Your submission at Articles for creation: Titans of Tech Awards (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Officaillychibuzor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Titans of Tech Awards

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Titans of Tech Awards, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit
 

Hello Officaillychibuzor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Officaillychibuzor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Officaillychibuzor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please I was not paid to publish any article here or to promote any article here , I’m here just like normal other people and if they is article about me that is related to advertising please edit it and publish it for me and if they is anyway I’m not online you want to contact me you can ask me to drop my WhatsApp number or email for easier access thank you Officaillychibuzor (talk) 10:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's not how this works, communication about Wikipedia should take place on Wikipedia, for openness and transparency. 331dot (talk) 13:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Officaillychibuzor! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Don pedro aganbi moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Don pedro aganbi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

It has enough notability both online and offline, you can check Google to see all his notability for Wikipedia platforms Officaillychibuzor (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
It isn't up to us to find that he is notable, you must show it. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okey, please let me edit and publish it Officaillychibuzor (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
You have submitted it for a review. You are welcome to continue editing it. I can say that all external links within the main body of text should be removed. (such as the link in the word "journalist"). 331dot (talk) 14:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okey , I will do that now Officaillychibuzor (talk) 16:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in West Side Boys, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Catalyzzt (talk) 13:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don pedro aganbi (September 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Don pedro aganbi (September 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Youknow? (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucky ekeh

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lucky ekeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please why is that my article was deleted Officaillychibuzor (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lucky Ekeh moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Lucky Ekeh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it isn't formatted very well. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 02:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Officaillychibuzor! Your additions to Draft:Lucky Ekeh have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 02:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have edited the post while is it that it has not been approved Officaillychibuzor (talk) 10:40, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lucky Ekeh for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucky Ekeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Ekeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 13:55, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I can provide all the evidence that shows he is qualified to be on Wikipedia, Lucky Ekeh is public figure if you think I’m lying you can make use of google Officaillychibuzor (talk) 15:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Okafor have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 01:15, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucky Ekeh

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lucky Ekeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky Ekeh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 21:49, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Coolwealthawards moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Coolwealthawards. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nenub per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nenub. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #95987

edit

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply