User talk:Plastikspork/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Plastikspork, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! --GreenJoe 20:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Survivor: Gabon

Hi Plastikspork, it's great that you've added information to the ratings box for Survivor: Gabon. However, it is preferred that we know where this information is coming from (i.e. that it's verifiable). If you could link to the website or refer to wherever it came from, that would be more than helpful! If you need a hand, be sure to find me on my talk page, or leave a note here =D -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 00:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that's most useful! -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 01:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

The Real World

In answer to your question, I believe they referred to it as a Winnebago in the series, but the Winnebago article indicates that a Winnebago is an RV. Nightscream (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Right, Winnebago is a brand name for a particular kind of RV. Much like the words "kleenex" (a brand of tissue) and "band-aid" (a brand of adhesive bandage), it has become a sort of generic term for an RV, even though it's still a brand name. If the RV they are using is actually a Winnebago, then that's what it is. If not, we should probably call it an RV. I would have to re-watch the series to see what they actually call it and/or what it actually is. Thanks for responding. Plastikspork (talk) 05:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

You're very welcome. And yeah, maybe a discussion on that issue is warranted, so feel free to chime in here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Rock of Love Charm School

I'm just wondering if your really sure Kristy Joe's name is actually spelled "Kristy Jo", without the "e" at the end? It has her name without the "e" on the end of Jo on the Rock of Love 2 Website, and on IMBd site. Holidayroad92 (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Survivor: Panama

The references for this quote are from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNCmM6pN-o8&feature=PlayList&p=EE6CD39E42DBADC1&index=12

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni3dJN-ZhKw&feature=PlayList&p=EE6CD39E42DBADC1&index=13

Thanks, I found a reference to his obituary (now cited on page). Plastikspork (talk) 14:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Challenge Pages

Duelly noted and fixed..Its crazy how many people watch reality tv. seems like every page i'm attached to has your name as well. ah what would anyone do without the antics and shenanigans of people on tv?! Cheers--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

I guess people dont believe the same thing we do. I'm gonna leave it until a later date when i can get into a civilized edit war..lol not really..i guess this minute issue is gonna have to go to a talk page..as ridiculous as it sounds..--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 00:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Real World/Road Rules Challenge

I noticed you've been monitoring the Real World Road Rules Challenge page. The IP editor you reverted on The Real World/Road Rules Challenge article in part for his incivility went back and reverted your edit. I reverted it back. I also reminded the IP editor to go to the talk page and added my own statements on his user page regarding that there was a post near the questionable information. Anyways, just letting you know that you may want to continue monitoring that particular IP user in regards to that edit. 65.31.103.28 (talk) 22:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I will keep an eye out when I have time. Plastikspork (talk) 05:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jessica Kiper

A tag has been placed on Jessica Kiper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. andy (talk) 16:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

About the Deletion of the ANTM Cycle Statistics Sections...

Instead of simply deleting them outright, perhaps you could check the sources and remove the information that doesn't have a source. For example, the "call-out average" category (among many other categories) is accurate; that information comes straight from the call-out tables, which, of course, are taken from the episodes themselves. As for the other information, such as heights and weights, perhaps a source should be found for each before considering deletion. I understand that the heights and weights of the contestants from the first six cycles were available on the UPN website, which has since been shut down. However, it shouldn't be difficult to get information about the contestants of the subsequent five.

I, for one, like the "Cycle Statistics" sections. They're easier to analyze than the call-out tables, and I enjoy the availability of the comparisons. It's a shame to see them deleted just because of a lack of sources.

• I understand your reasons now. Thanks for taking the time to explain them to me. Jhg812 (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Why add it if it's disputed?

...because, as I already said if you bothered to read, it's written in the main survivor article and I think it's a relevant point. I have found some sources for it but they are against wikipedia policy. ie, from blog sites. If it isn't allowed, then I will remove it from the main article then. Sockies (talk) 22:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Love your editing style Plastikspork. You're such a civil editor. Thank you for going out of your way to inform me on my userpage that you had struck up a discussion on the article talkpage. =) I'm going to have a look now. Cheers dude (talk) 23:16, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

No, no, no…

Please tell me "If you already have your own webpage, it doesn't seem necessary to have one on Wikipedia." was in error and/or haste. This is a total misunderstanding of the purpose of Wikipedia. Virtually all of our subjects have their own websites, because they're notable in their fields and notable institutions, in any field, tend to have their own web presence. In assessing any article, the core thing you need to look at is whether it is verifiable from reliable sources; in a case like this, that would be hairdressing trade publications and possibly fashion magazines. (Of all the alphabet soup of allcaps acronyms that get flung around Wikipedia, that's one of the few that's an outright policy; even the much-cited notability guideline is just, as the name suggests, a vague guideline.) This article appears to have multiple, independent, non-trivial sources; in this case, it's down to those wanting it deleted to make a case for deletion, not the other way round. – iridescent 20:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

It sounds like my comment was taken out of context. My point was that simply having a website doesn't entitle a shop to have an article on wikipedia. However, sources are important, and a source other than the shop's own webpage would be helpful. In this case, there does appear to be some external references. However, this is not clear given the structure of the article in question. Since you care so deeply about it, perhaps you could fix it? Thanks for your input. Plastikspork (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, what needs fixing? It's all clearly referenced using inline citations (I've checked them all out and they all work). I can't see what the problem is here; if the author were planning on taking this to FA or GA it would need a separate reference section, but that's only 0.748% of our articles; for the remaining 99.252% it's not an issue. – iridescent 00:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Add a references section and external links section and fix "external link 3", which is not a reference since it's just another wikipedia page. Thanks for all your edits on that page and it's discussion page. Plastikspork (talk) 00:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

You can safely assume I'm familiar with our guidelines and policies and that you don't need to make (inaccurate) explanations to me. There is no need for a reference section unless you plan to take an article to GA/FA. There is no need for an external link section unless you plan to take an article to GA/FA. There is nothing to suggest that the link you mention is meant to be an external citation as opposed to an attempt to insert a wikilink by a new account who isn't familiar with the vagaries of MediaWiki syntax. The MOS is a vague guideline and not any kind of policy for any level of article on our arbitrary assessment scale (hence the big "this is only a guideline and should not be taken as policy" warning at the top of every MOS subpage). And if you'd spent half the time you've spent biting this newcomer and attempting to defend it afterwards, actually fixing all these issues, then I wouldn't be wasting my time and yours with this discussion. – iridescent 00:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

ikki twins

I replied on my talk page, as I like to keep things in one location. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 04:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia has its own style book for article titles. And MTV has The Ikki Twins and their own website has The Ikki Twins. MerriFunn (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

ds ikki

i apologize about that edit i had no idea that the reasoning behind it was what you had stated..and in fact it is very confusing how they are being eliminated so if the previous edit is how they continue do feel free to revertg it..i just saw what seemed to be color confusion so i changed it to be more smooth and clear..--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 01:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Day Of Winter!

Happy First Day of Winter!

A stand of Pine trees beautifully coated in winter snow.

Wishing you a Merry Christmas, Hanukkah, or Kwanzaa!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Winter 2008! Mifter (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Summer not Winter then I wish you a happy First Day of Summer 2008!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Winter}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks

Ahh great! Just when I thought I had no regrets about leaving, you had to show up. =( I'll miss editing articles with you, Plastik. I love your editing style. I wish all editors were like you. You're respectful, fair, sensible, and reasonable. I can't put up with the behavior some of these other users engage in on this site though. I really can't and I refuse to edit here again. I'd love it if we could keep in touch through e-mail or something but I don't know if you'd be up for that. 65.31.103.28 (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Edits

Dear Plastikspork...I really appreciate the edits on the Cynthia Flood page. Thanks. I'm a neophyte so if I make a mistake, please forgive. Thanks, Rdream —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.171.22 (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Toolacademy cast.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Toolacademy cast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanx from Maxipedia

I'm a beginner, sorry if this is not the right way, but I wanted to thank you for the work you did on the "Massimo Gabutti" biography.I could have never made it! Just one question: in the page title's "Gabutti" is not written with capital first letter (gabutti) which is a mistake, since that is the surname. how can that be changed? Thank you in advance and keep up the good work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxipedia (talk • contribs) 00:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Hi Plastikspork, thank you again for the redirection of the page, which has solved the problem , and for the useful suggestions. I'll will surely use it to write other articles about music ,productions and culture from Italy, in english, in order to expand the the wilkipedia world. thanks again!Maxipedia (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Taya Parker

I have cited the additional information. What I think is ironic is that just because it says it somewhere else on the internet doesn't necessaily make it factual information.

I'm the one who provided the original information for those sites such as Exotic Dancer, Playboy, Penthouse, etc. in the first place, but if it's that important... I'm trying to go by the rules. LOL

If you think that my "claim" to work with Taya directly on this.. Feel free to email for a response at www.TayaParker.com or www.myspace.com/tayaparker

thanks

Poker Babes

Before this turns into an edit war, I'm asking you, 2005, and the others involved to start discussing the Poker Babes bio's at wp:poker. This is getting ridiculous.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 01:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Lightmouse date scripts

• I see you operate date script written by Lightmouse: A discussion at Lightmouse's house may be of interest to you. Ohconfucius (talk) 10:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Really?

That sucks. I had no idea of the whole sockpuppeting case. Seemed to be a decent editor though. Ah well on to the next I suppose.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

AFD

I had no idea that Ray J even had a show. And yeah I look at the history and it's clear that the page we toiled over was simply copied and posted into a new page. I guess I'm leaving a comment back at the AFD about this because (ahem) One bad apple shouldn't spoil the bunch. Specially if the bunch is a show that has been confirmed for months.

Attempted outing of a Wikipedia contributor

Your comments in a current [AFD in which you claim to identify an IP contributor by name appear to violate the Wikipedia policy WP:OUTING. Please delete immediately any reference to the supposed name of contributors. You can note the possible COI without claiming to provide the real life name of other contributors who have not themselves provided that information on Wikipedia. Edison (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric de Sturler

Thanks for making the requested edit. Edison (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Lady Tribe

Huh?? Plastik, The woman is 50 percent japanese.(LonerXL (talk) 08:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC))

It's not a war at all. Please don't worry, because it's not that serious with me, Plastik. It's just she is half japanese. No Chinese mixture at all. She was only born in Hong-Kong, but came to America soon afterwards.(LonerXL (talk) 03:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC))

RELAX. lol This is by no means a war. Me and you are only having a dicussion like like "true, elite wikipedians." LOL Calm down, Mr. Plastic. This is a very good discussion and debate! I love that question you asked, because I always wonder things like about that too all of the time! Usually I just go by what race they are.(LonerXL (talk) 03:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC))

I understand your point of view. This is one of those rare situations where nobody is wrong! Hmmn... lets see. I believe Asian is a nationality, and Japanese is a race. She can't get american citizenship, because she has a felony record and would get deported back to Hong Kong. A half Japanese woman with a Hong Kong citizenship? Sounds like good movie. LOL. Hey I was thinking that we put both "Japanese" and "Chinese Graffiti Artist". And then we can seal the page so nobody can delete that. Sounds like a plan?(LonerXL (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC))

Prod of Giles Williams

Yes, you're quite right. That stub fails WP:N with RS highly unlikely to be found. Guilty creator says speedy at leisure. Cheers. MURGH ^disc. 01:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Done and deleted. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Twin Concepts

If you nominated twin concepts for deletion, then answer my question first: What is dualism, the redirect? Where is the definition? To remind you: am encyclopaedia is

The encyclopedia as we recognize it today was developed from the dictionary in the 18th century. A dictionary primarily focuses on words and their definitions, and typically provides limited information, analysis, or background for the word defined. While it may offer a definition, it may leave the reader still lacking in understanding the meaning, significance or limitations of a term, and how the term relates to a broader field of knowledge. Vakeger (talk) 06:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

I have reentered the headword for your attention

Vakeger (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I've speedy-deleted the article under CSD G4, as the content was pretty much the same as when it was deleted. I'll keep an eye on it. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

VH1

I see you have an interest in VH1 programming...hmmm. Sorry if I offended you. Your block of me was pointless. 1) I will have a new IP address in two hours 2) Ever heard of hacking? 3) Ever heard of proxy servers? 4) Ever heard of public libraries? Remember we can all see where your edits are focused. Brett Michaels? Are you serious? OKAY...you dont like my "opinion". I will give you that, it IS my opinion. BUT, why is VH1 so concerned about an old worn out rocker that still wears mascara? Do you honestly think if He walked down the street like that (and He wasnt already famous) that all those skanks would pay him ANY attention....No,VH1 pays those tramps to hang out with him. Why? Because He is so desperate to attain more money that He will do anything VH1 tells Him. Thus He wears masacra and makes a fool of himself on national TV. This is NOT REALITY even though they advertise it as "reality TV". The guy is a "has been". His window of opportunity is diminishing. Go ahead and defend him. I don't give a crap. You are dedicated I will give you that. How much does VH1 pay you to patrol (and censor) these wikipedia pages? Everyone should ask themselves, why does VH1 pay Brett Michaels to do what He does/act like He does? I wont say on this post, but Plastickspork knows why. Plasticspork is out here making sure that little pissants like me dont interfere with what VH1 wants little emo boys to do. I'm out and dont write back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.73.149 (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Refactoring Comments

Sorry. I'm not sure what refactoring is, but I'll look it up. Any abuse was unintentional.Camera123456 (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

OK, I found this page (Wikipedia:Refactoring_talk_pages) that says that refactoring seems to be about tidying up, removing unnecessary content, etc. I'm not aware that I did that, and if I did, it's unintentional. Could you let me know what it is that I did wrong so I can avoid doing it in the future? I'm not trying to be dense.Camera123456 (talk) 00:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I get it. It was a formatting issue. I was not meaning to imply that it was another editor's comments, I was just trying to attach the SPA account tag to another editor's comment, that I'd seen other editors do in the past (but without implying that the other edit made it). I must not have been careful in how I did it, and I will look much more carefully in the future.Camera123456 (talk) 04:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Intentions of Lament

Hi. Anyone, even the author, is allowed to remove a PROD for any reason, and once removed it shouldn't be replaced - because PROD is intended only for uncontroversial deletions. I've taken this to AfD here. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

True, but when removing a prod, the editor should state a reason in the edit summary, as per Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Contesting a proposed deletion. In this case, none of the steps were followed, with blank edit summaries. Thank you for creating the AfD. Plastikspork (talk) 14:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Rock of Love Bus with Bret Michaels

Hi. Just wanted to let you know that you now have some help in watching this page, as it seems like you are the only one watching it.  ;) ArcAngel (talk) 14:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool script

"Script-assisted whitespace removal, table & color simplification, and link repair." Wow. Can you tell me what script you used? It sounds pretty cool. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 00:57, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

It's something that I have been developing (User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js) after stumbling upon the Lightmous script (User:Lightmouse/monobook.js/script.js). I don't recommend anyone else using it right now without extreme care as it's constantly in flux. Basically, I wrote it to automate the repetitive tasks listed (whitespace removal, table formatting, link repair). I am considering releasing a less aggressive version for public consumption. If there is a tedious editing task that you are interested in automating, let me know and I might be able to help you write a script. There is currently an injunction against some of these scripts (mostly if they are operated in unassisted mode), in particular for date-unlinking. My script doesn't do that, but the Lightmouse script does. Plastikspork (talk) 01:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I just checked and it looks like you know all about these scripts, and have quite a list. Let me know if there is anything you are missing. Plastikspork (talk) 01:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

edit conflictedYes, I do know of Lightmouse's script (having submitted evidence in that case :) ) Do you think you could tell me when you are ready to release your script out to the public? It sounds really nice. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 01:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Sure. I need to figure out what parts of my script are completely uncontroversial and safe, and which are just part of my own personal taste. I'll let you know when I have something I'm happy to have people test. My script is similar to Lightmouse in that it always shows you the diff and it's up to you to commit the changes. Plastikspork (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Malaka Dewapriya

Malaka DewapriyaThis article may require copy-editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. could you please assist by editing , if you have time —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetskere (talk • contribs) 10:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Jerri Manthey

I undid revision. Totally allowable to note whom someone on Survivor voted for, and noting Jerri voted for Tina after noting Jerri's interrogation of both Colby and Tina was within scope of and factually accurate to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whippletheduck (talk • contribs) 07:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Sounds fine. My revert was most like a knee-jerk reaction to seeing an unsourced addition, but in this case it's perfectly fine (of course) since the main page has the details. Thanks for letting me know. Plastikspork (talk) 00:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Tags added to "Professor Sydney Selwyn" article

Hi Plastikspork. Thanks for your help and advice (much appreciated, and very instructional) over the article I started about "professor sydney selwyn". I've added fairly extensive notes to the discussion page for the article (Talk:Professor_Sydney_Selwyn) in response to each of the three tags you added and look forward to your further comments. Barryz1 (talk) 22:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes I saw your comments. I will have a look when I have a chance. I put in a request to move the page to "Sydney Selwyn", as the convention for WP:BLP is not to include the Prof in the title. Again, I will have a look at your comments when I have a chance. Plastikspork (talk) 22:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I look forward to your comments when you're ready. Meanwhile User:Anthony_Appleyard has kindly sorted out the move from "Professor Sydney Selwyn" to "Sydney Selwyn" (with appropriate redirects). It's much better now and I can see I should have done it that way in the first place - I'll know better next time!

Yes, normally we can move pages ourselves (move tab at the top of the page), but this particular one required admin intervention, so I posted a request on the admin board and they took care of it. Plastikspork (talk) 00:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I have a slight worry that since the move some of the references and links might not work correctly when reading the article via a redirected page (for example if you spelt the name wrong and arrived via the "Sidney Selwyn" redirect) however I might be mistaken about that so need to do some test before being sure.

Thanks again. Barryz1 (talk) 23:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

The page move created a redirect, so if someone links to Professor Sydney Selwyn it will act exactly the same as if it were linked to Sidney Selwyn or Sydney Selwyn. The only difference is the "redirected from" text at the top of the page. If you want to see what links to a page, there is a "what links here" option in the toolbox on the lefthand side of the page. I typically use this after page moves to eliminate double redirects. If there are other "plausible" mis-spellings, you can create redirects for those as well. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help, or if you have any questions about anything. I try to help when I have spare time. Plastikspork (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh ok. It sounds slightly complicated but I think I understand. When you have the time please let me know about the COI and 'refimprove' tags as it would be nice to remove them once you're comfortable. If you have any further questions about any of it please just ask and I'll do my best to try and help. Barryz1 (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, just to let you know I've received a couple of emails back from relevant people who didn't want to update the article directly themselves but have suggested some useful corrections (largely typing mistakes but not only). I'll collate and implement these when I next have some time. Also I plan to go through the article carefully and add further references and citations as you have suggested.

You mentioned in your comment for your recent edit that you were still concerned about possible POV. Can you give me a few clues and pointers please so I can look into it and either clarify or tidy up those sections as required (however it may just need referencing to sources?).

(By the way, though of no relevance to the Prof Selwyn article we've been discussing you may be interested in the following rather long but nonetheless interesting article artical in the Independent).

Thanks again. Barryz1 (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

DOB citations (Conan, Jay, etc.)

I don't think most articles on really famous people have sources for their DOBs and such. It's almost impossible to find a reliable source on the internet. And the introductory paragraph is almost never sourced. Belasted (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I have seen these citations for articles which make it to WP:GA or even WP:FA status. Not citing this information is not inline with WP:BLP. The problem is that many cites use WP as a source, and "generally accepted" information can be fabricated. A good source for this information is often the agency which represents the person. Don't give up. I'm sure we can find a WP:RS. Thanks for helping! Plastikspork (talk) 05:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Were you aware?

Of this task force? You've done so much work around the Survivor pages that you may consider being a part of it. Granted, it is almost as inactive as a blocked troll, but once upon a time ago I tried to get it up and going to standardise our articles. Nothing much happened, but it's there anyway if you want to help out. In any case, thanks for the work you've been putting in over the past few months. Keep it up!...(or else :p) -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 11:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

andrew c miller

i took the suny affiliation off the emedicine chapter which says suny. im not sure how to source that unless i re-cite it. look at the emedicine chapters and let me know. please re-place this as you see fit. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki4ppeace (talk • contribs) 11:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I added his affiliation to the first line of the article, and cleaned things up a bit. I don't really have any direct interest in this article. I often find pages while searching for articles needing to be wikified, and clean them up when I have time. Plastikspork (talk) 14:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Malaka Dewapriya

All related internal and external link on the article unsigned comment added by Jetskere (talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC).

Could you Plese do your Contribution to this aricle. Malaka Dewapriya best (Jets (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC))

MD Anderson

can someone break down the notable departments and faculty at md anderson. it looks like a previous edit tried to do it for dermatology and was deleted. people should have an easy way of finding out who is the best achieved physician in each area. otherwise its just "they told me he was good" if we can track achievments we can get more out of this. i.e who publishes the most on rare tumros, who treats tumor x and has published novel treatments and results..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimd1 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Eric Nies's

Plastikspork,

With regard to my recent addition to Eric Nies' actions on the show Confessions of a Teen Idol, although the practice of using urine for holistic purposes in itself is a disturbing concept for most of us to comprehend, my statement was neither negative or controversial biographical material, it is actually true documented public fact.

Here is the video footage from Episode 4 (act 1) of "Confessions of a Teen Idol" found on VH1's website in which not only does Eric demonstrate his unusual practice in front of the camera and a fellow roommate, but in act 4 of the same episode, goes on to defend his holistic beliefs.[1]

The video and link above "[1]" will prove my statement which was nothing more than factual, and in no way damaging according to Mr Nies himself. Please scroll to 00:23 - 01:19 in the video clip.

Based on his own statements in this video...in no way does Eric think there is anything wrong with his own actions so I wouldn't consider my addition to be harming him or his reputation at all.

I hope this addition is not withheld from Wikipedia as the world relies heavily on this site for factual information.

Thank you for wanting to verify the validity of this information... —Preceding unsigned comment added by B d c a z (talk • contribs) 23:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Not every single bit of WP:TRIVIA goes into a WP:BLP. Thank you for your help editing. Plastikspork (talk) 23:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

The Fact that Wiki is trying hide factual information that is not in any way trivial, but FACTUAL...is quite disturbing.

This information was shared by Eric himself.

The fact that Wiki keeps on sending me different messages each time with invalid reasons to omit factual information from their site is ridiculous.

Some one also tried to remove my account...for what reason?

THIS IS NOT DAMAGING INFORMATION....IT REPRESENTS ERIC'S BELIEFS!!!!

Why shoot the messenger? —Preceding unsigned comment added by B d c a z (talk • contribs) 23:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Since I am assuming you are new to editing Wikipedia (account just created about 30 minutes ago), I can try to help. What you should do is start a new section on Talk:Eric Nies, and present your view that this information should be included. Creating an account is good, since it shows you are committed. In my opinion, the problem is that his article is very short, and we would be careful to not put undue weight. You might want to spend some time reading WP:BLP and WP:RS. Don't give up. I'm confident you will get the hang of things, but you might want to start a tad bit slower, and spend some time reading the WP guidelines. Recently created WP:SPA accounts are a red flag and often cause knee-jerk reactions, like trying to delete your account. Also, not adding WP:RS with your information is problematic, especially for a WP:BLP. Let me know if I can answer any more questions, or be of any help. Plastikspork (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and one more thing, be sure to sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Allison Harvard (ANTM12)

The article Allison Harvard, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Harvard. Thank you. -Misty Willows (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Voting is fun! Plastikspork (talk) 04:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Romanoro

Ciao! For a layout you could use for Romanoro, you can give a look to Castelnovo ne' Monti. I've also just added an article about Mount Cusna which you could mention. Good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I happened upon the Romanoro article while search for pages with broken links and/or external wikipedia links which could be reformatted as internal links (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanoro instead of [[Romanoro]]). I had a look at the other two pages you mentioned, and both looked fine, or at least my script didn't do much to them. If you want me to help with something in particular (e.g. copyediting, wikicleaning, ...), let me know and I will help if/when I have time. I usually don't have any expert knowledge on the subjects of the articles which I am editing, just performing basic copyedits. Thanks for all your hard work! Plastikspork (talk) 19:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

I've just edited the article. Notice I purged away much stuff which, frankly, was ununderstandable or Wikipedia:POV ("excellent for fishing", "it is impressive" etc). I think the article now is good enough for such a place; anyway I welcome any useful encyclopedical addition. Ciao and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, much better. I made a few minor changes myself. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 19:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

from conti gionata :could explain me your edit on my romanoro article? also could you explain me how to load the images which i've taken from lupidellavalle website becouse it keeps saying that it doesn't have license? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gionataconti (talk • contribs) 10:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

ciao i am conti gionata i wanted to know if i could add a small phrase do dam bit saying that it deviates water 15 miles downward to the farneta powerploant and the power plant is not actually in the dam please write me back in my talk page thank you very much--Gionataconti (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Survivor Task Force

Sorry, I'm a little late, but welcome! I had trouble with my temporary password (ugh!). However, enjoy yourself. From Tagi to Bottom, MySurvivorPartay (Wobbuffet!. Dats right) 17:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Malaka Dewapriya

An article that you have been involved in editing, Malaka Dewapriya, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaka Dewapriya (2nd nomination). Thank you. NYScholar (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Wow. Why perform 98 edits over 13 hours just to nominate the article for deletion? You are certainly dedicated. I hope you put this much time into the articles we keep. I personally don't care if the article gets deleted. I was helping clean it up a bit as per the request of another editor. Thanks for the notification! Plastikspork (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Could you please move on to another article? It pains me to see someone with such incredible talent and dedication spend it editing an article which will very likely be deleted! Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Seriously, looking at your edit history, I think you have to be one of the most dedicated and careful editors I have ever seen! Plastikspork (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I do understand your comments. I had hoped to find some justification for keeping that article prior to my examining every single URL listed by the other eds.; but in the course of trying to straighten out the format, I discovered that that person is most likely not notable enough a subject. I hoped that showing what the sources actually do document will provide a stronger basis for others deciding whether or not to keep it. --NYScholar (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Because of incompetance

re: this (edit summary) query

... or imho, more likely the lack of maturity and professionalism... coupled with blindly following bad guidelines... a year back when the merger took place.

• The links were to allow appropriate data mining the great majority of information that was not merged when the articles were raped. That was normally placed in {{also starring}} as you can see by many completed episode summaries in about four seasons of work. Talk discussions on my talk and some others should fill in the backdrop.
  • The template needs a mere case change (as was the plan... see discussions 2-3 weeks back, my talk) in a single letter (or similar logic override) to make the links all vanish into the bit bucket... so the method is documenting the old article this way as well.
  • In the meantime, the links enabled finding the right article page via history, E, or C options combined with the names, and so fix ups of the redirects to point to the new page sections covering the page.
  • I'm afraid I'll never buy into the idea that one overly long page is superior to a short page sufficiently covering a topic.
• Someone put an awful lot of time into the series, and was totally disrespected.
• But so was I when I made my displeasure plain... so I'm not working to clean it up anymore. My time is too valuable.

Since you asked. // FrankB 17:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I found the pages while searching for unnecessary "external wikipedia links" that include the full wikipedia URL. If the template would have taken the "revision id", instead of the full URL, I would have never noticed it. In fact, that appears to be the only use for the E option which would make things shorter, but as you said you aren't working on it anymore. Thanks again for the response. Plastikspork (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Whatever, some others were giving it time, and they've morphed since I went on strike. Suggest you could easily change the local parameter (Case of any one letter) and make things go away... {{Chrmd}}...

Actually did better. this change makes links IFF "L" (for Links) defined.

• Amused I am by your template... What happened to just pinging a user?

Have a good life. // FrankB 17:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you have any objection to modifying the template so that one can shorten {{Chrmd|The Honeymoon's Over|x|4=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Honeymoon%27s_Over&oldid=183180040}} to {{Chrmd|The Honeymoon's Over|oldid|4=183180040}} or say {{Chrmd|The Honeymoon's Over|o|4=183180040}}? I can do it, if you don't have time and don't object. Thanks!

The talkback template seems to be fairly standard these days. It makes my head hurt to follow threads split between pages. I'm not aware of other options, but this seems to work. Plastikspork (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

re: the above.

• • WHERE'S it written cutting and pasting the thread on BOTH talk pages is prohibited? (My preference, others snooping have immediate context, the whole message, and the time to ping an addy or the text is moot and mostly washes.
  • I generally do an edit summary linking to the talk recipients page, after prepping the answer on mine, then before closing, cut that, traverse to their page, paste it down, and save. Then back space then save there on my page... with occasional curlicues like italicising his or her paragraphs and adjusting indentations to match, works fast.
  • And is to me, the most courteous way to go.

---

2

Any modification that doesn't change the status quo ante to the template, and the way things currently output so things don't break articles will be fine.

• (Apparently, based on my last two hours, the advertisement of my departure may have been overstated... I'm still pretty pissed though! <g>)

Looks like you can just add the partial and expand it as a new parameter, so sure... but it's far easier to cut and paste from the address bar... :::I admit to being lazy, and have too many mouse operations already slowing me down... but whatever floats yer boat.

regards // FrankB 20:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to David Letterman

First, you title the section "Allegations of sexism", but no such allegations are made at all in the Newsvine article you cited, only that he made a joke about Katie Couric being on Rachel Ray. Second, Letterman isn't even mentioned in the Susan Estrich Fox News op-ed piece. You wrote "This offended some viewers, who pointed out that Couric was the first female anchor of a major network news broadcast". Neither the "viewers" who were "offended" by the Rachel Ray joke nor their collective "pointing out" is mentioned in that piece. So I really don't understand why you included this. Third, in the Greta Van Sustren transcript, although it is titled "Is it sexist?", oddly they do not actually accuse him of being sexist. They accuse him of being "creepy", "condescending", "ignorant", and "stupid". The only things that those cites you provided show is that Letterman made jokes about Katie Couric and Sarah Palin and that Van Sustren and Mary Matalin were offended by one of them. Lastly, I am not sure if Newsbusters is considered WP:RS but even if it is, I don't think that is enough to devote a section titled "Allegations of sexism" based on an op-ed piece. It implies that such allegations were widespread. MrBlondNYC (talk) 03:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not the one who wrote it. Check the edit history. I only reverted removal of sourced material without explanation in the edit summary. In the future please Wikipedia:Assume good faith, be sure to be WP:CIVIL, and don't assume the last edit is the author. With that said, you are almost certainly correct that the section is of debatable value in a WP:BLP. If you want to issue a complaint, you can start one in an appropriate section on the Talk page. If you would like to complain to the original authors, you can try to find them in the edit history: [2], [3], ... If you check my edit history on the page, you will find that almost all of my edits are reverting vandals. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I violated neither Wikipedia:Assume good faith nor WP:CIVIL but thanks for the tip. I apologize for assuming you wrote it. What I don't understand is why did you restore it? It was poorly sourced and poorly written. Just because the editor didn't give an explanation doesn't necessarily mean that it is a bad edit and should be immediately restored. By the way, no complaint needed. No reliable sources supporting the writing means it's gone. MrBlondNYC (talk) 07:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Mysterious template

In this edit, you replaced "=" with a template. What is the purpose of that template, both generally and as it applies to that particular article? Michael Hardy (talk) 23:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

The idea is to replace sequential non-breaking spaces, A&nbsp;B&nbsp;C with the {{nowrap|A B C}} template. However, many of these templates break if there is {{{1}}} inside. The fix is to use the = template. You can read more about it in the nowrap template documentation. One can debate if x&nbsp;=&nbsp;y is shorter (or easier to read) than say {{nowrap|x {{=}} y}}. I personally find the nowrap version easier to read. Of course, none if this is necessary in math mode. There is also the nbsp template which is useful when you need sequential non-breaking spaces. I hope this answers your question. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

S. Scott Conner/Your edit

We spent a lot of time "ref" Mr. Conner's page, with his permission and help on fact checking. Yet this morning you again re-edited and deleted our work! Why? CC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connerfan (talk • contribs) 17:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, we mirrored Mr. Conner's page after Jay Leno, Conan O'Brien, and the like, and We DO NOT see where either of those Host, have to "Ref" where they were born... or their fathers name... or... Please explain.

CC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connerfan (talk • contribs) 18:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your work. However, citations are needed to support statements. I looked through each of the references, and if the citation did not support the statement, I removed the citation, and replaced it with the "citation needed tag". You have probably already read WP:RS and WP:BLP. Simply citing an organizations webpage, or a persons Zoominfo page, or the main webpage of a ratings service, are not examples of citations which support statements. Let me know if you have any questions or further comments. Again, thank you for your work in trying to improve this page. I feel the subject is notable, or I wouldn't be so interested in making sure it's factual. As for Leno and O'Brien, thank you for letting me know, I will be sure to look through those as well to make sure they are properly cited as per WP:BLP. Plastikspork (talk) 18:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I've spoken with Mr. Conner, and he has confirmed the facts of his Wiki. What I (we) do not understand is as I stated before, why it seems you are flagging every thing and not other in his field. i.e., You want proof of his date of birth?? His fathers name??? the fact that he is a radio/tv host? And as far as ratings goes, anyone that signs up for nelson or arbitron can see said rating, we can not provide our password to said sites.

It seems like you are going a bit overboard here. We are willing to work with you on this, but lets stick to a few flags, vs. every other word. Please.

If not, who can we appeal to? —Cathy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connerfan (talk • contribs) 07:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

In a good WP:BLP, every single statement should be cited. The guidelines for WP:RS in a WP:BLP are much more strict than for other articles. If a person is notable, it is usually fairly easy to find secondary RS as these people have articles in newspapers, biographies in the NYT, etc... To answer your more specific queries (1) Yes, proof via a RS is needed for his DOB, see Jay Leno for example. (2) His fathers name is either not relevant or can be cited using a secondary source. (3) The fact that he is a radio and TV host is not being disputed, although citation would be good for that as well. (3) With regard to the ratings, read the posted copyright warning for Nielsen Media. So, unless you can find a secondary source for this information, it cannot be included. (4) If you want to appeal, you can follow the instructions on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, there are multiple levels including WP: RFC. I personally don't really have any interest in Conner, I am just striving to make WP a reliable source for finding useful information. Please read WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:POV, and WP:DR, if you have not already. They have lots of useful information. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

red links

Hi. Please don't eliminate redlinks by redirecting them to inappropriate (in the long-term) places, as you did here. Per Wikipedia:Red link#Dealing with existing red links, "red links should not be removed from articles if they link to something that could plausibly sustain an article." Hesperian 22:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I can see your point, and totally agree. I semi-reverted your revert since you reverted more than the redlinks, and followed the linking naming convention on the List of pages that I had linked to hopefully avoid the creation of multiple pages of similar names. Thanks for the message! Plastikspork (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: I Love Money 2

I am not sure what the *best* way to solve the problem that it's copyright, although I think it would be a better idea if actual episode summaries, which appears on many reality television pages, were posted. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 01:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

what exactly is copyright--the entire article, or the episode summaries? In any case the summaries are unclear, so they should simply be rewritten. I left a note on the tallk p. DGG (talk) 21:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

redirects

We usually leave redirects from alternate capitalizations, . We especially do when the mis-capitalization is the form the article was entered in, or the author will be unable to find his own work. Another admin. removed the speedy. DGG (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I wasn't aware that there was an official policy to keep lowercase versions of proper names, e.g., Kamal givens vs. Kamal Givens. If there is a WP article where I could read about the official redirect policy, that would be helpful to make sure I don't mistag articles in the future. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I believe I found some more information on Wikipedia:Redirect, but now I am confused. If I am reading this correctly, there is no need for Kamal givens? The example involving "Francis Ford Coppola" vs. "Francis ford coppola", contradicts keeping Kamal givens, which I tagged for deletion? Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

It is not necessary to make such a redirect. It is also unnecessary to remove such a redirect. The amount of individual and computer work involved in removing redirects is greater than that involved in just leaving it alone. DGG (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Concerning Clarification of redirect policy

A good day to you; as I always say: redirects are cheap. You are right insofar as it is not necessary to have this redirect, but it also does no harm (and I noticed when I type in a query, I do not always think about using capitalisation). Cheers and happy editing. Also what DGG said above. Lectonar (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Recreation of deleted material

Thanks for the note. I'll ask another admin to look at it, as I have the obvious COI. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 23:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Bloodsplattered Joe

Bloodsplattered Joe was a B-movie I stared in in the 90's it had 2 sequels and was by far my most successful film to date I was wondering If I started a Page on the 3 films if it would get shoud down due to the fact that it is really unknown Thanks for all the help -Buffyfan882(talk)

If you have citations to WP:RS then it should have a chance. Otherwise, it would most likely be tagged for deletion. Plastikspork (talk) 03:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Would The IMBd be enough? - Thanks Buffyfan882 Never Mind I just saw what you said on another post well what about Cinemorgue?

I don't know. Do you have a link to their policy for verifying information? Plastikspork (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Tamara Witmer

I don't know how much you pay attention to other Playboy Playmate articles but a great resource for them is the listing at uChicago. I have corresponded via email with the maintainer of that page. They do try to make sure that their info is correct. In most every case, they get their info direct from the magazine. Dismas|^(talk) 01:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I will be sure to add this reference to any relevant articles. It's often hard to find WP:RS for things like DOB, POB, height, weight, etc. Thanks again! Plastikspork (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD

Snazzy gadget. I just let people do it the hard way. Good exercise...

Couldn't remember who Harvard was then. I stick an oar (or a spanner) into quite a few AfDs, with a wide range of subjects. I'm a specialist in non-specialism (see my contribs for examples). Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Prout if you want a good one... Peridon (talk) 23:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hear ye

I'm sorry for the problem about your article, I Love Money (Season 1). Could you revert it back as I Love Money (season 1) article. Thanks. ApprenticeFan (talk) 06:33, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with the move, but it's better to just request an admin to move it. I put in a request for a proper "clean" move on Wikipedia:Requested moves#Uncontroversial requests, this will preserve the entire edit history for the page. Thanks for helping move these pages! Plastikspork (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

PerceptIS Page

Hi,

I am the author of a page on PerceptIS on which you provided feedback. I wanted to thank you for your constructive criticism as this is one of my first pages. I have strong, unaffiliated interest in Cleveland Ohio and am writing articles pertaining to unique Cleveland businesses. I am unbiased and am simply looking for businesses that have a unique notable elements, and on which I can gather accurate information.

I have toned down the language on this page and tried to make the data less like an advertisement and focus more on why i think the company is noteworthy. In particular its genesis originating at Case Western Reserve University.

I will be addressing the references and the orphan status but wanted to let you know I am taking any and all comments seriously and welcome any direction from more experienced wikipedians.

Thanks, (Bctwriter (talk) 03:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC))

Sydney Selwyn article

Hi Plastikspork just a quick line to thank you for your ongoing help with the Sydney Selwyn article. I've gained quite a few useful tips by watching what you've been doing, like for example your "cite web|url =" edit. I'm hoping to further improve/enhance this article myself, time permitting, but obviously all this extra help is welcome! Barryz1 (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Charm School (Season 3)

Why are the people of wikipedia is Deleting Charm School (Season 3)? It premieres this Summer 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capoeira Fighter 3 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

can you ad lease be leave me at once. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capoeira Fighter 3 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charm_School_Gives_Back. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 00:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Saleisha

If what I add refers to something on the Tyra Banks show web site, how can I ref it without a link to the Tyra Banks Show site? Please tell me. I think it fits this cas "Some sources may be considered reliable for statements as to their author's opinion, but not for statements of fact. A prime example of this are Op-ed columns that are published in mainstream newspapers. When discussing what is said in such sources, it is important to directly attribute the material to its author, and to do so in the main text of the Wikipedia article so readers know that we are discussing someone's opinion."--81.194.35.225 (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

You weren't linking to the Tyra Banks show website, you were linking to a google cache of a picture comment page:

URL: http://209.85.129.132/search?q=cache:eajHUGWPCsIJ:photos.tyrashow.warnerbros.com/galleries/top_model_winners_circle+top+model+winner+circle&cd=2&hl=fr&ct=clnk&gl=fr

You should link to a WP:RS. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 16:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

It is actually a slideshow on the Tyrashow website. since it was taken down, I used the cache page.--81.194.35.225 (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Possible vandalism

It looks like the editor at 216.25.247.247 may be ignoring your vandalism warning with this edit [4]. The three IP addresses 216.25.247.245, 216.25.247.246 and 216.25.247.247 all seem to keep removing linefeeds from articles and breaking formats. - Ttwaring (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I had the main one blocked. I will see if the admin will block the others, or just wait until they vandalize again. Plastikspork (talk) 23:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

FYI

On Dancing with the Stars Season 6, I was in the middle of adding all the names back in the "Call-Out Order" when you made your revision. Onesmallnote (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I saw that, but please just hit the "undo" button, don't type them back in by hand. It's much quicker. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth‎

That IP just DOES NOT GET IT. Is there anything that you can think of to help?-- The Red Pen of Doom 01:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Eventually, some admin is bound to get sufficiently tired of it and issue a block. I suppose if warnings are continually escalated for addition of non-WP:RS, then it will eventually get to the level that will warrant a block. Or, hopefully, the warnings will be observed and this nonsense will stop. We shall see. Keep up the good work. It's nice to see someone here actually cares about WP:BLP. Plastikspork (talk) 01:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Bob the Builder

Hi there,

I thought I was being helpful by adding the information you have deleted. For a reliable source, you can't do much better than me - I am part of the cast of Bob the Builder and the information I provided was 100% accurate. I would be grateful if you'd undo your edit.

Many thanks

Rupert Degas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupertdegas (talk • contribs) 23:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you did make a useful contribution. The problem is that it needs to be referenced by a WP:RS, and the footnote provided did not support the information being added. There is an easy solution, add the information with a new footnote for a WP:RS. For example, this reference supports Rupert Degas as Scrambler. However, the infobox is already very full, and there is a notice at the top of the page about "too much intricate detail", so perhaps the best solution is to just add Rupert Degas to the list of voices without the detail about who voices which character. Thanks for your help. Plastikspork (talk) 23:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Access dates to ymd

Hey there. I had been using a part of your script recently, "Spork: cite date mdy", on pages that were already in mdy formatting but had yyyy-mm-dd access dates. Rlevse objected to my use of it on one of the pages he had been working on, and I offered here to reverse my actions. I wondered if it would be possible to code up a method for changing the cite dates to yyyy-mm-dd. If it would be so possible (or if you think Lightmouse could do it), do you think you could give it a try for me (or tell me to ask him). It would be much appreciated.

Thank you and happy editing, NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 02:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

I just added "Unspork: cite date", which will change any match to 'date = Month DD, YYYY' or 'date = DD Month YYYY' to 'date = YYYY-MM-DD', which includes both 'date = ' and 'accessdate = '. My script now has eight links, which may be a bit excessive. When I first wrote it, I didn't think anyone else would be using it, but now it appears there are about five people using it. Please let me know if you find any bugs, or any unsafe transformations being made by the script so I can fix it. Also, if there are any functions that you would like to have split or merged, or any other suggested improvements. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help! The script is really useful; you should think about advertising it more ;) NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 19:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Fall vs. autumn

I noticed your edit summary here and, while I'm not sure whether it was a sincere question, I thought I'd offer a sincere (possible) answer. Of course the edit could very well have been someone simply testing the waters, so to speak, but it also could have been someone who's not from North America. In other English-speaking countries, the word "fall" is very rarely used to mean "autumn". Therefore, "autumn" might actually be a less ambiguous word for the Letterman article since it's understood by all, even those of us who commonly say "fall". Personally, I don't care much which way it ends up in the article; I'm just offering an explanation, nothing more. :) -- edi(talk) 05:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I do understand the meaning of "till autumn". I just thought it was pointless to change it since both are valid, and Fall is the common term used for North American television programs. I have never seen a television station announce their "Autumn Programming Schedule". Thanks for the message. Plastikspork (talk) 16:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, good point that it's a North American program. That does make a difference. -- edi(talk) 18:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Amanda Habrowski

Hello, I was wondering why the speedy deletion tag? Amanda Habrowski has appeared on two popular Vh1 programs, is a well known radio personality at a major Detroit station, and is all over the web. I listed over 5 credible links to websites that have information about her, and I believe the deletion was made in error. I didnt even get 24 hours to add a "hang on" at the top of the article, and leave a message in the talk page. I kindly ask you to please reconsider your deletion. Thanks. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 05:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I tagged it for speedy deletion due to lack of sources establishing notability, in particular failing Wikipedia:ENTERTAINER. This does not mean the subject is not notable, but notability was not sufficiently established through inline citations using secondary sources. Of course, this is my opinion, and the admin who actually deleted the article agreed. If you wish to have the deletion reversed, you should take it up with the admin who deleted the article. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Amanda Habrowski is currently a contestent on I Love Money 2. Is she wins the contest i believe, using wiki standards that she would then qualify to have an article made. If she wins I plan to create an article under the same title. Please let me know weather or not you would still feel the subject lacks something and would delete the article even if she wins the current contest. Thanks. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm well aware of who she is and her history on reality television. If she wins, I believe notability is still weak, but probably weakly arguable, based on my observation of AFD nominations. I've got an even better idea, why don't we try to establish her notability outside of reality television? For example, she is reportedly a popular radio personality. This would indicate that there are secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles) establishing her notability in radio. Or, perhaps she has articles written about her for other reasons? I am all for having more articles about notable people on WP, but I don't feel as though simply appearing on one show and another spin-off show is enough. Otherwise, everyone on I Love Money would be notable enough to have an article, which I don't feel is true, as these articles tend to be very short and include nothing more than a recap of what they did on the reality show. However, such a recap is best placed in the article of the respective reality show. On the other hand, if they are notable beyond the show, then it's clear that an article is helpful in consolidating this information and avoiding WP:COATRACK/WP:TRIVIA on the reality show's page. Thanks for having this discussion, and I hope we can work together! Plastikspork (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes I absolutely agree, let her notability be outside of Vh1 shows, and/or reality television. Some verifiable things are, she is a radio personality for a major American (Detroit) station, and she is a well known D.J (her mixes in Europe are known). Unlike some contestants in these programs, Amanda does qualify for an article, based on, she is known outside of reality television, she is a well known radio personality, and she even has records released in Europe. After presenting these facts I would assume, using wiki standards, that you would re-create the article that you yourself erased, considering the subject qualifies for an article. Thanks. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Sure, given more WP:RS for statements of notability, I would support recreation of the deleted article. Again, I'm not the one who deleted the article. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 03:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Katarzyna Dolinska

An editor has nominated Katarzyna Dolinska, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Dolinska and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. ... MistyWillows ^talk 00:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Script partly broken

Part of your script (cite date mdy/dmy) does not seem to be working properly (example article). Just wanted to let you know. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 01:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Charm school 3

I accidentely created a new article which you can reach by typing in "Charm school 3" as opposed to the main article "Charm School with Ricki Lake" or "Charm School 3". This was shortly after I created the other, main article. If you could delete this unneeded and out-dated copy article, it would be appriciated. I put "Delete" in the talk page of that article. Thanks Andrew097 (talk) 03:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem. In the future you can paste {{db-author}} at the top of the article. I pasted it in there for you, but had to add some explanation since I was not the original author. The "Charm school 3" is probably harmless, if it's redirected to Charm School with Ricki Lake, but I may tag it as well. Thanks for the note and keep up the good work! Plastikspork (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Your script...

Does it work in conjunction with, or instead of, Lightmouse's? Regards, Matthewedwards :  Chat  18:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

It does work perfectly in conjunction with Lightmouse's script. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 18:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I would say 'in conjunction with'. Basically, I started using Lightmouse's script awhile back and decided to write my own to automate some tasks that I found performing myself. I try to add as many comments as possible to make it clear what it's doing. There is a very minor overlap between the two scripts, but this is very very minor. However, I used Lightmouse's script as a starting point since although I know quite a bit about regular expressions, I am still learning about javascript and interfacing it with wikipedia. You can have a look at the brief documentation and commented code in User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js. Let me know if you have any further questions or if there is something I can help you automate. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Does "reigns" used in Australian English?

I think Australia's Next Top Model article has misspelled "Reins" in Controversy section. Should "reigns" be use in Australian English? ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 00:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Good question, as that is a common misspelling, and "took the reins" is correct. See for example Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/T. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I really don't know the word. I use it on American English background. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 11:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

User: Zurvivor

Hello.. I don't see why my page would be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zurvivor (talk • contribs) 23:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Basically the content is a violation of WP:NOT. You can respond and read more about it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zurvivor. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 23:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Cash Cab

Why'd you take out my comment about the Cash Cab being a Toyota Sienna minivan with tag number 1G12? Your explantion is that 1) it's "unnecessary detail." Well really, a lot of stuff on Wikipedia is "unnecessary." If you use that standard you could probably delete most of the site. And 2 you said that it's unsourced. Well, I've watched a lot of Cash Cabs and I've taken a lot of NYC taxis, and I can tell you without a doubt that it's been a Toyota minivan and its tag has been 1G12 (it's changed for this year apparently and is now 7N78). Again, if everything unsourced was removed from Wikipedia you'd lose a lot of content. I can't understand your motivation for wanting to remove an interesting detail which is totally non-controvertial. —69.200.229.108 (talk)

Thanks for your help adding content to Wikipedia. Please consider reading WP:RS, WP:HTRIVIA, WP:OTHERSTUFF, and WP:ALLORNOTHING if you have not already. The last two are about article deletion arguments, but can be applied to deletion of material. I am all for including more factual information to Wikipedia, but it really must be backed up by a WP:RS. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

bob characters

why did you deleated griiper and grabber from the list. they are part of the crew now. the first were in the movie called race to the finish and are going to be in an upcoming episoded called Breezy Bristle. also Mr. Bently is not the mayor of Bobs ville he was the building inspector. he is the electerd mayor in the episoded called Mr Bentley's Big Parade. can you change that and add gripper and grabber. if you need more reference just look at bob the builder.com. for pilchard can you add that she had kittens confimed in the episoded called Roley the Green Cat. thanks please respond. Ffaadstrbdetete (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your edits for two reasons, as given in my edit summary: (1) You did not add a WP:RS and (2) Your addition suffered from poor spelling and grammar. I can deal with the second issue (spelling), but the first (reliable sources) is problematic. Thanks for your help! Plastikspork (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Script-assisted editing?

Noticed your edit. What tool is that? I'm interested because I find myself doing a lot of gruntwork/cleanup, and really wouldn't mind being able to speed it up with some sort of scriptability for the repetitive stuff. DeFaultRyan 23:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

That particular edit was a combination of User:Lightmouse/monobook.js/script.js and my User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js. The script removed all the &nbsp; tags, so after the edit was finished, I did add a few back again to make the table look a bit less collapsed. Otherwise, it was completely automatic after hitting a few buttons. I keep a User:Plastikspork/script list for my own sanity as there are so many that I would like to try. If you can describe a particular repetitive task that you would like to automate, I can probably write a script to assist you. Just let me know, or if you have any more questions about how to install scripts, use them, etc... Plastikspork (talk) 23:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Celebreality Series

Hrmm... Im just thinking but should 'Tool Academy', 'Scream Queens', 'Most Smartest Model' and 'I Know my Kids a Star' but under the celebreality banner too? From the VH1 website it seems to blog over these shows in the same fashion and often the people from the shows have been seen in events with the 'Of Love' series... Anyway your opinion on this? Jamesbuc (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually im just looking at the Celebreality block on the VH1 article. Makes me wonder if the template should be under a different name and another made for the other shows? (Hogan Knows Best, Salt'N'Pepa etc etc) Jamesbuc (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, there are some shows missing. Of course, not every show on VH1 is Celebreality, but it appears to be exponentially increasing. There are formatting tricks to make it more compact and get rid of some of the excessive whitespace. Another option would be to remove the title characters from the top. By the way, is there some place with a comprehensive list of all the Celebreality shows on VH1? I searched on VH1 and found some useful hits, but nothing complete. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 04:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Would a page work labelled 'Other Shows' which lists the various shows that are not as directly connected as the love series are and to add shows to that list when possible? Im not sure of any other way to go. As far as space goes the Title Characters section could do with being cut. Also the ILM2 page has been blah'ed about by User:Happy Party Here. Im not brilliant with Wikipedia edits so could something be done? Jamesbuc (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

A note on how the shows could be cut up into 2 seperate boxes. The page is missing a few shows (Charm school for instance) but the idea still stands on that way ...of Love Series Jamesbuc (talk) 18:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Cindy & Mindy Hall

I declined your request for speedy deletion per A7 for this article. The article makes a claim for importance/significance in that the people described are reality tv contestants. While this may not be enough to avoid deletion via AfD as it does not meet wP:N, it does fulfill the requirements to avoid speedy deletion per A7. If you have any questions, you might want to review WP:FIELD, WP:10CSD, and/or WP:WIHSD---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 03:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. I thought it was marginal since it was entirely unsourced and seemed strange to be an article about two people with no press indicating they were twins. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 03:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, this is the type of article that would probably fail an AfD, but if it was sent there and the author wanted to salvage it, they probably could. I mean, twins who were on separate reality based TV series? I'm sure that you can find sources to make a reasonable article out of that basis. Which is why articles only have to make a claim of importance/significance (which is a much lower standard than WP:N).---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 03:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. I will nominate it for AFD, sorry for wasting your time on a marginal case. I don't think 'Wikipedia:ONEEVENT' becomes TWOEVENTS just because you join two people together. Plastikspork (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

No problem.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 03:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Daisy of Love callout order

I made an edit to this page which you reverted as vandalism, and I'm not sure why. I marked four contestants as eliminated in episode 1. You can see this by viewing the episode at VH1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.69 (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

It was reverted as vandalism because the listed air date isn't for another couple days and you didn't include a source. A more minor point would be that it was not properly formated to conform with the format used in other Celebreality shows, i.e., include the episode number as opposed to a colorbox. Thanks for following up by providing a source! Plastikspork (talk) 20:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Tom Buchanan AFD

Could you read the Tom Buchanan AFD on MacGyverMagic's talk page. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 02:18, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done Plastikspork (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Eva Marcille

Hello, I wasn't aware that TV.com was a wiki, I'll file that away for future reference and not use it to cite anything. I've found a couple of other citations for Eva's AKA and engagement and added them to the article, but please take them out if they aren't "up to snuff", so to speak. Couldn't find anything else for now, but I mostly was just trying to improve the article. Speaking of which, the references look all out of whack, and other than changing "references" with <> to "reflist" with {} (because I think it looks better) I didn't really know how to fix them. Any ideas? Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 02:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, much better. I am developing a script to help with this process of cleaning up references. Unfortunately, it still requires quite a bit of work by hand after it runs. I got most all but the bare urls, which will require clicking through to get the titles. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you as well. Now I know what kind of "script" you're working on, I thought maybe you were making a movie. Cheers. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 02:45, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

.....just a quick line .....

Hi Plastikspork - sorry to clutter up your talk page (feel free to delete these lines once read). I just wanted to say I did notice your comment on your most recent edit to the Sydney Selwyn article; 13:42, 25 April 2009 'Yes, that's much better. Keep up the good work' and to thank you for what once again turned out to be helpful intervention by you (I admit I was sceptical at first).... anyhow I've learned something and do agree it has improved the article. All the best Barryz1 (talk) 21:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Please reply as to Kegel Male Trainer

I understand the reasons that the KMT article was tagged for speedy deletion, and would like to know if another, with the same title, can be reworked, while maintaining neutrality and staying within the proper narrative boundaries. Thanks kindly; I await your reply. Respectfully; Smkovalinsky (talk) 21:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

If you can sufficiently establish notability. Why not start by adding a section to Kegel exercise, perhaps something like 'male trainers' or whatever and possibly other male exercisers could be added as well? Assuming it's suitably well written, I would not object, and in fact, KMT could be redirected there. Plastikspork (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR RESPONSE. I will take your advice to heart, and speak with my client. Smkovalinsky (talk) 02:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Um, your client? You should seriously read WP:COI before writing anything. Plastikspork (talk) 02:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Well, I work for a multimedia firm, and many of our assignments are to write Wikipedia pages. Hmmmm. I have not had much understanding of it, and just more or less wanted to write well, and help out. Sigh. Live and learn. Smkovalinsky (talk) 02:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say you can't write anything, you should just seriously read WP:COI before writing anything, and disclose any financial interests on your user page to avoid misunderstandings. Best of Luck. Plastikspork (talk) 02:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I understand, and thank you kindly. I believe one can maintain neutrality; certainly reporting demands it, which has been a lot of my prior experience. Smkovalinsky (talk) 02:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Gerzema

Pretty spammy/vanity, and now deleted as such, thanks jimfbleak (talk) 04:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Michael Bolton

This is number 66-something.

It's the first time I have learned about this method of contact.

What I did was make a necessary add to include "Adult Contemporary" under Genre. I might have re-adjusted the pop rock label to look like "pop/rock".

I was at the time browsing the page and learned that the genre states that his music was 'rock', so I searched for one of his rock songs and found one called 'Fool's Game'.

After listening to 'Fool's Game', I then agreed that "rock" belongs under Genre.

Thanks for sending me a message and letting me know that this page is like under parental supervision.

Sincerely, 66-something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.233.4.135 (talk) 16:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, there are so many pages on Wikipedia and a nontrivial number of edits are vandalism. So, when I see a constructive edit by a new (or anonymous) user, I try to give some positive feedback. Hopefully we can increase the number of constructive editors, and as a result, improve Wikipedia. Thanks again for your edits, and I hope you decide to stick around and help out some more. Plastikspork (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Malik Ali

Mr. Plastikspork, My name is Malik Ali and I am the author of the Wikipedia page, Malik Ali. I reviewed your comments this morning and I wanted to make you aware of some revisions I have made and some concerns I had. First, I added a section titled Reliable Sources that reference my accomplisments as a writer to the paper that I was employed at, as well as what newspapers published articles about me as an athlete. I certainly hope you review the modifications I have made in a fair manner. Furthermore, I was greatly offended that you chose only to recognize that Panagis Dionysios Evangelatos is only noted for being arrested, but you didn't care to mention a single word about the degree in English and World literature also earned under that name. I hope you consider my message with honesty and fairness, and appreciate that my page is a valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Malik Ali —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alim27 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. Be sure to voice your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Ali as the deletion of this article is not up to me. When editing articles, please read what you are editing. You modified the AFD tag which removed the link to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Ali. When adding comments to talk pages, be sure to sign your comments with ~~~~, otherwise we don't know who left the message. When adding information to a Biography of a Living Person you absolutely need to include a reliable source. And, you should really try to avoid writing an article about yourself. For example, see WP:COI and WP:autobiography. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

CariDee English and Jaslene Gonzalez birthdates

The actual birthdates of CariDee English and Jaslene Gonzalez are considered true from Fashion Model Directory profiles. Fashion Model Directory is a reliable source not as IMDB.

http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/models/Caridee_English
http://www.fashionmodeldirectory.com/models/Jaslene_Gonzalez

Thanks. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 05:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Can I remove the birthdates of these article according to reliable sources policy? BTW, If those birthdates are needing in RS, I add Year of birth missing in living people. Thank you. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 23:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Again, this sounds reasonable. WP:BLP is relatively strict on birthdates. Plastikspork (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Appreciation

I just want to say that I really appreciate your looking out for so many of the reality show articles and articles related to them here at Wikipedia. If you were not around here, I can only imagine how awful some of these articles would be. The Tiffany Pollard article, for example, has been subject to much bad editing and vandalism (as I am sure you know). It is nice to see it currently stable and free of all that mess. You are mostly to thank for that, as well as keeping many more articles clean. Thank you for all your help around Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 21:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the support. I have about 2000 pages on my watchlist and I sometimes it becomes a bit much, but I do what I can. I keep a mental list of editors whos edits I don't need to carefully check and you are on the list. Someday I should read up on how to automate this process, but one thing at a time. Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:BLP

Hello Plastikspork, it is really nice to hear from you. We have never interacted before, but I have to tell you that I am impressed with your work and dedication here. While it is true that policy does not state that "birth dates" does "not" have to be sourced, it doesn't state that birth dates have to have a source either. I would say that it is an unwritten law in Wikipedia since birth dates of notable people which have been published in one or more reliable sources and therefore been widely published. I would say by viewing the thousands of Bios. here, that it is a widely accepted norm. Otherwise, we would have to start asking for sources every single minor detail.

Now, in regard to "La La", it seems to me that the most of the reliable websites which had her born 25 June, 1979, when the article was started are no longer in the net, yet the vast majority in google cite her as being born in 79' while about two cite her in 80'. I believe then the best approach would then be to cite her birthdate as (c. 1979). Hey, I'm sorry to take so long to answer you, but I have so many things on hand. Take care and keep up the great job. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. Thanks for the feedback. Plastikspork (talk)

Rathore

Nice job on improving that butt-ugly genealogical table! pablo_hablo. 09:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure if it's all factually correct, but at least the formatting is a bit nicer. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 17:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Lists of Common Misspellings

I was curious why you changed the script that was run on the Lists of Common Misspellings. The one run around April 24 was fine. But the script run around May 7 did two things that were somewhat unexpected (at least to me). (1) The pages now display the quotation marks for words in which the search parameter initiates an exact search. It's a bit jarring to see, but in the final analysis may be helpful. (2) The script re-inserted at least two entries that had been commented out because they returned too many false positives (the words "u" and "planed"). Not a big deal (I can re-comment them out). Again, neither of these issues is a problem; I was just curious as I hadn't seen anything on the talk page announcing the new script. Thanks. JimVC3 (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that. It appears I completely forgot to leave a notice before making the change. I am in the process of fixing the problems that you mentioned. On a related note, in the process of making the change I actually found quite a few errors. Basically, by requiring that the search term is listed twice, once for the link and once for the link target, this allows for the two strings to not match. Usually it was the link target which was wrong, since the link would then look correct when rendered on the page. I hope you find the 'search link' template helpful in that it makes it easier to add entries without having to write the search term twice. I will work on making the template remove the quotes in the rendered search link, but for now, the second unnamed parameter is the link text. As for uncommenting false positive entries. I was not aware that it was a problem if they were not actually linked? Now that I have read the instructions at the top of each page, I see that the method for commenting one out is to change the bullet '*' to an indent ':'. By the way the script that I ran did not uncomment the entries, I did that by hand since I thought it would be okay if they were not linked to let people know that these were indeed misspellings, but not ones which could be reliably identified by a simple WP search. Sorry again and I hope that things are better when I am finished fixing the problems you mentioned. Plastikspork (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. A note on the talk page would have been helpful, but not a big deal. (1) Removing the display of the quotation marks is fine from a stylistic standpoint. Oddly, in the last hour I've convinced myself they're helpful. As I noted a few weeks ago on the misspelling talk page, some words need to be exact searches, others don't. It may be helpful to see which type of search is being performed without going to the edit page. (2) I'm not at all surprised that you found errors in the search terms. Many people who add words by cut and paste neglect to make changes in both places. I did a massive clean-up of other things several months ago and didn't have the energy to look for those errors. Thanks for cleaning them up. (3) I'm not sure what to do about the entries with thousands of false positives. I began working with these pages when I was a real newbie and just followed instructions to comment things out. But one could argue that a display that is unlinked is fine as well. (4) On a related issue, I actually believe that the instructions are incorrect. Substituting a colon does not comment the line out; it just makes for an unattractive, unlinked display. Yours look better. I may suggest a re-phrasing of the instructions at some later date. (5) I found the new template that you're using and read the discussion. Yes, it is helpful. Again, thanks for your work. JimVC3 (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. Let me know if you want me to do any/all of the following: (a) Restore the rendering of the exact search string; including quotes, (b) change the indentation style for 'false positive' entries back to the more visually appealing version, (c) update the instructions at the top of each page. I can do any/all of these by just adding a couple lines to a script and pressing one button on each page. It appears were are the only two who actively care about how it looks. I have been corresponding with another editor who appears to use the page as part of an automatic editing script, but he/she doesn't care as the script uses a cached version. For item c, we could try to hash out a more accurate set of instructions first. Thanks for the feedback. Plastikspork (talk) 22:31, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

You're right - there isn't a great deal of concern about how the page looks, so I don't want to unnecessarily complicate things. But for what it's worth: (a) I see you already changed the rendering to eliminate the quotation marks. My suggestion would be to keep it simple and leave it that way. (b) There were only two or three false positives that were commented out. Those could be kept as/returned to being commented out OR changed to the "*" style in non-searchable text. I don't have a strong preference. But there were dozens of "acceptable variant" words that I had already changed to the "*"/non-searchable (i.e., more visually appealing) style. The point was to allow visitors to the page to see that the word shouldn't be entered as a misspelling. It would be great if you could return those to the "*"/non-searchable style. (c) Depending on which of these options you settle on, new instructions would be great. I'd be happy to help work something out on the talk page. But I may be offline for a few days and don't want to hold you up. Your call. JimVC3 (talk) 02:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

I hope things are looking better now. I took a first stab at writing a better set of instructions by creating an instructions "template" which is included at the top of each page. This should help maintain consistency. Let me know if there are any problems. Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, things look great. Thank you. I think your instructions are clear, but I've already had to correct one entry. Using quotation marks in the new search parameter set-up is going to throw people off. But there's nothing more that you can do about it. It will just take time. Thanks again. JimVC3 (talk) 22:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I think I recall the entry you corrected was to remove the quotes from the link text? At least this is no worse than it was before when every link had to list the search term twice. Hopefully, this will cut down on the number of falsely listed entries. I believe it's possible to make {{search link}} remove the quotes automatically, but I will have to do some research on this. Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 22:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

About an individual in Indian government service

Dear Plastikspork:

Please help me improve the page: VS Sampath and post in google search page. Thank you. --Dr.Appalayya (talk) 04:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I would be happy to help you wikify the page once you have added some more content, but I don't really have time to do research on the subject for you. Best Regards. Plastikspork (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Script

Hi. I am in the process of developing a script to automatically correct common misspellings in articles. The initial goal is for users to have a button at the top of the article which will open an edit window and do a search/replace to correct common misspellings. When the script completes, it then shows the changes and allows the editor to decide if the changes were correct. The goal is to have as few falsely corrected entries, so some of the entries on WP:LCM wouldn't be added. If you are interested in trying it out, let me know. My initial prototype only has entries from the "A" page. There are probably some minor bugs in there as well, but it won't commit any changes without approval. The script is at User:Symplectic Map/AutoSpell and you just have to include User:Symplectic Map/spell.js in your monobook.js file, e.g., User:Symplectic Map/monobook.js. If you are using something other than the standard theme, it would have to be included there instead. It should work on Firefox and Google Chrome. I haven't tested Internet Explorer. If you know of another script for doing this sort of thing, please let me know, so I don't unnecessarily waste any time. Thanks! Symplectic Map (talk) 20:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Interesting. I will have a look when I have some time. It would be great if this could be integrated with the "machine readable" list on WP:LCM. Thanks for the note. Plastikspork (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Great. I noticed that you are one of the developers of WP:AutoEd, which has been quite helpful in developing my script. I also see that you are having problems with IE. I will let you know if I am able to solve this issue and please keep me informed if you figure it out first. Best regards. Symplectic Map (talk) 20:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

It appears I was able to solve most of my IE issues with the script. The major technical problem was that Firefox allows for addressing a string as an array, but IE didn't allow this. Instead, I had to use the slice function to address the individual characters. There may be a better way, but I don't know what it is at the moment. Let me know if you have any suggestions or feedback. Best Regards. Symplectic Map (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Interesting. I will see if I can figure out what is going on with WP:AutoEd. If you have some free time (who does these days), it would be great if you could have a look to see if there is anything obvious. Plastikspork (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I made some modifications to the core.js, (see User:Symplectic Map/autoedcore.js), and got something that works on IE. I also simplied the namespace logic, perhaps more/less than you what you need. The key problem with IE and Chrome is that you can't rely on a particular order of execution of statements due to optimizations. It's the whole execute on reference idea. Unfortunately, I'm not sure how to force execution before a 'typeof' statement. Feel free to use what I have written and refine it for your needs. Let me know if I can help any more. Best Regards. Symplectic Map (talk) 18:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Amazing. It works! By the way, I tweaked it a bit here. The minor changes being the check for 'ca-edit', just in case we aren't allowed to edit that page, and the 'typeof' check on the 'document.forms', which isn't entirely necessary, but seems more syntax pleasing. Thanks again! Plastikspork (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Allison Harvard requested at RFPP

I wonder the article has closed as result in AFD as redirect. It should be indefinite full protection which IP/registered user edits are malicious to re-create the article. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 05:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

The AfD was 4 months ago, and no longer relevent. Runner ups up ANTM are considered Noteworthy, and Alison Has more about her than just ANTM. ... MistyWillows ^talk 07:20, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Celia Ammerman

Thanks for your kind words and your comments during the AFD. It's always good to communicate with Wikipedians whose main goal is to improve things around here, even if I don't always agree with them at all times... — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 14:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

• Incidentally, there's a bit of a disagreement right now in the talk page about whether a fancruft tag is appropriate for this page. Personally, to me, it seems like someone who felt it should have been deleted now trying a different approach, and I don't think it's appropriate. I was hoping you could weigh in; I don't want to just rally the AFD supporters, but I thought you could be a neutral voice since you voted for a redirect but seemed to appreciate the article as well... — Hunter Kahn _(contribs) 23:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Spork: CiteTemplate

I just installed Sporkscript, and I tried it out on Allison Harvard. When I used Spork: CiteTemplate, it only modified the last reference. How do I get it to work for the rest? Thanks for writing Sporkscript it seems like a wonderful tool. ... MistyWillows ^talk 16:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I just improved the matching criteria in User:Plastikspork/citetools.js, and it should work now. The problem was there was a comma after 'Retrieved', which is a strange place to put a comma. The script now ignores this comma. You will have to force a reload of the script to keep it from using the cached version. You can do this by reloading User:Plastikspork/citetools.js, or probably by reloading your monobook.js. Let me know if you find other pages where I can improve the matching criteria. Also, I am currently merging this script with WP:AutoEd, but not all the features have been merged yet, and SporkScript will probably still exists after the merge, just with fewer buttons. Thanks again! Plastikspork (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks that helped alot. One other thing, it would be great if Spork: Wiki/LinkRepair checked for links to deleted/missing articles (redlinks) and unlinked them. ... MistyWillows ^talk 17:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Deleted is probably non-controversial, but delinking all WP:REDLINKS would be. That aside, coding such a script would be a bit more involved, but possible. I will look into it if I have some spare time. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Charm School 3

First of all, thanks for the barnstar! And I've kind of been watching the new Charm School article, I don't know why haha; I guess just 'cause the reality TV articles are more fun to edit. But I'm sick of the vandilism and having to revert it. Since you are an established member, I was wondering if you could get semi-protection on it? Thanks. Wikiguy09 (talk) 04:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Could you put Daisy of love on semi-protection too? thanks Wikiguy09 (talk) 22:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I just submitted a request. FYI, I'm not an admin so basically all I do is post a request on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. The key is to emphasize that you want temporary semi-protection, and that it is in response to recent vandalism. They will deny the request if it's not due to recent activity, so you want to post the request right after you notice a spike in vandalism. Plastikspork (talk) 00:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Tool Academy (Season 2)

Can You edit Tool Academy (Season 2) the date was announced on vh1.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capoeira Fighter 3 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

It looks like the main page was moved to season 1, which is reasonable. The next step would be to create a top-level page, and, of course, the season 2 page once there are more details. Creating a season 2 page too soon would most likely violate {{db-spam}}. Plastikspork (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

DOL

Still figuring this stuff out, so I apologize, but I do have a response to your comment on the Daisy of Love page.

Cage said it would be best for him to leave, so Daisy saying that she "had to let him go" is irrelevant. He was leaving anyway. Therefore, I believe that makes it a voluntary withdrawal. The VH1 blog on VH1.com also states on it's official recap that Cage withdrew on his own accord, thereby making the decision for Daisy. I don't see how this isn't a withdrawal.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bretter22 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a reasonable argument. It would probably be best to discuss this on the main talk page for Daisy of Love since there are other editors who would probably be interested in the discussion as well. Thanks for the feedback. Plastikspork (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I moved the discussion to Talk: Daisy of Love. Plastikspork (talk) 23:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Voice type

Thank you, I've been expecting attacks since I started reverting those. In your example no reference is provided, at this point the statement is purely unsourced point of view that should be reverted. J04n(talk page) 18:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

You questioned...

...why was that fact so important.[5] I must admit that I can't give you anything like perfect answer but I guess it's just that it was something different. Now, now, who am I kidding? 8) --62.240.86.64 (talk) 19:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I must admit, I really do like different, but it would be great if we could avoid WP:UNDUE/WP:TRIVIA sort of statements. From my reading of WP:BLP, we should avoid libel, and try to keep things balanced. I like 'controversy' sections, when there is something sufficiently notable. However, I would personally avoid adding tabloid statements about each time someone is found to be intoxicated. I'm so glad there isn't a WP article about me. Thank you for your contributions and helpful feedback! Plastikspork (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

That'd be true. Thanks for the fast response. Next time I'll try to be less experimental with the information added by me ;) --62.240.86.64 (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I had responded to that addition on my talk page. Part of the reason I removed it is also in agreement with Plastikspork's reason regarding WP:BLP. Flyer22 (talk) 02:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you for the feedback. I'm always very pleased to see reasoned discussion and cooperation. Plastikspork (talk) 15:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

La La

Hello Plastikspork, how you doing? Maybe I should place "La La" under temporary protection with the intention of preventing further disruptions of her birth date from non-registered users. What do think? It's your call. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Given the number of attempts, that sounds like a reasonable idea. I do like to generally avoid semi-protection, especially when there are constructive edits being made by IP users, but I haven't seen much of that on La La. I was an anon IP editor for about three years before I got an account, and the reason why I got an account was primarily so I could edit semi-protected pages. After I got an account I found all kinds of helpful benefits that I hadn't thought about. I'm on semi-vacation this week, so I haven't been able to watch the page as closely as I usually do. Thanks for your help and advice. Plastikspork (talk) 15:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

• It is done. Have a nice day. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Can I use your AutoEd sandbox?

I'd like to do some testing with a non-live version of AutoEd and was wondering if you'd be OK with me using your already-setup pages, rather than creating another whole new copy. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Sure. I don't know if the version I have right now is 100 percent synced, but it should be close. Plastikspork (talk) 05:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! If it doesn't work I'll revert to your last version. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 12:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Edits

In reply to your revision of Tammy Faye Baker -- Well done, and thanks for proving a point that I had made in a workshop that I am conducting.

In doing a workshop on the accuracy of online research with university students, an argument arose as to the validity of Wikipedia in that user contributions are posted without verification and checks for accuracy.

My student asserted that information, especially small bits of information, can be placed in a Wikipedia article and not be detected for extended periods of time.

As someone who uses Wikipedia for research -- not as the final word, but as an invaluable tool for obtaining initial information and resources for addition research -- my argument was that it is generally accurate and is in a state of continual correction and refinement. The "food for worms" insertion (just a few short words) was expected to remain until at least next week's class. However, the rapidity of the correction shows that Wikipedia works remarkably well. While individually, inaccuracies may exist, on the whole, the correction mechanisms demonstrate a resource that can provide reliable information as a basis for further investigation. I will use this at next week's class.

Regards, StevenKayTrenton —Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenKayTrenton (talk • contribs) 13:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Mark Cronin

Will you please stop reverting the changes about Mark Cronin?? All of that information is true according to the 51 Minds website and no citations are needed. I looked up his about page myself and the information about him are true. It's making it seem like that the information isn't true about him when those citation notices are there. King Shadeed 12:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

BLP

Greetings. I don't think we've interacted before, but I stalk Drilnoth's talkpage and I saw that he's nominated you for adminship. I see that you do a lot of work improving articles on living people, especially celebrities, improving sources and removing unsourced information. I was wondering if you do much with our BLP policy or the noticeboard. It looks like something you might be interested in. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 23:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I have read the BLP policy, but I had not seen the noticeboard. I will add that to my watch list. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 01:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Fair Use quoting size

You indicated in your RfA that you had posed an unanswered question regarding maximum size of a quotation under fair use - do you happen to have a link to a place you did so? It's not related to the RfA, I'm just curious. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 06:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I will see if I can dig it up. It was in regard to the quotation of paragraph long episode summaries in reality television show articles (for example, on Rock of Love Bus). It's particularly interesting in this case, as quotations are actually the entire episode summary, so it could be construed as copying the "entire article." On the other hand, each summary is only a few lines long. I would have posted the question to the talk page of a user who deleted such summaries as copyright violation. I will see if I can find it. Plastikspork (talk) 06:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

The original question is here and some follow-up discussion here. My main lingering question is basically if quoted episode summaries is copyright violation. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Disclaimer: IANAL

So, when Congress passed the Copyright Act of 1976, they included section 107, which lists four non-essential, non-inclusive tests for Fair Use. The third item in §107 is "the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole." The main thrust there is that you must examine quantity as well as importance - there was a case (Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises) where 300 words out of 200,000 were found to be substantial given their content. Essentially, you're right to notice a potential issue in those episode lists, since quoting the entire summary is, well, the entire summary!

Really, though, it all has to be considered along with other factors, such as the fourth (effect on the market). If, say, you were copying directly out of a TV guide, then you might be affecting the market, but normally I'd still say you're probably fine since each one would be from a different (old and therefore largely useless) guide. Still, it would be worth going through some/most of them and trying to rewrite them in your own words if possible, or only using a fraction, as quoting the entire thing really IS a poor fair use validation.

However, since all the quotes are from one page, you're essentially committing a copyright violation of that entire VH1 page. With that in mind, you're not only copying a substantial amount (all) of each individual summary, but a substantial amount (all) of the VH1 page itself. So... yeah, I'd change 'em, since as it stands, you've essentially copied the entire page into different sections. Hope that (overly exhaustive and largely irrelevant comment) helps! ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 16:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, what a thoughtful reply. I agree. I posed this question at VIO after responding to you here. Your thoughtful response might be useful there as well. I would repost it there, but I'll let you decide if you think it's a good idea, to avoid copying ;). Plastikspork (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Sure dude, go right ahead. Glad to be of help! ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 19:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

(Note to self) Check these pages. Plastikspork (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I be sorry, dude

I hope you accept my sincerest apology for the de-railment I made on your RfA, which is now on the talk page. I made my point in my oppose, and you honestly acknowledged it. It was rude of me to jump on an un-related comment for the sole purpose of arguing. :-| Sorry.--Koji† 22:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. No need to apologize, but thank you nonetheless. I am glad to see so many thoughtful, reasonable, editors debating important issues (as well as vetting my actions). Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Alright then, we're cool. :-) Thanks for the user page tweak, btw. --Koji† 00:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Your RFA

Best wishes for your RFA -- Tinu Cherian - 10:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Whitespace removal script

Hello, there is a discussion thread at User talk:Chrishomingtang#Whitespace removal too excessive that relates to one of your editing scripts. Could you please consider changing the logic so that whitespace removal is not so aggressive within wikitable markup, as editing readability is compromised? Thanks — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 16:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I responded on Chrishomingtang's webpage. If you want to show me an offensive diff, I can work on targeting that specific case. We have already had some discussions about leaving space alignments in infoboxes templates for example. Plastikspork (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Real Chance of Love 2 Cast

The Real Chance of Love 2 Cast had been announced.

You are now an admin

I'm pleased to inform you that Plastikspork|your RFA passed, and that you are now an admin. Although you have a high level of trust with the community, keep the comments of those who didn't support you in mind and learn from their suggestions. The sysop isn't made by how much they know, but by how well they learn. If you'd like to test your new tools, head over to New Admin School to do so. Should you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me or any of our fellow administrators. Cheers, bibliomaniac15 22:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats! :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy:

Remember you will always protect the wrong version. Remember you must always follow the rules, except for when you ignore them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5) Remember to assume good faith and not bite. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a troll. Use the block ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block. Remember when you make these errors, someone will be more than happy to point them out to you in dazzling clarity and descriptive terminology. and finally, Remember to contact me if you ever need assistance, and I will do what I am able. KillerChihuahua?!?

DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.

\o/ - Dank (push to talk) 00:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Awesome! So good to see that it was a success! –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating me. Now I won't have to bug you to make minor changes in AutoEd. Plastikspork (talk) 07:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats

I, Tony the Marine,present you, Plastikspork, with your adminship. Pilot her well!

Well done. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

It's a minor point, but I thought I'd point you to this discussion since it is about you, even though it shouldn't matter one way or the other. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Great. I did notice that admins aren't rollbackers while looking through the rollbacker list. Plastikspork (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Gahh!!! I am too late to congradulate you! Oh, wait. No I'm not. Errr... congradulations! Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 03:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

WOOOHOOO!!!!! You really deserved to be an admin, you'll do an excellent job -... MistyWillows ^talk 05:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to everyone for the congratulations and support. Now if my real life job didn't have me on travel nearly continuously this summer I could get started right away. Six transcontinental flights in two months is a bit tiring. Thanks again to everyone, I learned so much from the process and I am looking forward to pushing the mop. Plastikspork (talk) 07:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced material

Plastikspork,

I'm sorry,

I've learned that my nephew Alan, who was haunted by Feldman's amature performance in "Dream a Little Dream", made the false claims on his Wikipedia site. He will be appropriately disciplined. He's looking at me right now, over there in the corner.... eating that apple... what's he thinking... what other online vandalism is he scheming. I'm almost afraid to leave the computer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.72.191 (talk) 15:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Tiffany Pollard

Whoops! My bad. Thanks for the correction. --Pyho ^T / _C 11:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hicham Yezza

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hicham Yezza, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hicham Yezza. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Ian Montone

Hi,

I just wanted to see if this page could be deleted now. This information is sensitive and needs to be taken down because of all the edits that happen to it. I am not sure who put it up, but I was asked to remove it. I removed the content at first because I did not know another way to take it down. Content and factual information differ significantly and most of the real info. cannot be found on the internet. Thank you for understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajfrie02 (talk • contribs)

 Done Plastikspork (talk) 05:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Find A Grave vs Find a Grave

I don't think I agree with your recent move here. Please let's discuss on Talk:Find a Grave. --Alvestrand (talk) 10:09, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

...for taking care of User:Skomorokh/Lih, I appreciate it. Regards,  Skomorokh  18:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Pedrorivto/IPEA

I have been asked by the user of User:Pedrorivto/IPEA if his article is okay for inclusion in Wikipedia. It looks fine to me but I'd like to have a second pair of eyes check it out. -WarthogDemon 04:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure of the purpose of the third paragraph in the lead section, but other than that it looks like a reasonable new article. Plastikspork (talk) 04:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

CSD

How were you able to find them so quickly?

Wouldn't you like to know? BWA-HA-HA-HA! BWA-HA-*cough*-*cough*...

Sorry.

Actually, you can blame credit User:MER-C and his spam template of search links. I just use them, and vary the settings to include different namespaces and different search terms ("customer service", "real estate", "discount", etc) likely to be included in spam. It works a treat. And thanks for the compliment. --Calton | Talk 12:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Rombouts

Please inform me why you deleted my article Rombouts.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bgajrombouts (talk • contribs) 22:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I responded on your talk page. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 22:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

WDW Monorail system

Hi I saw you protected the WDW Monorail system however it has a big mistake on it. it says that Austin was driving the pink train and got killed by crashing in to the other train. NO, austin was in the purple train in the station when the pink train driver (on the other side of the train) was driving in reverse back to the station. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Locarbmonster (talk • contribs) 00:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I responded on your talk page. Plastikspork (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Talk:David Bernal

I see you deleted that page, allegedly based on Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G6, but I don't see how the page would have been a candidate for deletion when it had ongoing discussions. --uKER (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

The only thing on the page was a double-redirect, and the edit history had only two edits. Prior discussion must have been before the last delete http://www.familierombouts.nl/stromdonk3E.htm? I can restore it if you would like to have a look. Plastikspork (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I spotted the problem. You (or another editor) created a double-redirect when the page was moved, which was then tagged and deleted. I have restored the edits from before the last deletion. Hopefully this fixes the problem. Thanks for the note. Plastikspork (talk) 21:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

It was me who moved the article, but I don't recall if I took any special attention to the talk page. Anyway, shouldn't a double redirect have been redirected to the final article instead of having been proposed for deletion? --uKER (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

It appears it was a "self-redirect" after the page move. You can look through the edit history if you want to figure out what happened. As I mentioned above, there were two deletions. When I encountered the article the edit history was nothing more than two bot edits. Plastikspork (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Never mind. It's fixed now, so thanks for your time. --uKER (talk) 02:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Alterations to cheryl moana marie link

I note that you have attempted to undo revisions to my work on the above link. I have reversed your work as I regard it as somewhat badly motivated and as misleading. I also take personal affront due to being a member of the Rowles family. I also note your unsubstantiated addition to the link to John's mention on wikipedia in regard to his so called ownership of a chain of islands of China. I ask where you may have gotten that piece of trival from as well. I trust that I have made myself clear as you are dealing with living people here and as mentioned on the page now, it does form the basis of an up and coming PhD - in other words, as part of a serious and referenced part of academic scholarship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.247.21 (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your POV statements about the true meaning of the name and your objections to people naming their children after a song. However, since the disambiguation page only had two entries, I have changed it to a redirect to John Rowles. With regard to the unsubstantiated claims on John Rowles, I am not the one who added them. I am the one who reverted your commentary about the claim being false. If you find a false claim, you should simply remove it, and note why in the edit summary. There is no reason to add commentary to the article. Alternatively, you can flag it with {{fact}} or {{dubious}}, which will alert other editors to the need for citations or verification. Thank you for your feedback and please sign your posts on talk pages as per the helpful instructions at the top of the edit window. Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 05:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

INFO

Hey Plastikspork I know you are like in charge of these shows: Daisy of Love, Charm School, Real Chance of Love, etc. but i keep trying to add that ashley from charm school 3's last name is Kamma, but you keep deleting it. Can you PLEASE change it back. To be honest the only way I know this is because my parents used to live by her in Minnesota and they knew eachother. I know i have no proof but if you could just trust me that would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yocca911 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a community project and I'm not in charge of these shows. However, I do my best to follow WP:RS and WP:V. If it cannot be verified by a reliable source, then it cannot be included. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks for your help in editing. Plastikspork (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Dora Sakayan

Hi,

I'm having trouble with creating a page. I personally know Dr. Sakayan and wish to create an entry for her using the bibliography page from her website www.dorasakayan.com as per her request, but I am not sure how to create a wiki page without getting it deleted. I tried referencing the cite, still considered copyright infringement. Is there anything I can do to make this work? I would appreciate suggestions from someone in the know!

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.229.134.241 (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, the problem is that you shouldn't simply copy content from another website. It would be best if you started from scratch. You should also read WP:COI and WP:AUTO, as there is helpful information about writing articles when you yourself know (or are in fact) the subject. Let me know if I can be of further help. Plastikspork (talk) 05:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

HELP

Hey Plastikspork,

How are you doing? I have a question. On a couple of the wikipedia pages it wont let me edit them, but others they will let me edit them. Please answer soon!

Sincerly, Yocca911 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yocca911 (talk • contribs) 05:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

This is most likely due to semi-protection. Try using your other account, Yocca101, unless you are evading a block? Plastikspork (talk) 05:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

THANKS!!! no im not trying to evade a block. I just dont understand something. I edited Charm School 3, and i gave my resource but someone keeps deleting what i put on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yocca911 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I believe you tried to add that Marcia's last name is Brazil. It seems dubious given that she is from Brazil. A more reliable source is needed. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 06:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Desi Williamson

Hi, Plastikspork. Thanks for reviewing Desi Williamson for speedy delete. I'd be interested to hear why you felt this apparently self-written page shouldn't be speedily deleted as a violation of Wikipedia:Autobiography. Also, your edit summary suggested I "feel free to prod/nominate"; I'm sorry; what's that mean? PRRfan (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, PRRfan, sorry to interject, but what I believe Plastikspork meant is that while the speedy deletion was declined, you're welcome to propose or nominate the article for deletion per the other processes for article deletion. Hope that helps. Cheers, Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 20:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Correct and see your talk page. Plastikspork (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Got it, and thanks. Thanks also to Plastikspork for cleaning up my first stab at nominating the page for normal deletion. PRRfan (talk) 21:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it should be fixed now. By the way, if you use Twinkle, the whole process is basically automatic. Plastikspork (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the deletion of my QuiFriends page... I hate userspace clutter. Could you do me a favor and indefinitely semi-protect User:Vicenarian/Status? User:Vicenarian already is and I can sense this as a (clever) vandal target, very annoying when you're Huggling vandalism. Cheers, Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 20:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done Plastikspork (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 20:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Questions

Hi,

I do not understand why my page was deleted?!? This Wikipedia is not user friendly at all- it says becasue it was promotional, but yet there are 70 other Credit Unions on Wikipedia.

Everything that I put in there is true and factual so I am not understanding why it is being deleted.

Please help!

Thanks! Emily —Preceding unsigned comment added by EJLindell (talk • contribs) 17:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me. The page was deleted due to the tone and language used in the article, which was viewed to be purely promotional. This is not a reflection on the notability of the credit union, but is instead, a reflection on the way in which the material was presented. For example, the lead section contained the following sentence: "Our online banking access is free and includes a remote deposit feature where members may deposit checks online and receive immediate credit for their deposit-a service offered to consumers by only a handful of financial institutions." This reads as if it were cut-and-paste from promotional materials provided by the Credit Union. My advice would be to start slowly, and rewrite the article in your userspace (e.g., what you have here). I would start with a list of facts about the Credit Union, and in particular, concentrate on those facts which make the Credit Union notable. It is important, if not critical, to include references to secondary sources. For example, news articles which discuss the credit union. This helps to further build claims of notability. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Plastikspork (talk) 17:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I will try that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EJLindell (talk • contribs) 19:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Madonna

Thannks. Was about to give warning when your meassage came. :) --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Sir Plastikspork.. thanks a lot for the one-day protection on my userpage.. I appreciate it... hope the guy won't bother me anymore.. cheers!--peads (talk) 06:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. We can protect it for longer if it becomes a problem. Plastikspork (talk) 06:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok.. if it becomes a problem, I'll make another request.. the guy or those guys are reacting to my comments in the Talk:Philippines about a rebel organization and their recent activities.. I didn't reply to him since it doesn't make sense to diplomatically talk to an anonymous user.. thanks again! --peads (talk) 06:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Sir Plastikspork... thanks for the protection.. I think he is taking it personally... and ever since he vandalized my userpage the first time around.. I've been avoiding the Philippines article in order to avoid another personal attack from him... but he seems to not given up.. --peads (talk) 08:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Helo Mr. Plastikspork

Hello my name is Julius and recently you deleted my article $o Fly Boy$ Club and I dont fully understand why but most importantly what I have to do to keep the page from getting deleted. Can you please message my back or respond and let me know what I have to do to stay away from deletion again and reframe my page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliusdevon (talk • contribs) 18:54, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. Plastikspork (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Analance

My article has been tagged as 'dated prod|concern = Non-notable software'. please asist me to make my article notable. (Rajansryas (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC))

Responded on your talk page. Plastikspork (talk) 06:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Viewing deleted articles?

Is there a way to view a deleted article? Shymian (talk) 06:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

In general, it is not possible to view deleted articles, unless you are an admin. I might be able to help if there is a particular article in which you are interested. Plastikspork (talk) 06:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. It wasn't that important, just wondered cuz a page I was looking at earlier is now deleted and I couldn't remember what was on it that could have prompted the deletion. Thanks! Shymian (talk) 06:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Which article? Plastikspork (talk) 06:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

stamdogg Shymian (talk) 06:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Deleting PRODs

Hello,

I noticed that you deleted a number of PRODs today as expired that weren't actually expired yet. PRODs are expected to remain open for a minimum of 7 days (not 6 1/2), so I just ask that you be more careful in the future.

Thank you, ThaddeusB (talk) 15:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Additionally, I would to specifically contest the following deletions:

• Association of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties
• Barton-Rush Bill
• HIV Prevention Act of 1997
• Keven Stammen

If you could please restore these articles, I would appreciate it. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I have been on travel and the clock on my computer must have been off. I will certainly be more careful in the future. Thank you for letting me know about my error. I will restore the articles right away. Plastikspork (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response. Most of your PROD deletions last night were actually up to ~20 hours early, so I assume you were just off by a day. :) In any case, those are the only 4 I found that were remotely notable so there is really no need to restore any others, as that would just be pointless process. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

P.S. nice job figuring out I meant stamdogg despite the fact I referred to it as Keven Stammen, which didn't previously exist. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Survivor: Palau

Hello, Plastikspork. You have an old and moldy message wallowing around on Wortschätzer's talk page.
Wortschätzer hadn't known enough until now to post a Talkback after he had thanked you on 18 April beneath your message on his talk page.
Here's a hearty cheer for your recent designation!         I feel quite sure you'll wear it well.

~ ~ Wortschätzer (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Dr. Mohammad Al-Hashemi

Hi,

We have recently created a page for Dr. Mohammad Al-Hashemi, a Doctor in Alternative Medicine. He requested this page to be made, and so we created it. This page was not made for any advertisement and the person himself only wanted for his profile to be seen on Wikipedia. We will make sure more external links and sources is to be added and we will remove a large amount of the pictures added on the page. We promise to go by the rules of Wikipedia, could you just tell us what is displeasing and we will remove it, and we kindly request for you to return the page and as we promised no further disobeying of the rules will occur.

Yours faithfully,

Ahmed Al-Menahi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glance2002 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Beelen

Thanks for your note regarding CSD. I agree that this one was probably on the fringes. Poltair (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

RE:ECBEA

I think you meant A7? Plastikspork (talk) 17:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Please refer to the articles talk page, where the author requests deletion. Thanks Patchy1Talk To Me! 17:22, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Plastikspork (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Happy Bastille Day!

Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not!  :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 23:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Help requested

Hey, I noticed that you were on. Could you have a look at {{user}}'s contribs? He's the same user as Boboy9 (talk · contribs) who got indef blocked for adding copyrighted material. Paul kenneth has picked up where Boboy9 left off and is reintroducing the same pages. Thanks, Javért | ^Talk 01:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, Paul kenneth monroyo mora (talk · contribs) is correct. He may not have deleted contribs yet, but all of his lives ones should match Boboy's deleted ones. Best, Javért | ^Talk 01:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done There was a problem with your first link in the {{user}}, but I figured it out. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Oops, yeah, I see it now. I put him in as "user talk". I appreciate your help. :) Best, Javért | ^Talk 07:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:Snowflake

Thanks. All moves are fine and accurate. Some talk threads were obsolete anyway. Other links will be built up gradually by editors. Materialscientist (talk) 04:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Block of User:Paul kenneth monroyo mora

Good morning,

As I investigated the CorenSearchBot report which flagged the first five articles eventually leading to the block of the above user, just a few comments here with the intent of ensuring that you have the full picture:

• The source material is licensed under GFDL 1.2, which has become incompatible with Wikipedia only as recently as June 16th this year. The user may have acted in good faith, not realizing that he was in violation
• From the username, he may be one of the two contributors to the source site's material, and again, he may have acted in good faith with the initial addition of the material
• Due to a bug, CSB cannot currently post notices to talk pages which have not been created yet, so the user may not have been aware of the issue until later actions either by me or CobaltBlueTony, who initially believed the material to be in compliance because of the GFDL 1.2 license on the source
• I note however, that he subsequently disregarded the manual note I left on his talk page and went on to add two more of the same articles
• Further, he appears to have created a sock with the purpose of evading his block under Paul kenneth m mora (talk · contribs) and reposted the material deleted as is
• Last but not least, there are traces of an earlier deletion performed on July 13th on some of the articles, which might indicate yet another username blocked in the meantime. Just read the help requested section above, you're already fully aware of this :)

There you go. Toon05 may possibly have more to add. Not sure any of this is helpful, if it isn't, please accept my apologies for intruding. Cheers, MLauba (talk) 08:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I was acting upon the request of Javert, who informed me of the block evasion. As far as I can tell there are at least three accounts. The details that you provided above are quite helpful. Thank you again. Plastikspork (talk) 16:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Question

Hey I am having trouble finding the Red Green Blue numbers for the hexadecimal color #20A020. I would apreciate it, Thank you. WikiMaster500 (talk) 20:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Are you asking for a named color, or the decimal equivalent? To convert a hexcolor code into decimal, you just break it up: 20 (hex) = 32 (dec), A0 (hex) = 160 (dec), 20 (hex) = 32 (dec). Plastikspork (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, if there is a name for the color code #20A020 then could you please help me find it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiMaster500 (talk • contribs)

Try this http://shallowsky.com/colormatch/index.php?hex=20A020 Plastikspork (talk) 21:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:NODRAMA reminder

Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 21:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Secure Wikipedia

Thanks, but what is "secure Wikipedia"? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and I've just spotted the vandalism revert, thanks again Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

There is an https interface to Wikipedia, https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en as opposed to http://en.wikipedia.org . When you login, the login screen mentions the secure connection as an option. You can make a Wikipedia URL work with both by using 'fullurl' for the base prefix. I wish there was support to make it so people browsing under https would always see the https links and people browsing under http would always see the http links, but not yet. Also, if you log in under https it doesn't log you into all the other wikimedia projects for some reason. I'm sure this is much more information than you cared to hear. In any event, I hope that helps explain the situation. No problem about reverting the vandalism. I have about 2500 pages on my watchlist and that particular edit looked rather fishy. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 16:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks for that. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for this. I explained the user now how to use talk pages. :) Garion96 (talk) 20:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the fix [6]! — Kralizec! (talk) 22:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

For the speedy deletion of Girls' schools in Pakistan. In case you were curious, I was trying to create the category and, um, forgot to put the word "category" in there first. Whoops! Matt Deres (talk) 02:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

MekongNet

How my article will be accepted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chansor (talk • contribs) 02:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Sprk script

I was wondering how you can install individual modules of your script, if it's possible? Specifically, I'd really like to have the date-formatting script, but the other ones I basically never use so they just take up space in the toolbox. I tried a few things, but they didn't work. Is this even possible with the current setup?

Also, I've found one common false positive with the sprk script's date formatting: If something like ?date=2009-9-12 is part of a URL, the script tries to change it and would then break the link. Maybe adding the RegEx \|[ ]* before the first group in the various date replacements will catch these by only modifying those with a pipe before them, e.g., template parameters? Thanks. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Good idea. I had a fairly complicated method for selecting which links were added, but it should probably be scrapped. A better method is to just split the script into smaller chunks. If you include User:Plastikspork/date.js, it will only add the three date formatting buttons. I also modified the script to make it look for the pipe as you suggested. Inadvertent modification of URLs is a continuous problem for many of these scripts. Thanks again! Plastikspork (talk) 04:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Awesome! Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent change to Template:Infobox Album

I think your font size change may have been a bit premature, Plastikspork. I think you should have waited until there was consensus to change the font size before actually changing it. Previous consensus was to make it smaller, and that definitely has not been overridden yet. Timmeh 16:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree, that was too bold. I have semi-reverted my changes back to 'font-size:88%' for all three templates, which solves the consistency problem without overriding the font-size change consensus. Sorry about that. Plastikspork (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Case of mistaken identity

Hi, You just left a post on my talk page asking why I put an advert tag on BCKS. It wasn't me that put the tag on, it was there prior to my edit of the page. You will have to go through the page history to figure out when it went in and by whom. Let me know if you need a hand J04n(talk page) 18:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Double mistaken identity. It appears some signbot attributed the comment to me. All I did was remove the db-spam tag from your talk page. I replied on your talk page as well. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, at this point I'm not even sure who I am! J04n(talk page) 20:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

(See User talk:Plastikspork/Barnstar)

P.S.-Feel free to check-out the major expansion I did to article Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino. Thant infobox was to be used in an article called Spice Market Buffet (Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino) so keep a look out for that page:DSchnitzelMannGreek. 21:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar. Let me know if you need any more help. Plastikspork (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

2009–10 UEFA Champions League group stage

I placed the deletion tag on that page because I intended to move UEFA Champions League 2009–10 group stage to that location, but I couldn't do that because of the redirect's article history. Could you do that for me? – PeeJay 22:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done Plastikspork (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much. – PeeJay 22:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Question

See also: Spice Market Buffet and template:infobox buffet

It is looking good so far but the picture I put in the infobox won't show. Can you help?--SchnitzelMannGreek. 02:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done I switched the 'infbox' to the 'infobox buffet' that you created and it appears to work fine. Plastikspork (talk) 04:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

leave me a message url update

Thanks for the update on my page. Good find.--RadioFan (talk) 16:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Rollaxer Salt

Hi Plastispork,

I note you speedied this article. Could you also salt the page to prevent it's recreation by the diabolical spammers? :) Many thanks! Crafty (talk) 22:37, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done Although, I did not heavily salt it as it appears it was only being recreated by one spammer. Plastikspork (talk) 22:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! :) Crafty (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Wildcats: World's End

I tagged PROD for that article, it is too empty context space. Speedy declined and it is now taking to PROD. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Or a redirect to WildCats Volume 5 would probably suffice. Plastikspork (talk) 01:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, done. I redirected to World's End (comics). ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Even better. Thanks. Plastikspork (talk) 02:00, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!

Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary states indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:

• T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
• WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
• WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
• WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
• WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 02:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

		The Anti-Drama Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in The Great Wikipedia Dramaout 2009, avoiding drama for a full 5 days!--The LegendarySky Attacker 04:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Return of User:Paul kenneth monroyo mora?

Today, a new user, User:Borines, went on another wikipilipinas TV station copvio creation spree. Do I hear quack? MLauba (talk) 07:57, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Update: already indef'd by User:Closedmouth MLauba (talk) 10:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Sprague High School

Thank you for reviewing the table on Sprague High School. They look better. Johnstonkl (talk) 20:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Keep up the good work. Plastikspork (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Marah and Kapri

Can you please restore Marah and Kapri article and copy it to Villains in Power Rangers: Ninja Storm#Marah and Kapri. After you copied to Villains in Power Rangers article, you will delete Marah and Kapri article. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 05:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I restored it to User:ApprenticeFan/Marah and Kapri. Let me know when you are done with it and I can delete it. Plastikspork (talk) 05:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. Delete it for good and I cleaned up some unsourced original research about their Good moral and behavior. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 06:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Moved back and deleted. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

re: Lyons Township High School

Greetings Plastispork!

I think there was a misunderstanding, about my reversion on this article, and I want to clarify.

Per WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG#WNTI, alumni are generally not included in a school articles unless they are themselves the subject of an article, have met the criteria to be the subject of an article, or may not have met the criteria for an article, but have an intimate association with an entity that meets WP:N. In my experience of editing, this commonly is used for something like a member of a band who is not notable, while the band is notable.

The alum is not the subject of an article. The company he created is not the subject of an article. These two things raise a red flag regarding the (wikipedia) notability of the person. I hope you will understand that this is why I took the action I did.

G-hits are not criteria for inclusion: several current high school students (usually athletes) can have many G-hits, but are in no way eligible for inclusion. There are several newscasters, businesspeople, college athletes, etc who have hundreds if not thousands of g-hits and all fail notability requirements for being included.

Now having said that, I could still be wrong. Maybe this company is notable, and by founding said company, this person may in fact meet the criteria for inclusion. The person may in fact be notable, and not have an article started about him.

I will leave this alone for now, leaving a note on the article talk page, but there are editors that I have met who would certainly delete this citing the same criteria I have stated. I will give some time for this to develop, but if there is not a more clear verification of notability, he will likely be deleted at some point in the future. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

BTW ... I hope your holiday is restful and enjoyable. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I apologize ... I cannot explain how I blew not finding Cirrus as an article here. I am not sure that everyone would support keeping it, but I certainly have no problem with it. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I would seriously question TMone which is definitely not as notable as Cirrus IMHO. Thanks for watching the article. List creep is always a problem. Plastikspork (talk) 00:26, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

The T.O. Show

I been editing the The T.O. Show so can help too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capoeira Fighter 3 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.

LOL at username & and page. Well first constructive edit to my page haha. Most edits I don't do are from bots. How did you find my page. you know I would have never thought about removing that cat. I don't mind if you are wondering...

Thanks,

^{The Great}_{SaiyanEmperor} 14:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

I found the page while looking through pages in that particular category. There were only a few which were user pages, which was a sign of a cut-and-paste or lack of 'noinclude' tags in the template. I'm glad you didn't mind. Thanks for the feedback. Plastikspork (talk) 11:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Help

If I could have your help on I Love Money page I would appreciate it. Basically people are posting season 3 and season 4 up constantly. They even made an I Love Money (season 4) page. Can you please post a speedy deletion on that page and help me out? Thank you. WikiMaster500 (talk) 03:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for alerting me to the problem. I'm still on vacation, so I have not been watching this page. However, I do check in from time to time to see if I have new messages. By the way, you can always ask for page protection at WP:RFPP and/or ask for speedy deletion by adding the appropriate WP:CSD tag. Thanks again. Plastikspork (talk) 09:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ThaddeusB

I wanted to take a moment to delivery a personal thank you (not "thank spam" :)) for your involvement in my RfA. (It passed 117-2-7 in case you hadn't seen.) As was thrilled to have your "Strong support" as I very much respected you based on our past encounters. I especially appreciated your kind word about my PROD work and look forward to continuing my work in my new role.

Thanks again, ThaddeusB (talk) 04:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Alex Egan

i did everything i sourced what needs to be done ??! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pwnatwii (talk • contribs) 07:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Tool Academy 2

Here I edited Tool Academy season 2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capoeira Fighter 3 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)