Rayshade

• Welcome!

Hello, Rayshade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Spoonerism are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Sanju Pass

Dear Rayshade:

Thanks for your note which I appreciate especially as I had feared an argument from you know who. There is absolutely no need to apologise, though, I make similar mistakes all the time. I send you my very best wishes, John Hill (talk) 22:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Dear Rayshade: I award you with this "Original Barnstar" in recognition of your excellent unbiased work recently on the contentious status of the passes between the Indian subcontinent and the Tarim Basin John Hill (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation of Muqarnas Superfluous

As per disambiguation guidelines, the disambiguation of Muqaranas was unnecessary- the architectural element, from which the Journal takes its name, is clearly primary, and there are no other pages. Given only 2 pages with one primary usage, a hatnote (rather than disambiguation) is appropriate.Mavigogun (talk) 05:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Aye, ack. Sorry for the inconveniece, didn't check policy prior to editing. --Rayshade (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Request for help with editing an image on the Sven Hedin page

G'day Rayshade. As this the only way known to me to request for assistance I take this opportunity as I see you've been a frequent contributor to the Sven Hedin page. In the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Exploring_expeditions_of_Sven_Hedin_1886-1935.jpg there is a grave error with the dates in the blue line [expedition lasting from 1890 till 1991!], and I've requested assistance on the discussion page, alas to no avail. I've also contacted the Sven Hedin Foundation as they appear to be copyright holders and as such might have the error in their archives as well. Thusfar no answer from them either. I'm not in the position to edit this image, nor have I found enough info on 'how to procceed' on any of the help pages. As such I'm taking this straw and would politely request for your help, either by editing it, or helping me out with a pointer. Thanks in advance and best of greetings (Qwrk (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC))

Aye, it's a jpeg image, instead of editing it should be converted to svg version, as far as I know, which needs manual labor. If you open it up on editor for retouching, decompress/recompress will lose some details. But, I've added note of the inconsistency to Commons description of the image. I'm not sure the Swedish and German descriptions are top-notch, but they should at least warn users. Thanks for pointing it out! --Rayshade (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hazara page

Hello. You edited the Hazara, Pakistan page and removed the name of Nawabzada Salahuddin, Nawab of Amb, ex MNA and former Federal Minister's name from the notable persons list. It was probably the only name on that list with reference footnote tag. Why did you feel like removing it? Wikitanoli (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Aye, that must've been a genuine botch-up. Checking and re-checking, I see no reason whatsoever to leave him out. Sorry about that and thanks for pointing out. Cheers, --Rayshade (talk) 21:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou! cheers! Wikitanoli (talk) 21:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Gilgit

You are most welcome. :) Green Giant (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Ata Fida Aziz is Paknur evading a sock. He was banned a year before that too YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 04:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I'll try to dig through his/hers change log, at least the changes Partition of India --> independence of Pakistan. Cheers, --Rayshade (talk) 11:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

avoid using ā

Avoid replacing a with ā as you did in Banihal. No ref there mentions it as ā, unreferenced materials are removed without delay. This is english language wikipedia, see WP:MOS for further details. Doorvery far (talk) 10:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Also your this edit [1] breaks template map due to unnecessary wikilinking. Please be careful while editing unfamiliar template. Doorvery far (talk) 10:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Aye, sorry about the mess, I'm still learning W—been here actively since May. Looking back ta banihal, it's true that only place mentioning it with "ā" is GeoNames. Reading between the lines, GeoNames is not to be used at all as a source? Thing is, it's not only Banhal where I've used GeoNames coordinates if literary sources or maps have nothing. I have only used GeoNames as a last resort, though. Cheers, --Rayshade (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Never mind, problem been your edit could not be undone by "undo link" because edits were scattered, so i had to change back individually. If refs are conflicting we go for majority, also since it is english wiki, not french, we avoid symbols like - ' etc.. Doorvery far (talk) 04:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kari Voutilainen

The article Kari Voutilainen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources indicating the notability of this watchmaker.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Citation templates

Basically, the templates were created as a shortcut system for Wikipedia users who were unfamiliar with bibliographic referencing. The creators have chosen a particular citation and bibliography style based on the American Psychological Association (APA) Style guide which is used for academic work in the social sciences (anthropology, archaeology, economics, geography, history, linguistics, political science, international studies, communications, and, in some contexts, psychology). I prefer the Modern Language Association (MLA) Style Guide which is used predominately for academic works in the humanities (ancient and modern languages, literature, law, history, philosophy, religion, and visual and performing arts. Additional subjects often included in the humanities are technology, anthropology, area studies, communication studies, cultural studies, and linguistics.). Since the work I specialize in is the history of a technology subject, e.g. aircraft, the MLA style guide works best, however, there are no Wikipedia templates written for this format. It is not that I am a Luddite, as I have been a reference librarian for over 30 years and had used electronic referencing templates for decades. Since I and many other Wikipedia editors can use "scratch" cataloging by hand-writing the preferred style guide, I find I can accommodate all manner of media, from print to non-print, every aspect of authorship and publishing and yet have the information appear correctly to the reader or viewer. FWiW, it still amounts to the old/new adage: "garbage in, garbage out." Bzuk (talk) 04:28, 21 September 2010 (UTC).

However, in the case of the Convair XFY article and the bibliographic notation added for the Allen article, first of all, the note should have been placed in alphabetical order, and the template chosen has some problems, namely in the way that the publishing source is identified, i.e. the periodical publisher should be identified by name, issue, date, then page number, with ISSN given as an option. Rather than wrestling with an inaccurate and error-filled template, it is often easier simply to write out the notation properly. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC).

Bf109 and conversion template

"RLM overlinking removed; only first occurrence should be iw linked. The infobox doesn't still look good with all the convinfobox templates - why put all of them with conversion template?"

As overlinking goes i'm of thought that new occurrences between paragraphs could be linked because it's pretty big page, and i personally like to have quick link beside me rather to scroll thu page where th i already see that unfamiliar abbreviation" (or that odd king/ruler/character in play), at least nowadays proper linking doesnt cost too much of cloud space. Convinfobox gives better auto-conversions than copy-pasting someones bad calculus. I assumed that at least metric units (for Germany) are properly copied from respectable source. But seems that some people might be faint of heart for non-working (Aircraft template) when convinfobox is used, instead properly filling all those items in list, and hate that "()" which template leaves when missing parameters in list, no matter if converted results are off by few inches. Convinfobox simply gives more accurate information if used properly with significant and it's there ready for usage. But seems some disagree with me, compare my version with current reverts.Aikenware (talk) 00:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Aye, yeah, the extra ()'s looked kinda bad and the extra mess it makes on source text, that's what I was referring to. I'm no expert in Wikipedia, certainly not on templates, but couldn't help thinking that template should take care of conversion i.e. it would be Really Good to propose necessary changes to template itself — would be much nicer to read the source text as well when editing. It's much better to do conversion just once in template and perhaps fix those few places with convinfobox that the standard template doesn't cut it. BTW, what was the main reason to use convinfobox on Bf109 article in the first place?

On the iw links, I prefer minimum amount of clutter in the source, but that's personal opinion. It's true that on long pages the iw links could be used more than once, MoS does allow more links. Don't know for sure what would be the best solution on this one, but perhaps not every occurrence of RLM?

LSAT Tag

Look, I'm not arguing with the tag but can you take a few moments and expand a bit on the tag as the multiple issues doesn't give great amounts of what you would like changed. I might consider helping but I rather dislike shooting in the dark.Tirronan (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Aye, 'tis good to hear someone would like to improve LSAT article.

First off, the article in my opinion is way too long for the given title and scope, a lot of fat cutting is in order. The introduction could do with one paragraph instead of three. Drop the self-promotional puffery. Program achievements section duplicates stuff from other articles, sometimes in identical paragraphs. Perhaps cut it just to see also section. Majority of sources are written by two researchers, Shipley and Spiegel. All links in article to AAI Corp are dead, probably the presentations exist but have been moved.

Seems that dtic.mil links work for now, when I tagged those as dead they didn't work. American rifleman link does not work. Most important issue though would be to get source(s) other than PowerPoints slides produced by the LSAT program members, i.e. reliable 3rd party ones. AAICorp seems to be the sole contractor, so any info from their pages should be regarded with grain of salt. Please do take a shot at the article, can't get worse than it is now! Cheers, Rayshade (talk) 23:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muqarnas (journal)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muqarnas (journal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusio (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Hubert Jones

In your editing, you removed the text of a military decoration citation from this article. This is an erroneous edit for two reasons:

• It is a government document, with no author to whom copyright could be assigned, even if it were legal to copyright public documents.

• It was created so long ago that any possible copyright would be expired.

However, the bot is not smart enough to know this, so these citations are often tagged. They inevitably remain in, or are restored to, an article. However, some editors are led astray by the bot.

It is my intent to restore said text. However, I thought it fair to message you so that we can avoid unnecessary disagreement.

Georgejdorner (talk) 01:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Aye, thanks for dropping a line. Did also wonder if the copyright had been expired but did not know copyright status of a gov document. The text was placed inline without quotation marks, alas, the original author has already restored the quotation and added quotation marks. Take a look, if that satisfies you by all means let's keep it. Cheers, Rayshade (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

It is always a pleasure to chat with a civil and amiable fellow editor.

Georgejdorner (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

WQA and the removal of citation templates

Hello, Rayshade. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The issue is at WP:WQA#user:Bzuk and the removal of citation templates. Thanks, Andy Dingley (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations Rayshade, your image Image:Ekeberg-central-oslo-panorama.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this: User:Presidentman/potd/19 November 2024. Presidentman (talk · contribs) (Talkback) Random Picture of the Day 00:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Events leading to the Sino-Indian War

An article that you have been involved in editing, Events leading to the Sino-Indian War , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Rayshade; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Harrison Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OSS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Remagen

No problem. Thanks. Dapi89 (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rayshade. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rayshade. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rayshade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)