User talk:Norden1990/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Norden1990. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Üdv a fedélzeten!
Örülök, hogy visszatértél. :) Borsoka (talk) 03:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yep, welcome back, Norden. KœrteFa {ταλκ} 13:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you! :) --Norden1990 (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (George, son of Cronik) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating George, son of Cronik, Norden1990!
Wikipedia editor TeriEmbrey just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Are there English sources available? Adding those would greatly help this article.
To reply, leave a comment on TeriEmbrey's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Removal of sourced content
Hi Norden,
unfortunately, you have removed fully sourced content from [[1]]. If you speak about properly sourced article, please take into account that you removed fully sourced sentences. I am only restoring my latest version before the other authors began edit war. As you can see from the talk page, I (contrary to you) fully explained the reason of the modification with references to wiki rules. Thanks.--Ditinili (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, and you were not waiting for an answer, as I see. Discussion is based on dialogue, I'm sure that the other users will respond your arguments, but you have to wait a few days (many editors have real life...) and if there will be no answer, you can modify the article. I note, for example User:Borsoka also explained his argument with refs to wiki rules... If there is no compromise, involvement of other editors from the affected WikiProjects (WP Slovakia, WP Hungary, WP European history...) might be also useful --Norden1990 (talk) 16:50, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Norden, as you can see from the history of the article, other authors (not me) began to remove properly sourced content without discussion. I did not remove any sourced content. I only extended and properly sourced text and then reverted changes in which other authors did it in a way which you criticize. Particularly, this removal of sourced content was done by Fakirbakir, tolerated and then repeated by you. None of you waited for any result of discussion. If you repeatedly remove sourced content in the similar way in the future, I consider escalation to administrator noticeboard. Ditinili (talk) 07:57, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest you should read WP rules instead of these childish threats. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is not a threat, it is only a rational statement related to the removal of the sourced text.Ditinili (talk) 11:48, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest you should read WP rules instead of these childish threats. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Norden, as you can see from the history of the article, other authors (not me) began to remove properly sourced content without discussion. I did not remove any sourced content. I only extended and properly sourced text and then reverted changes in which other authors did it in a way which you criticize. Particularly, this removal of sourced content was done by Fakirbakir, tolerated and then repeated by you. None of you waited for any result of discussion. If you repeatedly remove sourced content in the similar way in the future, I consider escalation to administrator noticeboard. Ditinili (talk) 07:57, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Peter, son of Töre
On 9 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peter, son of Töre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hungarian lord Peter, son of Töre, was impaled for the assassination of Queen Gertrude in 1213? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter, son of Töre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Battle of Brenta decisive victory
Hi, my oppinion is that the Battle of Brenta was a decisive Hungarian victory, because, as a result, Berengar I, until his death, and the Kingdom of Italy until the occupation of Otto I (with short interruptions caused by the comming to power of kings like Rudolph II of Burgundy or Hugo of Provence, who also started to pay tribute to them after a while), became tributary and ally to the Hungarians. As the result of this battle, Italy became the most faithful ally and remained the longest period tributary to the Hungarians (with interruptions 900-951), even if some historians say that the regulary payment started after 904. But without the battle of Brenta that wouldnt be started. Sylvain1975, talk, 12.38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I accept your arguments. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atyusz (genus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balaton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theodore Vejtehi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Severin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Soós Győző
Halálának dátumát nem ismerteti a forrásként hivatkozott cikk, a hír megjelenésének dátumából nem lehet egyértelműen azt a következtetést levonni, hogy aznap halt meg, tehát a "before 27 August" lenne a megfelelő. Gyurika (talk) 09:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Köszi. Mivel augusztus 26-án tette közzé a hírt az MSZP, ezért gondolom, megfelelő, ha azt a dátumot adom meg hozzávetőleges időpontnak. Remélem, a konkrét halálozási nap is ki fog derülni. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Dujam II Frankopan) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dujam II Frankopan, Norden1990!
Wikipedia editor Lucifero4 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
OK
To reply, leave a comment on Lucifero4's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Dujam II Frankopan
Yes, but not now. Probably in about 3-4 weeks. Tzowu (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter I Csák, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Komarno. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of 2021 World Aquatics Championships for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 World Aquatics Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 World Aquatics Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Rubicon
A legutóbbi számában vannak cikkek a Nádasdyakról. Eddig csak belelapoztam az újságba, de jónak tűnnek. Borsoka (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Köszi. :) Valamikor egyszer meg kell írni a Nádasdy Ferenc országbíró szócikket is, mert eddig fájóan hiányzik. Sok a teendő, de most maradok az Árpád-kori tisztviselőknél, míg tart a lendület. :) --Norden1990 (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William V of Saint Omer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thebes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
I had been hoping for a Hungarian to expand that article, it is now very interesting. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC) '''tAD''' (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have nominated it for DYK. If I had my way, the subscript would say "Created as one sentence by The Almightey Drill. Actually written as a proper article by Norden1990" '''tAD''' (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- OK, Thanks. :) --Norden1990 (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- I have nominated it for DYK. If I had my way, the subscript would say "Created as one sentence by The Almightey Drill. Actually written as a proper article by Norden1990" '''tAD''' (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
István Simicskó has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, Norden1990. István Simicskó, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 14:55, 14 September 2015 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:NationalLabourPartyHungarylogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NationalLabourPartyHungarylogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nemzeti Munkáspárt logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nemzeti Munkáspárt logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Austria-Hungary may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ZoldSandor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ZoldSandor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
DYK for István Simicskó
On 9 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article István Simicskó, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hungary's new Minister of Defence, István Simicskó, was the only MP who voted against the country joining the European Union? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/István Simicskó. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Thanks for helping with the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 07:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
ITN for Árpád Göncz
On 11 October 2015, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Árpád Göncz, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. |
Eljen a Magyar !
Greetings from Labradorus Labradorus (talk)
Please check the original text
I only made a necessary correction... 79.117.154.36 (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Béla Horváth
Hi there, and profuse apologies for my delay in responding. I only saw your message today. Béla Horváth (1886-1980) was my grandfather. In addition to having his interesting autobiographical memoir, I have some small newspaper clippings in which his appointment was announced; I believe I also have a document to this effect that was signed by Regent Horthy. My father translated all this for me some years ago, here in the USA (as I don't speak Hungarian). I have uploaded a few of the news clippings, in case you are interested to see them: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/ak8agkzj2a4iw/Horvath-Bela
I think my grandfather's story is a "missing" part of Hungarian history. It would be great to bring him into the historical record. Anyway, thanks very much for your interest!
Best wishes, George Horvath 24.5.107.93 (talk) 23:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hello again! I have now created a Wikipedia account. I am not sure whether the system will notify you automatically, but I responded in detail to your kind note, on the other talk page (talk). Best wishes, GH. --GH-1959 (talk) 00:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I suddenly realized that your comment on Gergely András Molnár was most likely sarcasm which means I should probably get whacked with a trout, however, you are getting a kitten from me instead! Well, done!!!
MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 19:13, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) My Kryptonite is kitten image. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
CCI
Hi Norden1990. I recently spotted these edits you made to your CCI. I am wondering, have you been given permission to evaluate your contributions at the CCI? Editors under ongoing investigations should generally not evaluate edits in any CCI (including their own), although they are welcome to help paraphrase or clean up their own copyright violations without making evaluations. I look forward to hearing from you. Many thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 23:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- When I requested my unblock, I promised to help in fixing the remaining copyright problems. If my method is incorrect and irregular, please feel free to revert my edits there. --Norden1990 (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. You are welcome to help fix any remaining problems (i.e. by removing or paraphrasing copyright violations), but I'm afraid that you should not be providing evaluations at your CCI. Thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK Thank you, and I'm sorry for that. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've undone your edits to the CCI, although I have restored your comments on articles you marked as containing violations. You are welcome to provide notes at the investigation if you act upon a copyright issue, without providing a full evaluation. No worries. Thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK Thank you, and I'm sorry for that. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. You are welcome to help fix any remaining problems (i.e. by removing or paraphrasing copyright violations), but I'm afraid that you should not be providing evaluations at your CCI. Thanks, Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Molnár
Köszi az infót; a huwikis cikkében még ő volt a rekorder, de frissítettem ott is. – Alensha talk 18:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A huwikis cikke ezt írta róla; gondolom, a forrásaiban benne volt, de sajnos már nem elérhetőek. – Alensha talk 19:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Entrepreneurs' Party
If what you said is true, can you also amend the article, as the categorisation directly contradicts what the article says. Thanks, Number 57 20:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Done, I hope. Soon, I would like to continue to expand expand the article. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human Chain for Hungary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HVG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Vecelin etc.
I knew Hungarian nationalism is impossible to deal with rationally, but to remove a source and then to claim change is unsourced goes a bit too far even for Magyar standards. Pls. stay civil. Arminden (talk) 19:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)ArmindenArminden (talk) 19:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Your "source" (a high school history book...) writes: „Venzelin“ aus Wasserburg. This is NOT Venzelin of Wassenburg, you manipulated with the reference. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
a) wouldn't see why not. it's not the school pupils who write them, and see who supported the publication. b) read again, it's the exact same. "manipulated"? so not staying civil, after all. c) I've now added Gesta Hungarorum and Chronica Budensis as sources, saying precisely the same. again. the most original sources of them all. if you like playing the Pannonian Don Quixote, fighting the obvious, go ahead, it's all yours from here on. except he wasn't ridiculous. servus, Arminden (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)ArmindenArminden (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe you should read WP:OR more carefully. --Norden1990 (talk) 23:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for participating
Thank you for your participation in the Women in Science Virtual Edit-a-thon, 8 to 29 November 2015, hosted by Women in Red together with Women scientists. It was held in parallel with a meet up at the New York Academy of Sciences on 22 November. In addition to improvements, we created well over 300 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated!
Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon from 5 to 15 December.--Ipigott (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somogy County Christian Coalition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian conservativism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Just to say thanks for all the Hungarian political party articles! Number 57 19:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC) |
- Thank you. :) --Norden1990 (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Norden. Could you tell me what is the right course of action to propose the edit you reverted? Thanks Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 13:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- I replied there. --Norden1990 (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Bravo, smart edit, "hungary" with small letter
Did I say smart? Oh, sorry, didn't mean you. Enjoy the freedom, WP is for all & everybody to edit. Arminden (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)ArmindenArminden (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Go away. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Austrian Empire
Thank you user:Norden1990. This issue has been playing since April (and basically even longer) on several pages. I'm trying to reach a new consensus with Fakirbakir on the Kingdom of Hungary (1526–1867) page. His original text there (with which I had and have issues) was butchered and stuffed by two confirmed socks of user:Stubes99 and added to Austrian Empire back in April. The matter seemed settled in May but recently it cropped up again. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DaruvaryGeza.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DaruvaryGeza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ErdeiFerenc.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ErdeiFerenc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FeilitzschArtur.png
Thanks for uploading File:FeilitzschArtur.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FerdinandyGyula.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:FerdinandyGyula.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HorvathBalazs.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HorvathBalazs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:RádayGedeonVII.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RádayGedeonVII.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NagyVilmos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NagyVilmos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PukyEndre.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PukyEndre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:RakovszkyIvan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:RakovszkyIvan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SzellJozsef.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SzellJozsef.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy Hogmanay!
Viszont kivanok neked is Eredemenyekben Gazdag Boldog Uj Evet! Fakirbakir (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Nonsense
How was my request for deletion nonsense? Not only do I find this offensive, but also baffling. You may be living in 2016 in Hungary, but what about those in North America and Oceania? Your nonsense comment is an absolute oxymoron. Neve-selbert 03:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Now, everybody living in 2016, just you should have wait some hours. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
BUÉK
Köszönöm a jó kívánságokat, és kívánok neked és mindenkinek, akit szeretsz, boldog 2016-ot! Borsoka (talk) 13:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Keresztes-FischerLajos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Keresztes-FischerLajos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GyongyosiJanos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GyongyosiJanos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gábor Vajna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German occupation of Hungary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Szia! Honnan tudhatjuk, hogy melyik az igazi kép? A másik is hitelesnek tűnik. --Lálálá9999 (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Mindkettő hiteles, de az első színezése megegyezik az eredetiével (többféle hasonmás kiadás létezik Thuróczi és a Képes Krónika esetében is). Szerintem az eredeti kép jobb, amellett, hogy élénkebb is. --Norden1990 (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ja értem. A másik képen meg talán az jobb, hogy nem fekete a korona és a jogar. De maradjon ez akkor. --Lálálá9999 (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Meggyőztél, legyen akkor az új kép (a fekete koronaékszerek eddig nem tűntek fel). --Norden1990 (talk) 23:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- Rendben. :D --Lálálá9999 (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ja értem. A másik képen meg talán az jobb, hogy nem fekete a korona és a jogar. De maradjon ez akkor. --Lálálá9999 (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)