Own Your Word and Learn From All
Hello, Own Your Word and Learn From All, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! EvergreenFir (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
July 2024
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American Council of Trustees and Alumni. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are engaging in WP:COATRACK. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at American Principles Project, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Own Your Word and Learn From All (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I appended a quote to member wikis from the president of the board on which they sit on. I used the same quote and source that is on other pages in Wikipedia. How does the quote I appended not belong but the other quote it appends does? Own Your Word and Learn From All (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One open unblock request at a time, please; you had two. I don't see the value in adding that same content to eight separate pages. It's worse than that, of course. You've been abusing multiple accounts (
Confirmed to Rrace001 to add the same quote an additional three times. It's hard to assume good faith given this clear demonstration of bad faith. Yamla (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Own Your Word and Learn From All (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Two points in response.
#1 RRACE001 was not blocked when I made the new account. I checked RRACE001 after you blocked the new account and it was still open. You just blocked the RRACE001 account. I created a new account because I was thinking to have keep the old one for engineering/science/math and the new one for others as I was appending quotes. I did not know that this is not allowed,
#2 You never answered my question and you reasoned that there is no value to put the quote on all those pages. I appending this quote to the same paragraph on all these pages. Those same paragraphs that I appended are still there but I got blocked for appending a quote to them. Please clarify your reasoning because as of now it appears biased to the content and not the quantity. What part of you job allows you to define value and adjudicate based on your perception of value? Your value appears biased. Please explain how it does not.
FYSA There are 100+ board members and I was just going alphabetically which I think the other person was doing ahead of me. There repeated content is still there. Own Your Word and Learn From All (talk) 20:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address the concerns that led to the block. 331dot (talk) 07:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Comment from blocking admin - To answer #2, please see WP:ADMIN. This is not a "perception of value". I blocked you because you were disruptively copy-pasting the same quote into these articles, yet the quote is unrelated to the articles. You are trying to make an argument that X is part of Y and someone in Y said FUBAR, therefore FUBAR belongs on X's page. But that is WP:COATRACKing. The quote belongs on Kevin Roberts (political strategist)'s article and maybe on Project 2025. There is no reason to spam it on 100s of other pages. It appears that you have some agenda or point motivating your editing, trying to associate these hundreds of organizations with a vile (yes, that's my perception) statement by Roberts. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Again, You have not directly addressed my question on the paragraph I appended which is on 100+ pages. How is that not "spamming" as you call it but the quote I appended to the paragraph is? The quote is directly related to the article as these people work for each other and have a professional business relationship. How is it that the affiliation is ok to be cited on 100+ pages but a quote from the president of the affiliation not?
- Your response was that it had no value. These are your words. I asked about your words.
- Most important, I have provided no opinion on the matter. You did. I simply copied a quote.
You Own Your Word and Learn From All (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not every statement needs to be an unblock request, only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 07:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)