User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 15
This is an archive of past discussions with User:PatGallacher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Nomination of Anton Kuprin for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Kuprin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
How Green was My Father moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, How Green was My Father, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 18:23, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Bunclarke With an E moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bunclarke With an E, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 20:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Zarzas
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zarzas".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Golda (film) (May 2)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Golda (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Golda (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, PatGallacher!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dege31 (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
|
The article Socialist Group (UK) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is a stub that has been entirely uncited since 2014. Given that the relevant details about the Socialist Group already exist in the articles about the Workers' Socialist League and the International Socialist Group, I propose that this article be deleted.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 16:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
A P Herbert's Misleading Cases moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, A P Herbert's Misleading Cases, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 12:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Aboriginal languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrernte.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?
Hi PatGallacher, I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, most pages are easy to review, and habits are quick to develop). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board. Cheers, and hope to see you around, (t · c) buidhe 22:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC) |
Concern regarding Draft:Sion Daniel Young
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sion Daniel Young, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Greek people convicted of rape
A tag has been placed on Category:Greek people convicted of rape indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 00:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Amber Heard
How is her formal diagnosis made by a PhD Clinical Psychologist “problematic”? It's a fact that not even Amber Heard has denied or disputed the diagnosis, what gives Wikipedia, or you, to override this fact? This is why Wikipedia is getting terrible media coverage. Wikipedia is supposed to be about verified facts, not member opinions based on arbitrary made up rules. But whatever, this isn't my normal area of expertise as I am a pathologist assistant MorphinESTP (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with the above comment. As on Amber Heard's Wikipedia page there are numerous mentions of what took place regarding the trial, which was public and televised, why is one specific aspect of said trial not allowed to be mentioned on Wikipedia? I have BPD, the diagnosis Amber Heard received, and I for one am not ashamed of my disorder and the fact that people are actively silencing it as though it is not to be spoken of is extremely triggering. There was defamatory information on Amber Heard's Wikipedia page for six years and yet you refuse to print the truth? Shocking, truly. Demi26x (talk) 14:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Newton-John
You're a regular so I won't template you. The sources cited for her death (so far anyway) do not identify a cause of death, and therefore should not have been stated in your edit. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 19:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
I think they do actually, but will check this. PatGallacher (talk) 20:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- One source now verifies it, but when you made your edit, neither of the sources stated cause of death. Sundayclose (talk) 21:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Topsy Jane
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Topsy Jane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Topsy Jane
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Topsy Jane".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:How Green was My Father
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:How Green was My Father, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Theresa McDermott for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa McDermott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Concern regarding Draft:Bunclarke With an E
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bunclarke With an E, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deaths at the Battle of Sauchieburn
A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths at the Battle of Sauchieburn indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Jack Pizzey (broadcaster) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Pizzey (broadcaster) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Your draft article, Draft:How Green was My Father
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "How Green was My Father".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bunclarke With an E
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bunclarke With an E".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:La Libertad Avanza
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:La Libertad Avanza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: La Libertad Avanza (October 29)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:La Libertad Avanza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, PatGallacher!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
|
Concern regarding Draft:A P Herbert's Misleading Cases
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A P Herbert's Misleading Cases, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
German weather ship Sachsenwald
I'm in a position to improve the German weather ship Sachsenwald article, which you created. You've got measurements of height 5.03m and draught 4.43m. Shouldn't these be draught and depth respectively? Just wanted to check as it may be I've been misreading Gröner 1993 and need to alter a number of articles. Mjroots (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- I did create this as a stub article, but it has been enhanced substantially by other Wikipedians, I don't have the technical knowledge of ships to reply to this. PatGallacher (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- OK, well I'm sure that the measurements are as I stated. Will improve the article and make the necessary corrections in the next day or so. Mjroots (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Nairn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn (1968 TV series) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn (1968 TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:43, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
The article Harriet's Back in Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2013
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:La Libertad Avanza
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "La Libertad Avanza".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Laura Cano moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Laura Cano. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:22, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Cano has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Curbon7 (talk) 04:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Category:Marcomannic rulers has been nominated for renaming
Category:Marcomannic rulers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Priyanka Patel moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Priyanka Patel. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Battle of Omdurman
You moved the talk page but not the article itself. DuncanHill (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn (1968 TV series)
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn (1968 TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
"Philip and Mary of England" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Philip and Mary of England has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 17 § Philip and Mary of England until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 12:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths by horse-riding accident in Germany indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Mauryan empresses has been nominated for renaming
Category:Mauryan empresses has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 10:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Laura Cano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Ref's given do not demonstrate that this subject has significant coverage. The tag is meaningless as no ref's from said search have actually been inserted so far as I can see...
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Category:Timurid empresses has been nominated for merging
Category:Timurid empresses has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 11:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Audrey Fildes for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Fildes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Your draft article, Draft:Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn (1968 TV series)
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Leo Lieberman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Relies exclusively on entry in online database and trivial mention in a book as sources. Online search only returned results of fictional character, one Dr. Leo Lieberman (unclear whether the same individual as the subject) and more trivial mentions. Does not seem to have pass WP:NBIO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Hou Yifan's age when qualifying for the grandmaster title
Hi – I thought you might be interested in this comment I wrote regarding Hou Yifan's age when qualifying for the grandmaster title. Joriki (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The article Marxist Workers' League (Finland) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Édouard Brémond moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Édouard Brémond. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 20:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Édouard Brémond has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spinster300 (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Hello, PatGallacher
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Jonathan Steinberg (disambiguation), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Significa liberdade (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
It looks to me as if you could have jumped the gun by deciding that the historian was not the primary topic, but I'm not going to get into a big dispute about this. PatGallacher (talk) 00:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Priyanka Patel
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Priyanka Patel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Category:Wives of Holy Roman Emperors by person has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wives of Holy Roman Emperors by person has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)