User talk:OlifanofmrTennant/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, OlifanofmrTennant! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 18:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Dates

Hello OlifanofmrTennant! I echo the Welcome given above. I'd like to suggest, however, that you think about reverting the edits you have made to some Roman emperors changing eras from BC/AD to BCE/CE. This is a helpful section of our MOS to read, especially the bit which says An article's established era style should not be changed without reasons specific to its content; seek consensus on the talk page first (applying Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Retaining existing styles) by opening a discussion under a heading using the word era, and briefly stating why the style should be changed; i imagine you can see where i am going with this ~ discussions on the relevant talk pages are essential. I truly do suggest you revert yourself and start those discussions. Happy days, ~ Lindsay^Hello 18:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Love Life (British TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dana Terrace—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Knocked Down, Knocked Up

Since this is the (unintended) series finale of LoT, I believe this needs an article more than the other episodes. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that we work on a draft for that episode? If so I would happily would begin construction on the episode. OLI 05:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

I have created the draft and begun construction. OLI 00:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masters of Horror (soundtrack), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphan articles

Thank you for adding article (B) links so that an article (A) is no longer an orphan. Want to let you know that the Orphan tag (A) can then be removed. There is no need to add the "att=" like here. Any questions, more info. is at Wikipedia:Orphan. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Villages list - Pazarcık District

Greetings, for article Pazarcık District, I pulled all those (50 or so) Village articles from Category:Orphaned articles from May 2023 using Petscan tool into a plain text file & then posted to Villages section. All villages were tagged as Orphan, so lastly, I removed the orphan tag. I realize this was a unique situation and might never happen again; just thought to share that sometimes it's easier to de-orphan an article than to tag it. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 12:47, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Marc Guggenheim

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Marc Guggenheim, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knocked Down, Knocked Up has been accepted

Knocked Down, Knocked Up, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 08:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Check...

I have marked your answers on User:OlifanofmrTennant/Adoption School. Please let me know if you need any more clarifications. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of 100th episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 100th episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 100th episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meet the Legends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossover.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Meet the Legends.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meet the Legends.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 09:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Me, Kiss Me, Love Me (Legends of Tomorrow episode) has been accepted

Miss Me, Kiss Me, Love Me (Legends of Tomorrow episode), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amity Blight.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amity Blight.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amity Blight.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amity Blight.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ground Controll to Sara Lance.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ground Controll to Sara Lance.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Arrow characters into Draft:Malcolm Merlyn (Arrowverse). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malcolm Merlyn (Arrowverse) (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malcolm Merlyn (Arrowverse) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, OlifanofmrTennant! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 22:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gideon (Legneds of Tomorrow).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gideon (Legneds of Tomorrow).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of A New World (The Flash) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Di (they-them) (talk) 17:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Strange Visitor from Another Planet into Draft:Strange Visitor from Another Planet. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 15:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

It’s the same title I also moved the page you can see the page history. 2600:1700:3351:1610:D036:23CF:934B:B2A1 (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slay Anything has been accepted

Slay Anything, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cambalachero (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow) (July 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon (Legends of Tomorrow). This draft appears to be the same as the deleted-merged article.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for A New World (The Flash)

On 23 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A New World (The Flash), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that episodes of Angel, Lost, and The Office inspired the writer of The Flash series finale? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A New World (The Flash). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A New World (The Flash)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ground Control to Sara Lance has been accepted

Ground Control to Sara Lance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malcolm Merlyn (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malcolm Merlyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chicago Way has been accepted

The Chicago Way, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

In the future, please do not remove AFC comments that you disagree with. The comments say that they should not be removed. They are removed automatically when the article is accepted. Other reviewers who see that comments have been removed may think that this illustrates tendentious editing.

I saw that some of the episodes of Legends of Tomorrow have articles, and that accepting this one is consistent with the ones that have already been accepted. Please do not remove AFC comments in the future. It is sometimes done in bad faith. All of the AFC comments have been removed, because the acceptance script does that. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Zari, Not Zari has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zari, Not Zari. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Zari, Not Zari has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Zari, Not Zari. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Draft:One Last Con

Just wanted to let you know that you accidentally created Draft:One Last Con in mainspace at Draf:One Last Con and that I moved it to draftspace :) ULPS ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

GAN reviews

Thanks so much for your reviews! Just as a note: GAN reviews should have "spotchecks", i.e. looking at one or more sources in the article to see that they say the same things as the article and that the article isn't using any copyrighted text. It's a good idea to mention any spotchecks you've done in the review clearly, which makes it easier for us to check that the review was good and give points for completing it. It's also good to mention some suggestions for improving the article, if there are any, and let the review stay open for a little to hear from the nominator. Again, thanks for any help you can give at GAN! Vaticidalprophet 00:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Can i retroactively add spotchecks to get credit? OLI 03:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes, if you've done a review without them, it'd be great to look back at the article and add the spotchecks to the review :) Vaticidalprophet 11:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Draft:2023 Bommarito Automotive Group 500

Please, can you explain what & which source you defined as "unreliable". Both, Racer.com & Motorsports.com, along with their writers, Marshall Pruett & Charles Bradley, have proven to be more that reliable sources in the Motor community & in motorsport wiki. Thank you. -HotMAN0199(talk) 18:16, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes but there is only two sources. I'm guessing thats because the event hasnt happened yet which if we consider other drafts only being in the draft space becuase their topic hasnt been relesead yet means It will remain declined. OLI 21:35, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it only has two sources because the event has yet to take place. That said, motorsport events are always posted to the main space before the event takes places, so anyone that wishes can update the article as different sessions take place. - HotMAN0199 (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Can you provide some precedent for this? OLI 22:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

• Example 1 created on July 31, 2023 to main space. Event occurred August 4-5.
• Example 2 Draft created April 10, 2023, & moved to main space April 13. Event occurred April 14-16.
• Example 3 Page created into main space June 18, 2023. Event is scheduled to occur October 5-8, 2023.
• Example 4 Page created into main space July 25, 2023. Event occurred July 28-29.
• Example 5 Page created into main space August 7, 2023. Event occured August 11-12.

- HotMAN0199 (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Okay, its been accepted. OLI 03:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much. - HotMAN0199 (talk) 03:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Bommarito Automotive Group 500 has been accepted

2023 Bommarito Automotive Group 500, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 03:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prochnost (Arrow) (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prochnost (Arrow) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Quark Baby

Hello @OlifanofmrTennant, I had submitted this article (Draft:Quark Baby) to the AfC for consideration but in your wisdom, you saw it fit to decline it as it read as promotional and you believed it was written by one of the founders. For the record, it was written by me, not one of the founders, I was only paid to create it. I have consequently addressed the aforementioned issues and I'm inviting you to take a second look and consider approving. Your advice will be highly appreciated. See-N-e-v-e-r-M-i-n-d (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zari, Not Zari (Legends of Tomorrow) has been accepted

Zari, Not Zari (Legends of Tomorrow), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 23:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Flag of Toledo, Ohio

Hello, I recently got your response to my draft article for the flag of Toledo and added your requests Monkeylol (talk) 05:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Last Con has been accepted

One Last Con, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 05:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your AfC review of Cover-up of rape at Johnny & Associates

Hi there, just stopping by to let you know you should be a little more careful accepting submissions through Articles for Creation as this article in question Cover-up of rape at Johnny & Associates was almost a 100% direct content fork of Johnny Kitagawa#Sexual harassment allegations. As a New Pages Reviewer, I've now redirected that page into the original section at the original article. That's all from me, have a good rest of your weekend! :) Fork99 (talk) 11:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Just read over my comment again, just clarifying if it wasn't clear, that the content fork in this case involved copying word for word straight from the original article into the new one. Fork99 (talk) 11:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Request on 16:15:00, 2 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Baah Thomas

• Baah Thomas (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Otuo-Akyampong Boakye (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello can you show me how I can make it acceptable?

Baah Thomas (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Poorly worded decline rationale in Draft:Donald Eugene Fields II

Hello, I am a fellow AfC reviewer like you. However, I just wanted to say your decline comment in Draft:Donald Eugene Fields II may confuse new editors. What matters is not the number of sources(three good sources are enough to satisfy WP:GNG), but the quality of the sources. On your future reviews, you should clarify the difference and that quality is more important than quantity. Other than that, continue with your excellent work at Wikipedia! Ca ^{talk to me!} 16:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Elsie M. Lewis - Decline reason

Hi Oli,

You recently declined Draft:Elsie M. Lewis for 'Bad formating + no infobox'.

Please note that per WP:AFCSTANDARDS 'Avoid declining an article because it contains formatting issues, such as no wikilinks to other articles, or because it has no sections. Instead, fix it yourself, or accept the article and tag it with maintenance templates to alert other editors to the one or two issues that you believe need to be resolved first.' and 'Avoid declining an article because you personally don't like the citation style or formatting.'.

Furthermore, there is ZERO requirement for any article to have an infobox and certainly an article does not need one to pass at AfC - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 22:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prochnost (Arrow) has been accepted

Prochnost (Arrow), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 03:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, OlifanofmrTennant. Thank you for your work on Prochnost (Arrow). User:Fork99, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Did you review and accept this AfC that you created yourself?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fork99}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Fork99 (talk) 04:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2