Getting started
|
|
Finding your way around
|
|
Editing articles
|
|
|
Getting help
|
|
How you can help
|
|
|
|
Both statements in the edit summary given in this edit of yours to the Heliocentrism article are blatant falsehoods. In the first place, before reverting the original addition of the passage in question, I had already fully explained the reason for doing so on the article's talk page, and even gave a link to the explanation in the edit summary of my reversion. In the second place, for the reason given in my explanation, the material in the passage I removed was not properly sourced at all, let alone "fully sourced" as you stated in your edit summary. So in future, would you please refer to the talk page in lieu of an edit war. Thank you
David Wilson (talk · cont) 09:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply