User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive July 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trivia sections

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

The Spent Idols

Hi Rsrikanth05,

Please tell me why you reverted my edits. Thanks

Angel Spent (talk) 06:16, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

I goofed up. Big time. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sandhu

Why you are deleting important information about "Sandhu"?

Sandhu (Punjabi: ਸੰਧੂ) is a second largest clan as well as surname of Jatt people. They mainly live in Punjab region (East Punjab and West Punjab) and also abroad as they migrated overseas. As of 1881 census, there were 135732 Sandhus. The Hindu Sandhu Jatts of Bar region, converted to Islam, while the Hindu Sandhu Jatts, of Majha region, converted to Sikhism. Muslim Sandhu Jatts were mainly found in Sialkot, Gujranwala, Shiekhupura, Lyallpur, districts of the Bar, while the Sikh Sandhu Jatts, were found in, great large numbers in Amritsar, Lahore, Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Hoshiarpur, districts of Majha, Doaba, and Malva. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.1.86.21 (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

@174.1.86.21: The important information that you are trying to add is already present on Sandhu clan. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Replicant edits revert

Hi, you have just reverted my edits to the Replicant (operating system) page. Care to explain why? I have a conflict of interest here, that is clearly established in the Talk page and the changes I have made were commented and factually correct. Thanks. --PaulK (talk) 08:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I have reverted your revert since it doesn't seem to have any grounds. Please discuss the reason here if you wish to undo my edits again.

@PaulK: Please have a look at the page on reliable sources. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Gentamicin edit

Hi, Can you tell me why was my change on Gentamicin page reverted? It'll be great if you can tell me what exactly was wrong with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harsh6886 (talk • contribs) 10:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

@Harsh6886: Hi, I undid your edit because Gentamicin has too many trade names for all to be listed. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Sexart

edit on sexart page. The images for the Cultivation CD are my images and not copied from the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thereeper (talk • contribs) 13:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Duly noted. Will undo then. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

- I have permission for their use (I am friends with Dennis Shinn, an original member, who holds the copy right for the images) - I will also add my own scan from the cd for the band image. - Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thereeper (talk • contribs) 13:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dennis Hastert

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dennis Hastert. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

• News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF

• In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology

• WikiProject report: Able to make a stand

• Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.

• Traffic report: We're Baaaaack

• Technology report: Technical updates and improvements

• Blog: These Texans are on a quest to improve Wikipedia’s coverage of their state’s revolution

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Finally (CeCe Peniston song). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wanderer of the Wasteland (1945 film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wanderer of the Wasteland (1945 film). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Its not vandalism

It's not vandalism it's changing something that's not right. heres proof that what's on José Holebas page is wrong http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/588675/Watford-Transfer-News-Jose-Holebas-Roma-Never-Signed-Watford-Contract Soccerqueendallas (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 03:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Solapur

Buddy. Can u please change the name of Solapur Junction railway station to simply Solapur railway station. I dont know how to. Because Solapur is not a junction recognised officially by Indian Railways Dongar Kathorekar (talk) 05:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Will have a look. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

 Done --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2015)

Mecca is regarded as the holiest city in the religion of Islam. Pictured is the Masjid al-Haram during Hajj, 2007. Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Holiest sites in Islam Rump steak Job Mario Kart Exhibition Staple food Previous selections: Party • Fat • Nightlife Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 18:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Please comment on Talk:Brian Leiter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brian Leiter. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Miroslav Filipović

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Miroslav Filipović. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

• Hello Rsrikanth05:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 31 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Legality of Bitcoin by country

Instead of reverting edits to outdated information based on a single action against a company that was, to put it mildly, acting controversially, you might actually try going out and finding what the current situation is. 111.81.121.231 (talk) 11:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

I assumed good faith while undoing your edit, but you just took out 60k bits with one edit. That, is a problem. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:On Becoming Baby Wise

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:On Becoming Baby Wise. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Good article status for Maharashtra

Can you give Maharashtra a good article status? Dongar Kathorekar (talk) 03:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

HI, I'd appreciate it if you added new messages at the bottom of the page so it is easier for me to find it. You can use the + or New section next to the Edit button on top. As for GA status to Maharashtra, the article seems to be in a good condition now. It will require a little bit of copyediting and sourcing, after which we can go in for a GA-review. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bias in reporting on North Korea by Western news media

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bias in reporting on North Korea by Western news media. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gog and Magog

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gog and Magog. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

• Editorial: So you want to get your message out. Where do you turn?

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation annual plan released, news in brief

• In the media: Wikimania warning; Wikipedia "mystery" easily solved

• Traffic report: The Empire lobs back

• Featured content: Pyrénées, Playmates, parliament and a prison...

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Supply-side economics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supply-side economics. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for

your great efforts working to improve the article Galileo affair. Your assumption about POV-pushing is understandable; however I suspect in this case it was actually just a case of ongoing crazy and kind of random edits to the page. -Darouet (talk) 18:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

@Darouet: Thank you. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 01:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

• Hello Rsrikanth05:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 32 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 12:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Debut

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debut. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2015)

Kayaking in whitewater rapids Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Kayaking Hemispheres of the Earth Elephants in ancient China Oscar speech Bottled water Previous selections: Holiest sites in Islam • Party • Fat Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Please comment on Talk:Daniel J. Caron

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Daniel J. Caron. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
361		The Braxtons (talk)						Add sources
164		Dorney Park & Wildwater Kingdom (talk)						Add sources
211		Marathi people (talk)						Add sources
281		Baloch people (talk)						Add sources
69		Solapur district (talk)						Add sources
101		Ganpatipule (talk)						Add sources
54		Nuclear drip line (talk)						Cleanup
93		Hulk in other media (talk)						Cleanup
29		Subh-i-Azal (talk)						Cleanup
808		The Color Run (talk)						Expand
66		Wai, Maharashtra (talk)						Expand
537		Robert (doll) (talk)						Expand
78		Tourism in Maharashtra (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,416		Rape (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
143		History of Maharashtra (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
51		Saraikistan (talk)						Merge
554		Super Mario Bros. 3 (talk)						Merge
65		Sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (talk)						Merge
29		Ushtima e maleve (talk)						Wikify
17		Hyde and Hare (talk)						Wikify
886		Tom Kenny (talk)						Wikify
4		Swar Sagar- The School of Music (talk)						Orphan
3		Railpar, Asansol (talk)						Orphan
1		Shirshi (talk)						Orphan
103		DC Avanti (talk)						Stub
11		Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1920 Haydon film) (talk)						Stub
8		Shelley Day (talk)						Stub
2		Albion College Symphony Orchestra (talk)						Stub
48		I, Monster (talk)						Stub
72		Irish breakfast tea (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Can you help?

Hi, I'm making an article on historic Dharashiv caves of Osmanabad, I found pictures of caves on flickr [1], can you help me to take that pictures to commons? I'm not able to do it because of some technical issues. These are very nice pics and can be very useful to Wikipedia. --Human3015 knock knock • 21:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey @Human3015:, have you tried using Flickr2Commons? It's the method I normally use. If you are unable to get it to work, lemme know. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for this tool, I didn't know this, but I just tried it and they said no photo is under suitable license. Maybe all photos are copyright protected. --Human3015 knock knock • 07:50, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Licence details are normally mentioned under the share button on Flickr. You can always request for it to be relicenced. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

MKM Is Also Air Superiority Fighter.

Hello,There is a Reason That MKM Need to Combine To Multirole Air Superiority Fighter.So Please Thank You.175.136.111.225 (talk) 13:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure, why not? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Reverts in Global Peace Index

I noticed you "re-reverted" yourself here in Global Peace Index. You were correct in reverting him in the first place, but unforunately it would not have helped because he has been messing up the list since May. See comments in Talk:Global Peace Index#Global Peace Index ranks. I'm not entirely sure how to deal with this, especially because a check of the other lists he has been editing show the exact same and it would be a lot of work to clean it all up. 62.107.216.149 (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

@62.107.216.149: Let me see. I unid my edit after I noticed an outdated tag was put up. I thought he was updating the figures. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Coolest Cooler

Hi - I see you edited Coolest Cooler - and pushed to list of highest funded crowd funded projects - can you help me make it it's own page?--Scmtowers.

Hi @Scmtowers:, 1. Please add new messages at the bottom of the page. Not in the middle of an existing one. 2. Please sign your messages with ~~~~. 3. I have undone my edit and cleaned it up a bit. Please make sure that it is sourced, verifiable, not written like an advert. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Heraklion International Airport

'Scheduled Destanations' is a better way of indicating to readers that these are scheduled destanations and airlines. 'Summer Seasonal Charter Flights' Indicates that these are charter flights, operating in the summer, but on certain dates.

Please don't add these again as they cause confusion to readers, thanks. RMS52 (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Please follow the standard pattern that all airport pages follow. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

In fact, there is no 'Standard pattern' that all the airport pages follow, most are different and don't have seperate sections for charter and scheduled flights. Again, I have changed it to Charter Destanations and Scheduled Destanations, if you have any problems with this feel free to tell me. RMS52 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

• Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it

• Traffic report: Belles of the ball

• WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?

• In the media: Shapps requests WMUK data; professor's plagiarism demotion

• Blog: Wikimedia Foundation releases third transparency report

• News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania

• Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Indian cities by GDP (per capita)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Indian cities by GDP (per capita). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chinese language

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chinese language. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Revert on Jim Parrack

Hey there. Just wanted to point out that while this is probably a good revert because it's original research, I don't think it's such a good use of rollback since it's not obvious vandalism. I'm afraid we're alienating IP users by not explaining to them what's going on. agtx 22:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

@Agtx: I reverted the edit because the url says fansite. However since you say it is a good edit, I'll undo it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

No it's definitely a bad edit. You don't have to undo it. I only brought it up because I think it would be been appropriate to explain in the edit summary why you were reverting, as opposed to using standard rollback per guidelines at WP:ROLLBACK#When to use rollback. agtx 22:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Already undid it. I did not leave a specific edit in the summary because I was using Huggle and there wasn't a suitable preset message in the list. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Understood. However, that probably means that you shouldn't revert that kind of edit with Huggle. agtx 23:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

This is the first time I'm actually hearing of a not to undo with Huggle. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 00:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Well, Huggle or no Huggle, you're using standard rollback without an edit summary, so the I'd think the rules of using standard rollback apply. Overall, it's just not great to revert things that aren't obviously vandalism without explaining why you're doing it. agtx 01:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

That renders all the Anti-vandalism tools pointless at some point or the other. My rationale is simple. User removed a link to Variety.com and replaced it with a fansite, that's normally borderline vandalism. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 01:16, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Right but the guidelines for standard rollback don't say "borderline" vandalism, they say obvious vandalism. I don't think that renders the anti-vandalism tools pointless. They are useful for their intended purpose: reverting actual vandalism. Wikipedia starts to be a hostile and unwelcoming place when we revert new users' or IP changes with no summary and no explanation as to why the revert happened. Might it slow you down if you have to explain why you're reverting something instead of just hitting the button? Yeah, it might, but that's not a bad thing. agtx 01:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't slow it down, it brings it to a complete stop. I have to open my browser and find that page. I'd rather just skip and keep going. Either someone else or Cluebot will revert it. And they'd do the same thing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Good article status for Maharashtra

The Maharashtra article is worthy for this? Dear Buddy reply? Dongar Kathorekar (talk) 13:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, a kind request to post new messages at the bottom of the page, so it is easier for me to monitor it. I'll have a look at it. There are a few dead links, I'll fix them using Archive.org. Some amount of copy editing is required. Once that is done, I'll ask for a GA review. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Advocacy ducks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Advocacy ducks. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement – discussion about changing project processes

• Hello Rsrikanth05:

A discussion is occurring at Change project processes regarding potential changes to the Today's articles for improvement Wikiproject. Your input is welcomed at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 11:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quint Studer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quint Studer. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's articles for improvement (week 30, 2015)

Dessert is a typically sweet course that concludes an evening meal. Pictured is a chocolate-strawberry crumble ball. Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Dessert Home Taboo Post-production Aerosol spray General aviation Previous selections: Kayaking • Holiest sites in Islam • Party Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) on 04:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014

Why did you revert my edits? [2] They were constructive and improved the article. You gave no reason. I don't want to get into an edit war, but please have a look and see whether you didn't perhaps make a mistake. --104.238.169.54 (talk) 06:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

@104.238.169.54: I undid your edit because you did not provide a source. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I didn't need to: the source for the first edit is already there, in the sentence (citation 5). Did you read it? It mentions both groups I used to clarify the 'who' tag. The second sentence I added is supported by the citation in the sentence immediately prior. Is there a way of providing an 'op cit' citation? At any rate, the better solution is surely to put a 'citation needed', since these were clearly good faith edits. --104.238.169.54 (talk) 06:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Humanistic Buddhism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Humanistic Buddhism. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Real Estate Trends

Hello,

I tried to replace the link with a new related link, because the current one is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trav52 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I undid your edit because it seemed promotional. If it is dead [I have no clue what a broken link is or how a link can be broken], it should ideally be replaced by an archive link. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

If you follow the link that is currently there, it goes to a page with no content. I decided to link to an article talking about the same topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trav52 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

If that is the case, I'd suggest copying the link to Archvie.org and getting an archived version of the page. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 00:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

I checked Archive.org, and it appears that there is no archived version of the page. I believe placing an article talking about the same subject would have just as much authority. -Trav52, 7/21/2015 10:41 am PST — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trav52 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Alright, go ahead. Just make sure the source is a reliable one. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bad Girls Club

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bad Girls Club. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Transhumanist politics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Transhumanist politics. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not enable the defacement of Observium

The page has been under intermittent defacement attacks for a year and a half. The attackers are people who set up a competing project, and keep trying to add links to their project and write bad things about Observium on the entry. Unfortunately, due to the nature of wikipedia, it isn't easy to keep the page clean, and it's even harder to demonstrate to the wikipedia community that the LibreNMS people are the defacers. -- 109.154.122.54

@109.154.122.54: Wikipedia is not a battleground for both Observium and LibreNMS. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

So why do you take their side and restore their edits, then? Remove the entire section.109.154.122.54 (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

All references to LibreNMS should be removed from the Observium article, and that would solve the problem.109.154.122.54 (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

@109.154.122.54: I'm a neutral party here. My concern relates to your disruptive editing, and nothing more. Accusing me of taking the side of your rival is not correct, not unless you have proof. So stop with your conspiracy theory and remember than Wikipedia is not a place for advertising or promoting your project. I'm pinging @Adamathefrog: as well so they know. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

B.A.D

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with B.A.D. (professional wrestling). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. The AFD states that BAD is also nominated for deletion. w^{L<speak·check>} 08:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

@WikiLeon: Hi, you might be an admin but both your revert and your warnings were done in bad faith here. The AfD DID NOT INCLUDE B.A.D till your edit less than 30 minutes ago. Would appreciate it if you could strike off this warning. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:04, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict)The diff says it was made at midnight 22 July 2015 (UTC), that was about 30 hours ago. Shouting "how hard is it to read" at me looks uncivil and I took it as bad faith and unwilling to follow WP:3RR. If this wasn't your intention, I apologize. This nomination was based on TheBellaTwins1445 putting an AFD tag that links to a related article's AFD.[3] I thought the same as you and reverted,[4] but later found that WP:BUNDLE allows nominating multiple articles in one AFD if they are related. To finish TheBellaTwins1445's nomination, I added the {{la}} for BAD. If you feel that the nomination is unwarranted, I think the best place we can voice that is the AFD itself. --w^{L<speak·check>} 08:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Materialscientist, sorry to bother you, again. I need a little of your guidance right now. Last night, on Huggle or Stiki, I came across a user adding an AfD template on B.A.D. (professional wrestling). Initially it was added by another admin, which I undid because the AfD in question did not mention the article where I had found the template. The admin came along and reverted my edits, left me two warnings, and at the same time added the article in question to the AfD. Was I right in removing the template when the AfD never mentioned the article where I found it till hours later? I'm posting a copy of this message on my talk page right under the warning. Please have a look at let me know. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

• Just a heads up - I've removed the other nommed article from the AFD as quite frankly it's ridiculous to include an article when 4 or 5 editors have so far !voted on one article, The top half of the AFD as the days went on wouldn't of made any sense, As I said on the AFD if someone wants to nominate B.A.D they can AFD it instead which atleast in my eyes makes much more sense (Had this new article been included before anyone !voted I obviously wouldn't of cared but anyway babbling on ), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

• From the editor: Change the world

• News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case

• Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries

• In the media: Novelists annotate Wikipedia; Wales promotes TPO; Working for free

• Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'

• WikiProject report: Some more politics

• Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters

• Gallery: "One small step..."

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (software)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (software). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Krystal Meyers' birthday valid source Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento CA

So you came in (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krystal_Meyers&action=history 18:02, 24 July 2015‎ Rsrikanth05) and removed what I reverted to prove Krystal Meyers birth, with no reason given at all so your accomplice Rmhermen could come in after you and add her or his block, to make it look like she did not instigate the point at which the block was made (not showing a birth date for Krystal Meyers, which was YOUR role in this conspiracy), for Rmhermen to try to protect herself as she threw your dumb ass to the curb, and you're so stupid you let her. But all of you are just as guilty.

I wrote the below, and you are obviously working with Rmhermen and Walter to make people think Krystal Meyers is a child, to make it Wikipedia's view of Krystal Meyers to be a child so Wikipedia will be coughing up 300 million for their role in the conspiracy to murder Krystal Meyers, to create a false "Krystal Meyers' who the world would not expect to be able to have kids because you present her as a perpetual child. That is your agenda. You are conspiring in crimes so vast that you will never get out of prison, if you are not executed for them.

Written to Rmhermen

You wrote "Reverted edits by Asian Radio Guru to last version by Walter Görlitz" and he wrote in error "This was the original source that was removed" which is untrue as the original source was a site that no longer gives birth info for free (see below links). So you are NOT paying attention to the facts. My info goes to the United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics which is proof as proof gets. You cannot say it is not a valid source, period. So you cant just revert something back to an untrue reason (Walter Görlitz reason) as you conveniently gave no reason for your action. You did that because you knew you had no valid reason for you action.

What I have as PROOF of Krystal Meyers' birth is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krystal_Meyers&oldid=670472721#cite_note-birth_name-1 going to this page https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VLY6-RMX which is incontrovertible proof of Krystal Meyers' birth.

California Birth Index - Krystal Nicole Meyers, 31 Jul 1988; citing Orange, California, United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento". Family Search: Intellectual Reserve, Inc. 1988. Retrieved July 7, 2015. l that linked to here https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VLY6-RMX that is NOT the previous, effectively, non functioning site

What was there was that no longer provides birth info for free was this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krystal_Meyers&oldid=667124565#cite_note-birth_name-1 "California Births - Krystal Meyers". Pearl Street Software/Family Tree Legends. 1988. Retrieved February 1, 2013, that linked to here http://www.familytreelegends.com/records/calbirths?c=search&first=krystal&last=meyers&spelling=Exact&4_year=1988&4_month=7&4_day=31&5=female&7=orange&SubmitSearch.x=45&SubmitSearch.y=19 which now redirects to the site that now requires a payment to view their information and NOT what I am linking to as proof.

So that was only able to be removed in the first place because that site changed to be a paid service that no longer provided birth record information for fee, for public view, where the site I have linked does offer birth record info for public view going to go to Orange, California, United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento

The site I listed gives proof of Krystal Meyers birth : https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VLY6-RMX

So I am reverting your objection and notated this page and I will also direct people to see the history of this page just in case you try to do like Walker did and simply remove it (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Walter_G%C3%B6rlitz&oldid=672798318#Krystal_Meyers.27_birthday). Know that you cannot remove it from your history and people would see you removing valid proof, so I would suggest you do not make any attempt to undo my edits, because this page is being watched by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Not threat. A fact.

This is an unreliable copy of a primary source, not a secondary source. We have no way (from that source) to know that that record is correct or that it refers to the subject of the article. Rmhermen (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

You are a liar. You do not work for the FBI. So you are impersonating an FBI agent and just so you will know what you are getting yourself into, that is a crime punishable by up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine and that is for that crime alone, when you are found guilty of it (you are guilty because you just said you are an FBI agent and that history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krystal_Meyers&action=history you cannot get rid of. You can, at best put a line through that but it will show. I know by you current and previous actions that you are not an FBI agent. I am not an FBI agent. But I factually told you that page (and now I am letting you know that Krystal Meyers' also) was being watched by the FBI and it is. But you took that information and dug your high heels in, like a rebellious child with no sense at all.

I have reverted your edit because the information a site that is known to provide accurate information. It is NOT a secondary source. It is a portal for that direct information. Is a feed from Orange, California, United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento, NOT secondary information. They are linked to the database of the United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento. So your secondary information claim is invalid.

No it is not a direct link to Orange, California, United States, Department of Health Services, Vital Statistics Department, Sacramento and a secondary source is what we need since you have noo way of establishing a connection between that original record and the article subject. Rmhermen (talk) 18:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

What kind of nonsense is this? I'm NOT working with anybody. I'm not conspiring with anybody. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categories, lists, and navigation templates. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Amy Hughes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Amy Hughes. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Metro-North Railroad rolling stock/Metro-North Railroad

Is there a good reason you reverted my edit? I have already talked about splitting this article in the talk page, it has been up there for a week, and only one person commented on it! And he was for it! I split the article, like I said I would, and all of the information is still in the other article. I will not start an edit war, but I want an explanation please! RES2773 (talk) 14:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)RES2773

As I posted on your talk page, I undid it because you just removed 16000 bytes of data without an edit summary. However, I'd suggest waiting a little more than a week for splitting an article. A single response may not reflect general consensus. Maybe posting on the local Noticeboard would get more eyes. Hence I undid it in good faith. However, for the moment, I'm undoing my edit. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:37, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

I understand. I will keep the discussion open for another week, and if no one has objections, I think we should have it split. Thanks! RES2773 (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)RES2773

Please comment on Talk:Venues of the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Venues of the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

This week's articles for improvement (week 31, 2015)

An example of an igloo Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Igloo Unmanned spaceflight Underground restaurant Haribo Voice acting Previous selections: Dessert • Kayaking • Holiest sites in Islam Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Nominate an article Review nominations Have your say in future selections Posted by: Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Please comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eliot Higgins. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yelp

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yelp. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

TAFI's List of articles

• Hello Rsrikanth05:

A discussion is occurring at the TAFI talk page regarding potential changes to the project's List of articles page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

revert on St Louis-style bbq?

Hi, I noticed you marked a revert as a minor edit -- I looked at it and couldn't see any problem with the user's edit. Why did you revert? valereee (talk) 13:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

The statement inserted was an opinionated statement, which did not have a source. HenceI undid it. It was marked as minor, because Huggle marked it as minor. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Then why not drop a instead of reverting? And Huggle should be ashamed of itself. A revert should really almost never be marked as WP:MINOR valereee (talk) 13:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

I reverted it also, because the same user made THIS EDIT. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd certainly agree that's straightforward vandalism.  :) I checked another edit of his to Baker Hughes, which his IP is apparently registered to (according to another editor's post on his talk page) and reverted it. Definitely an IP to watch. valereee (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Park Yeon-mi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Park Yeon-mi. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

• News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate

• Op-ed: My life as an autistic Wikipedian

• Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted

• In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?

• Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues

• Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikimania Scholarship

Hi Srikanth, FYI: Currently there is a thread in Wikimania list, related to Wikimania Scholarship program. [5]. Regards--Praveen:talk 13:59, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

@Praveenp: Hi, thanks for alerting me, but I think I'll let this one pass. If I say something now, the WMF just takes it as the words of someone upset for not having got a scholarship for five years in a row. I've put it on record that the process is the least transparent process ever and nepotism and favouritism oozes out of it. Maybe @Saileshpat: would be interested. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)