User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 16
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:PatGallacher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Priyanka Patel
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Priyanka Patel".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Avoiding links to disambiguation pages
Hallo, in this edit you linked to the disambiguation page World Youth Championship.
There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 09:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
@PatGallacher: Hi there and happy new year! I'm just messaging as I've seen you have edited at talk on Lucy Letby before so thought you may be interested in giving your view at Talk:Lucy Letby#RFC on Lead sentence. There's a vote there on whether to exclude calling her a serial killer, on various grounds including "I don't think we can assert in Wiki's voice that she is a murderer".
Suspiciously to me, the whole debate was started when the editor Richard D. Gill -- already-blocked for promoting his real-world advocacy in trying to portray Letby and others as innocent [1], [2] -- apparently appeared again(!) to evade his block and suggest the whole intro be changed to claim she is just an "alleged" killer: [3] - EXACTLY the same wording he'd suspiciously been asking for on his own Twitter account!: [4]. All seems very weird to me. 86.187.174.5 (talk) 15:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Akram al-Shafei
Hello PatGallacher, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Akram al-Shafei, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akram al-Shafei.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Karnataka}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lewis Grassic Gibbon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Craig.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
"Ukrainian Census (2001" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Ukrainian Census (2001 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § Ukrainian Census (2001 until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Page move discussion
An ongoing discussion regarding whether to relocate Clement of Rome to "Pope Clement I" is underway. You're invited to join the conversation here. Thank you. EXANXC (talk) 02:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Gabor Vernon moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Gabor Vernon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rape in Belarus
A tag has been placed on Category:Rape in Belarus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, PatGallacher. Thank you for your work on Maria Caroline of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Béatrice d'Hirson for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Béatrice d'Hirson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Jean de Cherchemont moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Jean de Cherchemont. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 16:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rona Munro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Hamilton.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ruth Baza has a new comment
The article Yonatan Steinberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Pretty much a classic, if not stereotypical WP:BLP1E instance. No meaningful coverage of the subject before or after the one event involved, and basically only obituary coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 12:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Yonatan Steinberg for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yonatan Steinberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Regarding striking non-EC comments
Hey, to the best of my knowledge, striking comments that are not extended-confirmed (in areas where you have to be) is pretty close to standard practice. I‘m happy to stop if it isn’t permitted, but I’m unfamiliar with the policy saying that it shouldn’t be done, and it feels like a good compromise between leaving as is (bad for the closer) and fully removing (less transparent).
I apologise if I missed something obvious :) FortunateSons (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- News to me that this is standard practice. Also, when you said EC, I assumed you mean Encyclopedic Comment. PatGallacher (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The older move discussion on Talk:Flour massacre has a few examples of !votes by users who are not extended confirmed being struck. However, I do agree that it’s optional, so I don’t mind the removal, I was just confused. :) FortunateSons (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Ilaria Salis moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Ilaria Salis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Lori Wells for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Wells until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Greg Philo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Greg Philo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Women prime ministers of the United Kingdom has been nominated for merging
Category:Women prime ministers of the United Kingdom has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Mistresses of Charles Edward Stuart has been nominated for deletion
Category:Mistresses of Charles Edward Stuart has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Mistresses of Frederick, Prince of Wales has been nominated for merging
Category:Mistresses of Frederick, Prince of Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 10:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
The article Paul Greenwood has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JoeNMLC (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The article Tom Gordon (English politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
An article with the correct name style already has an article see Tom_Gordon_(British_politician)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 00:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Luca Hámori for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Hámori until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 03:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Jean de Cherchemont has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Baza (August 30)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruth Baza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, PatGallacher!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:06, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Concern regarding Draft:Gabor Vernon
Hello, PatGallacher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gabor Vernon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Gilbert Wynne
Hello PatGallacher, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gilbert Wynne, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilbert Wynne.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Miminity}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Terence Wilton moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Terence Wilton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)