Oaktreemaster1911

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oaktreemaster1911 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Oaktreemaster1911 was changed by Oaktreemaster1911 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.988892 on 2016-09-19T18:36:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you recently removed some content from English language without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 18:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Oaktreemaster1911. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

October 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at English language. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 17:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Claude Picassojpg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Claude Picassojpg.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

I undid your edit to Self-portrait with a friend, which seemed rather pointless and was likely a mistake. If not, don't do stupid stuff. You should know this by now.—chbarts (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. --John (talk) 17:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--John (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oaktreemaster1911 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was doing stupid stuff I am sorry but when trying to add a fun fact about somebody should be allowed

Decline reason:

While you believe that "trying to add a fun fact about somebody should be allowed" in a serious encyclopedia, then I don't think it is safe to unblock you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oaktreemaster1911 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I will not edit any pages for "fun" I only will edit if I have information that will help make the article better. I have read all the information on how to make good edits Oaktreemaster1911 (talk) 15:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, you've shown you can't be trusted to do that. You deliberately vandalised Wikipedia and continued even after being asked to stop. Yamla (talk) 15:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oaktreemaster1911 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here I learned my lesson just unblock my account I made many good edits before I messed around on one article.Oaktreemaster1911 (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is simply not true. I don't see a single good edit from this account. Also, you didn't mess around on one article, you messed much more articles. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.