Raahulpk
Speedy deletion nomination of Shopkop
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shopkop, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JamesG5 (talk) 08:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Copyright & COI
editHi, I saw your comments, www.shopkop.in belongs to me only and shopkop and all content from www.shopkop.in belongs to me... so keep this page please, on the talk page for Shopkop. There're two issues here. First, see WP:PROMO. You should not be using Wikipedia to promote your own business (which is why "promotion" is one of the deletion criteria I cited), and in fact per WP:COI you're discouraged from writing or editing articles about your own business. Second, even if you own the content cited, per WP:COPYRIGHT you still can't automatically use it here on Wikipedia without taking specific steps to allow it to be used. If you have more questions, you can get advice at the WP:TEAHOUSE. I hope this helps. JamesG5 (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
edit
Hello, Raahulpk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 09:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shopkop
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shopkop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 10:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)unblock
edit
Raahulpk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Raahulpk (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You haven't addressed your inappropriate edits. Please take the time to read WP:SPAM, WP:PROMO, and WP:COI and try again. Yamla (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
i am new over here
unblock
editplease unblock my for writing... i am new over here
Unblock Request
edit Raahulpk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I found my fault, i was trying to write which in advertising manner. i read whole terms and conditions. I promise such things will never happen again. So please kindly allow me to write for my page.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline: Multiple concurrent open requests. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Can you be more specific? You have to:
- convince us that you understand the reason for block, and why that was wrong,
- tell us what kind of edits you want to make if unblocked and how will that be different from your previous editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Unblock Request
edit Raahulpk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- Sorry I am new to writing section of wikipedia so couldn't make it properly. *# Unknowingly i started writing my article in Advertising manner. i found it's prohibited. Sorry for that! this wont happen again in future... i have gone through all terms and conditions and i learnt noms of wikipedia. *# if unblocked first of all will erase all the contents, then i will update it with informative language. so kindly allow me to write. i promise this wont happen again *first of all extremely sorry for inconvenience caused, i literally regret for that. i was new to writing section so couldn't write it with rules. I created the page SHOPKOP for my company, but unknowingly i wrote it with Advertising Content. Before creating page i didn't read the guide to writing your first article. Now when i was blocked from writing i read guide for writing, all terms and conditions, user guide etc. Now i want to share my part for Wikipedia. i want to contribute for your the greatest cause. When unblocked first of all i will erase all the content which is prohibited and assure you such things will never happen again in future. Please kindly look in this matter
Decline reason:
Procedural decline Multiple concurrent open requests. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note to reviewing admin:' This user created a wp:sockpuppet account named User:Shopkop and continued making the same advertising edits. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
why are you not unblocking me?
edit Raahulpk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry I am new to writing section of wikipedia so couldn't make it properly. Unknowingly i started writing my article in Advertising manner. i found it's prohibited. Sorry for that! this wont happen again in future... i have gone through all terms and conditions and i learnt noms of wikipedia. if unblocked first of all will erase all the contents, then i will update it with informative language. so kindly allow me to write. i promise this wont happen again first of all extremely sorry for inconvenience caused, i literally regret for that. i was new to writing section so couldn't write it with rules. I created the page SHOPKOP for my company, but unknowingly i wrote it with Advertising Content. Before creating page i didn't read the guide to writing your first article. Now when i was blocked from writing i read guide for writing, all terms and conditions, user guide etc. Now i want to share my part for Wikipedia. i want to contribute for your the greatest cause. When unblocked first of all i will erase all the content which is prohibited and assure you such things will never happen again in future. Please kindly look in this matter
Decline reason:
The fact that you evaded your block through the creation of Shopkop to continue promoting your company makes me disinclined to accept your unblock appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I have asked for unblocking request so many times with proper apology. I am new here.
- Either unblock me or allow other people to create this page again Raahulpk (talk) 05:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Please see WP:SO, no more socks to advertise here and you may be eligible for it. —SpacemanSpiff 06:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- i have read all the contents... terms and conditions...noms....what next? 2405:204:908E:E0B7:B4CD:DD1E:26F6:1424 (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Wait for six months wihtout creating another sock account. —SpacemanSpiff 06:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- six months would be very long time... i have to shoe my page to the people.... Advertising was the reason behind blocking..... I apologies for that... i wont do it again... i have read everything necessary before creating any page.... please help me out.... Raahulpk (talk) 06:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- NO, you or anyone else can not create that page to show to people. You can do that on other websites, this is an encyclopaedia. Your talk page access will be removed if you continue to ask for having your advert featured here. —SpacemanSpiff 06:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)