Wikipedia

User talk:Renamed user df576567etesddf/Archive 9

< User talk:Renamed user df576567etesddf
Latest comment: 10 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 25 December 2013
Archive 5←Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11→Archive 15

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Diary of a Nobody

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. If you feel like looking at something completely different, above is the latest offering that I have placed on the overcrowded FAC page. It would be good to have your thoughts. Brianboulton (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I had been meaning to pop in on the PR for this but I never quite got around to it. I'll be sure to get around to the FAC however —Cliftonian (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sabra

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The first part of your change is fine, as far as it goes - I'm glad to see you used an academic source, and I'm assuming you are not misrepresenting what it says. However the second part is not supported by the OED source, which says exactly what the article said before you changed it (and hence why I re-phrased it slightly to avoid copyright problems). Note that I will have no problem with any changes you might make, as long as they are supported by high-quality sources (and you can't get much better than the OED). Note that, for a long time, the article had a very poor definition, with an equally poor source: "a native-born Israeli", which, apart from the ugly redundancy of "native-born", also implies that non-Jewish Israelis are sabras. I did try to find an extensive, preferably academic, article discussing the whole topic of sabras, and was surprised not to find one in the limited time available to me, so I settled for the OED, of which I'm fortunate to have a printed copy in my possession. --NSH001 (talk) 12:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I replied on NSH001's talk page. —Cliftonian (talk) 15:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

1st day on the Somme

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Question re Rhodesians on the talk page.Keith-264 (talk) 16:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

OK —Cliftonian (talk) 16:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I started a revamp of the Delville Wood page here User:Keith-264/sandbox after Farawayman turned out to be still active so I'll transfer the SR details to it. Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I've just noticed that you are a fascist terrorist involved in the occupation of Palestine so I will have no more dealings with you.Keith-264 (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Er, okay, I guess that's your prerogative. I hope this doesn't affect future cooperation on the First World War articles. —Cliftonian (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

how are you. long time no talk

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

how are you. long time no talk. Hows the army treating you. Hope you enjoy it and your stay in Israel.
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

מה נישמע הונור, הכל בסדר איתי. השתפרתי בעברית שלי בגלל הצבא ובגלל הארוסה הישראלית שלי דליה. הכל טוב בצבא, אני עכשיו רב"ט, יש לי עוד שנה. זה טוב לי, אני אוהב להיות חייל בישראל. לבוא לישראל זה הדבר הכי טוב שעשיתי בחיי. תודה, אני מקווה שאתה גם מרגיש טוב, תגיד לי אם אתה צריך עזרה במשהו, אני תמיד שמח לעזור. —Cliftonian (talk) 06:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
וואו מזל טוב על האירוסים, אני שמח שאתה נהנה בשירות הצבאי שלך. שיהיה לך שירות נעים בשנה שנותרה לך ושמח שעלייה לישראל הייתה טובה.
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 16:54, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WP:FOUR RFC

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Southern Rhodesian involvement in World War I‎...

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

...Just to say that it's great to see the article going for Featured Article status. Best of luck with it over the coming weeks! Hchc2009 (talk) 06:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

  • Thank you very much for the encouragement and the kind words! It's nice to know people enjoy the articles and find them interesting. I hope you're well and have a nice weekend lined up. —Cliftonian (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I'm sorry to bother you. I wondered, in light of your work on Rhodesian military history, whether you might consider doing a GA review for Belgian Congo in World War II? I wrote and nominated it but it's been nominated for a month now and nothing. Finding a reviewer for African articles in general seems incredibly difficult. If you're not interested or busy, I fully understand but it's worth asking anyway!

All the best! Brigade Piron (talk) 09:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

No problem at all. Looks pretty solid for GA status from first glance. I should be able to do it today, if not tomorrow. Good on you for putting work into African history. —Cliftonian (talk) 10:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, I'll get back to you on them tomorrow but many thanks for being so quick too! Incidentally, you might be interested in Kenya Colony in World War II (another one of mine, though not anywhere near GA standard) if you can add anything? All the best, Brigade Piron (talk) 12:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm more of a Rhodesia expert... I am always happy to lend a hand where I can, but I simply don't know that much about Kenya. —Cliftonian (talk) 12:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
No problem! Thank you very much again for your work on the GA! All the best. Brigade Piron (talk) 09:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

South vs. Southern

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You are 100% correct.... was "Southern" indeed! Lets ignore being pedantic, now its correct. However, I am not sure what the Wiki policy is - to use the correct term, or to use the term stated in the book by the publisher? I am though content to simply leave it as it is now. Farawayman (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Good show. —Cliftonian (talk) 05:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Military history Wikiproject coordinator election

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Cliftonian, I'd like to encourage you to nominate for the upcoming election of coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject. I think that you'd do a great job, and you'd bring some new blood into the coordinator team (including from a couple of under-represented backgrounds given that you have an interest in Rhodesia and live in Israel). Details on the election are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/September 2013, but please do let me know if you have any questions about the role or the election process - neither is very time consuming. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the encouragement Nick! I think I will throw my hat into the ring as you suggest. —Cliftonian (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Thames Valley Royals proposal

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

yay —Cliftonian (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Frederick Russell Burnham

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for your helpful edits of the Burnham article. Burnham has been stuck as a FAC since July 30th. Three reviewers have been charitable with their observations and voiced their support for the article once I addressed their comments. However, the first reviewer immediately posted an oppose and left few actionable objections to resolve. She has been both slow and miserly about posting comments even though I speedily addressed all her actionable issues and erred in favor of the reviewer in several cases where the comments were only a matter taste. Still, she has not removed her opposition.

I know you are a subject expert on Rhodesia and a major contributor to related articles. If you have not yet been a major contributor to the Burnham article, I would appreciate your taking a look at the FAC and posting comments here. Many thanks. Ctatkinson (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, we have corresponded in the past and I have a cursory knowledge of the journey the Burnham article has been through. I don't think I will be able to get to this tonight but I will post a thorough review and get the ball rolling on this FAC again tomorrow. I look forward to starting. Have a great weekend —Cliftonian (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Keith Moon

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've gone through all of the issues you raised in Wikipedia:Peer review/Keith Moon/archive1 preparing this for FAC, if you want to have a look. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Benjamin Disraeli

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Greetings, Cliftonian! Can I interest you in a spot of 19th-century non-military history (well, mostly non-military)? Wehwalt and I have been scribing away for some weeks aiming to get Disraeli up to FAC standard, and if you can find time and disposition to look in at the peer review page and give us comments, quibbles, and suggestions for improvement we shall be very glad to see you there. (But quite understand if your commitments prevent it.) Best wishes. Tim riley (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tim! Please do call me John. Yes of course I am interested. I don't know if I will be able to get around to this today but I will certainly have a look over the next few days. Thanks for the heads up and I look forward to taking part in the peer review. Have a great weekend! —Cliftonian (talk) 11:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Honoured! No rush at all. Tim riley (talk) 12:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I chuckled at your "aka 'an Israeli look at Disraeli'." A few weeks ago I was offering a Briton's look at Britten. I just hope this doesn't mean that as a Scouser I am obliged to revise the article on one of our most boring PMs, Lord Liverpool. Tim riley (talk) 14:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Award

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you kindly! Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and happy Rosh Hashanah for the other day! Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I actually don't celebrate Rosh Hashanah, but I still appreciate the thought. Thanks :) —Cliftonian (talk) 14:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

When God Writes Your Love Story

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi John,

Because you participated in the FAC for the When God Writes Your Love Story article, I thought that you should be notified of the article's current featured article review. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

I had seen this, but thanks for the heads up. I will take part. —Cliftonian (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Awesome work you've done here! Thanks!!! Biosthmors (talk) 11:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem at all. —Cliftonian (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for the review; I'm glad you enjoyed it. It was fun to research and write, so it's good to know that it is fun to read too. Thanks as well for the copy-edits, they certainly improved the article's flow. Cheers, Harrias talk 12:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey. Hopefully I've addressed all your comments at Talk:1888–89 New Zealand Native football team/GA1. -- Shudde talk 11:06, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll look over it over the next few hours, thanks for the heads up —Cliftonian (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Keith Moon

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've closed down the peer review and have started the FA review, which is in the expected place - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Keith Moon/archive1. Thanks for all the help in getting it this far. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem at all. I'll pop in at the FAC too. Good luck! —Cliftonian (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Good Humor Bar

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The Barnstar of Good Humor
For a brutally honest - and by extension humorous - answer to the question "What would you do for a Klondike Bar?" that resulted in a well understood smile and chuckle you are are hereby presented with this Barnstar of Good Humor. Endevour to maintain that lightheartedness in your impending assumption of Coordinator duties, you'll find it will serve you well. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Gosh, thank you very much! :) But I haven't got to 20 votes yet, don't jinx things! I hope to see you as a Coordinator over the coming year also. —Cliftonian (talk) 21:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for John Plagis

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Ah, splendid! —Cliftonian (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kellie Loder

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi John,

The Kellie Loder FAC was successful! Thank you for participating in that conversation. I have nominated the article to go up on the main page here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 17:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations David! Thank you for the heads up, I will have a look in and try to help where I can. Have a great weekend and God bless. —Cliftonian (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

G'day, in recognition of your successful election as a co-ordinator of the Military History project for the next year, please accept these co-ord stars. Welcome. I look forward to working with you over the next year. If you have any questions about co-ord tasks, please let me know. I'm more than happy to help. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

 
Coordinator of the Military history Project, September 2013 – September 2014
Thank you very much Rupert! I look forward to being of service and hope I don't disappoint. —Cliftonian (talk) 06:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:FOUR award

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Southern Rhodesia in World War I. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 10:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Well hooray! Thanks PantherLeapord! —Cliftonian (talk) 11:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  For making me actually laugh out loud with confession of stalking in this edit. Babakathy (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

=) —Cliftonian (talk) 14:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Matabele and Marston

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, I took the note you crafted from Marston to describe the Matabele variations in the Shangani Patrol article and re-used it in the Frederick Russell Burnham article. Also, thanks for your on-going interest in Burnham. A lot of comments have come out of the peer review and some of my edits could use another set of eyes, so I really appreciate your jumping in. Should you come across something that just doesn't fit with your understanding of history, especially when it comes to Africa, I would be pleased to get your input. Ctatkinson (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad the note helped and that you feel I am helping. I will continue helping out on the way as we go. If there is something specific you would like me to look at please let me know. I hope you are well. —Cliftonian (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Question(s)

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Cliftonian! I wandered can you help me with the following issues:

1) For some time now, I want to create a list of opposition leaders of Rhodesia since the introduction of responsible government in 1923 until its demise in 1979, but I can't find any source, website etc which contain data about that. As Rhodesia's political system was modelled on the Westminster system, and all the other Westiminster system countries (UK, Canada, Australia etc) already has lists of opposition leaders, I think Rhodesia should have such a list too.

2) Also, I can't find the names of people who served as the Speakers of the House of Assembly of Rhodesia from 1952 to 1959, at the moment there is a gap in list of Speakers for that period...

If you can help me with this issues, I'll be really grateful to you. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sundostund, I will have a look at these issues over the next few days and will try to get answers for you. I fear that both will be difficult to find sources for but I will do my best. I hope you are well! Cheers! —Cliftonian (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Cliftonian, thank you for your reply! I'm sure it will be hard to find sources, so far I wasn't able to find them anywhere. But, do whatever you can - have a look at these issues when you have enough time, I hope you'll have a better luck than me. I truly believe that lists of Rhodesian officeholders can't be complete until we make list of opposition leaders and fill gap in list of Speakers... I hope you are well too! Everything best to you. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for 1981 Entumbane Uprising

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Woo —Cliftonian (talk) 12:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1981 Entumbane Uprising

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article 1981 Entumbane Uprising you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1981 Entumbane Uprising for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Eland kills at Entumbane

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Cliftonian,

As you may have noticed, I've been working on the Eland Mk7 article lately and recently saw it promoted from stub to B-class status. There is a section on the vehicle's combat history that includes its confirmed kills of ZIPRA armour during Entumbane in '81. Some of the Rhodie vets kindly disclosed that at least one BTR-152 was destroyed, and two mentioned a one-on-one encounter in which a BRDM(-2?) driving up the hill was hit on Essexvale opposite the petrol station by a single Eland parked near the Bulawayo drive in. A BTR was also apparently fireballed crossing the bridge on Essexvale at some other point.

Your sources for 1981 Entumbane Uprising are evidently more extensive than mine; I noticed you mention that ACR accounted for at least three BTRs during the entire op. I've seen a tally of ZIPRA vehicles destroyed by the Zim security forces somewhere before, but since ZNA was also using 106mm recoilless rifles against the APCs I'm still completely in the dark as to how many were armour-to-armour kills. Could you help shed some light on this matter by confirming how many vehicles and of what type were claimed by Elands at Entumbane?

Thanks! --Katangais (talk) 22:34, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Katangais,
Well done on your fine work on the Eland Mk7 article! Now regarding your question: my main source for the fighting at Entumbane is Masodja, the history of the Rhodesian African Rifles by Alexandre Binda. The narrative of the uprising mostly comes from ex-RAR officers. According to this the armoured vehicles were Soviet BTR 152 APCs mounted with 12.7 heavy machine guns. On page 387 it is mentioned that Sergeant Stephen Devine (Australian) encountered one of these at the Holiday Inn intersection on the way out of town towards the Johannesburg road, and that he destroyed it with a single shell (also killing the 20 ZIPRA inside). On the same page it is recorded that Devine's four Elands then destroyed two more advancing BTR 152s on Essexvale (see the Entumbane article for a more detailed description of this). The book mentions no more BTR kills.
I hope this is helpful. If you would like me to look up something else please don't hesitate to ask. Keep well and have a great Sunday —Cliftonian (talk) 04:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Nefarious: Merchant of Souls

Latest comment: 10 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

Hi John,

Thank you very much for your comments on my past FACs. My newest one is for the article Nefarious: Merchant of Souls. Any comments you would be willing to provide at the corresponding FAC would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I will pop in for sure. Thanks for the heads up. —Cliftonian (talk) 07:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
I greatly appreciate your comments, and have made changes to the article accordingly. Please let me know if you have additional concerns, or if you can help address other concerns raised at the FAC. Neelix (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the pointer, I will continue to look over the article and post comments. Well done on the great work so far and I hope you are well. —Cliftonian (talk) 17:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
I am enjoying life. I hope things are going well with you too. Did you have any more thoughts regarding this article? There hasn't been a lot of discussion at this FAC lately. Neelix (talk) 17:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I must apologise for my reduced output recently, David; I've been feeling somewhat jaded and so haven't been doing so much. I hope you understand. Thank you for the extra heads up, I appreciate how frustrating it can be when one's articles go unreviewed for a long time. Don't worry, this review is high on my list of priorities and I will get back to it soon. I'm very glad to hear that you are well. Thanks, —Cliftonian (talk) 08:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
No worries about being somewhat less active on the project as of late; we all need breaks from time to time. Thank you for making this FAC a priority. I hope the situations that are causing you frustration will resolve soon and in a positive manner. Neelix (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for contributing to the Nefarious: Merchant of Souls FAC. The article has been featured and I have nominated it to go up on the main page here. Neelix (talk) 22:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. Hope you're well, God bless —Cliftonian (talk) 08:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Rudd Concession

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments6 people in discussion

This is a note to let the main editors of Rudd Concession know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on October 30, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 30, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Rudd Concession, a written concession for exclusive mining rights in Matabeleland, Mashonaland and other adjoining territories in southern Africa, was granted by King Lobengula of Matabeleland to Charles Rudd (pictured), James Rochfort Maguire and Francis Thompson, three agents acting on behalf of the politician and businessman Cecil Rhodes, on 30 October 1888. The concession conferred on the grantees the sole rights to mine throughout Lobengula's country, as well as the power to defend this exclusivity by force, in return for weapons and a regular monetary stipend. Despite Lobengula's retrospective attempts to disavow it on the grounds of alleged deceit by the concessionaires regarding the settled terms, it proved the foundation for the royal charter granted by the United Kingdom to Rhodes' British South Africa Company in October 1889, and thereafter for the Pioneer Column's occupation of Mashonaland in 1890, which marked the beginning of white settlement, administration and development in the country. The Company officially named the territory Rhodesia, after Rhodes, in 1895, and governed it until 1923. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Well hooray. —Cliftonian (talk) 07:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Glad to see this one on the front page--a quality piece of work. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations, John! You've produced another very informative article. Neelix (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much both for the very kind words! =) —Cliftonian (talk) 08:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations also from me Nick-D (talk) 08:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Also from me. Babakathy (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you both of you :) —Cliftonian (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

D'Oliveira

Latest comment: 10 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

I commented out part of your edit on the football team because my source doesn't quite stretch far enough. Do you have a source for the 1964 suspension? Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Do excuse my presumptuousness; I hope this helps —Cliftonian (talk) 08:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Not a problem at all, and feel free to chip in at any time. Sarastro1 (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
I think I got your point on the MCC. I've tweaked a few of your tweaks, but thanks for the copy-edit. I've just a little more to add about what happened, but then I want to go through and add a few bits and pieces from at least two other books, so we are not over-reliant on Oborne. So there's a bit to do yet. After that, I usually go for GA before PR and FA, and can be irritatingly slow to work on things as I like to leave them to brew for a while before working on them a bit more! But as always, and assuming I don't drive you mad by leaving it for weeks at a time, feel free to jump in at any time. If you want to leave anything on the sandbox talk page, again feel free if you want to keep everything together. It may be a little while before I copy it over to the article page.
One point on the images, though. I'm not sure how well up you are on images. I'm patchy, but I'm 99% certain that most of the England player photos are not really PD in the US and would fail an image check at FAC. There are weird rules over Australian images, and I wonder if NZ images apply too. I may ask someone who knows. Images may be a problem. I can get a dead cert image of Allen and Gilligan, but nothing really from the 1960s. I may ask an expert or two if we'd get away with a FU image of D'Olly. Thanks again. Sarastro1 (talk) 22:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Can you source Pretoria for the Maori rugby thing? Oborne only says South Africa. I've just a few bits to add now, then I'll copy it over to the article and think about GA. Cheers. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I put "Pretoria" in as a metonym in place of "the South African government" to save words and reduce repetition. I've used this without issue in several FAs, but feel free to change it if you don't like. Hope you are well and well done again on this really good draft. I feel proud to have lent a hand on it here and there —Cliftonian (talk) 08:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
I've copied the sandbox over to the main D'Oliveira affair article now, and I'll finish it off on that page. I think it's essentially complete now, and just needs bulking out in places and a few more references adding. I've put in a (frankly dreadful!) lead, but that part isn't anywhere near finished. Feel free to work on that part yourself as well. Any queries or thoughts from now on, I'll put on that talk page. Thanks again for all your help on this so far, and please keep adding stuff that you think will be useful. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I'll carry on helping out here and there on this like you said. If you have anything in particular I'd like me to help out on, please don't hesitate to ask. —Cliftonian (talk) 13:44, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Adam Render

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I've just done the review for the Adam Render DYK nomination. No problems at all but could I ask you to double check the isbn for the Rosenthal book, please? Maybe it's something I'm doing wrong (quite a common occurrence for me!) but I'm getting this error when trying to access it; I'm guessing it's this one? Thanks for such an interesting article! SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:23, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for the review and the kind words about the article. I'm glad you found it interesting. Yes that is the book that is cited. I have replaced the spurious ISBN with OCLC number 390499. I hope this is better. Thanks again and I hope you are well and having a pleasant week. All the very best! =) —Cliftonian (talk) 15:35, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Brilliant, thank you!   SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:41, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Adam Render

The DYK project (nominate) 06:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

D'Olly update

Latest comment: 10 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

I've taken out a few of the images as I have some concerns; I've asked an image expert to take a look, though, to see what we can get away with. I've also asked for some advice on the referencing for the two ebooks I've used. But I'm basically done from my end now, apart from tweaks. Maybe the aftermath section could be beefed up? Anyway, I'm going to nominate at GAN now to see what happens. The standard of review there can be patchy, but it may be useful before heading to PR and FAC. I hope you can continue to help out before, during and after the review, and I hope that you will be a co-nominator when we get to FAC (unfortunately there is no co-nom thing at GA!) Sarastro1 (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I nominated in the sports and recreation section, but that doesn't seem right somehow! And thanks for the lead revision, by the way. It looks much better now. (I hate leads) Sarastro1 (talk) 21:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
One other point. Two of the English selectors had very right wing links: Gilligan was a member of a fascist party in the 1920s, and Bedser was associated with a far-right group. Now, no-one suggests that this had any bearing on anything (although it is hinted at in places, and I can source it) but I wonder if it should be included; either as a note, or in the main text. Any ideas? Sarastro1 (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I'll be more than happy to keep on helping out on this as I have become rather interested in it. I'm flattered that you would like me to co-nom and will gladly do so. Regarding the right-wing links of Gilligan and Bedser, I think this is certainly interesting, and worth mentioning in a note or in passing, though I would be careful not to put too much stress on it as this could be perceived as POV (and perhaps original research as well). Perhaps put it in the article and see how it looks; we can always take it out later. Re: referencing, I'm somewhat confused by what we mean by "Loc 1387" etc; are these page numbers, entry numbers or what? I think perhaps a section relating to politics or something would perhaps have been better as it may have helped us get a more prestigious reviewer, but on the other hand there are more reviewers at the sport section and I don't think any dubious fly-by-night is going to take on a political review like this. Hope you're well and having a good week. Cheers, —Cliftonian (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
It's not OR about Gilligan and Bedser as the sources make the connection without saying it had any impact. "Loc" is the location in an ebook; I don't have print versions of two books, so I can only give the location on Kindle. I've checked with Brianboulton who suggests adding the chapter numbers to make verification easier; I will do that today or tomorrow. I wondered about politics; I may move it later; you are right about the prestigious reviews, and I speak as someone who writes pretty exclusively about sport! Sarastro1 (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
What I was meaning to say was that the wrong wording here could imply a link, which would be OR. Sorry for being unclear. Okay re the locs, yes think adding the chapters would be good for now if page numbers not accessible. —Cliftonian (talk) 20:33, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
All done now: chapters added, and a note on Bedser and Gilligan (and I've worded it very carefully, and matched the sources). I think I'll leave it now and see what happens at GA. I'm still undecided on whether to change the section in which I nominated, but I'll keep it there for the moment. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Tichborne case, May 2012 FAC

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In May 2012 you were one of the reviewers who commented on this article at the FAC which led to its promotion. I have recently noticed that an editor has added a substantial amount of text to the article, without talkpage discussion and of course without review. I have outlined some concerns on the article's talk, here. I would greatly appreciate it if you could look at the page and give a reviewer's opinion on this new material. Brianboulton (talk) 22:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I posted there. Sorry I missed the boat. —Cliftonian (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Peer review request for Arthur Gould

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey. I was wondering if you'd be willing to provide some feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/Arthur Gould (rugby union)/archive1? Understand if you're busy or unable to help, but would really appreciate any input. Thanks! - Shudde talk 10:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I look forward to helping out. —Cliftonian (talk) 11:46, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GA review of Malagasy Uprising

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Cliftonian, Thanks for being willing to review the Malagasy Uprising article. I've never had one of my nominations be picked up that quickly before - I'm sure you know how these African topics sometimes fly below the radar. If you ever need someone to review one of your Rhodesia articles, please don't hesitate to ping me on my talk page. That said, I literally *just* got it ready, and I was prepared to have to wait four months for a review (like my last one on Marc Ravalomanana, the last elected president of Madagascar before the 2009 coup), and expected I might continue to add content that would get it close to FA level. If you do find anything significant is needed, don't fail it - let me know, and I can probably do significant additions within the week. Best, Lemurbaby (talk) 16:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lemurbaby, please call me John. No problem at all re: Malagasy, glad I can help. I have reviewed the article and put some comments from my first run-through, I hope these help on the way to GA and perhaps beyond. Don't worry, I don't think I have ever straight-up failed an article at GAN (perhaps because I usually only review high-end work). Thank you very much for your offer re: Rhodesian topics, I will let you know next time I have one ready for review. You may have noticed that I have been somewhat less active these past few months so I don't expect to have one ready for a while. Keep well and have a great week, —Cliftonian (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi John, I'll look forward to making the GA changes on Saturday. If you have the time to read through my current FAC, Jean-Joseph Rabearivelo, which has been stalled for several weeks at two supports and needs the third not to fail, I would be much obliged. It's another pretty good insight into the toll of colonialism in Africa, but on the individual level. - Carrie (Lemurbaby (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC))

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nominations

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Cliftonian, I hope you don't mind me asking and won't be offended but you seemed the best person to ask! I've reviewed at least a couple of your DYK nominations in the past so I know you usually nominate them yourself and undertake a QPQ. However, I've noticed recently there have been quite a high number of 'not a self nomination so no QPQ required' nominations and as one of your articles was among them - Jonathan D. C. Turner - I wondered if there was a drive or blitz taking place? I do appreciate that the DYK rules allow for no QPQ when it isn't a self nom. I really don't mean to cause any offence by asking but I'm just trying to work out why there is such an influx of them at present? SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:19, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Phil—don't worry, I'm not offended at all. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I was actually quite surprised by your note as I hadn't been aware that Turner had been nominated for DYK. I'm not really that into DYK and this is not the only time I have not nominated an article I have created. I didn't bother nominating this one because I thought it too short and kind of dull for the main page, but it seems somebody else has taken it upon himself to do so (and without informing me, it seems). Anyway, I'm sorry to say I don't know of any drive or blitz with DYKs and I don't think I can really tell you anything that would help you figure this out. I'm glad (and kind of flattered) you thought to contact me about it though. I'm sorry I can't be more helpful. If there's anything else, please don't hesitate to drop me a note again. Cheers, —Cliftonian (talk) 17:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for such a prompt and understanding reply, it's very much appreciated and has been very helpful. Now I know there isn't a drive/blitz I'll risk bringing the influx up at the DYK talk page. Thank you! SagaciousPhil - Chat 17:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem at all —Cliftonian (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rhodesia

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Cliftonian! As per my earlier questions, I just wonder whether you managed to find some sources about Leaders of the Opposition and Speakers of the House of Assembly of Rhodesia. I wasn't able to find anything so far... I know its a hard task, but maybe you had some more success than me. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 13:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Sundostund, I'm sorry to say I still didn't find anything. I'll be sure to let you know if and when I do. Sorry I can't be more helpful right now. I hope you're well and having a good run-up to the holiday. Merry Christmas to you —Cliftonian (talk) 20:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
No problem, Cliftonian! I fully understand you. Its a really difficult task, believe me, I know! I hope you're well too, and Merry Christmas to you too! Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The Teamwork Barnstar
Thanks so much for your assistance in making the Adolf Eichmann article as good as it can be, and for helping it to obtain GA status. It makes me proud to be a Wikipedian when I see such important and controversial topic covered with such high-quality articles. Thanks for all you do. – Quadell (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Wow, I hardly feel worthy of this (particularly as several of my copy-edits were reverted), but thank you very much nonetheless, Quadell! This is very kind of you and certainly within the Christmas spirit. A very Merry Christmas to you and a Happy New Year! =) —Cliftonian (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Renamed_user_df576567etesddf/Archive_9&oldid=1168307445"