Normal rookie, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Normal rookie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SkyWarrior 05:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

About Draft:Mohamed Bakri Omar

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Mohamed Bakri Omar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Mohd Bakri Omar. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Mccapra (talk) 07:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yuen Yuet Leng moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Yuen Yuet Leng, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [utc] 07:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Leong Chee Woh moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Leong Chee Woh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [utc] 07:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Paul Kiong moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Paul Kiong, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leong Chee Woh (September 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Arthur Hirai (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Kiong (September 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 02:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuen Yuet Leng (September 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 02:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohd Bakri Omar (September 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leong Chee Woh (September 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 03:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Kiong (September 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Mohd Bakri Omar has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohd Bakri Omar. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Kiong (September 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:58, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuen Yuet Leng (September 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gorden 2211 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gorden 2211 (talk) 04:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Ahmad Phesal Talib

edit

Hello, Normal rookie,

Thank you for creating Ahmad Phesal Talib.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article - and the sources supplied - does not establish notability for public officials nor biography of living people. The article has to establish basic notability - see WP:BASIC - People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 20:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Kiong (October 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Kiong (October 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nazaruddin Mohd Zain

edit
 

The article Nazaruddin Mohd Zain has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 09:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wilfred Gomez Malong

edit
 

The article Wilfred Gomez Malong has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a run-of-the-mill dude. Completely non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 03:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nazaruddin Mohd Zain for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazaruddin Mohd Zain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazaruddin Mohd Zain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wilfred Gomez Malong for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilfred Gomez Malong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilfred Gomez Malong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leong Chee Woh (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Curbon7 (talk) 03:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuen Yuet Leng (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Curbon7 (talk) 03:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gui Poh Choon for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gui Poh Choon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gui Poh Choon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Reggie anak Deli for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reggie anak Deli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reggie anak Deli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Borhan Daud for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borhan Daud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borhan Daud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kulasingam Sabaratnam for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kulasingam Sabaratnam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulasingam Sabaratnam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohd Bakri Omar (October 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 04:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Arthur Hirai (talk) 01:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Kiong (October 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iflaq was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
signed, Iflaq (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia

edit

  Hi Normal rookie! Thank you for your edits to Order of the Crown of Pahang. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Order of Sultan Ahmad Shah of Pahang into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 01:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please do not move drafts to mainspace

edit

Please do not move draft articles, especially improperly sourced BLPs like Mohd Bakri Omar, back to the mainspace without proper review first. Consider submitting it for review instead. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Mohd Bakri Omar has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mohd Bakri Omar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohd Bakri Omar (November 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gorden 2211 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gorden 2211 (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Christopher Wan Soo Kee moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Christopher Wan Soo Kee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Christopher Wan Soo Kee. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Normal rookie,
You should have either continued to work on the copy of the article in Draft space or moved that article back to main space. Now we have two versions of the same article. Please do not copy and paste entire articles on to new pages. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gui Poh Choon

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gui Poh Choon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gui Poh Choon. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Arthur Hirai (talk) 10:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gui Poh Choon

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gui Poh Choon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gui Poh Choon. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:06, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mohd Zaman Khan moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mohd Zaman Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 15:47, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohd Zaman Khan (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 20:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Your edit to Mohd Reza Mohd Sany has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ngalinuh Bala Kilah Atu

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ngalinuh Bala Kilah Atu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Feline Hymnic (talk) 13:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Flags in infoboxes

edit

Please do not add flags to infoboxes, as this goes against WP:INFOBOXFLAG and Template:Infobox weapon . Thanks. Loafiewa (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Beretta 92. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 10:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mohd Zakaria Ahmad

edit
 

The article Mohd Zakaria Ahmad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG, and does not meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mohd Zakaria Ahmad for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohd Zakaria Ahmad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohd Zakaria Ahmad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 16:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mohd Zakaria Ahmad. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.Onel5969 TT me 01:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Mohd Zakaria Ahmad. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mohd Zakaria Ahmad. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Onel5969 TT me 12:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Samsuri Arshad for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsuri Arshad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsuri Arshad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 11:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Samsuri Arshad, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Leong Chee Woh

edit

  Hello, Normal rookie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leong Chee Woh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Paul Kiong

edit

  Hello, Normal rookie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul Kiong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Samsuri Arshad

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samsuri Arshad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsuri Arshad. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 04:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Normal rookie,
Do not recreate articles that were deleted through AFD discussions. They will just be tagged for CSD G4 speedy deletion. If you have questions about Wikipedia's deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Yuen Yuet Leng

edit

  Hello, Normal rookie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuen Yuet Leng, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Kiong

edit
 

Hello, Normal rookie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul Kiong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Yuen Yuet Leng

edit
 

Hello, Normal rookie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuen Yuet Leng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Zulkiple Kassim

edit

Hello, Normal rookie,

Thank you for creating Zulkiple Kassim.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more information and must follow layout given in WP:MOSBIO

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Abdul Samad Idris

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from I’d.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template I’ll add to the talk page for you if you can confirm please whether you translated this from id.wiki or ms.wiki. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help. Mccapra (talk) 10:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ielias Ibrahim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page General Service Medal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Normal rookie

Thank you for creating Shamsuri Arshad.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Reserve Unit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramilitary police.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Normal rookie

Thank you for creating Abdul Jamil Abdul Rais.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Shaharon Anuar

edit

Hello, Normal rookie,

Thank you for creating Shaharon Anuar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It is unclear how this person is notable. The few references mainly relate to routine announcements concerning his police career honours. No citations are provided for his role as a police officer or his acting. Biographies of Living People require significant coverage in reliable independent sources (WP:RS).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shaharon Anuar moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Shaharon Anuar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources so that notability can be verified. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Shaharon Anuar has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shaharon Anuar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Samsuri Arshad

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Samsuri Arshad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsuri Arshad. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 13:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shaharon Anuar for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaharon Anuar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaharon Anuar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 13:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shaharon Anuar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerak Khas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Merican Sutan for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Merican Sutan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merican Sutan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 19:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Shamsuri Arshad, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.Onel5969 TT me 20:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Normal rookie,
If you keep recreating this article and putting it into main space, it will continue to be deleted through speedy deletion, CSD G4, as an article that was deleted through an AFD discussion. The only way around a Delete decision that I know of is to submit a Draft to AFC for review. If it is approved, it can then be moved to main space without the likelihood of deletion. But continuing to do the same thing and having your efforts be deleted is not the road to success.
If you have questions about Wikipedia's deletion policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I just want stop against my article I created so hard and got delete Normal rookie (talk) 22:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Normal rookie,
Well, I urge you to copy the content of this article elsewhere because it is likely to be deleted again. Please read the advice I posted above. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ibrahim of Johor. DrKay (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

“ non-Malaysian cabinet position”

edit

Is this right? A cabinet position in Malaysia designated for an individual who is not Malaysian? Did you mean something else? Mccapra (talk) 05:43, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oops sorry Normal rookie (talk) 05:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdul Hamid Othman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Abdul Ghani Salleh moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Abdul Ghani Salleh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Ghani Salleh (January 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Normal rookie. Thank you for your work on Mohd Shariff Omar. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article! I encourage you to create more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:57, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Your edit to Public Service Department (Malaysia) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Abdul Ghani Salleh for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Ghani Salleh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Ghani Salleh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 TT me 11:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reverting a move at Johore Bahru Barat (federal constituency)

edit

Hey, why did you revert the other person's move here? There is no reason to include (federal constituency) in the title – there's nothing ambiguous about Johore Bahru Barat, there's no other Johore Bahru Barat, so it can take the primary title. WP:TITLEDAB makes this quite clear to me, at least. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Abdul Ghani Salleh

edit
 

Hello, Normal rookie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdul Ghani Salleh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 03:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Penang State Executive Council

edit

Hi

It is better to have an article for each cabinet : for example for Penang State Executive Council, have the previous ministers. Panam2014 (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ng Chok Sin moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Ng Chok Sin. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 02:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ng Chok Sin (November 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 23:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I see that you're still not using edit summaries. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I try to remember it, thanks for notify. Normal rookie (talk) 13:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Batang Lupar

edit

You have not explained your blanking. Xx236 (talk) 12:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

thanks for reminder, the reason of blanking is the add of (federal constituency) next to article title is more accurate. Normal rookie (talk) 12:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Batang Lupar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Certes (talk) 10:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

First I move the page to added the (federal constituency), it say that it existed so I copy from the no (federal constituency) title and paste it to the (federal constituency) title. Normal rookie (talk) 10:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Firstly, the previous title is better per WP:CONCISE, so the page should not be moved at all without first gaining consensus in a move request. Secondly, this is the wrong way to move a page. Although, sadly, it is easier than moving a page properly, please never cut and paste again. I'm finding similar cut-and-paste moves such as List of Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Malacca and Kuala Krau. Discovering and repairing the resulting damage requires an admin and can take hours. Certes (talk) 10:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for inconvenient, but if a article dialogue seem about a parliament constituency need a (federal constituency). Normal rookie (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Neither title is wrong. It's a matter of judgement and we could get a third opinion on whether concision or consistency is better here. However, the vitally important point is that cutting and pasting is always the wrong way to move an article, however bad its title. Instead, we must always follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Moving a page. If you still believe that cutting and pasting is better, please start a central discussion, where many more experienced editors will explain better than I can why it is unacceptable. Certes (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see that most pages in Category:Sarawak federal constituencies have "(federal constituency)" in their title because there are separate articles about the town with the same name. For example, Julau is a town, and Julau (federal constituency) is a federal constituency. Where is the article about the town named Batang Lupar? Is there no town that has that name? wbm1058 (talk) 01:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Anwar Ibrahim Cabinet ownership behaviour

edit

  Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Anwar Ibrahim Cabinet, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Please continue discussion here. Try not to revert too much which leads to WP:edit warring.
SirSX3 (talk) 13:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

28 Nov 2023 — WP:UCR
  Hello, I'm SirSX3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anwar Ibrahim cabinet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can continue discussion on this thread. SirSX3 (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ng Chok Sin (November 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Normal rookie. Thank you for your work on Deputy Minister of Plantation and Commodities (Malaysia). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day and Merry Christmas!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Normal rookie. Thank you for your work on Marzuki Mohamad. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Hi Normal rookie! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mohd Nardin Awang that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdullah Ahmad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Machang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:C1B0:969A:ADC4:8139. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:C1B0:969A:ADC4:8139 (talk) 04:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:C1B0:969A:ADC4:8139 (talk) 04:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rita Sarimah Patrick Insol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join New pages patrol

edit
 

Hello Normal rookie!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Musa Hassan, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

 
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Normal rookie. Thank you for your work on Murugiah Thopasamy. Umakant Bhalerao, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've removed the entire 'Join MIC' section because the links you gave for the sources are both dead. You can put it back in later with proper references.--

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Umakant Bhalerao}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahadzir Abdul Hamid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nallini Pathmanathan

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently modified and removed content from Nallini Pathmanathan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I believe I understand the rationale of some of the edits and have kept those, however certain removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can continue discussion on this thread. (talk) RGuy02 (talk) 08:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ng Chok Sin

edit

  Hello, Normal rookie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ng Chok Sin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Yang di-Pertuan Agong a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 01:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Because I tried move it and cannot move to original page, it said that the page still exist, the Yang di-pertuan Agong is official name in Malaysia. Due to that I have to on my way. With all due respect, some editor didn't do deep research before take action. For example, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong since article create, there is no issue. In Malaysia, Yang di-Pertuan Agong is official name, we not call King or Queen. I hope you understand. Normal rookie (talk) 02:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ng Chok Sin (June 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not passing WP:NPOL neither WP:GNG.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Adding flagicon in the Wikipedia article

edit

Hi.. I see you reverted my edits by re-adding the flagicon in the Soh Wooi Yik and Aaron Chia article. Fyi, your editing violates the WP:ICON, MOS:DECOR and MOS:FLAG. So, based on the Wikipedia rules i will revert ur edits. Please don't repeat the same mistake. Thank you. Stvbastian (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Soh Wooi Yik, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop adding flagicon to decorate Wikipedia article, as you did in Soh Wooi Yik and Aaron Chia articles. Stvbastian (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Goh Liu Ying. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding flag to decorate Wikipedia article! Stvbastian (talk) 08:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Goh Liu Ying, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop decorating Wikipedia article with logo. You are violate Wikipedia rules MOS:ICON. Stvbastian (talk) 10:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rosli Abdullah moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Rosli Abdullah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --- ᗩvírαm7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 15:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Aviram7: Pretty sure this meets WP:NPOL. Doesn't it? C F A 💬 03:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CFA: Hello, Yep!This subject's is currently meets WP:NPOL when I incubates this article into draft then this article was not fillings WP:NPOL policies and article was too short but currently article is passed to the releated notability policies and you're right and you're work is incredible. Happy editing --- ᗩvírαm7(@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Aviram7: The length of the article doesn't matter as long as it is notable. You draftified it for "more sources to establish notability" but notability was already established. C F A 💬 13:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosli Abdullah has been accepted

edit
 
Rosli Abdullah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 03:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annuar Musa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muhammad Mustafa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Chong Wei. Please read MOS:FLAGICON Stvbastian (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Melcous (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is no reason that remove the person have titles on the article. Normal rookie (talk) 07:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

PPS and PPA

edit

I look you still put PPS and PPA awards in Armed Forces section. I have told you before that according www.istiadat.gov.my that PPS and PPA not only awarded to military personnel, but also awarded to other uniformed personnel like police, warden, etc.

I hope you understand and can be guided by that website I mentioned before if you want to edit or add new list of medals. Thank you. Elfath1421 (talk) 22:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply