Welcome!

Hello, Rahul Vijay Kumar.  Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:
    Introduction to Wikipedia
    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    Editing tutorial
    How to edit a page
    Simplified Manual of Style
    The basics of Wikicode
    How to develop an article
    How to create an article
    Help pages
    What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
    Do be bold
    Do assume good faith
    Do be civil
    Do cite reliable sources
    Do maintain a neutral point of view
    Don't spam
    Don't infringe copyright
    Don't add original research
    Don't commit vandalism
    Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
    Ask a question
or you can:
    Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
    Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the   button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.



August 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Naam Tamilar Katchi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Naam Tamilar Katchi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Naam Tamilar Katchi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - SUN EYE 1 13:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you recently removed content from Supreme Leader (North Korean title) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HurricaneEdgar 05:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. HurricaneEdgar 05:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seeman (politician), you may be blocked from editing. - SUN EYE 1 05:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi. - SUN EYE 1 05:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. PLS add sourced if you not add sourced this is will considering as see WP:OR Wikipedia:SOURCE HurricaneEdgar 06:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Seeman (politician). - SUN EYE 1 10:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Naam Tamilar Katchi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SUN EYE 1 16:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - SUN EYE 1 16:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing. - SUN EYE 1 16:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Vijayalakshmi (Kannada actress), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SUN EYE 1 06:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

If you really want to add "right-wing" to Naam Tamilar Katchi, you must WP:CITE reliable sources which says it. Edit warring over it will make you lose your editing privileges more than ever since you are in the verge of getting indefinitely blocked.- SUN EYE 1 17:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Naam Tamilar Katchi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Indefinite block

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 19:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mohan G moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mohan G, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Me in Wikipedia

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahul Vijay Kumar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I made Correct Edit So They Block Me,So Unblock MeRahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 18:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your user talk page is full of warnings for disruptive edits. PhilKnight (talk) 19:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahul Vijay Kumar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Some Fake Id Block Me Unblock Me Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 15:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahul Vijay Kumar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 18:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Rahul Vijay Kumar (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Autoblocked]] because your IP address was recently used by "[[User:Rahul Vijay Kumar|Rahul Vijay Kumar]]". The reason given for Rahul Vijay Kumar's block is: "{{checkuserblock-account}}: Abusing [[WP:SOCK|multiple accounts]]: Please see: [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahul Vijay Kumar]]".


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 12:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 12:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock me Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahul Vijay Kumar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand why I were blocked and I understand of the policy I were against. I Address the reason for me block in my reasoning. I Admit that I did something wrong and that it won't happen again. I Show that the block is not necessary to stop you from causing further problems on the site.

Decline reason:

You aren't convincing yourself, you are convincing us. Frankly, it looks like you simply don't understand written English and cannot write coherent English. Perhaps you would be happier contributing to the version of Wikipedia in your native language. Yamla (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahul Vijay Kumar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked and I understand the policy I were against. I Address the reason for me block in my reasoning. I Admit that I did something wrong and that it won't happen again. I Show that the block is not necessary to stop me from causing further problems on the site. Rahul Vijay Kumar (talk) 09:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are just repeating words back to us. I think that Yamla is correct in that you should contribute to the version of Wikipedia in your primary language. You will need to improve your English skills in order to participate here. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll add for the record that I just blocked yet another sock of this account. This user is now banned from editing per WP:3X. I am revoking talk page access because of these repeated bad faith unblock requests - you can contact WP:UTRS if you think there are reasons why you should be unblocked, but you will need to stop trying to evade your block before anyone will be prepared to act on an unblock request. Girth Summit (blether) 10:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mohan G

edit

  Hello, Rahul Vijay Kumar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohan G, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mohan G

edit
 

Hello, Rahul Vijay Kumar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mohan G".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply