User talk:PeepeeDino

Welcome to PeepeeDino's talk page! 👋 Feel free to leave me a message below. I try to reply when I can!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malaysian embassy in Bern (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, PeepeeDino! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, PeepeeDino. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by CanonNi (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Concern regarding Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern

Hello, PeepeeDino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern

Hello, PeepeeDino. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Malaysian embassy in Bern".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuantan 188 Tower Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kuantan 188 Tower Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 10:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, hello, thanks for the reminder. The image I uploaded will be used in an article about Kuantan 188 which I'm currently drafting. PeepeeDino (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maha Tower (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The current sources doesn't seem very reliable or independent.

The Island Drum is a random blog site.

Malaysian Reserve seems decent, though it doesn't have a listed author

Naturally Langkawi is the official tourist website of the area and it reads AI-generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maha Tower and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $250 worth of prizes for architectural articles. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuantan 188 has been accepted

Kuantan 188, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Katharina Otto-Bernstein. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. I strongly advise that you provide a more detailed explanation when you remove these tags, and/or provide a couple of explanation sentences on the talk page. N.B., that was not the only page where you removed tags without a full explanation. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

AfD Process

Hi! I see you tried to nominate Bala Ganapathi William for deletion. Please make sure to fully follow the guide to how should an article be nominated at WP:AFDHOWTO, it's better to do these steps using a desktop or better yet, with Twinkle!

I had gone ahead and help you create the AfD for the article, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bala Ganapathi William. Cheers! Syn73 (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the assistance! Should have read on how to do it in the first place 😅, cheers to you too! PeepeeDino (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello, I'm Kovcszaln6. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Some of your recent edits seem to be generated with an LLM. Please refrain from using them. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 12:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Clear use of an LLM

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to First light (astronomy), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Your submission featured a clearly-hallucinated citation to a fictitious source; please do not submit LLM-generated sources you have not personally verified to exist. Altoids0 (talk) 06:23, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Duly noted. It seems I've been caught up with tidying articles using LLMshout apparent concern over misinformation PeepeeDino (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! Going through your contributions however, I ended up discovering a very large number of erroneous LLM changes and created made a discussion on the admin incident board before you replied, as it seems that a lot of changes have to be reverted and I don't really have the special roles necessary to do so expediently. If you could comment there as well, and maybe identify which contributions you used an LLM to create, that would be great. Altoids0 (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PeepeeDino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Yes, I don't understand how I was being disruptive. Maybe it was the 'nonsense' gargle in my first line (which you can thank my slow connection for) or the way I spoke? If it wasn't obvious, then I lack a concerning amount of interaction with people online using a suitable language. My way of typing is attributed to the fact I'm an ESL speaker, but that does not of course void me from being blocked for 'disruptive' behaviours. Now for my actual reason to be unblocked? I'd like to clarify a few more mistakes and give a clearly explanation?PeepeeDino (talk) 11:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you don't understand how providing references that don't back up the information they claim to is disruptive, you are not currently capable of contributing productively to Wikipedia. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Link to ANI - Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#PeepeeDino_-_LLM_Usage. PhilKnight (talk) 13:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PeepeeDino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello, I feel a long time has passed for me to realize the errors of my old habits and to properly apologize for my previous actions.

During the span of two weeks of late July to early August , I mistakenly and horrendously used a Large Language Model (Specifically ChatGPT) to help with creating new articles. While I didn't think much of it, the admins during my discussion made it extremely obvious that not only was it wrong, it tainted the site as a place for ai-slop. I would've, of course, responded in a more professional matter and tone, however the circumstances at that time would not allow me to control my own emotions and thus, my disasteruos response during my first appeal.

So, I apologize for distributing false citations and claims, article-making using ai, and ignoring previous warnings from the higher ups. I've changed since the past 2-3 months, (while I've been indefinitely blocked) by contributing to my own Wiki's language (ms-wiki) and properly learning the ropes.

Hope this appeal sees you well, and I hope the block can be lifted. PeepeeDino (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Given Richie333 has edited since, and no objections have been made, I'm unblocking on the condition that you are banned from using large-language models (in any way, shape, or form) while making any edits to Wikipedia. Sohom (talk) 13:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

cc @Ritchie333, thoughts? @PeepeeDino would you be willing to agree to a ban from using large-language models (in any way shape or form) while making any edits to Wikipedia as a condition to your unblock? -- Sohom (talk) 15:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

cc

Yes, I will sincerely stop all large-language models I've used in the past for all minor and major help. This think this also applies to translations and/or formatting code doesn't it?

If so, I'll do my best to edit with with full responsibility and precaution while also consulting help from actually more experienced editors on the site to guide me in stuff I'm less informed about. Realizating now that my efforts in churning out my old edits were just mere emotional satisfaction and not based on ensuring the quality said edits.

If it helps, I can start by re-editing my Kuantan 188 article to remove the LLM warning tag with some assistance that'll I'll definitely be needing.

Sorry again for all the trouble I've caused

PeepeeDino (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Waiting on the blocking admin in that case. Sohom (talk) 03:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Chiming in to say I also support an unblock. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

I really appreciate all the help in my unblocking and rest assured, will keep my end of the deal. (And apologies for such a late thanks too) PeepeeDino (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maha Tower

Hello, PeepeeDino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maha Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PeepeeDino. Thank you for your work on Jason Chong (born 1980). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish WP:Note. Please also fix the errors in the footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei:

Hello and thanks for the feedback! I'll add the notes and also continue to improve the Soloz article (I think replying to both in the same reply would be less redundant?) as soon as I can.

The more technical ones are going to be a bit more slower as I'm still quite a rookie.

Have a good day to you too!

PeepeeDino (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your continued improvements. In general, we need to be quite careful about WP:BLP guidelines, but notability can wait as long as you are making continuous improvements to the pages. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PeepeeDino. Thank you for your work on Soloz. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 15:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Estonia, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delfi was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome PeepeeDino! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 18:06, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Kuttankulangara Sri Krishna Temple. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. ‎ ‎ — B.J (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey, what happened. You literally added this line ]5yeteeeeeeeeweweswtgggdefeffgjndghdgsdgdfghjjdjngngtgh ‎ ‎ — B.J (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

If you wouldn't mind, I would like re-add my citations to the article, which is what I intended to do

PeepeeDino (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for your comment.

I'm very sorry for the mistake, must've been my keyboard acting up.

Will clean it up, no worries.

PeepeeDino (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

About your reviews of my WP:MAR26 edits

Hi, points to you for your reviews as part of WP:MAR26. I would like to comment on two negative ones of my edits. You are right that information was missing from the source added to Noregs Mållag; I've added a source for the member number and removed the number of local organizations, I guess I didn't count the list in the source (note that your review is misleading since the article never said 200 youth groups). Other reviewers added a {{cn}}-tag in this kind of case of partial sourcing except something specific, bringing attention to the more specific problems.

But regarding the other edit, at List of members of the Storting, 1981–1985, I don't follow the negative review. The page does indeed list the number of mandates for all elections since WW2, but I don't see it mixing it anything, it's just a bit oddly sorted. For some reasons they are but into groups of 4, but under 1977–1989 you find a column for 1981, and it gives the numbers and info in the paragraph it's added to (footnote mentions the election that had to be redone; I haven't found any good English term for omvalg). I just put the government list of names at the end because it doesn't seem reasonable to put that individually after each name. Would you reconsider that one or at least explain a bit more? //Replayful (talk | contribs) 20:38, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, some further nitpicking: The source for Noregs Mållag was added Mar 1st, but was edited late March (your reviews were added Apr. 2nd). However, it turns out the version I used does indeed describe the member number as 16000, also mentions "approx. 170 local organizations and 17 fylke organizations", not that far from 200. For unknown reasons these two things were from the source in late March, but they were there when I added it. //Replayful (talk | contribs) 21:08, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for your feeback (I was hoping for more to highlight any of my mistakes, but alas you're the first!). I've looked at the source for Noregs Mållag that you gave. You're right! It clearly states the number of members and your approximate. However, because the source was updated, I didn't see it and so would everyone else who would want to explore the source. Even though the page is currently available, I would suggest using an archived source using Archive.org. Unless there's a way to freeze the page, it looks like that seems to be the only way to actually see the figures.

For the List of members of the Storting, 1981–1985, you have all the rights to be confused. Sorry! Let me expand on what I wanted to say: It wasn't confusing due to the numbers it gave, it matched well with what the article said. But looking at the timeline, it says between 1981–1985. 1981 had different number of members each party than 1985. With closer inspection actually... I might just be confused at how term limits and election years work.

I think you do deserve that 2nd source though, I was just bad at figuring which seats the article wanted. Can the list still be edited though? If so then I'd gladly tick the latter. Good work on the other articles though!

PeepeeDino (talk) 08:15, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, I can see why we were all confused! I fixed Noregs Mållag by adding another source for the membership number, removing the subgroup number (not important), so the current version should be in order.

About List of members of the Storting, 1981-1985, the title is a bit odd. The people elected in 1985 (as described in the 1985-column you mention) are handled in List of members of the Storting, 1985-1989. I suppose a more accurate title would be "List of members of the Storting elected 1981" (but that doesn't seem to fit with existing conventions). Norway has elections at fixed times every fourth year, so 1981-1985 is one membership period, 1985-1989 is another. What matters is the election in the election year (the first one) and then whatever changes happens through party changes or deaths, for instance.

If I were you, I'd just try to edit it and see what happens :) One point more would mean I'm secured 5. I asked somewhere else about the process for discussing reviews, but haven't had an answer yet. Thank you for your good work on reviewing! //Replayful (talk | contribs) 08:44, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay but it would seem like the organizers had placed the final edit. Drats! If only the event was prolonged just a little bit more. Hope it's fine for you :>?

PeepeeDino (talk) 03:18, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of MRSMs with IGCSE

The article List of MRSMs with IGCSE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this grouping is a notable subject.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Fram (talk) 08:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Standard layout and formatting of honours

Hi PeepeeDino. Thanks for improving the sourcing at Pati Maldaner. Going forward, please use the standard layout and formatting as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players which is the result of past discussions of the community of football editors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:58, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Ah there's a template for it. The more you know I guess! Thanks for the help in reverting and improving those edits of mine.

I assume there's more than one sport that uses templates? And sports isn't the only genre. If you'd be so kind to share some examples, I'd love to learn.

PeepeeDino (talk) 11:23, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome.

Football is the only sport I regularly edit. There have been rare instances where I went looking for templates for players of other sports. For some sports I found a template, for some I didn't. You can find them via the project pages. For example,

• templates relating to football, not just players, but also clubs etc. are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Templates
• there's Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby league with Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby league/Players.

See Category:Sports-related_WikiProjects for an overview of sports-related WikiProjects. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

March 2026 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to PeepeeDino for achieving third place with 569 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's March 2026 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8362 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 16:35, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

March 2026 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to PeepeeDino for collecting more than 569 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's March 2026 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8362 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 16:35, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for both of these by the way! Thought I'd reply with something better than a normal "thanks" (being a week and all) but less is more I suppose. PeepeeDino (talk) 14:16, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capulin Volcano, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raton was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:02, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2025 Barnstar

Betty2407 (talk) 08:38, 6 June 2026 (UTC) on behalf of Wikipedia Asian Month User Group

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bunty Aur Babli, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanjay Mishra was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:51, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome PeepeeDino! I'm glad that you are joining the August 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 22:20, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

AUG26 reviews

Hi! Thanks for reviewing several of my submissions for the WP:UA backlog drive.

I have a habit of defining references in the reference section at the end of the article. I hope that wasn't confusing. I find that it makes the wikicode much more readable.

The first article you reviewed for me was marked with N Just listed citations in ref section with no incline cite

The diff (Special:Diff/1367096554) shows that there are some citations in one of the tables, though the article prose does remain uncited. Is that sufficient? – Reidgreg (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello Reidgreg,

It does seem like I missed the ones in the boxes. Bit hard to really see while reviewing on mobile (especially late at night) Thanks for mentioning it!

I'll take back the review as soon as I can once I review another bunch. Shouldn't take too long.

PeepeeDino (talk) 14:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of glitch artists

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of glitch artists, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A unsupported parameter error. References show this error when you use a parameter name that does not exist. Please replace the parameter with one that the template supports, or remove it if no such parameter exists. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Koehler, Robert. "Glitch in the Grid". Retrieved 17 August 2026. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |days= ignored (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cloud formation and climate change, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luke Howard was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 20 August 2026 (UTC)