User talk:Safiel/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Safiel. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
Not an admin?
How are you not an admin yet? I think we could fix that. bd2412 T 20:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Would be helpful to be sure. :) Particularly those times when I list an article at WP:RPP and it takes 6 to 8 hours for somebody to deal with it. I wouldn't mind handling some admin tasks. Safiel (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- It would be good for you to have a bit more participation in AfD/CfD/RM discussions, for this purpose. bd2412 T 13:38, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- I see lots of AfD participation (but not recently), a demonstration of clue in discussions, and an ability to stand up to existing admins when required (see above). I can look more thoroughly if you like. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think that would be a good thing. Safiel is an industrious editor, and the project would benefit from their being an admin. My only concern is the degree to which the adminship process itself has become negative. bd2412 T 15:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- @BD2412 and Ritchie333: I agree with you regarding participation in discussions. For about the last year and a half, I have been concentrating very much on cleanup of judge's articles, so haven't done much outside of that. After I complete this current group of judge's articles from Gerald Ford, which should take just a few more days, I will start to step back into various AfD and other discussions. Safiel (talk) 16:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think that would be a good thing. Safiel is an industrious editor, and the project would benefit from their being an admin. My only concern is the degree to which the adminship process itself has become negative. bd2412 T 15:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I see lots of AfD participation (but not recently), a demonstration of clue in discussions, and an ability to stand up to existing admins when required (see above). I can look more thoroughly if you like. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- By the way, when you are done with federal judges, if you need something to occupy your time, there is much to be done at Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices. Cheers! 03:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your 2016 creation of the Fat Leonard Scandal article
Though I think the article deserves to receive considerably more attention, your initiative provided the venue for accessibility to an extremely important public issue after it being ignored for years on Wikipedia. I just sent similar a note to User: Neutrality because they improved the article considerably by the addition of a table to their ongoing textual contributions. I suppose I should figure out how to send each of you a barnstar. Kudoes! Activist (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Activist: Thank you. I figured such a high profile scandal should have its own article, rather than be included in another article, as it was previously. Safiel (talk) 23:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. B dash (talk) 02:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note @B dash: That particular comment was deliberately not dated, using the three tilde function. I deliberately did not want a time stamp on it, nor does it need a time stamp, since it is just an explanatory note, not part of a discussion. Safiel (talk) 02:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
List of federal judges appointed by ... articles
I appreciate your cleaning up of the judicial appointments articles for most of the presidents when it comes to the tables on the pages. Would you be willing to do the same for the George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush articles? – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 15:10, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
@JocularJellyfish: Yes, I will go ahead and hit those articles fairly soon. Safiel (talk) 01:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For all of your work on federal judicial articles. Marquardtika (talk) 19:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Andrew Muecke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emanuel Mac Troutman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenwood Township, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roger Kiley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loyola University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Missing an important column in table
I think in order to give more complete information, there should be a column showing the date that the seat is/is to be vacated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.71.20.105 (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L. Richardson Preyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L. Richardson Preyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
List of Circuit Judges Article
Hello, a user recently created the List of current judges of the United States courts of appeals article and has been populating it and linking it to various federal courts pages. It's my impression that this page is immensely redundant, as Template:United States courts of appeals judges and the individual pages for the United States court of appeals already exist. Do you think that List of current judges of the United States courts of appeals would be a viable AFD candidate? – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 00:36, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @JocularJellyfish: I have started an AfD. Safiel (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Safiel: Thanks. I'll drop a comment. – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 01:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @Safiel:@JocularJellyfish: PLEASE READ - FROM THE ORGINAL CREATOR. I created this list because I was searching in vain for a list of all the appeals court judges in one location. The list exists nowhere on the internet (after a pretty thorough search). I was interested in a list because of the recent supreme court hoopla and many nominees come from the appeals courts. It's just convenient to have them in one place. It gives you a solid overview of the system visually. It allows you to quickly compare the courts. The data on the nominating president is critical because it gives you an idea of the ideological balance of the court and the appeals court as a whole. All that said, its become of a bit of a passion project and my introduction to being an editor on wikipedia. I've spent many hours on it even though the core data comes from the existing appeals courts pages. Updating it isnt bad at all. Once a month I go to the pages and bring the data to my main list. I'll add that the page is already seeing hundreds of views daily - some people are interested. I cannot see a good reason to delete the page. I appreciate your concern and for taking the time to adress some issues and for the past work you've done on wikipedia. But I'd really like to keep this page going. At the least maybe we can assess six months from now? Thoughts?
- Kudos - Hi, just closed this nomination as Keep, but thought I'd come say thanks - cheered me to see Nom not merely change their minds but actually do the slightly unusual work necessary to abrogate the reasoning for their own nomination. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Burton Ellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Office of Emergency Planning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Nominator or Appointer
Hello, the recent discussion that we both participated in over whether to use nominator or appointer in infoboxes has been archived without any consensus being reached. What should be done? – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 22:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- @JocularJellyfish: At the moment, I would just wait and see. I have gone through all judge articles from Obama back through JFK and I have processed about 2310 judge articles, which now read appointer. I would just keep periodically changing any nominators you see to appointers and hopefully people will finally get the point. I would wait before starting another discussion. Unfortunately, it is difficult to get the participation level in a discussion needed to formally decide the issue. If there continues to be a problem, then another discussion will be needed, but hopefully people will get the point. Safiel (talk) 16:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Safiel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Fahy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duncan Lawrence Groner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Erskine Mayo Ross
May I ask why the fact that he is one of the founders of Alpha Tau Omega was removed from the article? While it may not belong in the heading, I feel it should be somewhere in the article.Naraht (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Naraht: My main reason for removing it initially was that it was mentioned only in the infobox, with no mention in the body and no reference. However, I have added a referenced mention of it in the body and accordingly I have restored the blurb to the infobox. Safiel (talk) 20:45, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William H. Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Louisiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Welker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahlon Dickerson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Hanover Township (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Creighton Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bank of the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Laurance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| You nuking Nauman Scott last year was very helpful to me right now, as I'm clearing out Billy's copyvios. Thank you for making my job a little easier! 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 00:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC) |
ITN recognition for Warren William Eginton
On 10 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Warren William Eginton, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Addison Brown article
Outside my knowledge base, but I think that the recent LARGE addition to this article warrants an upgrade from Start class. I leave to you. David notMD (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for James A. Redden
On 2 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article James A. Redden, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please do not change degree abbreviations unless you are familiar with the history of the university at issue
Just noticed this edit. The University of California has always awarded the Bachelor of Arts degree, or B.A. Not the A.B. The B.A. is written into section 7 of the Organic Act. --Coolcaesar (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Coolcaesar my edit was proper and made in good faith, based on a reliable source. I committed no fault in making the edit. Also, not every user is familiar with the organic acts of every damn college in the land. If the reliable source, in this case FJC Bio, says A.B., then that is what I go with. Reliable sources can be wrong in some cases. That is the fault of the source, not me. I will continue going by what reliable sources say, as being reliable sources, 99.99% of the time they are correct. Safiel (talk) 05:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Marianne Battani
On 14 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marianne Battani, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 08:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Philip R. Lammens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider/WP:USCJN
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Snickers2686 (talk) 03:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Suzanne Mitchell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider/WP:USCJN
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Snickers2686 (talk) 04:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Elizabeth J. Drake for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth J. Drake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Thomas L. Halkowski for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas L. Halkowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Vik Edwin Stoll for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vik Edwin Stoll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Jeanne E. Davidson for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne E. Davidson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Patricia M. McCarthy for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia M. McCarthy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Winfield D. Ong for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winfield D. Ong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Claude J. Kelly III for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude J. Kelly III until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Ronald G. Russell for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald G. Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Jennifer Prescod May-Parker for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Prescod May-Parker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of E. Scott Frost for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Scott Frost until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Donald Karl Schott for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Karl Schott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Rebecca Ross Haywood for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Ross Haywood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.