You said:
| “ | About Nickleback. If you had bothered to actually look at the revision, you would have noticed that i did not add any information (hence, your template was not only misplaced, but also rude) and i removed the refs from the infobox because they make the box look clogged, which as i have read recently is also an issue in the infobox discussion. In any case, you did not even try to initiate conversation before blocking me. I hereby demand that you unblock me within 60 minutes, or i will have to request assistance from other administrators, for adminstrator abuse. | ” |
It is simply not the case that I did not even try to initiate conversation with you. I did, see here, which you blanked rather than responding to, here. This was not the first time you have blanked warnings from your page. See here, where you blanked similar warnings. Given that you were removing citations from a band whose genre is particularly and regularly disputed, and continued to do so after being warned about this and did so without any further communication or even meaningful edit summary, I believe my actions were appropriate. If you are willing to refrain from this sort of behaviour in the future (for example, moving the genre citations down into the article and leaving a comment in the infobox), I would be happy to unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Although I am now past your 60 minute limit, I presume as I have made two attempts to communicate with you, both with no response, that you are satisfied with the situation. This does not, of course, mean that I am unwilling to read any response if you have one now. --Yamla (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- For some reason i thought i wasn't able to edit my own talk page. My bad. I accept your offer and would request to be unblocked - i will make sure to replace content to a more fitting place rather than remove it. Thanks.Niderbib (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, you have been unblocked. If you are still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. --Yamla (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Genre delimiters
editPlease stop changing them. You are violating WP:EW on Amon Amarth and Opeth for no reason. Genre delimiters do not need to be changed and changing them only causes edit wars. As you can see you have been reverted by me and The Haunted Angel. On another note, I agree with you on the Firefox article. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 20:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- You offer no explanation for your edits, continue to edit war and refuse to talk about it on talk pages or anywhere else. You are going down a dangerous path. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not to mention you blatantly lie, mislead or just give plain wrong explanations in your edit summaries. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- I used the exact same bullshit you wrote, hypocrite. Niderbib (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Wrong. There's one big difference with what you and I are doing. I know there is no consensus either way, first off. The big difference is that I don't go around to band pages and turn them to line breaks, I leave them the way they are and if someone changes them, then I revert them even if they changed comma breaks to line breaks. Besides there was a huge war on the Amon Amarth page before (and yes, I was involved) and it was decided by admins to leave it alone (in line break form). I'm just keeping pages as they are. I don't go around changing bullshit for no reason. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 21:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, i'm not wrong. No, you don't leave them the way they are. No, it was never decided to be left alone in "line break form". No, you are not keeping pages as they are. But yes, you are going around "changing bullshit for no reason" a lot. Niderbib (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Wtf, have you even watched any of my edits? I never change genre delimiters. I only revert other people when they change them. If you haven't noticed that, you need to open you eyes a little more and take a look at the history of those pages. Show me one edit in the last few months where I went to band's article and changed genre delimiters without them having been changed right before me. You are wrong and you don't seem to know what you are saying. Also, you once said that by using comma breaks that it would be less "space consuming." Well, I don't recall where it was at the moment but there was some wikipedia rule that states that there is no limit (unlike a book) of how much can be put on wikipedia and articles. Also, you are the one who's going to pages that have had line breaks for months (at least) and changing them (for no apparent reason, except that you seem to think it has more space or better formatting). Prove me wrong. Do it. Show me the diffs. ou can't. Because you either just lied, or mistakenly said something wrong. Show me the diffs. And then I'll show you mine. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 23:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well looky who just got blocked again? You are such a dissembler.. Niderbib (talk) 11:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
You're invited to the above once your block is over. Do try to remain calm and civil if you wish to take part in the discussion. --Bardin (talk) 14:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Foo.
editAesthetically prettier? Traitor. :) ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 12:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Lawlzs. Go cry emo kid. And btw. wtf is this? PS: Yo mama's so buff, you can see her pulling trucks on your local sports channel. Niderbib (talk) 18:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Haha. Wow. Oh yeah? Well yo mama's so fat, when she enters the room, people say "Maulgar is king!"! ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 21:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have reported you to WP:AIV for persistent vandalism. If you continue, you will be blocked indef. Undeath (talk) 19:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)