PinakaCute

A Friendly Notice

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PinakaCute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, this is her sister speaking. To the blocking admin, please be guided that this user is only a 14 year-old girl and has autism; easily get offended when she felt rejected, betrayed and declined. please give her a trust and unblock her that she is only a fan of that band. Thank you for your consideration.

Decline reason:

CheckUser confirms this is a sockpuppet. I'm revoking talk page access; you can appeal this block to the Arbitration Committee. Katie^talk 15:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PinakaCute, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PinakaCute! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: PinakaCute (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:PinakaCute/sandbox/PinakaCute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, PinakaCute, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

National English differences

Hi, just as a note, you generally shouldn't change spellings to match your national version of English as you did at Catholic Church. I've since reverted it, but thought I would let you know. Welcome to Wikipedia! TonyBallioni (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Why delete page Liveloud Worship?

why the page I created Liveloud Worship deleted without further notice? and why I'm blocked? Do wikipedia hates religious articles? I believe the article Liveloud Worship has a neutral point of view, and according to the sources, it exists like as many Christian bands. (PinakaCute (talk) 10:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC))}}

In order, the page you created was deleted because multiple accounts (created by the same person) have also created it, and we delete pages like that. You are one of those accounts, and thus blocked. Wikipedia has no opinions on religious articles. Primefac (talk) 14:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Unblock Request PinakaCute

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PinakaCute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• My reason is I did not create any vandalism. * I created an Article Liveloud Worship and contributed to it * removed redundant and unnecessary contents and fixed typo. * I did categorizing the article by linking it to another article to avoid this from being "Orphan" which supported its claims. * The article Liveloud Worship is also under maintenance because I'm still looking for more references for the needed citations.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, which is that you are believed to be abusing multiple accounts, or editing in direct concert with other users in violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• • • I only created one account. Can you provide an evidence?

(PinakaCute (talk) 13:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

Request to undo deletion of Liveloud Worship

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PinakaCute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

• To let you know, Sometimes (if you see only IP User) it is because I'm currently experiencing interrupted connection with the device I'm using (I don't know if it is the internet or device exactly) That I'm using has a problem. because when I refresh/reload my browser, I logged out unintentionally. I believe there's a problem either in my connection or my device. * Please provide evidence, because I believe I only created only one account, and If it is previously created by anybody and recreated again, it means, other people has the same interests about the topic Liveloud or Liveloud Worship, and what I created has a neutral point of view. * According to the sources, "Liveloud Worship" conducted in various areas in Asia, middle east and US, then recently was in Alberta and BC. (According to blogs, news and websites which is not related to the subject). and for more evidence, their music can be found at Spotify, Itunes and Deezer, under Ablaze Music productions. *Although all its composers are ordinary people, According to its claim, anyone can compose a gospel music to be submitted to Liveloud, whether if you are a member of Couples for Christ or its affiliated ministries or not. *Furthermore, (Whether if it does not meet the criteria). the deletion of the article Liveloud Worship doesn't encounter any notifications like "Speedy Deletion" to discuss or contest its deletion. (PinakaCute (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

Decline reason:

Checkuser is far more sophisticated than just comparing IPs. To have a hope of an unblock you need to explain why you used multiple accounts (or worked with others). Just Chilling (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, User:PinakaCute/sandbox/PinakaCute

Hello, PinakaCute. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/PinakaCute".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)