Archive 30Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2021

Delivered January 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

20:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
  • Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

CallMeCarson Draft

Hello! I was in the process of accepting Draft:CallMeCarson, but noticed that you had create-protected the page. I think this draft falls safely within the GNG, particularly with the new sexual misconduct allegations. If you could unprotect the page or let me know why not, it would be much appreciated. Thanks! AviationFreak💬 05:17, 12 January 2021 (UTC) (please   mention me on reply)

@AviationFreak: title unsalted. Nthep (talk) 10:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

DiscussionTools update

Hello,

The Editing team has scheduled a major update to mw:Extension:DiscussionTools (the new Reply tool) for next week's deployment train. Since you invoke the feature from a script (I do, too), you're probably going to see that update next week, before it's officially released in the mw:Beta Feature system. The new update will use a similar system for starting a ==New discussion==. As before, full-page wikitext editing will not be affected. There is more information on the project page at mw:Talk pages project/New discussion.

You don't have to do anything about this; I just didn't want you to be surprised. If you encounter problems next week, please ping me or leave a note on the talk page for the project. Thanks, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki page

Hi my name is (Redacted) I was wondering how wiki pages are made.

Thanks Editzz16 (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

  • New EBSCO collections now available
  • 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
  • Library Card input requested
  • Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2021

Delivered February 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

15:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Can this IP be blocked?

Hello admin, can this IP 23.233.138.142 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) be blocked as soon as possible? --Ashleyyoursmile! 13:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

done. Nthep (talk) 13:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 13:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2021

Delivered March 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

13:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  TJMSmith
  Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

  Interface administrator changes

  AmandaNP

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Re your suggestion

You do realise that what you said is victim blaming? If someone improves an article then that's one thing but just deleting everything is completely against the ethos of wikipedia. Will you be writing something on the talk page of the people who did the deleting warning them not to do it and to try to improve pages instead, or is it just me you seek to correct?SandrinaHatman (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@SandrinaHatman: or you could just try writing articles that, you know, meet our inclusion criteria. Try this page for some suggestions of how to avoid your work being deleted. Nick (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
@SandrinaHatman: I'm sorry you feel that a note meant as suggestion to how to avoid more of the same is victim blaming but Wikipedia has standards and while, yes, in an ideal world everything would be given the opportunity to be improved rather than deleted but there is so much rubbish knocking about (for whatever reason) that stuff that doesn't obviously meet the standards does tend to get summarily deleted. That's a statement not an excuse for anyone's actions and others may have done things differently but as Nick says understanding what the criteria are is a good place to start. Nthep (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

  • New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Peter Gutwein image

Hi,

I can confirm this picture was posted by the Tasmanian government, I can send a link to the government page if you want.

Cheers - Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomVenam2021 (talkcontribs) 23:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

Should I try and find if this image is in the public domain? If not, how do you know the other images are not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomVenam2021 (talkcontribs) 23:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@TomVenam2021: You can ask the Tasmanian government but the permission has to be explicit. The existing image is licenced as the photographer's own work and has attached EXIF information that strongly suggests that this is the case. Nthep (talk) 23:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
And if it’s copyrighted, is there anyway we could get a better quality image instead of the low quality one right now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomVenam2021 (talkcontribs) 23:32, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@TomVenam2021: you don't need to add a new heading every time you comment on a talk page. Finding a replacement photo is easy as anyone can take a photo of him and upload it accordingly. The hard bit is being in the right place at the right time to get one. Nthep (talk) 23:37, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

A quick but possibly dumb question about speedy deletion criteria

I have requested this image that I've uploaded for the article Everywhere at the End of Time to be deleted in the FFD discussion about it, as I did with some audio samples from that article. After an interesting conversation with another administrator, where I had rickrolled him, I realized just how many non-free content I had put in that article. He pointed me out to this list, where the EatEoT article was at the top of. While yes, the article's topic is very abstract (a musical depiction of the stages of Alzheimer's) and very long (a series of six different albums), that does not justify such a large amount of non-free content as I usually though it would.

Anyway, my question is: since an administrator speedily deleted the audio samples I had uploaded, due to criterion G7, could I do that to the previously mentioned image, too? I am genuinely curious about this, as I see a "delete" button just after the name of the file on its FFD discussion, but I have no idea where it takes me or if I have the permission to delete the image. The criterion in question states that, if the uploader of the file him(her)self supports its deletion, it should be speedily deleted. And I am the uploader of the image (two obvious facts). But the criterion says nothing about if the uploader can delete the file if he supports so, which I obviously do.

So, in summary: can a file be speedily deleted by its own uploader, even if he does not hold a higher position on Wikipedia?

Wetrorave (talk) 22:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Wetrorave: Hi, simple answer is no. Deletion of files, articles, indeed anything requires administrator rights. G7 is simply a criterion for speedy deletion, not the actual mechanism. You're right that G7 is in an indication that the creator agrees to the deletion of the content but it is also part of G7 that there has to be little or no other editing made by anyone else. If G7 were unbundled from admin rights (I'm not sure if that is technically possible) then the possibility for abuse is huge, if page creators could delete content solely because they were the first to edit a page. Nthep (talk) 08:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Tanks. Wetrorave (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

  Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

  Arbitration


Garth Crooks and Rear Of the Year troll

Hi Ijust wanted to let you know that there is a annoying editor on the Rear of The Year page named Ceej1979mo who also edits the same things unregistered who is changing names of yearly winners to Ralf Little and Garth Crooks when the official website which is on the page confirms it's actually John Altman and Andy Murray respectively. He's very persistent and when I revert it he reverts it automatically and often.

Just saw you and Favonian blocking other people that have edited this so just hopeful you can block this one too. Can you check this out? Thanks135.0.252.54 (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Here is one that you did recently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:18AE:4900:C28:AD45:3B7C:E71F and here is Ceej1979mo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ceej1979mo

I am getting a bit fed up about this. I'm sure he'll continue to do this under different registered threads. Thanks in advance1135.0.252.54 (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

He's blocked. Nthep (talk) 17:20, 4 April 2021 (UTC)