User talk:Norden1990/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problems: Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014

Your addition to Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. With this edit you added non-free text from http://www.valasztasirendszer.hu/wp-content/uploads/PC_ElectoralSystem_120106.pdf. Psychonaut (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.bbj.hu/politics/govt-backs-off-on-voter-registration-after-constitutional-court-ruling_64514

http://www.valasztasirendszer.hu/wp-content/uploads/PC_ElectoralSystem_120106.pdf http://www.politics.hu/20111022/gyurcsany-announces-departure-from-socialists-formation-of-new-western-civic-center-left-party/ http://www.politics.hu/20140114/quotable-antal-rogan-on-the-opposition-coalition/ http://www.politics.hu/20140114/opposition-leaders-agree-on-joint-list-for-general-election/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014 and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014 with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Hungarian parliamentary election, 2014 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Unity (Hungary)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Unity (Hungary), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.politics.hu/20140408/composition-of-left-wing-parliamentary-group-yet-undecided/ http://www.politics.hu/20140407/2014-hungarian-election-wrap/ http://www.politics.hu/20140307/left-wing-alliance-changes-its-name/ http://www.politics.hu/20140114/opposition-leaders-agree-on-joint-list-for-general-election/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Unity (Hungary) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Unity (Hungary), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Unity (Hungary) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Unity (Hungary). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Unity (Hungary) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Béla Turi-Kovács

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Béla Turi-Kovács, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.parlament.hu/kepv/eletrajz/hu/t004.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Béla Turi-Kovács and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Béla Turi-Kovács, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Béla Turi-Kovács with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Béla Turi-Kovács. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Béla Turi-Kovács saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

CCI Notice

Hello, Norden1990. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Kérés

A fenty leveleszés alaplyán láthom belephutottál vmi elhiwatottba. Rézvétem. Eccer már én isch megszíftam. :) Fel a fejjel! Tudok segíteni valahogy? Mellesleg hasonló ügyben kérnék segítséget itt (a képekkel kapcsolatos problémákat nem értem és nem is tudom megoldani). Van valami ötleted? Előre is köszönöm! Borsoka (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Szervusz, Borsoka! Ha segíteni akarsz neki, akkor légy szíves, ezt olvasd el. We're in great need of help from bilingual editors such as yourself to identify and remove the non-free text. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Kedves Psychonaut! Ne haragudj, de ez a vizsgálat egész egyszerűen nevetséges. Szerintem el kellene gondolkodnod, hogy valóban a megfelelő eljárást választottad-e. Borsoka (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for repeated copyright infringement

I have evaluated the CCI request concerning yourself (now at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Norden1990). You have had more than a week to respond to this, but have declined to do so. One of your first articles, Stephan Burián von Rajecz, was a copyvio and János Hargitai, your most recent article was also a copyvio. Your attempt here to address a copyvio concern is woefully inadequate. It is evident that in the 4.5 years you have edited Wikipedia, you have never understood Wikipedia's copyright policy. Therefore:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

In order to continue editing, you must convince an administrator that you understand the copyright policy. You must also help clean up your previous edits, which are listed at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Norden1990. MER-C 03:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Goodbye

I'm Norden1990 (I hope, SPI investigation will not take place...)

After this unexpected and, I think, unfair ban, there was nothing left but goodbye. To tell the truth, I'm a WP fanatic, so I will have withdrawal symptoms in the next few days (or weeks). Wikipedia will miss me. Nevertheless, perhaps I also could be grateful to User:MER-C and User:Psychonaut that I got my real life back. My girlfriend is the biggest winner with this ban. :)

When I began actively editing English Wiki in 2009 (though I've already registered in 2006), lot of articles on Hungarian history did not exist or was in a disastrous condition. Fortunately, the situation is much more better than those times. We, a few enthusiastic editor gathered and recovered the articles. I also created painfully missing articles (ministers, politicians, parties etc.), though to be honest, most of them are stubs even today. Maybe the largest negative yield that it would have been a lot of things to do (historical persons and positions, parliamentary constituencies and new MPs 2014-18, academic people etc.). Well, that's the situation.

Following sentences to my fellow Hungarian editors in my mother tongue (I know, it's another violation...)

Azért is tartom fontosnak külön búcsúzni Fakirbakir, Borsoka, Koertefa szerkesztőtársaimtól (és elnézést azoktól, akiket kihagytam, s persze ugyanakkor jó viszonyt ápoltam szerb, horvát, lengyel, örmény de akár még román szerkesztőkkel is), mert úgy érzem, hogy az elmúlt években kialakult egy olyan csapat, ami képes arra, hogy a pártatlan történetírás jegyében helyre rakja a magyar ill. közép-európai vonatkozású cikkeket. Azért a különböző vitalapokon, javasolt címváltozásokon keresztül sok győzelmet megvívtunk. Sajnos, én most ebből kapitulálok (vagy éppen kivégeztek? látásmód kérdése).

A Wikipedia-ban sok lehetőség van, én hiszem, hogy egyszer el ér egy olyan színvonalat (főleg az angol), hogy az összes online és nem online enciklopédiát kiválthatja és az emberiség egyetem tudásbázisává válhat. Éppen ezért éreztem fontosnak ezt szerkeszteni, hogy minél több ember ismerje meg ezt a nagyszerű országot és annak történelmét. Na meg, egyszer eljuthatunk oda, hogy Magyarország és múltja, a többi állammal egyetemben, már csak ezekben a bejegyzésekben fog létezni... lehet, kissé nagyképűen (kissé?) hangzik, de sokszor azonosítottam a munkáinkat a középkori krónikások tevékenységéhez. Ez felemelő érzés volt. No de ennek most tényleg vége, így búcsúzom. "Minden nyárnak vége van egyszer. Beszélhetünk és megjátszhatjuk, amit akarunk, de ezen úgysem változtathatunk!"

További sikeres munkát és szerkesztést, örömmel fogom olvasni mindet.

Bye, Norden1990 --84.236.3.233 (talk) 11:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Oszintem remelem, hogy meggondolod magad. Ez a kopivajoleson dolog egyszeruen nevetseges. Ezek az adminok aztan tudjak hogy lehet elvenni az ember kedvet a szerkesztestol. Az, hogy evekig itt "galyaztal" az persze nem szamit nekik ........ Fakirbakir (talk) 12:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Nagyon-nagyon sajnálom, hogy így döntöttél. Mi lesz így mindenféle furcsa nevű tisztségviselőinkkel? Csak megjegyzem, hogy néhány évvel ezelőtt én is visszavonultam közel egy évre hasonló ok miatt. Fel a fejjel, töltsd jól az idődet, és térj vissza hamarosan! Visszavárunk. Borsoka (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Norden1990. There is no denying that you have done a lot to improve the state of many articles and subject areas here, and for that you should be commended. But at the same time you have terribly damaged Wikipedia by inserting large amounts of non-free text, in violation of the original copyright and of our project's mission to provide freely licensed content. I understand your frustration at having observed that so many articles on Hungarian history here were "painfully missing" or in a "disastrous condition". But engaging in systematic plagiarism and copyright infringement only makes things more of a disaster.

You should know that you are not banned from Wikipedia; you are only blocked until you demonstrate an understanding of the problem and a willingness to work towards fixing it. I hope you will reconsider your farewell and instead stick around to help identify and correct the copyright problems. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh, Norden1990, I have just read about your block and goodbye message. Hope this goodbye is only temporary, as I also took a bit of a Wikibreak in the past months. While I understand that copyright issues must be taken seriously, I think that you were blocked way too hastily. I truly hope that this issue will be sorted out and you will be back on board, soon, as you were one of the most active and thorough editors working on topics related to both the history of Hungary and its current politics. Cheers and don't give up, KœrteFa {ταλκ} 10:24, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Norden1990 copyright violation

I'm Norden1990. I used Politics.hu articles, which are almost proper translations of Hungarian articles and statements. Furthermore, these articles are full of comments made by politicians and quotes (latter's verbatim citation is essential, I think). On the other hand, for MPs, please use List of members of the National Assembly of Hungary (2010–14). However, I've noticed, these articles are not only mere translations of CVs, because I also updated them and I also used Hungarian wikipedia (which is a free content, I assumed). That's it. "I will go home and rethink my life." Best wishes, --84.236.3.233 (talk) 18:56, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I've moved the above message, which you left on my talk page, here so that the conversation can be continued if necessary without you running afoul of your block. (Did you know, by the way, that you can still log in and edit your own user talk page while blocked? It is better not to use an IP account, as this calls into question whether it's really you who's making the edits, and moreover compromises your privacy.)

Thank you for the information about your edits. Yes, it seems most of the English text has been copied from Politics.hu (though there's also a lot from the BBC, the New York Times, and other news sources). You should know that text and images from these sites are almost always non-free content which cannot be used on Wikipedia, even if you cite it. You are free to rely on such sources for facts, but the presentation of these facts must be wholly your own words. (Of course, there are exceptions for things like direct quotations from public figures.) Copying text and then making minor or superficial modifications to it, such as changing a word here and there, is known as close paraphrasing, and is still a copyright violation.

Material from other Wikimedia projects, such as the German and Hungarian editions of Wikipedia, is fine to copy, translate, and modify, provided that it's done in accordance with the terms of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 Licence. In short, this means that you must conspicuously acknowledge the source of the material; if you don't do this it's an infringement of copyright. We have a number of templates that can be used to provide the required acknowledgment for text which is copied or translated from other free content projects, so if/when your block is lifted you should familiarize yourself with these.

It would be great if you could identify for us which of the articles you edited were copied from which sources. In many cases it's easy for us to identify the source, since it's usually one which you've cited using a <ref> tag. However, in other cases you have copied or translated text from non-free web content or from the Hungarian or German Wikipedias, but have not given any clues as to the source. This forces us to spend time searching the web and the other Wikipedias for the source. Perhaps you have recollections about specific cases? —Psychonaut (talk) 19:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

>Did you know, by the way, that you can still log in and edit your own user talk page while blocked?

Yes, you should be doing this. I'm going to look the other way regarding the block evasion. If you want the IP removed see WP:RFO.

>Material from other Wikimedia projects, such as the German and Hungarian editions of Wikipedia, is fine to copy, translate, and modify

Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia covers this briefly.

The door is not closed to your future editing. I (or some other administrator) will seriously consider unblocking you if you can demonstrate understanding of the problem with your edits, that you will avoid them and that you will help us clean them up. This discussion pretty much covers it. To request unblocking, follow the instructions above.

It would be greatly appreciated if you could tell us about any print sources you have plagiarized. We will try to salvage what we can, but if we can't access a print source presumptive removal may be necessary. MER-C 07:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

I used print sources only for historical functions and persons (voivodes, palatines, bishops, chancellors), but those articles are not "plagiarized" works. --Norden1990 (talk) 23:31, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright issues explained

Hello, Norden1990.

From your last note above, I fear that you may have misunderstood Wikipedia's copyright policies. In case this is the situation, I will try to explain a little better and hope this will help.

Wikipedia is run by a US-based company and therefore must conform to United States law, including copyright law. Our copyright policy was created to comply with this law. In brief, content is presumed to be copyrighted at its creation, unless the US law says it is not eligible for protection. Copyright expires, for instance, after a relatively length term (a period of decades, generally, after publication or, usually, the death of the author). While the US government does not claim copyright on its own publications, it allows governments in other nation to claim copyright on almost everything they produce. Copyright law prevents us in most cases from copying, directly translating or too closely reproducing copyrighted text. Brief quotations are generally allowed under fair use; Wikipedia's approach to fair use is explained at WP:NFC. In essence, if a source is copyrighted, you can only copy a little from it, and you must mark the copied content with quotation marks or block quotes or another indicator that you are directly quoting. Saying "According to" is not enough to indicate that you are quoting, unless you also use quotation marks. All quotations must be followed directly by a citation.

If we can prove that content is not copyrighted, or if it is compatibly licensed, we can copy it, but we have to acknowledge that we are copying or closely paraphrasing to comply with Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Otherwise, we need to put all content on Wikipedia in our own language, written to conform to but not too closely follow our sources. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Dear Moonriddengirl, why did you delete all texts in Unity (Hungary)? "History" section was definitely not "copyvio" work and also contained a useful table created myself (candidates and gained seats). On this basis, delete my all edits since 2006, no need for this "investigation process". --Norden1990 (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

I understand that this must be a shock, and I have all faith that your contributions have been made with good intentions. Given your subsequent behavior, I think probably you are more interested in helping to resolve these issues than your note above indicated, so I'm going to try to explain a little more how this process works.

When content is flagged for copyright concerns from a user who has been demonstrated to have copied content from multiple sources over a long range of time, it is generally blocked for about a week to allow community members an opportunity to rewrite the material. After that week, the content may be removed by an administrator - administrators may take the time to rebuild the material, but will not necessarily do so. It's simply not possible for the few people who work in copyright to do this for every article, and unfortunately more complex articles are the most difficult to salvage, even if often very important. This is the reason why the big template is put on articles - it is to encourage people who care about the article to help out.

There is no desire to delete all of your edits. While policy permits this in such situations, the WP:CCI process was created to prevent it. I know, because I was part of the creation of that process. The editors who work at CCI do their best to identify articles in which problems exist so that those in which they do not are not impacted. When they do find problems, they flag the content to allow interested editors the opportunity to help before the content is deleted.

As the template itself advises, the best way to help is to rebuild the material from scratch. This is a time-consuming process, but avoids creating a derivative work. Where issues exist like these - copying is pervasive and scattered through the work from multiple sources, including faithful translation from Hungarian sources - it's really the only way. You cannot easily rewrite this material sentence by sentence.

I gather from your contribution history that you have done quite a lot to try to bring information about Hungarian politics and persons of interest to the world. Personally, I have no interest in stopping you from doing so. I'd much rather you did. If you want to help, we really need some indication that you understand what our copyright requirements are on English Wikipedia (including the need to thoroughly rewrite content and not paraphrase too closely) and that you will comply with them. At that point, you would be very welcome to help clean up articles where problems have been identified. Others who have been through the WP:CCI process have done so very successfully. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MaleterPal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MaleterPal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristiana of Capua and Adelaide of Riedenburg

Please vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristiana of Capua and Adelaide of Riedenburg.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 06:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TasnadiNagyAndras.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TasnadiNagyAndras.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:András Hegedüs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:András Hegedüs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sztojaytrial.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sztojaytrial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Request my eternal ban

Dear User:Psychonaut and User:Ronhjones. Since a still active sockpuppeteer over and over will try to relegate me from en.wiki and other WP projects, I request my ban forever. It's obvious Iaaasi affects editing in Wikipedia, Ronhjones used the same unfounded reasons against me as Iaaasi did in Commons (maybe after an e-mail contact, I suppose). Formerly a user was blocked because he was marked as my sockpuppet after report of dear Iaaasi's sockpuppet. Later this editor found me in hu.wiki and asked my help to resolve the problem. The next victim was Tomasso89, who is a different, passive editor from hu.wiki. This guy was also blocked as my sockpuppet just because fully translated Hungarian version of this article to the english wiki (I think I was a better quality, in comparison to this...). After a series of vandalism, a totally inappropriate administrator User:Tiptoety protected the page Viktor Orbán referring my persistent sock-puppetry. Where? As I was involved in large amount of Hungarian-related articles, from insignificant MPs to Presidents, royals etc, from all Hungarian history-related articles to politics, sports and everything, it's obvious I will not have the chance to appeal my block, because you can always say "where Norden1990 had contributed in the past with his main account." , following the instructions User:Iaaasi, who still edit articles under IPs. As a result I ask administartors to ban my user name forever, forgetting my useful and constructive edits here. I'm curious who will update the Hungarian political events and new developments after that... I had no chance to fix my serious error (as this is untouched since May, it's still active issue) and there is a provocative and destructive user, Iaaasi who will return in April 2015 despite of his sockpuppets and vandal activities (like this, so I have no place here. --Norden1990 (talk) 17:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

As I said on the SPI page - Forwarding message delivered at OTRS 2014121110008477 - this was just an e-mail sent to the Foundation. and they did not give a user name (just a real one). We get all sort of e-mails at OTRS from people unable/unwilling to edit for various reasons - we don't ignore them, we just advise or copy the text to an appropriate place. It is not anything I've personally discovered. It will be up to the admins that patrol API to make a decision. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello

I have just read your above message. Even so I am suggesting (=asking) you to try to return. When will we have new articles about our officials bearing strange names? As you know, I concentrate on other subjects, I have little time to deal with them. For instance, I should edit articles about our royal princes and dukes, and I would like to carry on my Southeastern and Central European project (if I you look at the GAs and GANs, you will see that I have made some progress). Nevertheless, I would appreciate if the articles I expanded would be reviewed by more editors, because I sometimes forget to mention an important detail or write too much of non-important details. By the way, happy new year. Borsoka (talk) 03:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC) (Here is my original message in Hungarian. It was deleted by an administrator for unspecified reasons [1]. Borsoka (talk) 03:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC))

Dear Borsoka, thanks for your words. I'd like to request my unblock in this year, however it not only depends on me whether it will be successful or not. I need convince an administrator to unblock. I've done the above remarks because of unfair process against me initiated by Iaaasi, who is still active and continues his struggle with his arch-enemy Stubes99 as you can see in Charles I of Hungary and Louis I of Hungary articles (I think he is). Which are great works, congratulations to you for that, of course I could make comments regarding minor changes but I have to stay passive. :) If my request will be successful, i will create new articles about Hungarian officials (in December 2015, the final medieval archontology - between 1457 and 1526 - will be releasing), including voivodes, palatines and judge royals and other smaller positions (Peter I Csák is on my sandbox since the past year...). My goal is no less than we will have articles of all Hungarian officials until 1526 (at least), like in the case of English nobles. I suppose we should have to share the "medieval task" between us as you're much better in understanding of medieval social phenomena and events (I even don't understand the system of privileges...). So go ahead, I wish you efficient editing and BÚÉK. :) --Norden1990 (talk) 12:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DobiIstvan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DobiIstvan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John Albeni (bishop) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Albeni (bishop) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Albeni (bishop) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JustBerry (talk) 03:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John Albeni (bishop) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Albeni (bishop) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Albeni (bishop) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JustBerry (talk) 03:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KallaiGyula.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KallaiGyula.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MihalyfiErno.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MihalyfiErno.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SzakasitsArpad.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SzakasitsArpad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RoderVilmos.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RoderVilmos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Norden1990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear administrators! Following Psychonaut's copyright investigation process, I was blocked indefinitely by MER-C on 25 April 2014. After one-year break I would like to apply for unblock. Now I am aware of Wikipedia's copyright policy and understand my some of edits damaged seriously Wikipedia with non-free texts. I would like to emphasize that it was not intentional as I always provided the proper source (mostly Politics.hu articles). If my return is possible, I would like to fix my former errors, because as I see the cleaning process stalled since 19 May 2014. I'd like to help in the deletion or modification of the non-free texts. Furhermore, there were also sockpuppet investigations against me. Some of these are legitimate (all of them IPs as I had never registered again), however as a result of a banned sockmaster's activity, multiple innocent users were blocked as my sockpuppets, including Tomasso89, Nemerjunkkicsiklenni, Biziclop2 and another guy who later unblocked but now I could not find his case. Later Biziclop found me on Hungarian Wiki. Nevertheless I admit it should not have been to use IP sockpuppet even their were constructive edits (expansion new updates or non-free texts' removal). Summarising--Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC), if I get a second and final chance, I will fix my serious mistake and reputation. Sincerely, User:Norden1990

Accept reason:

I am willing to give you another chance. The discussion below looks to me like a general consensus to unblock. the blocking administrator has not commented, despite having edited a good deal since being pinged here, so I assume he or she has nothing to say on the matter, so I am going ahead with the unblock. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I support this request and look forward to Norden1990's assistance in fixing the remaining copyright problems. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:33, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I support it too. @MER-C:, is it fine by you as the blocking admin? Max Semenik (talk) 22:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

The user has admitted socking with IPs but denies doing it with named accounts. Yet, Tiptoety confirmed at least some of the named accounts. Mind you, if you look at the SPI, it's confusing at times, but I just wanted to make sure that an involved checkuser has a chance to comment before unblocking the user.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I checked the account requesting unblock as per practice; there is nothing from checkuser to suggest current socking/IP conclusively related to this account. However, that does not mean that is not occurring. CheckUser has nothing to help nor harm this unblock request. Keegan (talk) 07:02, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I doubt any socking and/or editing while logged out has occurred in the last six months. (When it was going on, it was not difficult to identify behaviourally.) Moreover, when it was happening, it was generally free from copyright infringement. I'm fully satisfied that Norden1990 understands his previous problems with close paraphrasing and direct translation of the sources, and has long since demonstrated the ability to avoid these problems. —Psychonaut (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Norden1990 (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)