Oh, DrPizza!

Welcome

Hello, Oh, DrPizza!, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Wham2001 (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

New Metro West Stations

Firstly re your question as to why Parramatta railway station and Sydney Olympic Park railway station. This was done as at the time there was the possibility that in both locations there would be a common stations there is in Chatswood railway station with the situation to be reviewed if that was not to be the case. Now that we have two locations with separate stations I have altered Template:Sydney Metro stations to allow for these stations with what are considered non standard names. I have also updated Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Australian and New Zealand stations) to cover that. Please feel free to expand this if necessary. Also from Template:Sydney public transport I have removed "under planning" and under construction" as they are already covered by the italics.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Using the copy edit tag

Hi, I have noticed that you are placing the copy edit tag on a great number of pages related to Australian TV. On first glance, these articles appear to be in much better shape than typical articles that are tagged for copy editing, so I am removing the tags. If you spot specific changes that could be made to further improve the articles, I would encourage you to make those edits directly rather than adding a tag to the article. If you want an experienced copy editor to review specific articles, you can make two requests at a time at the Requests page of the Guild of Copy Editors, although we prefer that a good faith effort to improve the article be made by the requester before we work on it. Regards, Tdslk (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

WOW!

You've only been here for a month or so, and yet you know so much about Wikipedia's policies and ways of doing things!! That's incredible! I mean, your second edit here has the edit summary: Remove duplicate link per MOS:DL and create consistency with the unlinked nationalisation per MOS:OL. How ever did you learn so much about Wikipedia so quuickly?? Anyway, keep up the good work!!! Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

So you can read! It's nice to know you do at least have the competence to view user contributions pages. Oh, DrPizza! (talk) 00:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Antisemitism. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• I see now that the most recent edits you made to Antisemitism were not simply reimposing your originally-contested edit. That having been said, it probably would have caused less disruption overall if you'd raised a discussion on the talk page before reverting BMK in the first place. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

• Hey, I recognize that other editors were more hostile than they should have been to your attempts to improve the article, and you're justified in feeling frustrated as a result of this. However, this addition to your user page is not called for, and I'd ask that you consider removing it or toning it down. At a minimum the inflammatory section heading needs to go. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

How do you feel about Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_180#Proposal:_Allow_wikilinks_and_other_wikimarkup_from_tooltip_text_to_be_displayed_on_WP_image_pages?

Since this is archived, you can weigh in at User talk:Naypta, who would be editing the software if this gets the go ahead.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hawkesbury River railway bridge, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. What you said in that edit summary is unacceptable: "incompetent shit stains at the WMF". Drmies (talk) 18:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

removing an owner because it is an old entity doesn't help, at least it pointed at the next entity name which would provide details as to where it went later, OR you could have just put that in instead of blanking the field Dave Rave (talk) 09:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Trends in Antisemitic Attitudes in United Kingdom

Template:Trends in Antisemitic Attitudes in United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

"MOS: LINK" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect MOS: LINK and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 26#MOS: LINK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ^Clyde!_Franklin! 22:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

"MOS: LINK" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect MOS: LINK has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5 § MOS: LINK until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)