RashmikantT

Welcome!

Hello, RashmikantT. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do cite reliable sources   Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't add original research   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 12:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

RashmikantT, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RashmikantT! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vidarbha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Vidarbha. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Amravati, you may be blocked from editing. DO not add personal commentary in the articles. No reason tarnishing the image of the settlement. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Godi media. You have also been adding text that is not neutral to the article. bonadea contributions talk 10:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

You fucking shit holes u suck RashmikantT (talk) 10:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

RashmikantT, it is never fun to have your edit reverted, but you can't attack your fellow editors – No personal attacks is a Wikipedia policy. The content and sources you added, about courts stopping various programmes, might belong in some Wikipedia article about media controversies in India, but Godi media is an article about that term, and so content and sources that don't discuss (or even use) the term do not belong in the article. I hope that makes sense. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 14:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 14:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Why u reverted indian to ndtv jounalist idk thats not "neutral" as well There r several pages like dhruv rathee where people made him anti bjp why u silent there RashmikantT (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

And i dont see why i cant use those godi media anchor names or the indian before ravish kumar thats fine for u I have given the articles where the agitators were not only addressed but branded as terrorist it is all over the news websites why i cant use it There is no allegation they were branded terrorist by godi media it is available RashmikantT (talk) 19:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Total fatty matter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please provide citations as requested in the article. You were also under discretionary sanctions. Please read more about them. -- DaxServer (talk) 06:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ramdev, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. A week ago, you were specifically warned about personal attacks and asked to adhere to the policy on assuming good faith. bonadea contributions talk 10:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

U dimwit i am giving u source, u r not What makes ur edition reliable if it has no evidence RashmikantT (talk) 10:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Ramdev, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- DaxServer (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Pls gracefully accept my unconditional apology I did not mean harm whatsoever. But pls give source on topics, i find some topics biased even with facts to make content extra "neutral" editors i found just skip the content or make unnecessary changes to it. Like in Ramdev topic it is even u can get on his product that he uses Fluoride in his toothpaste still people claim him as making herbal and mineral extravaganza which i find factually incorrect. There r other instances as well. Still i on all accounts held me as responsible for losing my patience and calling out names. I will fully try to endeavor more in future and will try to not get involved personally. Kindly accept my apology. Let us try to make web factually correct. RashmikantT (talk) 11:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, if you have read the guide to appealing blocks and are willing to abide by the policies, then you would reply under the block notice which is at the end of the page and you should put your text within this template: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} -- DaxServer (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Best of consumer products in India

The article Best of consumer products in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Nothing more than a few lines and external links.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aknell4 (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Best of consumer products in India

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Best of consumer products in India has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review DMacks (talk) 16:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

U suck It is open for general public to download dimwit RashmikantT (talk) 10:04, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 12:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

• The next block should be indefinite IMO. Bishonen | tålk 12:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RashmikantT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am willing to learn, willing to have discussions with seniors in wiki, there is lot of room in me to make a better person than i am today and i just feel wikipedia could be that door for me to not be biased and bring some meaningful change. RashmikantT (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Everyone is biased; the key is in being aware of one's biases. This is why Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state. The main reason for the block is personal attacks; for the block to be removed early, you will need to describe what you will do to avoid making personal attacks and how to better handle resolving disputes. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For not making personal attacks 1.i will endeavor in future more 2.i will think calmly and will try to have meaningful discussion. 3.And i will try to counter by facts rather than name calling. 4. I will try to bring change on way i present myself on wiki 5. And i will listen to other side story as well before making any rash decisions. RashmikantT (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

• Can you explain why it took a block to make you realize the problems with your behavior? You had been given many civil warnings and explanations of how Wikipedia expects users to talk to each other, and to use reliable sources, for instance by Bonadea here and here. All Bonadea got for that was "You fucking shit holes u suck" and "U dimwit". But as soon as you're actually blocked, you're suddenly soft-spoken. Is it that you respect admins because they have the power to block you, but don't have any respect at all for regular users? In my opinion, two weeks was a short block for such behavior, and I'd certainly hesitate to unblock you. But I'll leave it to 331dot. Bishonen | tålk 22:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC).

I was heavily relying on the fact that for one tiny user perhaps the warnings would not result in ban; plane-ly i thought u were bluffing. I cant however overlook the downfall or, the language i used for other users particularly when i was ban. I was king in my mind after few edits i cant lie about it, i thought i have power, perhaps it is a strong word but corrupted me. I am always soft spoken these links of abusing is exception. Had i been in your shoes it would not convince me either i cant blame u. About extending the ban, if u extend it i would happily accept it:) RashmikantT (talk) 07:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

I have a motion to add, i plead not guilty in case of disruptive editing, as i am told i am guilty of personal attacks and that is why i have been blocked however i noticed just now that in another charge i have been punished of disruptive editing. I want to defend it. RashmikantT (talk) 18:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

If you wish, you may make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bharatiya Janata Party without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dewritech (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

In intro i find name of communist party of india absurd How indian national congress is biggest party still? The facts should put 1st rather than opinion like no of seats is fact but right wing is kind of derivative from book... RashmikantT (talk) 00:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Indian National Congress, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. TheWikiholic (talk) 03:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Bharatiya Janata Party, you may be blocked from editing. TheWikiholic (talk) 03:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aam Aadmi Party‎, when that content is supported by reliable sources cited for it. Wikipedia has principle of verifiability not truth.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aam Aadmi Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi RashmikantT! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Aam Aadmi Party that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 04:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aam Aadmi Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Anna Hazare‎. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your alleged information is scaring me. And I need to comprehend the importance of information rather than some allegations. There are allegations that holocaust didn't happen, that the earth is round, etc. The allegations can't be facts you don't have the direct data even to verify it. It's called hearsay plane and simple. I respectfully want to state my chagrin with respect to your edits which is solely for the sake of editing. RashmikantT (talk) 01:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Not round* RashmikantT (talk) 01:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.-- Toddy1 (talk) 03:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Aam Aadmi Party, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aam Aadmi Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

You keep censoring the article on the Aam Aadmi Party. You claim in your edit summaries that the source does not support the statements that you keep deleting. That is not truthful. The article on the Aam Aadmi Party cites an article from The Hindu for these statements, and that article explicitly supports the statements you claim are unsupported by any of the citations.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

However, he did not answer the question the media has been posing on a possible alliance between the two parties. In fact, AAP leader Prashant Bhushan was quoted in a newspaper report as stating that the party would not tie up with the CPI(M) as corruption had seeped into its rank and file. This is your basis I think, from the news article... So if someone asks about ufo it can be included in pentagon and its secrets? Plus prashant Bhushan, by the news doesn't seem to respond to the CPI M member but a general statement, however by teddy's editing it seems like prashant has been responding to the CPI m member, it's frivolous and very vague about the incident. If it is a media speculation, kindly add a new section called "rumors" we can put such news in that section, there is also a rumor by opposing parties like Kejriwal, de facto leader of AAP, is a terrorist and Khalistan funded, even Indian pm, whilst his election rally "accused" it. By teddy's logic kejriwal can be granted a terrorist, and his party, the AAP, can be called as a Khalistani funded party, anyhow I'm asking the person concerned to recognize the biaseness in the statement presented in ideology section which I deleted with no prejudice whatsoever. I'm again asking for a non threatening tone if possible in future :) RashmikantT (talk) 19:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

If you think an article should be deleted.

At Talk:Integral humanism (India) you wrote that the deletion of the page Integral humanism (India) should be discussed. The way to go about that is to use the process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. There are instructions on the page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:47, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Aam Aadmi Party does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Venkat TL (talk) 13:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aam Aadmi Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Copyright violation at Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Your edit to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 03:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

How should I know which content is copyrighted and which is not. Many cite news articles aren't those copyrighted too? Kindly resolve the query at the earliest. Do you block certain individuals only or threatens others also RashmikantT (talk) 03:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Everything on the internet is copyrighted, (unless mentioned that it is not). Wikipedia admins will block users who dont follow the copyright rules. Venkat TL (talk) 08:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

What Venkat TL says is correct. The site that you copied from, https://www.clearias.com/reservation-in-india/, also has a notice at the bottom that reads "Copyright © 2022 - ClearIAS.com", so there is no indication that it's compatibly licensed. Citing news articles and summarizing them in one's own words is not a copyright violation, but you can't directly copy copyright text from other websites to Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 12:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Your edit to Ajmer rape case has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)