Canadian River Kansas City, Kansas Paseo Arts District Oklahoma City Farris, Oklahoma Eastside, Oklahoma City Hampton, Virginia Word stem Land run Dawes Commission Western Open (women's golf) Travois

Cleanup 2003 invasion of Iraq Cold case Selenite Merge Southern Athabaskan languages Norris, Tennessee Royal Gorge Add Sources Edmond, Oklahoma Midwest City, Oklahoma Automobile Alley Wikify Paris, Arkansas Yukon, Oklahoma Sequoyah County, Oklahoma Expand Indian reservation East Central University Indian removal

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for starting Lake Eucha State Park

I happened across it (via Randompage), and felt moved to expand it (primarily from the lovely, detailed Resource Management Plan that Oklahoma was kind enough to post) (and Google Scholar to index). I'd love your comments (and/or help) on the expansion. Keep up the good work! JesseW, the juggling janitor 07:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Assessing A City Page

Hello, I was wondering, since you had assessed recently Achille, Oklahoma if you would assess Elizabeth City, North Carolina. -- Icountryclub (talk) 19:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Done. Check the talk page. Narthring (talk • contribs) 22:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Oklahoma Barnstar
		Awarded to Narthring for contributions to all things Oklahoma Kiddo27 (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

WIKIPROJECT OKLAHOMA

--Steam Iron 23:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Atoka Agreement

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Atoka Agreement, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://digital.library.okstate.edu/encyclopedia/entries/A/AT004.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:50, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

WIKIPROJECT OKLAHOMA

I would like to know if it would be ok with you if I began to do the switch over to the new page design.--Steam Iron 10:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure, that sounds good to me.Narthring (talk • contribs) 13:11, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Great thanks.--Steam Iron 17:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Sources at Okie Dialect

Hello, Narthring. You suggested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okie Dialect, "The resources that Moorsmur provided seem to be reliable with one or two exceptions." I argued at Talk:Okie Dialect that none of the sources mentioning "Okie dialect" seem to be intended as reliable sources (all are works of humor), while those that are reliable don't describe Oklahoma as a distinct dialect region. I am hoping that you can convince me that there are in fact reliable sources that describe "Oklahoma dialect" as distinct from midlands or inland southern regional dialects. Thanks, Cnilep (talk) 19:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC) (from Norman, Oklahoma)

I should clarify. Although the works Moorsmur provided are reliable (with the one or two exceptions) you're right that the they don't describe Oklahoma as a distinct dialect region. I added several reliable sources to the article that mention the Okie dialect in passing, but they are certainly not significant coverage; they discuss how Steinbeck researched the Okie dialect he used in The Grapes of Wrath. If you're interested in saving the article one source that might be of interest is an article in the Chronicles of Oklahoma by Thomas Wikle and Guy Baily called "Oklahomy Folks Says 'em Different": Axes of Linguistic Variation in Oklahoma". (Vol. 75 No. 1) There may be something useful in there, thought I wouldn't hold my breath. Narthring (talk • contribs) 21:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome

Narthring,

Thank you for your warm welcome and useful pages. I do plan on staying. I would like to overhaul articles on Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri. I suppose I should say so on talk page and let everyone who has edit those articles know, right?

At this point, I have a couple of questions:

(1) What is your position among the Wikipedians? I am trying to orient myself.

(2) A friend of mine sent me a bunch of articles about "deletionists." Is it something I should worry about?

Vyeh (talk) 10:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

In response to your first question I'm not sure what you mean exactly by position; if you mean title then I am an editor like yourself. Just about everyone on the Wikipedia is an editor. A few trusted editors like administrators have extra tools to help keep things tidy. If you mean position as in Inclusionist/Deletionist looking back at my editing history I would say that I tend to be an Inclusionist.

In response to your second question Deletionists are certainly not anything to worry about. When you create any article it should be about a subject that at least meets the general notability guidelines or it may be deleted. Deletionist generally tend to believe that the Wikipedia should be cleaned up; inferior content that does not meet a certain standard should be deleted. Inclusionists in contrast generally tend to believe that inferior content that has the potential to be cleaned up should be left on the Wikipedia.

Mentioning on an article's talk page that you intend to overhaul and clean up an article is a good idea, but is usually not required. If an article is more mature and polished (such as a featured article) then it would be a good idea to get consensus by outlining your intended overhaul on the article's talk page and allow other involved editors to comment. You don't have to any any sort of approval at all to edit an article, anyone can edit any article at anytime. Even if you make mistakes they can be quickly reverted by other editors, and as you go along you'll learn more and more about how to edit the Wikipedia effectively. If an article clearly needs work (like Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri) I would encourage you to be bold and try to fix problems that you see. Narthring (talk • contribs) 15:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your thoughtful response. I meant the former. Since you welcomed me, I thought you must have some official position. I am glad to hear you are an inclusionist. I have met Reyk, who has been very kind to me and also encouraged me to be bold. At this point, I would say my views are unformed.

I did a complete overhaul of the External Links for both Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri and Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and posted extensive notes on the discussion page of both articles. I tried to clean up some inferior external links (pointing them to resources that would be of interest to Wikipedia readers and writing better descriptions). Sadly, some were not salvageable. One was pedestrian review. Another was modification of different game intended to get the flavor of SMAC. Obviously, I removed the broken links. I was able to salvage a self-serving external link by pointing to their files section, where there was some unique content. And I added a link to my forum, figuring that if three of the four largest forums for that game have links, then the largest should.

I did mention on the talk page my intentions. I assume that when I made a change, anyone that has checked "Watch this page" will be notified. I was planning to go through the history and put notices on the talk page of people who had made substantive changes.

Do you also feel that Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire also clearly needs work in addition to Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri? I think there is a lot lacking in the article (since I am an expert on the game), but I am curious about your opinion.

After overhauling both articles, my intention is to look at other articles about related games and put in relationship of SMAC to those games with internal link. There was a notice on the article page (I assume that only editors can see them) about a "Strategy Game Project" but it seemed dead. Do I have any obligation to coordinate with these projects?

Thank you for your lengthly response. I feel between you and Reyk I have a better understanding.

Vyeh (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Please look at Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri and Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire External Links

Hi. I think it is important that I bring you and Reyk into an issue. I overhauled the External Links (see the discussion pages), being extremely careful to be fair to all SMAC forums and notifying you and Reyk of my interest. Bdanv, moderator of one SMAC forum, edited the External Link for his forum introducing several self-serving elements (he moved his link to just below the official site's link, violating alphabetical order and he used "WePlaySMAC" instead of the "WePlayCiv" that appears on his forum page). What I have done pending review by you and Reyk is to put the WePlayCiv link back in alphabetical order, put in the correct "WePlayCiv" instead of "WePlaySMAC" and conformed the information to objective information that is available to you or Reyk upon following the link. (This necessitated removing material I had originally written when the link was pointing to the Alpha Centauri Downloads section instead of pointing to the Alpha Centauri Forums section.)

I believe my edit preserves the information Bdanv was adding while following the WikiPedia guidelines on external links.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

venom post

i saw that you have removed my recent post on the venom article, i was not vandalizing, a series of venom comics portray the symbiot itself as trying to force its user to have urges for the same sex. this is mostly seen in the comic eddie brock: the truth behind the venom, this is also seen in the venom dark origins series —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chadude (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

One of your recent edits here was vandalism and I assumed the change to the Venom article was also, because of its nature. If you can find reliable sources that support your edit please re=add it to the article with the appropriate reference. If you need help formatting the reference please let me know. Narthring (talk • contribs) 03:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Oklahoma State Parks

Hi, and thanks for your help. I saw that you were working on the list of Oklahoma State Parks. Making sure that we had the best possible information available for Oklahoma's state parks was my first priority. I work for the Oklahoma Tourism & Recreation Department who operates the state parks. I found your list of state parks and added some lakes, rivers and streams information. But I also came across a category of Oklahoma State Parks. I couldn't figure out how to fix it, but I did post on the discussion page some needed edits. There are some state parks that are missing, a few that are not really state parks and a name change needed. Here's a link to the discussion page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Oklahoma_state_parks. Is that something you know how to do? I'm brand new to Wikipedia and struggling to figure this all out. I'd appreciate any help you could provide.Jkalkman (talk) 13:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The entries on the categories page are added and deleted by actually adding and deleting the categories on the appropriate pages. For instance, you said that Black Mesa State Park needed to be added. I added that category to the bottom of the the Black Mesa State Park page, and now it will automatically show up on the categories page. I'll work on the others when I get a chance. Narthring (talk • contribs) 19:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Also, some of them are showing up as doubles because there are two separate, but related pages about a park. For example, Boggy Depot State Park. Some of them need to have categories added and removed from redirect pages; it's a bit sticky. Narthring (talk • contribs) 19:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for restoring WebChat Broadcasting System

I know it's long overdue, but I just wanted to thank you for recreating the WebChat Broadcasting System page following its unjustified deletion and for leaving me instructions on how to go about having properly restored. It's marvelous to see a page that I've worked hard on over the years restored in full. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobias382 (talk • contribs) 22:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

WPBS

Hi. Please be more careful with WPBS. Check [1]. You added |1= in the wrong place. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 16:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I had actually been using |1= as the first parameter instead of the last parameter on every page I added the WPBS. I'll start making corrections. Narthring (talk • contribs) 13:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Yves-Michel Marti

Willing to collaborate with you in making a neutral and encyclopedic article. Regards. JosefBar (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Hope Bourne

Why did you tag [2] the Hope Bourne article with a notability tag? She's been the subject of two documentaries (plus the other coverage referenced in the article), which more than meets the requirements of WP:NOTE Brumski (talk) 11:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I tagged the article as I was patrolling new pages and at first glance it looked like it might not meet the general notability guidelines. After reviewing the sources it certainly does appear to meet those guidelines; feel free to remove the tag. Narthring (talk • contribs) 13:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Narthring! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. Quick review?

Hi! Thanks for the introduction. I was wondering if you could conduct a quick review on my edit to Coasteering. Mostly I would like to understand the subtleties of external linking vs. references. Infamouse (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to Support WikiProject Oklahoma and Tulsa

--Kumioko (talk) 23:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Narthring! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Wikiproject Oklahoma

This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether or not you are still an active member of WikiProject Oklahoma Please respond Here By following the instructions.

--Dcheagle 09:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lake Thunderbird State Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lake Thunderbird State Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.travelok.com/listings/view.profile/id.4386. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 02:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Narthring. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Narthring! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 01:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Narthring. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bearden School District (Oklahoma) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bearden School District (Oklahoma) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bearden School District (Oklahoma) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  07:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)