ITN recognition for Asad Rauf

edit

On 17 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Asad Rauf, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

DS Alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 05:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)   There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Orientls (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Pakistan Army

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pakistan Army, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

AE

edit

I have filed a report against your violations at WP:AE where you can comment. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 06:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Balesh Dhankhar for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balesh Dhankhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balesh Dhankhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit
 
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Galobtter (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

The first-year of this block is an WP:AE action. After that the block can appealed in the normal way. See my comment here. Galobtter (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ivanvector: tagging you for your input. May I ask why AKG's own actions weren't scrutinized and this case wasn't dealt with even handedness. Oriental Aristocrat (talk) 15:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pakistan audio leaks controversy for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakistan audio leaks controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan audio leaks controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Saqib (talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply