User talk:Paper Luigi/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Are you a Paper Luigi?

Well, I checked the Paper Mario game here and Nintendo was originally made this game are you sure? that are you Nintendo's Paper Luigi? --182.191.188.175 (talk) 06:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Australia Guy from the best cricket team ever

Thanks for your Support! We Did it!

Jpcase has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Well, it took me long enough, but the Animation Barnstar is finally official! Thank you Paper Luigi for your support and for your patience. I look forward to seeing how you continue to contribute to Wikipedia's coverage of animation! :)

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

P.S. I know that you nominated Dexter's Laboratory for FA a year or so ago and am curious what your thoughts are going forward with that article. While I probably don't have the time to get significantly involved, I'd love to help out where I can, so let me know if you ever have any plans. --Jpcase (talk) 17:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Paper Luigi's birth year

	BAFTA
	Hi? Please tell me your birth year. Nandi10000 (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Can you please take a look at "Ed, Edd n Eddy" Edit request 78.146.140.77 (talk) 16:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paper Luigi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Paper Luigi! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Paper Luigi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Dexter's Laboratory

Well, as I'm sure you've seen, I managed to find a little extra time, haha. And in lieu of a peer review, I figured I'd go ahead and make some of the expansions that I thought necessary for the article.

I've really enjoyed working on it these past few weeks and wish that I could keep going - but the amount of time that I have for Wikipedia right now is pretty limited, so I think that I need to pass the baton. If you're wanting to bring the article to FA, then there's still a lot of information out there that could be added. I never even got around to incorporating everything contained in the handful of sources that I was working from, so pulling out additional information from those could be a place to start. But there should also be plenty of sources that haven't been utilized at all yet. If you need help finding some of them, let me know. I spent a lot of time running into dead ends, before I managed to track down anything useful, so I'm aware of how tricky it can be to locate quality sources. Google Books is probably going to be your best bet.

Good luck! I know that you may be limited on time as well, so no pressure if you aren't able to add anything more. But if you're wanting to continue expanding the article, I hope that my recent edits have been able to give you some ideas on where to go with it. :) Jpcase (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

@Jpcase: Yes, I've noticed what you've been up to, and I really, really appreciate it. Frankly, I thought I was at a dead end too when I quit making major additions to the article. Until your recent contributions, the page hadn't changed all that much since it reached GA-status in early 2013. Back then, I read every article pertaining to the series on every site I could find, partially thanks to my university's student access to several online databases. I learned quite a few things myself during this time! I first nominated Dexter's Laboratory for GA over 10 years ago, back when I knew diddly squat about writing strong prose, what constitutes original research, or where to find sources, let alone how to format them. The nom failed, unsurprisingly, but to me, it was a challenge. Thank you for taking your time to help expand and strengthen this article so much!

December is not a great month for me to spend a significant amount of time on this article, what with Christmas gifts, car insurance renewal, health care decisions, upcoming taxes, and other bills leaving me virtually penniless along with an approaching holiday vacation still in the mix, but I will, as I've always done, find ways to improve this article whenever I can.

And thanks for the wikibeer! I needed that buzz. :) Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 08:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Grim and evil

I apologize for any misconceptions on the Grim and Evil page. I was trying to document a bit of history in its airing. This is where I got it from: https://animesuperhero.com/forums/threads/cartoon-networks-temp-9-11-ban-on-toonami-cc-episodes-lifted-updated.2855441/

Some other forums on this site also back up the cut scene. https://animesuperhero.com/forums/threads/how-september-11th-2001-affected-cartoons-animation.5159671/

P.S I don’t feel fully ready yet to make a full account, some confidence issues so I’m gradually making edits without an account until I feel ready to make one. --108.14.13.172 (talk) 18:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	You're welcome. PilotSheng (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Are you making a bot?

Hello.

I was inquiring to the matter you raised in the Bot Requests Page of Wikipedia. I thought this was a great bot idea and I'm wondering have you started making it. If not may I try to develop it?

Porthysek (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

@Porthysek which topic were you referencing? I made two separate bot requests, but I'm not developing a bot for either one. You're more than welcome to take either of my suggestions and develop your own bot with them. I'd like to see it! Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 02:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

"Millard J Fillmore" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Millard J Fillmore. Since you had some involvement with the Millard J Fillmore redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:07, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

The omitted part of "Material conditional"

Hi and thanks,

Can I put the omitted of "Material conditional" in a "History" part, or add it to the part "Philosophical problems with material conditional" or you think this part is redundant?

Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Boyd Elder

Dear Paper --

Just a note to thank you for creating the updating the Boyd Elder page.

Best regards,

Stephen K. Peeples Boyd Elder Biographer skp@stephenkpeeples.com https://stephenkpeeples.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1705:25A:B9FF:19A0:5AE:3CF4 (talk) 06:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Paper Luigi

Thank you for creating Condemned property.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice start! This article need much work and expansion but I think it's a very wp:notable and encyclopedic topic. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:22, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

What’s the problem?

Hi Paper Luigi, I notice you left a comment on my talk page saying I made an unconstructive edit. I was hoping you could explain what you found to be unconstructive about it, since as far as I’m aware everything I added was factual. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funthole (talk • contribs) 03:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Adding factual statements can be unconstructive if you begin including graphic details about childbirth in an article about The Rugrats Movie. I appreciate that you have a sense of humor, but you're well on your way to being suspended if you keep it up. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (I've left a message with links to them on your talk page.). Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 21:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Did YouTube have a Dexter's Laboratory episode Tunnel Trouble?

Tunnel Trouble — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:A070:2100:4195:F663:13C6:DB4 (talk) 05:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

No. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 01:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Did YouTube have a CITV airing of the Dexter's Laboratory episode called Last But Not Beast?

Last But Not Beast

What is the date of the CITV recording? 20th April 2003

What is the date of the YouTube publishing? March 2008 (No idea the date) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:A070:2100:D182:69D2:5DCD:578B (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Where is the link to the original prototype version of Thomas and the Special Letter?

The Fat Controller's Engines

Only in MrHammadMossop1988's Recordings— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:A070:2100:BD3D:6559:D03D:8A7E (talk) 09:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Advisor

Have you ever got this figured out? I'm having the same issue, and I love that thing when it works.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 9, 2021; 14:53 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for asking. No, I never did figure out why Advisor wasn't showing up. Years ago on WP, it showed up every time without fail, but nowadays it only appears when I least expect it. It's surprising that no one has replied to my inquiry from two years ago. I wonder if anyone else would know. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 14:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Not sure if anyone has done anything in the past two weeks, but as of today, Advisor is working for me again. I'm a happy camper now :) Let's see if that lasts.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 21, 2021; 14:45 (UTC)

Why I also removed the YT link.

There’s an ongoing good article nomination for the page and the reviewer deemed the link non-reliable. It’s not my rules, I’m just following that because he said we should remove it and I want to get the page listed as a good article. SlySabre (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

To be more specific, it’s because the reference wasn’t a direct source. It would’ve been fine had the video been uploaded directly by Fox News, however, since it was an unofficial re-upload, it needed to be removed for the Good Article nomination review because it wasn’t a direct source. SlySabre (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Fan research interview

Hey Paper Luigi; it has been a minute! I hope things are goin' well for you. I'm currently working on a dissertation about the information behavior fan editors on Wikipedia, and as a result, I've been reaching out to people who I think might have some interesting insights. Given your interest in animation, I was wondering if you'd be interested in chatting with me about your information experiences on the site? The questions are going to be things like "where do you get info", "how do you organize it," etc.? I can send over an email your way if you're interested! Just let me know.--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 18:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, @Gen. Quon, I hope you're doing well. After reading your autoethnography subpage, I would be pleased to participate in an interview about my experiences editing pop culture pages. Send me an email at your convenience, and I'll get back with you as soon as I can. — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 20:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh, that's wonderful to hear! I've sent out an email with some more detail. Let me know if you didn't get it!--Gen. Quon_[Talk]^{(I'm studying Wikipedia!)} 14:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

I sent a reply. If you reply this evening and I cannot get back to you in time, it will probably have to wait until early next week (personal reasons and such). — Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 01:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

BRIAN A. MILLER - UPDATE

Hi Paper Luigi

Wondering if you could update the Brian A. Miller page with this article:

https://www.animationmagazine.net/tv/twentyone14-media-forms-animation-pact-with-brian-a-miller-dan-abnett-team-legend/

Thanks for considering.

76.87.135.179 (talk) 23:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Board of Trustees election

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion

I know you contribute a lot to WP:WikiProject Television and so you would be familiar with specific approaches the project takes. I recently nominated two season articles of The Chosen (TV series) for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chosen (season 1) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chosen (season 2). In both cases, they are essentially verbatim copies of the main article content and they don't meet the project's critieria for splitting (IMO). We don't count episode summaries per WP:NOTPLOT, leaving the article with about 500 words of redundant prose. Per my arguments in the deletion discussion, we don't create season articles for every show simply because the show itself is notable. Notability for the season itself is necessary. Am I off on this? I'd appreciate your input. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Talk pages

Hi there, generally there is no need to remove old talk page sections on articles, especially if having those previous discussions around is context so that a recent issue isn't brought up again. Better than archiving, in that case, is to set up automatic archiving so that the talk page maintains itself, but even this is best done as a contributor to the article rather than on a "drive-by" basis. And of course if the talk page is unfrequented, there is especially no case to add {{talk header}} to the talk page as there is no frequent discussion to warrant the links for newcomers (though it's unproven at all whether newcomers even read it). czar 05:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Austin Powers: Oh, Behave!

Hi, I saw that you worked on this article, and I wanted to hear your thoughts on merging this with Austin Powers: Welcome to My Underground Lair!. I think it'd be appropriate considering that they are quite similar and, in my experience, were often reviewed as a pair. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential primary campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential primary campaign, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential primary campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)