Oleg Yunakov
Welcome!
Hello, Oleg Yunakov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Joseph Yulievich Karakis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP Boomer! 23:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Leonid Mlechin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ankit MaityTalkContribs 16:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Page move
editDear Oleg, I was ruled only by thought, that not exists another person with the same name and surname, and for me was strange, why to use the Eastern Slavonic tradition of patronym for identification that only complicate a searching, but I'll try to be more attentive and of course, I'll try to avoid a violation of any rules (only problem, that they are multiplying, and I amn't able to catch them often). Thank you for the remark--Noel baran (talk) 08:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Noel. Yes, I understood that. And I do agree with the point of removing the middle name. However my point was not about the name, but about how to rename pages. When one copies and pastes content from one page to another (1, 2) the history of the page revision is gone. Moreover the initial creator of the page (who wrote most of the information) gets changed to the creator of the redirection (who wrote one line). Hence it's important to ensure that in similar cases we do page move and not just copy and paste. I have already asked to make proper move and admin has solved the issue. Now the history of the page show proper edits from the creation of the page in 2011 and not like it was yesterday when is seemed that the page was "created" six years later. :). So we are all set. And I totally understood that it was unintentional so just pointed it out as a friendly remark to help in the future. And yes, rules keep on multiplying and I also not know all of them. :) Cheers! Thank you. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 13:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Prix Versailles
editHi, thank you for adding your name as a contact for Anti-Spam. I have posted a message about Prix Versailles at ru:Обсуждение участника:Biathlon#Cross Wikipedia promotion and sock puppets for Prix Versailles, but have not had a response yet. I think the only sock puppet on tr Wikipedia was ru:special:contributions/TangoYalin and they only made eight edits. In en and fr Wikipedias we have deleted the Prix Versailles article, but obviously that is a decision for each Wikipedia to make independently.
Please could you respond to my message or pass it on to the correct project? If you have questions or comments you could post them on meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Following up Prix Versailles. TSventon (talk) 08:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi TSventon. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Besides that the article was created by an account that had sole interest to write about this topic, I have also verified the content of the article and it currently doesn't seem to meet notability criteria's for the inclusion in ruwp. I have nominated the article for deletion. Thank you. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 15:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, en and fr Wikipedias did not establish notability and therefore deleted their articles on Prix Versailles. Ru Wikipedia is fortunate that there is relatively little PV related content to review. TSventon (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Yanin
editThanks for reaching out. I removed the references from the lead but feel they do belong in the article. Feel free to add them to the body. I’ll mark it as patrolled after that. Thanks for your contribution to the Wikipedia! NiklausGerard (talk) 20:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, NiklausGerard! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 22:20, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Your new article "Use of white phosphorus bombs in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine"
editI did the patrol review of this article. Overall, the article is well written, but there are a couple of places where you have ambiguous attributions that you might want to make more specific. For example one paragraph begins "In mid-May, the Ukrainian side accused Russian forces...". I think "the Ukrainian side" is ambiguous. I have marked the attributions that you might want to modify with the[who?] tag.PopePompus (talk) 00:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks PopePompus! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 01:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
For Roman_Vladimirovich_Kutuzov. Thank you so much.
Twitter is reporting that General Lieutenant Roman Berdnikov has also been killed, reported as Commander 29th Combined Arms Army. Not sure if it's the Roman Berdnikov you made the article for - haven't read your article. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Buckshot06! Yes, that's the one! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 22:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach
editHi, I have another Anti-Spam query. I have posted a message about a museum in Poland, whose article has been translated into 18 Wikiprojects by a single editor, at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach. The Russian article is ru:Музей профессионального миниатюрного искусства Генрик Ян Доминяк. en and nl Wikipedias have deleted the museum's article as non-notable, but obviously that is a decision for each Wikipedia to make independently. Would you be interested in taking a look?
Coincidentally, I also noticed that ru:Премия Версаля was recreated by a single purpose account on 11 March 2022. TSventon (talk) 00:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello TSventon. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have deleted the museum article since it's a machine translation and spam. I have also deleted Премия Версаля and put admin protection for recreation for both old name (Версальская премия) and the new one. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 12:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Oleg Yunakov
Thank you for creating Serhiivka missile strike.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Здравствуйте! Я в Википедии впервые, и прошу Вас как администратора отпатрулировать текущую версию данной статьи. Я пишу сюда, потому что в русской Википедии кто-то воспользовался моим диапазоном IP-адресов для вандализма, и диапазон заблокирован. 2403:6200:8871:E966:9573:A2B1:234F:69EF (talk) 17:10, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Done. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk). 14:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Здравствуйте! Прошу Вас удалить данную статью, так как всё её содержимое скопировано из источника, защищённого авторским правом, без каких бы то ни было изменений. 2403:6200:8871:5B22:200B:9C30:829D:C172 (talk) 05:39, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте. В статье , созданной в 2014 году ныне на каждый фрагмент я вижу источники. Приведите источник чьи права по Вашему были нарушены и фрагменты, которые Вы считаете, что были скопированы. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 12:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Ukraine is not a part of the USSR anymore and the russian language has no official status in Ukraine at the moment
editAre you a Sovak? Stop russifying Ukrainian street names please. Ukraine is not a russian colony and should not be treated like it is. Ukraine is not a part of the USSR anymore and the russian language has no official status in Ukraine at the moment. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 15:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The content of this article was translated from my original article written in Russian in ruwiki. I do agree that street names should be written with Ukrainian naming. You changed the name and it's great. I did not change it back. Saying "Stop russifying" when no one was changing it after the initial name in the original article is not the right representation of the situation. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 15:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Sorry about this. I used to be a volunteer at a few schools in Dnipro years ago... So I am not in a stable state of mind today. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- It seems that we did not have a difference in opinions all along... Sorry about my abrasive behaviour. Like I said, I am not in a stable state of mind today. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I understand. My yesterdays edit can show how I feel myself... (And if you will check the source code before yesterday's edit it will show my opinion on this situation). With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 17:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding and I sympathise with your ideas. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Блокировка аккаунта в русской Википедии
edit@Oleg Yunakov Здравствуйте. Обращаюсь здесь, поскольку в русской Википедии все возможности связи перекрыты. Аккаунт VSL был без конкретных претензий, без предупреждения и возможности возразить бессрочно заблокирован после того, что можно назвать войной правок (два отката за сутки), начатой, однако, другим участником, неоправданно удалившим внесённый в страницу вклад. Аккаунт не является «консервой», хотя это, собственно, и не причина для блокировки. Могли бы вы помочь в разблокировке (снять блокировку самостоятельно или написать запрос к администраторам, сославшись на эти пояснения)?
Решение о блокировке: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия:Запросы_к_администраторам#c-Bechamel-20230516141300-Война_правок_участника_VSL_на_странице_По_сбо
Конфликтная страница: https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Википедия:Аргументация_за_варианты_«в_Украине»_и_«на_Украине»&action=history
Пояснение: данные правки аккаунта VSL не нарушают правил Википедии; конкретных и существенных возражений к последним правкам не было высказано; нигде не установлено, что каждый пункт правок должен предварительно проходить через страницу обсуждения и получать поддержку других участников (конфликтная страница не имеет такого консенсусного правила), хотя к обсуждению эти изменения предлагались. VSL (talk) 16:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. I looked at your contribution and, alas, I fully agree with both the wording and the action. What exactly is the reason for ban can be clearly seen here. Even in case that I would have not agreed with the ban, due to the WP:WHEEL rule, I wouldn't be able to undo it either... I am sorry about it. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you, in recognition of your contributions!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Hello!
I have taken a look at your contributions to this site, and I found you have made more than 300 edits in the past year-and-a-half regarding politics, particularly the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. I would like to give you this barnstar, to congratulate you for your contributions. I, in particular, would like to thank you for creating the article "Masha Moskalyova case", because I, too, am interested in that incident. In fact, I have recently made a YouTube video, titled Masha's Adventures in a Legal Wonderland; or, how a Drawing Jailed a Man, about this same case. Thanks again, Oleg Yunakov! С глубоким уважением, SleepTrain456 (talk) 20:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC) |
- Hello SleepTrain456. Many thanks for the kind words! I am glad that you found the information to be useful as well as took time to mention about it. A separate thanks fo the video. It's important to spread the real information. To be honest my contribution in enwiki is just about 0.1% of what I have created in ruwiki where I have started over 300 pages just about the war in Ukraine (including Вторжение России на Украину, Символы российского вторжения на Украину, Ракетный удар по торговому центру в Кременчуге, Ракетный удар по вокзалу Краматорска, Мятеж ЧВК «Вагнер» and etc.) and made thousands of edits. Since Russia has banned all of the normal news channels Ruwiki is one of the only still remaining source of truth that provide info on what happens and most people there speak only Russian language... All the best! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk)
Your accomplishments here are 0.1% of what you've done? I didn't know that! Also, I'm honored to be talking to the man that created the Russian Wikipedia pages on two major events in current history: the Russian invasion of Ukraine (Вторжение России на Украину) and the Wagner Group rebellion (Мятеж ЧВК «Вагнер»)! Thank you for your contributions to Russian Wikipedia as well!
Also, I'm glad you liked my video! I even have a sequel coming up. For now, you're welcome.
Yours sincerely,
--SleepTrain456 (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's a team work, I have started those articles and then was active contributor. :) P.S. Due to the fact that the Russian authorities throw people in jail foe expressing their thoughts, when I was in Arbcom, we decided to hide history of edits on the articles related to the war. Hence it's not possible to currently see it for non-admins. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Re'Im Music Festival Source
editPlease add this source to the Re'im Music Festival Massacre, since you're the only one not buying into the anti-Israel propaganda here.
A great source calling out the Haaretz article for taking information spread out of contact on social media and reporting it as misinformation. This is the original article out of which the video used in these accusations came, which deliberately states the helicopter was attacking targets in Gaza: https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/b111niukzt
Please mention how this is a misinformation campaign on social media and add it to the Disinformation the in Israel Hamas War article, you pointed earlier
I'd do it myself, but the Wikipedia censors aren't letting me due to article "protection" 2601:40:C481:A940:BC42:C2A9:7FF1:40AF (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, this first link was already added to the article after I have pointed out about it yesterday. In that conversation I have also mentioned about the fake news content from the second link about helicopters. I have created a detailed article on those events (you may use Google translate) and I read reports with the time when helicopters really came. In addition, I have also mentioned about third link (this one) which will eventually be added. Thanks! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- I still don't like the way it's worded in the article. It's completely ignoring the fact that that video that is being questioned was literally recording in Gaza. The article mentions the helicopter, but not the fact that it was in Gaza. That's the part that needs to be remedied using the Ynet link. As it stands now, it is still regurgitating misinformation.
- Can we just remove the whole thing? Like it's not that notable, and the laymen don't know what actually happened. Hell for all we know the whole thing is a hoax. It's really pissing me off that the editors are pushing for fake news like this, and they literally locked the article, specifically targeting me, because the facts I'm presenting to them don't fit their narrative.
- Shame on everyone else involved in this! 69.249.102.223 (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have mentioned exactly the same opinion. You might want to comment here on it. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 19:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of All-woman Israeli tank crew fight (2023) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-woman Israeli tank crew fight (2023) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Inbal Rabin-Lieberman for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inbal Rabin-Lieberman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Oleg Yunakov. Thank you for your work on Atzmona attack. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you North8000! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Oleg Yunakov. Thank you for your work on 8 July 2024 Ukraine missile strikes. Another editor, Fermiboson, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
possibly WP:TOOSOON but won't be in a few hours anyways.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fermiboson}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Fermiboson (talk) 11:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 11:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- And (you've been exemplary as far as I can see but making sure you're aware):
- == Introduction to contentious topics ==
You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
A.I. Notification
editHello Oleg Yunakov! You probably do not remember me, however, we talked back in March 2024. I have been running several experiments on Wikipedia regarding Artificial Intelligence. Funny enough, our conversation back then was related with the third A.I. experiment I was conducting. The associated article we talked about has since been merged and redirected, however, I kept an archived record of our discussion for the experiment.
I wanted you to know that our discussion was copied into User:WeatherWriter/LLM Experiment 3. I hope you are ok with that. Anyway, since I was restoring some old messages you made, I wanted you to be aware of that. Anyway, have an amazing day! If you are curious about the other experiments I ran, check out Experiment 1 and Experiment 2! Keep up the amazing work on Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Weather Event Writer and thank you very much of remembering about me. I'd definitely take a look. Have a great rest of the weekend and an enjoyable summer! With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 23:43, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
"Jewish pogroms in Amsterdam" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Jewish pogroms in Amsterdam has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8 § Jewish pogroms in Amsterdam until a consensus is reached. -- haminoon (talk) 06:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
"Jewish pogrom in Amsterdam" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Jewish pogrom in Amsterdam has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8 § Jewish pogrom in Amsterdam until a consensus is reached. मल्ल (talk) 16:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Commenting on closed discussions
editJust a friendly reminder that you should not make further comments on a discussion which as formally been closed like you did here. As the instructions at the top indicate, "Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page." You are welcome to further the discussion but it must be done outside of the closed merge discussion as indicated. Thanks for your cooperation. TiggerJay (talk) 22:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Where is the right place to discuss this topic please? With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 22:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- As both the article section and my reply above says, simply in a NEW section within that talk page. TiggerJay (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Cool, thank you. With regards, Oleg Y. (talk) 23:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- As both the article section and my reply above says, simply in a NEW section within that talk page. TiggerJay (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)