User talk:Realityhere

Deletion discussion about James A. P. Varkey

Hello Realityhere, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, James A. P. Varkey, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James A. P. Varkey.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:48, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Chandra Shekhar Natarajan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chandra Shekhar Natarajan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Please add WP:SECONDARY per WP:RS.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SatnaamIN (talk) 23:17, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Chandra Shekhar Natarajan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chandra Shekhar Natarajan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandra Shekhar Natarajan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Realityhere, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – for contributing to other articles. Writing a new article is tough, so getting experience elsewhere is useful.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:31, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Link to section ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 14:37, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Please stop

Hello, Please stop relisting discussions. You only have a few edits, and are not experienced enough yet to do so. When someone reverts your edits, according to Wikipedia:BRD, you should talk about it (on their talk page), rather than revert it. 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 23:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay but there was a option to do it, so I did it, tell the policy makers to not keep it open for less edit counters. Realityhere (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

You clicked it because there was an option to do so? (Also, what do you mean by less edit counters?) 🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 23:48, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

You mentioned I’ve only few edits Realityhere (talk) 23:49, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

WP:RELISTBIAS would be useful reading here. Discussions shouldn't be relisted where there's a clear outcome. Wikipedia's system allows editors to do a lot of things they should not do, including changing other people's comments or blanking entire noticeboards, but relies on the good faith of editors to not do those things despite the technical ability to do so. Your low number of edits is an indication that these were good faith closings, but that you just didn't have enough experience to make them.

When I was learning to parallel park outside my house 30 years ago, my first attempt had me knock the garbage can waiting for pickup about 15 feet, and strewing garbage all over the road, which I had to get out and clean up. It was not unfair for my grandfather to note at the time that I was simply very unexperienced; it was being kind. If I did that now with the garbage can at 47 years old, I think the reaction would be "what the hell are you doing?" CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on VST Industries

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page VST Industries, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Patu Keswani

Please don't reinstate articles that had WP:BLP cleanup tags on them. If you want to write a better article that is properly sourced then, well, I haven't looked at the person enough to have an opinion about whether that's possible; but reinstating material that has been identified as being unsourced is not the way. Morwen (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

You’re wrong here, I never published previously deleted material Realityhere (talk) 22:03, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

I can see from the edit log that you literally reverted it byte-for-byte to the edit made on April 5. Here's the link that shows that. Morwen (talk) 22:06, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Ofcourse I can also see it, but it was never repeated there been change so if you want it removed do not undo take it seek consensus unless you have consensus level experience in your edit history. Realityhere (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

58K edit count yet you reverted without consensus surprising honestly Realityhere (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

And one more thing I know you are an admin, i updayed myself on Patu keswani, yet you chose to revert it without checking references i changed, you just believed that i didn’t made a difference Realityhere (talk) 22:15, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

WP:BLP is policy and the link I posted shows you did not make a single change to the edit - you just reinstated the page as it stood on April 5th, prior to it being redirected. Morwen (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Now I’m right here, I never reinstated the previously redirected article infact i actually made difference Realityhere (talk) 22:20, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

This is simply not true. Morwen (talk) 22:22, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Its fine admin, I dont wanna get into this deeply anymore because I know its gonna get wasted since i rights to block me, so lets cut the chase and I’ll leave it here. Because you’ll eventually prove yourself right.

I wont anymore talk about Keswani. i’d rather focus on other hospitality Realityhere (talk) 22:22, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Lekha Washington in 2015 at GoodHomes Awards.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Lekha Washington in 2015 at GoodHomes Awards.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Morwen (talk) 22:32, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello Realityhere. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Patu Keswani, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Realityhere. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Realityhere|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 22:35, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Knew it, someone will come with this, but I dont care if this article is deleted or back to original redirect, but i believe based on sources provided actually if you check some fo the sources are independent and reliable, but its okay. I csnt invest my time defending article you wants gone, I’d go back to my job to improve articles Realityhere (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Genuinely you guys are crazy people, considering above things, just you got attention to my edits, which were genuinely real and neutral, suddenly lots of users attacking on my previous edits, even though every edit neutral, considering im your comparison, but it’s cool, elders sometime expect respect for no reason even though theu dont deserve Realityhere (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Wait, is that a Wikidata item? See Q16980003. —KuyaMoHirowo (talk • contribs) 23:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Seriously i didn’t even uploaded it, it was updated in 2024c get some CU here lol Realityhere (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Since I decided to do some neutral job, paid people came across

Not directly mentioning here everyone, but you can check my talk page, I made some changes to lemon tree hotel (recent changes with sources) dame hotel owner article was there ai just remoced redirection and completely edited and changed false inline references, yet paid people came across to revert LMAO. Realityhere (talk) 23:13, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

It's very strange that your English in this comment is so poor and yet you are able to produce a draft article that is in reasonably good English. This is a sign of paid editing. Deb (talk) 07:40, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

No that is a sign of tech, grammar can be corrected using ai and grammarly Realityhere (talk) 07:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to StayVista when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:50, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Yotta Data Services when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:39, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of StayVista

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on StayVista, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

No, I dont think so it deserves speedy, it has no advertising content, and its neutrally written and properly sourced, You can take it to AFD if you want. Realityhere (talk) 17:39, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yotta Data Services

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yotta Data Services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Yotta Data Services

Hi. I've moved your article to draft space, where you can work on improving it before submitting for review. Please do not try to move it yourself. Please remember to declare any conflict of interest you may have with the subject. Deb (talk) 07:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yotta Data Services Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yotta Data Services Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)