User talk:Pentagon 2057/archive B

Archives:Sep 17-Feb 18, Mar 18-Aug 18, Sep 18-Feb 19, current page

Downtown line

Honestly, isn't it a little too early to nominate Downtown MRT line for GA? Many portions, especially the History portion, need to be rewritten entirely, the lead needs to be refocused, and most of the cited sources are primary ones. R22-3877 (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC) R22-3877 (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

What im doing is I'm going to use DTL as a 'test' GAN and also a PR, and maybe like Sengkang somehow becomes a GA.1.02 editor (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Silicon/GA1

Would you mind holding this review open for another few days? I almost certainly won't have time to fix the remaining things till the weekend. Double sharp (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Sure I'll be happy to wait. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 23:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 14:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishan tunnel flooding (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bishan tunnel flooding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bishan tunnel flooding, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, 1.02 editor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:GulCircle tracks3.Jpeg

Hi, Thank you, for uploading this file.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm some details,

If it's your own work, please include {{own}}, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not your own work please provide as much sourcing/authorship information as you are able to.

It would also be appreciated if you could "claim" or update the source and licensing on other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transferred to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Listing good articles

Thanks for the Si GAN pass! I still intend to expand it further (this is one of those really important elements that deserve to be FA sooner or later), but I should note that after passing a GAN, you're expected to add the newly passed article to the list of GAs at Wikipedia:Good articles (it isn't done automatically). I've done that for you already. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I didn't know that. I always thought Legobot did that… 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 07:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

I would like to be adopted.

hi newroderick895 (talk) 09:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)newroderick895

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

ESEAP Conference 2018

Hello,

I’m Punchalee, a member of the Communication Committee of the ESEAP Conference. ESEAP Conference 2018 is a regional conference for Wikimedia communities throughout the ESEAP region: ESEAP stands for East, Southeast Asia, and Pacific. Taking place in Bali, Indonesia on 5–6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for these Wikimedia communities.

East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific are the most under-represented regions within the Wikimedia community. There is a significant number of Wikimedia contributors in our regions, yet we continue to struggle in establishing a well-managed community. This conference will bring participants from various ESEAP communities together in order to better understand the issues and to look for solutions. It also aims to connect people of the Wikimedia movement within ESEAP regions, to share ideas, and to build regional collaborations that are impossible to achieve through online communication.

We’ve got a lot of participation from several countries, but we’re lacking from your country. As we need more participants from your country, we believe that your contribution and participation would be a valuable asset to the success of this event. If you would like to participate in the conference, please do fill the form as soon as possible (by April 5, 2018) and we’ll inform you if you get selected for the conference.

Thank you and we hope to see you soon. --Pilarbini (talk) 10:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Per WP:FOOLS, please keep any April Fools' activity out of mainspace. ansh666 04:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

oops! Sorry. Would keep that in mind. Thanks for the reminder. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 04:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Evergreen Branch

You didn't mark the article passing at Talk:Evergreen Branch/GA1. Thanks. --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, have done it already. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

not my fault

Why — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.75.134.186 (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@138.75.134.186: may i know what are you talking about? 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 05:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

SS Choctaw

Hello 1.02 editor! Not too long ago you mentioned some improvements that need to be made to get the SS Choctaw to Good Article status. One of these was that the sections need sorting out. You recommended having four sections, design and construction, History, collision, discovery. But there are also two other sections about searches, and the description of the vessel today. Please could you specify what I should do with these sections?

Best wishes:GreatLakesShips (talk) 18:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

@GreatLakesShips: maybe you can put the searches under the discovery section, or have a section called 'Searches' and have a discovery subsection. Thanks. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 01:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
• Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
• Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
• SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
• Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
• Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
• Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Improvements completed

Hello 1.02 editor! I have fixed all the issues you pointed you when you reviewed the SS Choctaw after I nominated for Good Article status. Could you please have a look at it?

Thanks!GreatLakesShips (talk) 10:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your effort in improving Singapore Articles in all. I reviewed many of the AFD that you participated in and see your effort in improving Singapore Article. I totally support you in spending less time in Wikipedia overall, and hope you can return, like me, after 10 years. All the best Quek157 (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

haha thanks. I will still contribute here though. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 03:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Have a good wikibreak! Hope to still see you around SG articles. ~ KN2731 {t ⋅ c} 03:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I will still try to contribute here. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 06:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm back

Hi. Nice to see you doing well, from someone doing up minor edits in November last year to someone being named as one major contributor to Wikipedia. Congrats. While, in the past few months, I have been blocked for a while and I just recently filed an appeal, so I am back! If you can help, take more pics on the west side of Singapore MRT, especially Jurong East's, as all the pics of that station seems outdated. The MRT articles really changed a lot, but still some needs more citations, changes in expression, etc.--ZKang123 (talk) 09:48, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

@ZKang123: haha nice to see you back! I've semi retired from here as I need to cut down on the time I spend on wiki, but I'll continue to make changes here and there. Just an update on things here, we have a returnee - Quek157- and maybe you would like to contribute to the new Jurong Region MRT line articles. Regards, 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 11:23, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Re : Rant

Hi, saw your long rant etc. and thought just to leave a note.

I assume you have see the long list of former SG Wikipedians who left after various reasons. With various time / effort commitments and the lack of recognition, especially from schools, a lot of us probably has lesser time and effort to commit themselves to Wikipedia.

As Wikipedia is not especially welcome in Singapore's education system and being shunned by the educators, the wrong mindset and attitude leads to the dearth of SG editors. As an exception, Sgconlaw aka Jacklee had a few classes of students using Wiki as a tool to educate his classes and bring some law related articles to higher standards and we never know how many more new editors came on board. Then again he is an avid editor who still edits here and there once a while like the others.

While the mainly working class editors have less time to commit and write, some of them still come back to help to edit, fix, just giving advice to new editors or collaboration on articles in other way. I am a mediocre editor so I helped in the mundane tasks and the occasional editing (minor stuff) as and when I can or have the time.

So find your niche or what you like to do (I was on an adding of succession box spree for a while) which I think you have a few, come back and visit and edit as needed.

Being typically Singaporeans, there are probably a few silent editors and those who do not dare to speak up on talk pages, so do not despair and give up. Treat editing as a hobby!

All the best in your studies~

--Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Clydesdale GA review

You started a GA review of Clydesdale Motor Truck Company on 2nd May at Talk:Clydesdale Motor Truck Company/GA1. Are you intending to complete this review? SpinningSpark 20:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
• Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
• SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Legendary SGpedian returns

Ima back people. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 12:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back! Unfortunately I'm still tied up in school exams and afterwards HCL O Level oral 😣 but I'll attempt to return to Singapore articles myself after those. ~ KN2731 {t · c} 10:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

@KN2731: All the best! 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:57, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Impromptu Meetup on 22 August (Hari Raya Haji, Wednesday)

Hello Wikipedian! Andrew Lih (User:Fuzheado) of Wikimedia US Consortium is in town next week and he is asking if anyone of you can come at Han's Cafe, #01-01 National Library Building, 100 Victoria Street (S)188064 on 22 August 2018 (Wednesday, Hari Raya Haji). Should you wish to reach me directly in real time, please contact me using the Telegram mobile app @Exec8 --Exec8 (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@Exec8: do you have WhatsApp? I don't have telegram. Also, may I know a bit more about this person that is coming? Thanks. -1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 05:09, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Sent an email to you. Kindly click on Fuzheado's user account and it answers your question about the profile. -Exec8 (talk) 07:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Thessaloniki Metro

Hello, thank you for reviewing the Thessaloniki Metro page. I've put a lot of love into it. How do you suggest moving forward to get it to GA or FA status? Thanks again. --Philly boy92 (talk) 04:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@Philly boy92: the article seems sound apart from some minor issues such as formatting and grammar. However, I personally would prefer to wait until the system is completed before nominating it for GA as the criteria for a GA article includes that the article must be stable (content does not change much from day to day). Thanks-1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 04:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

• Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
• Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
• Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
• Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Nova Crystallis, Iazyges, SounderBruce, Kosack and Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bishan tunnel flooding

Hello! Your submission of Bishan tunnel flooding at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 08:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC) CeeGee 08:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Thank you for reviewing the Central Australia Railway page. I agree with your quality ranking of C and will look at reducing the lists. It's been an interesting introduction. Skillsy (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please explain

please explain what i did wrong on the clash royale article. you seem to have undone it. B.N. Dehigaspage (talk) 11:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Oh! I'm really sorry for not reading the guide. Thanks for showing me! I will try not to do it again. B.N. Dehigaspage (talk) 12:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

@B.N. Dehigaspage: Good that you understand! 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 12:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again B.N.D 16:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by B.N. Dehigaspage (talk • contribs)

Hello again!

Hello again. i just dropped by to ask you for help. Have you ever considered of improving clash Royale into a good article? Please help me improve it by adding more information, cause this can be made a good article, but it needs more proffesional editors. B. N .D | TALK 12:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

To get CR article to GA will take A LOT of work and given the current state of the article and game it is unlikely... 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 06:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Wishing you success...

...on your upcoming exams! Looking forward to possible future collaborations in the SimpleE WP. -- Deborahjay (talk) 05:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Hopefully I will be able to work on simplewiki and not get grounded... 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 06:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:ADOPTION

Wikipedia:ADOPTION request for socialist/ communist pages. As a new user I am interested in getting help from you. Umar shahid (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

@Umar shahid: Hello! Glad to see that you want to learn the ways of writing Wikipedia. I have reviewed some of your recent edits and have seen that you are fairly adapt with writing and have a relatively healthy edit count of >200 edits. Currently your main issues are only grammar and wiki text both of which can be easily learnt. I honestly do not feel that you require adoption but if you still wish to continue I am ok with that. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 06:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bishan tunnel flooding

Hello! Your submission of Bishan tunnel flooding at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)