NatsirttheMan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Altron (July 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Zxcvbnm were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is just a list - Wikipedia is not a database.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rayman Raving Rabbids (handheld game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Croods (video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 16:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nono-chan into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 19:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Crunchyroll into Draft:Crunchyroll Studios. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 17:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Fantastic Mr. Fox (film), you may be blocked from editing. A trailer for a game is not evidence that the game was ultimately released. DonIago (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on The Princess and the Frog

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Princess and the Frog, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grampu (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jdcomix was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grampu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jdcomix (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, NatsirttheMan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jdcomix (talk) 13:18, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NatsirttheMan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry that multiple accounts were used. I will only use one account from now on. NatsirttheMan (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What about your disruptive editing, the reason for the block of 72.92.37.34? Also, are you claiming you have used other specific accounts, or only WP:LOUTSOCK? Yamla (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NatsirttheMan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

From here on, I will only use sources while editing and only use one account. NatsirttheMan (talk) 22:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Could you list the previous accounts you have used. I am aware you have had your talk page access revoked, so if you use the WP:UTRS system, you could say what accounts and what IPs you have used. PhilKnight (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That does not answer the questions I asked. --Yamla (talk) 22:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I would like to apologise for disruptive editing and if I did not follow any guidelines by accident. NatsirttheMan (talk) 23:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

I've converted the above to a comment. You are permitted only one unblock request at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

What can I do to get unblocked? NatsirttheMan (talk) 00:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

As stated before, I sincerely apologize for my previous behaviors which led to my indefinite block from editing. I finally acknowledge that my use of multiple accounts is against Wikipedia’s policies, and now I understand that my previous edits were disruptive and did not adhere to the standards expected from contributors.

I realize now that my actions not only wasted the time of reviewers but also undermined the collaborative spirit of with Wikipedia. I take full responsibility for these mistakes, and I assure you that I have reflected on my actions and their implications for the Wikipedia community.

Moving forward, I commit to using only one account and to strictly adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. I will ensure that my contributions are well-researched, of high quality, and respectful of copyright rules. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of this invaluable resource and want to be a positive part of the Wikipedia community.

I appreciate the time and effort that administrators and contributors invest in maintaining Wikipedia, and I regret any disruption I caused. I kindly ask for your consideration of an unblocking, as I am eager to demonstrate my commitment to making constructive contributions.

Thank you for considering my request. NatsirttheMan (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Do not edit (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --Yamla (talk) 08:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

What I meant by I am sorry that multiple accounts were used. I will only use one account from now on. is that is was referring to 72.92.37.34, I am sorry. NatsirttheMan (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

I will now only use one account. NatsirttheMan (talk) 00:14, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Will I ever get unbanned? NatsirttheMan (talk) 18:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I am not an admin so cannot do anything about your block but I am not sure what benefit you are to the encyclopedia as there have been other issues with your editing outside of WP:LOUT such as creating multiple drafts on non-notable topics wasting the time of reviewers, using poor sources, copyright violations, etc. You were blocked as an IP three times for various issues before this last block which suggests you either lack the competence to edit here or choose to ignore the issues and carry on. S0091 (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

From here on, I promise to only submit promising drafts, use better sources, and respect copyright. NatsirttheMan (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I am not sure you even understand any of your promises except for maybe LOUT but either way, you had multiple warnings and chances to do what you are promising and there's nothing to suggest you able to follow through. This is my last comment. An admin will review your unblock request along with the discussion here and make a decision. S0091 (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I know you're not an admin and cannot do anything about my block but I do genuinely appreciate the hard work of the administrators and every member of the Wikipedia community, and I regret any disruption I have caused. I kindly ask for their consideration in unblocking my account, as I am eager to demonstrate my commitment to constructive participation and improvement within the community. NatsirttheMan (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

• I've revoked TPA for your disruptive use of this Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dustborn (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dustborn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)