User talk:Serols/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Serols! Thank you for your contributions. You can check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! 1 March 2015 (UTC)

On Whitewashing page

Dear mister Serols

Please do not undo my changes on that page which boycots the objective essence of Wikipedia, by bringing in Social Justice Warriors on this site, meant for objective information, and not to spread paranoid racist and blaguant lies from Tumblr.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borgoem (talk • contribs) 15:54, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Borgoem - see here. --Serols (talk) 07:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Significant Mother

For some reason you didn't think adding synopsis or a future episode to significant mother was constructive but I don't understand that. Having a synopsis and knowing what episode comes next is very relevant. And as a co-creator of the show I feel like my information would be pretty accurate. Thanks!

Hello Richkeith, please use references. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Michelle Pfeiffer: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  14:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Avocado

Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure an avocado is a fruit but yackity yack packing a mac in the back of an ac back pack rap crad . Check what the change was before my first edit on that page. Me and my friend was on skype arguing if it was a fruit or vegetable and he changed it into vegetable. That's why my first edit included a "hey, Jack" 114.78.51.221 (talk) 08:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello 114.78.51.221, sorry for my mistake. Greetings --Serols (talk) 09:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

AIV

Hi there! PLease remember that when you file a report at aiv that it goes in user reported, not bot reported. Cheers! TheMagikCow (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi TheMagikCow, thanks. Cheers --Serols (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Warning at User talk:92.24.54.198

Hello. I really appreciate the work done by you in reverting vandalism by the above mentioned IP Address. But, I replaced the message left on the user's talk page by actual warning which counts as a vandalism warning and will help further to maintain the series. Happy editing!--Kashish Arora (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your help in reverting vandalism!

PureRED (talk) 15:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Rollbacker

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 07:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Gilliam, thank you for the trust. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Unai Emery

Hi there SEROLS, from Portugal,

sorry for what I did in this person's article, not my intention and you were 100% correct to revert me, it really sounded like vandalism. Now I have done the adjustments correctly. Sorry for any inconvenience and happy Saturday --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions

Hi Serols, just wanted to say thanks for dealing with users that edit war. Cheers. -- Aronzak (talk) 14:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Im Happy you are on top of things

Hi Serols, I made a purposeful mistake to see if anyone would notice. Sure enough you did. This happend 1 minute ago and you changed it back. It was a little test to see if people where monitoring Wikipedia. I'm glad you are on-top of things! Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.247.222 (talk) 18:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

My edit is not nonconstructive. Adam Conley is no longer a minor league baseball player. I am doing what you are supposed to to when somebody plays in the major leagues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF43:9A50:2D7D:DCC1:E5B7:FAA3 (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

How are you able to do like 10 edits in like one minute? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sealloon123 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sometimes you can just take a break from fighting these pesky vandals and just play with a kitten :)

Fazbear7891 (talk) 22:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Unsourced Information

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources[edit] Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. How reliable a source is depends on context. In general, the most reliable sources are books and journals published by universities; mainstream newspapers; and university level textbooks, magazines and journals that are published by known publishing houses. What these have in common is process and approval between document creation and publication. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Material that is self-published is generally not regarded as reliable, but see below for exceptions. Any unsourced material may be removed, and in biographies of living persons unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material must be removed immediately. Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought[edit] Original research refers to material that is not attributable to a reliable, published source. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, ideas, statements, and neologisms; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position. Material added to articles must be directly and explicitly supported by the cited sources. Note the difference between unsourced material and original research: Unsourced material is material not yet attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributed but may be attributable. Original research is material that cannot be attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributable. The only way to demonstrate that material is not original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and to adhere to what those sources say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CopperPhantom (talk • contribs) 22:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

See here. --Serols (talk) 23:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi can you please explain why my contribution to the page na nach nachma nachman meuman was unconstructive and constituted vandalism? I added a legitimate link to a nanach website and removed an outdated one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabananach (talk • contribs) 11:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Sabananach, please read Wikipedia:External links. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I read the article about external links and the link I added fully complies with the objective. It is a link to a website that teaches and introduces people to a further understanding and experience of nanach. I believe this to be a very constructive addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabananach (talk • contribs) 12:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but your link is a spamlink for me. --Serols (talk) 12:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Could you please explain. I am very passionate about nanach and dedicate my life to spreading its message and teachings. Nanach is about happiness joy and belief. The link will enrich a persons search for the meaning behind its message. It is only a minor edit on the page and can only enrich the article. Please understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabananach (talk • contribs) 12:41, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Sabananach, a good link is one click = more information -> your link = no information. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

If you wish I can link it to the page which speaks about nanach in detail. The homepage is a video but I can link it to the article explaining nanach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sabananach (talk • contribs) 13:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok, try it. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Serols, I got your message that you reverted changes made by me on Robocall page because you think that it is promotion of some site. But that site www.fcall.in also provides same service like Robocall (VOIP) so i added that for reference . I just got dead link in wikipeida and i added new link like I repleaced new link on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMImobile page.

Please re-insert link added by me as it is replacement for dead link.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaikhshafique (talk • contribs) 13:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Shaikhshafique, I don´t re-insert your link, because this was the wrong place -> "References". --Serols (talk) 16:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Bycatch

Why did you delete my slight revision on the definition of bycatch? Either you made a mistake or you have no idea what bycatch is. The sex of the catch is often a determining factor in what is kept and what is put back in many fisheries all over the world. Just one of many examples are most crab fisheries where the male crab are the keepers and females are considered bycatch and are returned to the sea to further populate the biomass. I will revise again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.175.57.186 (talk) 18:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello 166.175.57.186, because it´s wrong -> chicken yes, bycatch no. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately it seems you are quite ignorant of the subject of bycatch. Once again I will revise. Next time you should actually check your facts before assuming you know something that you clearly haven't even researched In the slightest bit as a quick look pulls up multiple examples of the wrong sex being undesireable and therefore bycatch. "In the crab fisheries, crab bycatch includes females of target species, sublegal (small) males of target species, and non-target crab."

http://www.npfmc.org/crab-bycatch-overview/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.175.56.97 (talk) 21:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello 166.175.57.186, thank you for the link and sorry for my mistake. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

IP users keep confusing me for you

Hi Serols, you've got mail, via my talk page :)

You Deleted My Changes to Jack Canfield Profile - Why?

I have worked to follow all Wikipedia instructions and added some verified content and references to the Jack Canfield listing. I included other books that he's written that were not previously mentioned, as well as the name of his co-author for one book. I provided valid references. You deleted all of my effort. Can you please explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.166.222.226 (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

You're looking for Serols :) -- Aronzak (talk) 21:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello 75.166.222.226, see here - no Amazon-Link -> Wikipedia:External links. Regards --Serols (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

The ongoing vandalism

Don't bother warning User:Luridjohns and other users replacing "turkey" with "goobler" or adding "toast" to pages with "ghost". They're sockpuppets, and this has been going on for a little while now. Just report them to SPI / AIV. dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 23:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello dalahäst, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 23:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Bright House Networks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/50.89.183.253

I updated the new BHN slogan on their page which, if you need me to source it - I can, was probably a mistake to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.89.183.253 (talk) 23:37, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello 50.89.183.253, is now the slogen "See how bright life can be." or "Hello Friend"? Regards --Serols (talk) 23:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of links on Church of Bible Understanding page

Serols, I think what you are saying is that Amazon links are not permitted on WIkipedia. If so, I understand. Is a link to a Facebook page, which is a discussion forum for former members of that church also not according to Wikipedia's guidelines? 173.70.28.91 (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello 173.70.28.91, see Wikipedia:External_links -> Links normally to be avoided -> 10.. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Got it now, thank you. I read the guidelines too. Very helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.28.91 (talk) 11:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Do not spoil movie

do not spoil terminator genisys which is not realse yet ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandolinha4everyone (talk • contribs) 20:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Or you could just not read the article if you wanted to avoid spoilers. Ever thought of that? -- 73.170.48.34 (talk) 03:30, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Bollocks. --188.30.192.26 (talk) 20:42, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

please see wp:spoiler. "Plot summary" is a sufficient warning for a spoiler. --Fazbear7891 (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Jonathan King Edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.123.16 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Very odd that you removed reference to Jonathan King's criminal history from the introductory paragraph. He is well known for his career and equally well known for his criminal conviction. Your action in deleting my edit was not neutral.

Hello 86.11.123.16, an edit like yours without reference -> no. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Opa!

Please take another look at the revert you just un-reverted on the Opa! page. The revert was to remove a vandal's joke about premature ejaculation.

24.87.23.0 (talk) 05:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello 24.87.23.0, 1. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Street View

I do not understand your reverting my changes. Are Street View links prohibited or what ? (79.184.48.14 (talk) 10:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC))

Hello 79.184.48.14, the first revert was ClueBot NG and Google Street View is critical in some states - read -> Google Street View. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:43, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

All right, thanks for that information. But does it mean it is impossible to put the Street View links for South Carolina ? (79.184.48.14 (talk) 19:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC))

July 2015

Hi Serols, I was not intending to vandalize the page Derrek Bently Case. I was just trying to get rid of edits that I made earlier. I found three unconstructive edits, and deleted them. Later, I decided that I wanted to undo what I did, and get rid of the unconstructive edits by clicking undo, that way it is documented hat I actually undid those edits. You may notice hat I am using a differen IP address. In my house, there seems to be multiple IP addresses and I don't know why. I think you caught me before I was done with u doing everything I wanted undone.99.53.112.186 (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello 99.53.112.186, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry

I'm sorry

Dilshad Akhter 07:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrDilshad akhter (talk • contribs)  

FBI labeled him a terrorist.

He is labeled as a terrorist by the FBI and not just some activist. This should be somewhere in the article since it is on his life. The organization he belongs to is on the FBIs list of terrorist groups and him being a terrorist is not just speculation or opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.44.135.35 (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

/* Psychosocial Fragging */ bs

no citations. not well written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.214.0 (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey there, on the recent edit

Hello there! On the page you reverted, I'm in the middle of re-arranging a series of pages which are in a sequence (1-9), adding 2 need pages in the middle. That's why it may seem unproductive since I didn't at first all the content I wanted, but I'm in the middle of doing so. If there's anything objectionable, please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanos V (talk • contribs) 13:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Romanos V, you delete an entire section without references. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

DoItYourself.com

Please do not revert good faith edits on the DoItYourself.com. Let me finish my work and then you can comment on the talk page. You are Edit warring. Please stop. 166.173.63.184 (talk) 18:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello 166.173.63.184, please use before working the Talk-Page. Then everyone can see, that you are working on this article. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

GIUSEPPE DANISE as a notable resident of the Ansonia hotel

Hi Serols, I added days ago the name of GIUSEPPE DANISE as a notable resident of the Ansonia hotel (telling me that my contribution "didn’t appear constructive").But you cancelled everything https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ansonia

Mr Serols please double check Opera history. You probably don't know that GIUSEPPE DANISE "in a generation which boasted so many great Italian baritones, was among the most important ones"... (LEO RIMENS)

http://www.giuseppe-danise.com/giuseppe-danise/by_Leo_Riemens.html

GIUSEPPE DANISE AT ANSONIA HOTEL....FAMILY PICTURES: http://www.giuseppe-danise.com/giuseppe-danise/Family_pics.html http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9402E0DA1630E433A2575BC2A9669D946195D6CF

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denise http://bassocantante.com/opera/danise.html

In a generation which boasted so many great Italian baritones, Giuseppe Danise was among the most important ones, even though today he is undeservedly underrated. (Leo Riemens) Born in Naples, he studied there with Luigi Colonnesi and Abramo Petillo. He made his debut in 1906 at Teatro Bellini as Alfio in Cavalleria Rusticana and over the next decade established himself as one of the leading Italian baritones.

On 17 November, 1920 he made his Met debut as Amanasro in Aïda, (with Destinn, Matzenauer and Martinelli) and remained at the Met for 12 years, sharing most of the big baritone roles with De Luca, Scotti, Basiola, Ruffo and Tibbett. In his first season, one critic wrote of his portrayal of Carlo Gerard in the premiere of Andrea Chenier that he “sang like a true artist and acted like a real man.” During this period Danise remained in the US, singing at the Met during the winter season and at Ravinia in Chicago during the summer.

He bade farewell to the Met on 16 January 1932 as Count di Luna in Il Trovatore and returned to Italy, where, although he had been almost forgotten, he was immediately engaged to sing major roles at La Scala. For the next 13 years he performed at the major houses in Italy with a few essays to Rio de Janiero. After the war he returned to the US and settled in New York. He married Bidú Sayão in 1947 and dedicated himself to the management of her career. He also taught singing in New York, and one of his most famous students was Regina Resnick.

Danise recorded for Brunswick, a company that lacked Victor’s commercial commitment to the classics (especially opera singing), and this is likely a major reason for his not being better known today. Based on those few recordings, however, I have to agree with Leo Riemens’ assessment: “Without a doubt Danise ranks among the best Italian baritones of his generation: he combined the lyricism of De Luca and the dramatic temperament of Scotti with Stracciari’s sonority.” (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mialbini (talk • contribs)

Hello Mialbini, there was a mistake in your edit -> ItHeitor Villa-Lobos. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello [[User:Serols|Serols] Hi!What should I do?Edit again? Not clear what you mean with my editing error...mialbini

Hello again! [[User:Serols|Serols] Please tell me: what should I do? should I add my text again ? Not clear what you mean with my editing error (is that small error the reason for you to cancel everything?)... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mialbini (talk • contribs) 08:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

The tide

Why did you change it? It's true Brummiebrad (talk) 15:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Mistake

I don't know how to add image on the Golden Mickeys page, so something not constructive comes out. Can you teach me how to add a image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.117.217.119 (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello 219.117.217.119, see here: Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. --Serols (talk) 07:37, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Same-sex unions page

Oh sorry, I misread what page you reverted. Disregard my initial comment. But I do feel the chart I deleted in question was appropriate. Manful0103 (talk) 23:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Mistake.

Actually, I reverted the vandalism. You reverted my edit, so now it says "so saddened". You better check on what you just did. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello 99.53.112.186, sorry for my mistake. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

User:DumbBot page

That was a quick revert after the IP editor vandalized the page. Great work!Wzrd1 (talk) 14:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Migasyrn

Our legion is unstoppable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Migastehlulz (talk • contribs) 15:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Said from someone whose account and IP is now blocked.Wzrd1 (talk) 15:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Dean Flynn

No one cares that I edited a dirty pornstars page. He has contributed nothing to society. This page has slandered me for years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.252.45 (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

This is nonsense. --Serols (talk) 17:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Just further evidence that one should not imbibe of ethanol early in the day.Wzrd1 (talk) 17:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

	A Marine thumbs up
	A big thumbs up for your help reverting vandalism on the James Mattis page. Oh, and have some pie, too! KMJKWhite (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your user page has been vandalized

AIV for repeat vandal created.Wzrd1 (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I've deleted your user page. The contents was an edifying

"Dear Sir or Madame

I am writing to you to, to complain about the warning that came with my User page, as this is my story. Please refrain from editing my story or I will have to report you to higher authority.

Thank you

Yours sincerely

Jizzolve. X"

from Jizzolve --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:42, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Seattle riot page

I deleted those sections because they used poor sources like professors I couldn't find online and some obscure low-circulation magazine "the Indypendent" to substantiate propositions that use vague terms like "some" and "to many". The propositions both seem to support the same viewpoint, which makes the article look biased.

I think it would be hard to quantify or characterize the success of the events with the sources previously mentioned and the sections I deleted I think failed to, nor do I think this Wikipedia page should necessarily be the forum to attempt that. Consequently, it would be best if the article stuck to the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.204.195 (talk) 23:25, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello 74.72.204.195, you delete nothing without using the Talke-page. Regards --Serols (talk) 23:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Buddhanilkantha temple

Hi Serols! Thanks for your message. However, even if you won't find my corrections relevant, I warmly suggest you to check again the article. Some part need editing! Let me know, whatever I can be of any help ... my talk page 17:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Chiarabortolini, please read at first Wikipedia:External links. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:11, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Serols. Thank you for the suggestion! It is absolutely helpful. I was sure I had quotated the link as a footpage note. Sorry. However I was referring more to the editing. (my talk page) 20:54, 10 Augurst 2015 (UTC)

Pending reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. 07:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam (talk)

Not vandalism

Split content from the article page-boy to Page (assistance occupation) as per the talkpage... grr X(...

• Sigh, now the page's history is messed up. --X7C3(talk) 15:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello X7C3, sorry - I saw to late what you want to do. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for your counter-vandalism work! Rubbish computer 23:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Where can I place?

Hi, Serols! Where can I place (on wikipedia) the catalog of firms of our company? Contains the companies and firms of all countries of the world. It is similar to the yellow pages. What you say? — Preceding unsigned comment added by me 14:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello 178.165.85.106, please read Yellow pages. In Wikipedia is no place for your website. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a link-directory. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert (my mistake)

Hi! I just wanted to thank you for reverting a mistake I recently made -- I was attempting to create a page for Wixtend using the source code on the page Wiggio, and I accidentally ended up modifying Wiggio instead of creating a new page. Just wanted to explain why it looked like I sabotaged Wiggio's page -- oops! :) Jpskycak (talk) 17:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your efforts reverting vandalism. It's a very repetitive (and sometimes boring) task. -©2015 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 18:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

e5tdu Steven.k97 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

User page

Your user page was created by a vandal. You can tag it with speedy deletion criteria G7 if you want. Rubbish computer 18:46, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

CEG page

Hi I am trying to add their alumni website page in their college wiki page. The alumni website link is missing in those pages and before reverting the change I suggest you check the link to know the scantity of the links I am adding in the pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.34.240.78 (talk) 17:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello 27.34.240.78, only one page on this place. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Lindsey Stirling

She is gorgeous....that is undisputable fact. Don't like it, leave Wikipedia, Cobratrooper11 (talk) 18:30, 26 August2015

MREC Page

Hi I am trying to add their alumni website page in their college wiki page. The alumni website link is missing in those pages and before reverting the change I suggest you check the link to know the scantity of the links I am adding in the pages. This link will help many alumni and students about the alumni wesbite, which is very benficial for them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.216.134.149 (talk) 02:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello 106.216.134.149, only one page on this place. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Inappropriate user

I noticed that you had appropriately reverted the last two edits made by "SomeoneSmart" to the Jim Jones page. That user had a previous edit made earlier today, which was deleted, and reposted his marginally coherent and non-encyclopedic ramblings to the page again, which you deleted. I doubt if the user is an intentionally malicious vandal, but is likely just a youngster who has no clue what Wikipedia is about. If he or she continues to post, it could create problems. I don't know what the Wikipedia community does in such a circumstance. Have you any suggestions? Activist (talk) 18:32, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Activist, read and watch this page. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Vamona Navelcar

Dear Serols

You just deleted a link I posted on the "Vamona Navelcar" page which shows my book "Vamona Navelcar an Artist of Three Continents" which I think is entirely relevant as I am the author of his biography. If I posted in the wrong format I apologise, but please do advise how and where I can post the relevant information as the book is available. Regards

Anne Ketteringham — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.214.30.50 (talk) 12:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Anne Ketteringham please read Wikipedia:External_links - no facebook-links. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Photos

You don't have many photographs of the area and that is what I am trying to provide. People like to see pictures.

Thomas Levine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameraman888 (talk • contribs)

Hello Cameraman888, please read Wikipedia:External links -> no blogs. And your page ist not the Clarke Quay website. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Dead Baby Jokes

What was wrong with the joke? I just thought it would be a nice addition to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunaboy45 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Tunaboy45, sorry. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Examples on that page need to be sourced. Etamni | ✉ | ✓  18:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Reverted

Dear Serols, hi! I believe you probably reverted an article Izzet Hayat Khan that I had corrected, removing much false, and/or unreliable or unreferenced material etc. Im trying to improve this article and bring it within the bounds of Wikipedia regulations for such articles ; and I hope you will see what Im trying to do please and kindly cooperate. I have again edited and removed much material, hope its better now. Many thanks and regards, 39.54.121.16 (talk) 05:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC) Col (r) Mumtaz Khan , Pakistan

Hello 39.54.121.16, this was the last revert. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

mian tariq mehmood

dear i am his nephew if i just want to add some more information about mian tariq mehmood ,if you can ,i can provide you alot more about him by the way it was my first attempt and i dont even know how to use,thanks for informing

3chak (talk) 19:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 3chak, this page can help you: Wikipedia:Your first article. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Stop it please

Stop reverting my edit please and see Cody Decker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF43:8E60:915C:1663:8C65:53DC (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 2602:306:CF43:8E60:915C:1663:8C65:53DC, you deleted the Infobox, is he not a member of the San Diego Padres minor league players? Regards --Serols (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Old Skool Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your superb vandalism reduction achievements! -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Middle names

A minor point I know, but if you claim that an infobox is the only place to list a person's full name (as per Jesse Joronen), then surely you would have to rectify almost every Wikipedia page to fit along the same lines? 81.96.94.137 (talk) 19:55, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 81.96.94.137, for you it is important, so it isn´t a minor point. The infobox ist the place for the full name. In the article is the standard to start with the artikel-name, in this case Jesse Joronen. Regards --Serols (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

With all due respect, I don't think you've understood what I meant. The way I saw it was that any page relating to a person or business begins with the long/full name. Most other biographical pages include the subject's full name at the start of the article, so I was making the same change to the Joronen page. These are the sorts of edits I usually make, mainly because I'm a pedantic guy and because it mostly isn't the subject of a dispute, and I haven't been made aware in the past of what you just told me. 81.96.94.137 (talk) 20:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 81.96.94.137, the first given name is relevant for the article, not the second one. You'll be able to try it again, but please do not be surprised, if it will be deleted. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Well, news to me. 81.96.94.137 (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Maroon 5

Can you keep an eye on the page if who removed citation. 123.136.107.2 (talk) 13:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 123.136.107.2, why, what is the problem? Regards --Serols (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Pandas

I thought it was meant to say that they eat Pandas??? is that not correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.163.65.28 (talk) 14:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

No, panades are actually a type of pastry. --Rubbish computer 17:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For beating me to reverting vandalism almost every time. Keep up the great work! GABHello! 22:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ganesh Man Singh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bgwhite (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

This is the ENGLISH Wikipedia, not Nepalese. DON'T destroy section headers either. You have reverted me twice in two days for keeping non-English, wiki format destroying edits. I just blocked one editor for doing these. Will you like to be the second? Bgwhite (talk) 07:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Bgwhite, sorry, I was at the wrong section from the history. Thank you. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Serols

You might want to request protection creation for this page at Wikipedia:Requests for protection, to prevent further vandalism. Thanks, --Rubbish computer 11:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Rubbish, thanks for the link. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

my edit on Juliette grossman smisek

I feel this page should be removed. Compared to the current celebrities, Juliette does not have nearly enough credits to have a wikipedia. Many much larger film stars pages were removed because of this. She's too young and new to the business to have a large page. She hasn't been involved in any large professional projects, and she shouldn't have a wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.180.68 (talk) 01:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello96.246.180.68, to delete a page with this comment is nonsense and vandalism. --Serols (talk) 07:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Perth County newspapers

I'm not sure why you feel the newspapers I've added to the Perth County Media section are "not constructive," The Journal Argus alone being over 150 years old. For this reason, I've re-added all three to the page. Unless you can provide a reason why the Gazette, Journal Argus, and Banner should not be included, please leave them be. 192.206.146.240 (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 192.206.146.240, three identical links are link spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

So you just delete all three newspapers? You don't think that's overkill? It's a shared website; one that incorporates numerous area newspapers owned by the same company. If one wants to find information about any of these three publications, that's the site they have to go to. I'm re-adding them. Please leave them alone. (199.48.64.83 (talk) 06:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC))

Hello 199.48.64.83, what to three identical links you don´t understand? --Serols (talk) 07:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Waheela

Why would waheela be capitalized in some places and not the others? The term amphicyonids id definitely not capitalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.83.123 (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 66.61.83.123, sorry, my mistake. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Autorevert

The message that you'd reverted my edit came up when the page loaded immediately after my edit, making it massively impossible that you'd put any consideration into it at all. If you'd looked, you wouldn't object, those sections have been tagged as unsourced (and are unencyclopedic anyway) for more than 3 years. It is simply not possible to think that you put any thought into this revert at all, given how instantly it occured, you presumably just saw IP & section blanking and assumed, wrongly. 2.97.207.175 (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

And now you have accused me of vandalism. This sort of instant authoritarian judgement is why people don't contribute anymore....you should NEVER accuse someone of vandalism without even looking at the edit. 2.97.207.175 (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello 2.97.207.175, please use the talk page before you delete something. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletions

Hi. I have been adding links to the web site for the various churches in our group but to find that they are deleted almost immediately. The web site has a great more detail about our churches and is not a commercial venture. Please confirm that the links will no longer be removed. Thanks. From Ggmbenefice. Ggmbenefice (talk) 15:34, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Ggmbenefice, sorry, but what you doing is link-spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Serols for the reply. I am new to Wiki and have now had a chance to read up on the COI information and see why you would consider my edits to be spam. I do have a question, however. Given that web links are provided to other sites that feature our Churches, how can we enable people using Wiki to source the direct web link? Thank you for your kindness in replying. Ggmbenefice (talk) 19:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm Calidum. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rob Gronkowski because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. this edit Calidum 19:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello Calidum, I can not do anything with your comment. I reverted vandalism - see the history. --Serols (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

You listed the wrong but it looks like it might have been an accident. Sorry about the warning then. Calidum 19:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your user page

Do you want it semi-protected? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello NeilN, this is a good idea, yes I want. Thank you and regards --Serols (talk) 17:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Done. Only auto-confirmed editors will be able to create your user page which should stop most of the disruption. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello NeilN, thank you. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:48, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey!!! Serols MEG here I am new on wiki so am getting little difficulty to find out who it work. I actually wanted to edit the whole article bcoz the celeb name is spelled wrong its "KAPUR" not kapoor and i want to change the title also but I donno how to do can u plz tell me ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IMEGLEO (talk • contribs) 16:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Wally Bayola edit

I just removed a gross entry on the page. That also happened before, a few months ago, in another Filipino celebrity page, which I won't mention, wherein editors who wants to insert a similar entry are prevented to do so. And revision histories which have the said content are removed. 121.54.54.141 (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

USS North Caroline

You reverted my revision, wich was made to remember the Composers To Battleship program of the us navy in the early 50th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.59.172.204 (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello 46.59.172.204, please specify references. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're keeping me busy at WP:AIV, which is excellent! Thank you for your hard work — MusikAnimal talk 19:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Gay sexual practices

Please, read the talk page to the entry. There's a consensus among all editors who have weighed in on the subject that the 'health risks' subsections need to be trimmed down to respect Wikipedia's Undue weight policies. All I did was that, besides adding content and sources to the main subsection, which you removed. Rafe87 (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Rafe87, sorry for my edit. The word gay was the reason. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Glad we cleared that up! Rafe87 (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Brother Rice Edit

This edit was constructive. All of my edits were constructive. Thanks Lgbtbrotherrice (talk) 18:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Lgbtbrotherrice, of course -> absolute nonsens. --Serols (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Acheron timeline

Please read band members list and change the timeline with the true members list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.16.58.150 (talk) 17:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

That is your opinion. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok, run :) --87.16.58.150 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.15.231.144 (talk) 18:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear Serols...

...are you joking, arent' you? I've added the Italian IPA. WHAT's the vandalism in this??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.30.161 (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello 151.20.30.161, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Maybe, but it's just a stupid ignorant like me's opinion, Wiki patrollers should take half a second to reflect before compulsively click "undo", don't you think? Well, it's over, at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.30.161 (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello 151.20.30.161, by more than 10000 vandalism-edits every day, sometimes it gets the wrong person. Sorry that you are my wrong today. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Forgiven. Bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.20.30.161 (talk) 16:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Our Lady Peace

Hi. I reverted your unexplained revert. Take the time to read WP:REPEATLINK. Also, song titles always have quote marks around them. I don't know why you reverted, but it was incorrect for you to do so. Please actually review edits in the future instead of knee-jerk reverting them. Thank you. 198.169.127.201 (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello 198.169.127.201, there was no difference between your edit and the edit before. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You are absolutely wrong. Here is the edit in question. You can clearly see that I removed a duplicated wikilink and added quote marks around a song title. Again, review an edit before reverting. 198.169.127.201 (talk) 15:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You don´t understand me - there ist no difference to see at the artikel. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You are right, I don't understand you. What do "ist" and "artikel" mean? Are you saying that the article looked the same after my edit? Because that is incorrect, the article had one less wikilink and one more set of quote marks. It absolutely looked different. Please explain to me exactly what the issue was with my edit, in detail. 198.169.127.201 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but there is definitely no difference to see, but no matter, let´s finsh it. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

You haven't even looked at the diff I provided, have you? Instead of obstinately holding to your claim that there is "no difference", click the diff I provided above, and you will see the difference. Open up the version of the article prior to my edit, and then the version after my edit (before your incorrect revert). Visually compare the two. It may be a small difference, but it is different: one less wikilink, one more set of quote marks.

You need to put more effort into reviewing edits prior to reverting them, and only revert them if they truly are unconstructive. And if you are challenged on a revert, take the time to actually explain your revert, in detail (instead of typing these half-sentences full of spelling errors). And if you are wrong (and in this case you are 100% wrong), apologize and learn from the experience. 198.169.127.201 (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

And if you are wrong (and in this case you are 100% wrong), apologize and learn from the experience. I know enough, but I saw, that it´s better to buy glasses - I compared the wrong version, sorry. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Kripparrian request for page protection

You requested for Kripparrian protection here, however it already has. I suggest you to delete yours. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Dat GuyWiki, ok delete. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Bride of the Monster

You removed an external link because you didn't think it was constructive. https://www.facebook/com/edwoodsbrideofthemonster/ It's an external link which is free to everyone. How is that not constructive? It alerts fans to a new book by Gary D. Rhodes with new information on the subject that was previously unknown to readers. The book, likely, will be used as a source citation to revise the wiki article. Do you think it is better placed under the "See also" section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C517:96D0:F9F1:9579:D2E8:E0BA (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello 2602:306:C517:96D0:F9F1:9579:D2E8:E0BA, facebooklinks are not allowed in Wikipedia - see Wikipedia:External links. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Ah...yes. I see that now. OK. Registration. That makes perfect sense. Sorry I missed that. Thank you and have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C517:96D0:F9F1:9579:D2E8:E0BA (talk) 18:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello 2602:306:C517:96D0:F9F1:9579:D2E8:E0BA, no problem, I wish you also a nice day. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Kindly go through the article About Indic Scripts In Lead at {WP:INDIC_SCRIPTS}

Over here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India#Indic_scripts_in_lead103.16.70.67 (talk) 11:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC) Hope you are clear by now why Indic scripts are not to appear in lead in Wiki (Other countries or other international languages this is not an issue) And how could yourself asses whether my contribution is constructive or non-constructive, Yagnam is real pronunciation for word sacrifice, however if you are not in agreement with my edit you can stick to your version103.16.70.67 (talk) 11:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello 103.16.70.67 see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Factors associated with aviation accident

Hello i was trying to change my original copy " Gender and pilot performance" to this topic, but after i change it the and resubmit for review. It said i copy and paste from the original copy. Is there a way that i can put them into one with a new title as "factors associated with aviation accidents" — Preceding unsigned comment added by KennyW1215 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello KennyW1215, perhaps helps this page: Wikipedia:Merging. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

hi

Kinnaue ke sath garhwal,kumaon aur uttarakhand bhi lagao,tab mai band kar dunga boss ok.aur metal worker,peasent hatao.we r not metal workers Garhwalking (talk) 08:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Garhwalking, with your editing you destroy the article and this is only vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Facebook links are allowed in External links section when the Facebook page is official

Referring to your Chan_Zuckerberg_Initiative edit revision Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided "Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject" — Preceding unsigned comment added by RiskNerd (talk • contribs) 09:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello RiskNerd, sorry, in this case, you're right. Thanks for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Gagra choli

hi .. this refers to my edit that u reverted on the Gagra choli wiki page. Well in my pic Priyanka Chopra was wearing lehenga & choli & dupatta. As per text given in initial lines of this article.. these 3 r necessary for a Gagra Choli. So definitely my Priyanka is wearing gagra choli. Now the reason i put it as main pic is that its always better to have a modeern day pic as the main pic of wiki article rather than having a decades old black & white pic. I think u made a mistake by cancelling my edit.117.197.39.62 (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello 117.197.39.62, your pictures are no improvement for the article. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Apple Watch

Serols, you immediately reverted my reversion of an apparent vandalism or incompetent edit by user 216:226:127:71 to article Apple Watch. In fact, the last good page edit was made on 6:18 December 7, 2015. All subsequent edits require reversion because they created or resulted in invalid page content. Please refer to the current version of the Apple Watch article which nonsensically starts as follows…

According to analyst firm Canalys.[10][11]

The goal of the Apple Watch…

…i.e. the opening paragraph is grammatically incorrect and, in any case, has no meaning. Kindly refrain from interfering with my efforts to return the page to sensible form and content. I would appreciate confirmation that you will refrain from interfering with my efforts to return the cited article to good form.

--Dejandra (talk) 18:56, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Dejandra, sorry for my revert, but your attempt was a bit unfortunate. I restore an older version of the Apple Watch. Thank you for your attention. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 01:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Elizium23, what shoud that? I reverted vandalism. Please pass on better before you make a message. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I am not sure how you consider that vandalism when the section was clearly violating multiple policies. The IP editor was completely correct to remove it. But you restored it so the onus is on you to provide sources per WP:BURDEN. Elizium23 (talk) 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Elizium23, I think you have not behaved very cooperative because my intention had been identified for you. A message on my side would have been more than enough - that should be normal under wikipadians. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:UFC 194

Involving in discussions at above talk page will help community cooperate more. Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 17:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

I used her/his user talk. --Serols (talk) 15:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Re IP user

Re your post to the IP; I would suggest you not feed the trolls; that usually only encourages them to harass you or disrupt Wikipedia more, as they know they can gain attention from doing so. 331dot (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello 331dot, that was a serious-intentioned advice - read here. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

GAB^Hello! is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Best of luck,

GAB^Hello! 15:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello GAB, I wish you also a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year 2016. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 15:55, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

The Alcasser Girls

--Overdrive1979 (talk). About what you have reverted today on The Alcasser Girls, I think both links ones are useful to understand this weird, creepy crime, but anyway, as I'm a new user from WIkipedia maybe I'm wrong. Anyway, thanks you. —Preceding undated comment added 23:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Overdrive1979, sorry but one link is the wrong language and the second one has no added value. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:39, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Serols, so, does the external link of a given Wikipeda article fit the same language than the original article? If so, do "references" section contain links in another languages? I've seen that through some Wikipedia articles. Thanks.

Hello Overdrive1979, please read Wikipedia:External links or perhaps better for you Wikipedia:Enlaces externos. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Kpop

didn't appear constructive? really? what are you doing to the page other than deleting information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woods09002345 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Woods09002345, information? Please stop these edits. --Serols (talk) 16:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Serols!

Happy New Year!

Serols,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Poepkop (talk) 16:03, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.

.

Happy New Year, Serols!

Happy New Year!

Serols,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 01:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Rasputin (2015 film)

I am sorry. I thought I was editing in my SandBox. I reverted the Article.

Hello Niyazsky, a little late after four warnings. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:48, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

1967

I'm sorry. This is a school's IP address, so there may or may not be some idiots (like my friend that just edited that article) that attempt to change things for no reason. Thank you for correcting that.

Happy New Year, Serols!

Happy New Year!

Serols,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for helping to stop vandalism.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

What is and isn't vandalism

Regarding this edit, my changes weren't vandalism, the ref says nothing about when he worked there and your edit also restores a date format which is contrary to MOS:DATESNO. Valenciano (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Valenciano, this IP was the reason, not your edit. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Um...what???

Why do I keep receiving "bot messages" on my wall?Dankmaster33 (talk) 16:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, well, that kind of thing will happen when you vandalize stuff. Can't say I blame you, or that the edits you've made aren't funny, but it's how it is bud.1416domination (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Shmuly Yanklowitz Page Edit

HI. You recently reverted my edit to Shmuly Yanklowitz's page. There has been somebody going in and adding a lot of negative information, to the point of the page losing it's neutral tone. This anonymous editor includes their own commentary instead of straight facts, and it borders on vandalism in my estimation. Namely this line: "his conversion and status as a Jew is, at best, highly questionable." - Hi, That line comes only after many sources that lead up to it. I actually think it is not a neutral page if it continues to censor all the bad press this person has gotten.

Hi,

Thanks for getting back. I'm new-ish so please understand I am still learning! Please look at the tone that is used for the new edits. There is an action taken by the subject of the page, and the poster interprets negatively. These opinions are sourced, but does having a negative interpretation of the subject not indicate there is something, while not vandalism, something not right with the edits? I am just wondering.

Hello Fropals1, I reverted this edit -> no comment and no references -> bot-message ((Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism)). Hindsight was your edit correctly and please sign your comments. --Serols (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

@JoanieElf123, please sign your comments. --Serols (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Tejaswini Pandit

the page had non reliable stuff. so i removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.194.103.170 (talk) 12:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I saw, most your edits were ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Stadium pictures

Dear Serols, I'm just trying to make the stadium pages on Wikipedia better. A lot of pages don't have stadium pictures, and it's complicated to add pictures on the Wikipedia page. That's why it's better in my opinion to add some links to the most complete stadium websites, which have plenty of pictures for those who want to see how the stadiums look like. Kind regards, user farmnation

Hello Farmnation, most of the article have pictures and it´s easy to upload a picture in wikipedia. More than 90% your edits were inserting your links. Sorry, but I think this is only link-spam, also in wikipedia.de.. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your response Serols, I understand your concerns. But it's hard to find pictures which I can add to Wikipedia, because of copyright violations etcetera. And it's a lot of work. Maybe I can only add picture links to pages which don't have pictures yet, if you are okay with that? There are some good stadium websites with nice pictures, which could help Wikipedia users finding decent and up-to-date pictures of the venues easily. Greetings, farmnation.

• From my talk page (diff):

Hello Northamerica1000, how are you? Perhaps you can help me. More than 90% of Farmnation edits are inserting two links. I think it´s link-spam. Are you also in my opinion? Please see also my talk-page. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

I have decided to reply here, to keep the conversation in one place. From spot-checks, I think the links being added to the External links sections are all right, as long as they conform to WP:ELYES, particularly point #3 there, as long as they are added conservatively, and as long as Farmnation is not affiliated with the various sites being added. From what I've seen, the links being added do not contain advertising, promotional content, etc., and the content appears to be accurate, neutral and relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subjects. Some of the links I checked out that have been added include: http://stadiumdb.com/stadiums/ger/gruenwalder_stadion, http://www.worldofstadiums.com/asia/china/guizhou/guiyang-olympic-sports-centre-stadium/, http://www.worldofstadiums.com/south-america/argentina/estadio-antonio-vespucio-liberti/, and others. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello North America, thank you for your detailed report and your help. Best regards --Serols (talk) 18:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Alfred Clement Stewart

Now that you have left these messages and can see why it appears that I am vandalizing the Draft:Alfred Clement Stewart page. What I did was copy and paste the HTML from Thomas Edison's wiki page. I just wanted to see the correct way to format. What you saw as vandalizing was actually me erasing the Thomas Edison information and replacing it with the correct Alfred Clement Stewart information. Sorry I am new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerastez (talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Cerastez, sorry I saw too late, that you are the author of this page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

So can I keep editing? Now I realize that I should have done everything in the sandbox. I am really sorry. This is my first article and I don't really know what I am doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cerastez (talk • contribs) 19:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Cerastez, of course you can do it. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Earl of Home

Would you like to explain why you consider these edits 'vandalism' instead of just deleting them without explanation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.114.159 (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Color blindness

Sorry, Didn't mean to step on your revert. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 7&6=thirteen, no problem. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Qurabiya

What is constructive to you? Filling up the kurabiye article with polvorones? Polvorones came out of kurabiye but we don't fill up their article with kurabiye stuff. Why? Do we have a positive discrimination towards the polvorones? --176.239.72.85 (talk) 11:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 176.239.72.85, please omit such edits. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello hello. I was talking on the same. Sure you understood me? --176.239.72.85 (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 176.239.72.85, we talking on the same. Why you delete the section Philippines? --Serols (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Because it's not about kurabiye but about polvorones. Any difficulty in understanding English? I know that my English is not perfect but I expressed myself very clearly. Regards. --176.239.72.85 (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

-176.239.72.85 and the change in Mexico - Americas? --Serols (talk) 17:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Because in the section there is reference to the United States also. On the other hand there is reference to Philippines (the part I cut) in the Spain section. All about "polvorones". And this is not (bolded) the "polvorones" article. I hope you are satisfied. --176.239.72.85 (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 176.239.72.85, I'm satisfied - see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Kolkata reverts

Hi, the reverts (1 and 2) which you made on the page List of tallest buildings in Kolkata were not vandalism at all. They were certainly botched attempts by Wonderbank to add references to the page, but I'm not sure how you managed to view them as vandalism in this manner. I do admit they seem quite spam-like, but that is not the user's intentions here. Thanks, ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 11:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello ^{My name is}not^dave, for me it looked after link-spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

IP

So, don't want to talk about Spanish soccer in Spanish? ;-) [1]. Good work. Horseless Headman (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC).

Hello Horseless Headman, it is not my hobby for today -> thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Revert==

why you revert my update on Orai, Uttar Pradesh Page I only update the Heading Because Mr. Surendra Pal is only Advocate and there is only one clinic in Orai that have a website so i update it so please redo the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.49.61 (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 1.39.49.61, what kind of revert you mean? Regards --Serols (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

userpage?

Hey why is your userpage deleted XD?Argonite07 (talk) 16:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello talk, why are you interested in it? Regards --Serols (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

JFIIT

Hi Serols. Thank you for the cookies. I removed the content (as requested by the organization). I did it twice since I thought maybe I didn't complete to process the first time. Then, I checked the history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.3.57.81 (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Reseach for the Urabeños

Hi. Please research. Urabeños aren't those from Urabá. Those from Urabá are urabaenses.

Please give references about your actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.131.97.7 (talk) 15:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello 201.131.97.7, the article title is Los Urabeños. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

All Saints Church Edit

Regarding your reinstatement of the removed content. That content was removed because some of the content is subjective and not wholly factual. Including that content isn't constructive or helpful either to the church or to the individual concerned, indeed it might even have a negative impact on that individuals chances of finding another 'position'. The content could be considered as an 'act of revenge' by either the individual or one of their supporters and I'm sure Wiki would not want to be seen to be facilitating such actions. So, ideally it would be preferable for all concerned parties if the article was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.97.200 (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Minnesota United FC (MLS) edit

You deleted an edit that reflected MLS' decision to re-name the expansion team that will start in Minnesota in 2017 or 2018. You called it "un-constructive," which suggests to me that you didn't read the reference as it is clear as day that the team will NOT BE CALLED UNITED when it enters MLS. This means that all references to the club as "Minnesota United" are inaccurate. This isn't a subtle interpretation. The name "United" will in no way be used and the title of the page should be changed to reflect this as well. http://www.twincities.com/2016/02/20/whats-in-minnesota-united-fcs-name-depends-on-who-you-ask/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgrollins (talk • contribs) 16:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Dgrollins, here is the answer. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Recent Changes Praise

STOP. This is your last warning; the next time you beat me to vandalism on Wikipedia, you may cause me a mild inconvenience.

You're doing a fantastic job, especially during US school hours. Mr. Spink ^{talk★contribs} 16:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Spink, thank you for your praise. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Chams

When I looked at the revision history, I noticed a minor dispute between you and user:95.248.84.186 since I just recently did a minor edit. Actually, in this case, the IP is correct because they are removing one paragraph about one person's point of view who does not even have a Wikipedia page or is well known (a Google Search yields only 239,000 result and even there are different Hassan A Kasem present). This would be giving undue weight and I found that this is used in other pages such as Cambodia–Vietnam relations to smear Vietnam so that is also biased and undue weight. As well, if you read the paragraph, it is not related to Chams, it is a paragraph dedicated to bashing Vietnam for its invasion of Cambodia and has the typical comment that certain Cambodian political parties (e.g Sam Rainsy) have by claiming the Cambodian officials are actually Vietnamese which has not been proven. The way I see it, it is criticizing Vietnam for ideological purposes with little evidence to back up certain ridiculous claims. Ssbbplayer (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Ssbbplayer, and therefore I have also accepted. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

The Cure Award

In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Monty Hall Problem grammar

I corrected a grammatical error on the Monty Hall Problem page, changing "the first action uses the previous information and the later does not" to "the first action uses the previous information and the latter does not".

You then reverted my correction, returning the page to its previous state of error, claiming that you didn't consider my correction to be a constructive edit.

You are correct in that it wasn't constructive — it was corrective. Please revert your reversion, unless you prefer the page to contain the grammatical error in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.110.24.200 (talk) 12:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello talk, see here, your edit was correct, sorry. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Farman Nawaz

I have created another page for this draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehahurrain (talk • contribs) 17:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello contribs, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Chris Newman, artist

Hello Serols, thank you for letting me know that you reverted the entry on Chris Newman's exhibitions on artist-info.com artist-info is a unique worldwide research source for artist, curators, and exhibition places: 150.580 artists and 6107 curators in 505.217 shows (1930 - tomorrow) in 11.556 venues. In the case of Chris Newman it shows the artist's 81 exhibitions, the 569 other artist he did show with and the 15 curators. It shows how all of them are connected and benefit through these connections. What is for you the difference between Artfacts.net on Chris Newman and Exhbitions on artist-info.com? Sincerely Yours -- THHAP (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by THHAP (talk • contribs) 12:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello THHAP, all your edits were one link with no added value, sorry, but this is link-spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Serols, 98% of artist biographies don't inform about with whom they were showing in group exhibitions although this is for the artist's profile and for the public a highly valuable information. artist-info provides exactly this source through sientific research for artists and exhibition places and curators worldwide from 1929 up to today. Why should this important information be spam?--THHAP (talk) 08:02, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello THHAP, sorry, but I see on your link no added value for Wikipedia. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

You are as fast as Cluebot NG! I see vandalism and when I go use Twinkle to revert it, it says nothing to revert! Then I check the page's history and. . .you have reverted the vandalism. Darn. Thanks again! Peter Sam Fan | talk 15:34, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Peter Sam Fan, I'm doing 10 minute break just for you. Regards and thanks --Serols (talk) 15:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Doge

Gah! I think we both hit the page at once to revert it and I accidentally reverted you. Sorry 'bout that! RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello RickinBaltimore, no problem. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please don't revert edits without explanation

@Serols: - thank you for leaving the notice on my talk page about reverting my edit. However, when one reverts an edit they should describe why the revert is made in the edit summary and discussion of what belongs on a page should be on the talk page of that article, not on individual user talk pages. I gave clear reasons based on wikipedia standards for my edtis and expect engagement with those wikipedia standards if you disagree. Dan Eisenberg (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Dan Eisenberg, please use the comment field and references if you delete something, there is no other way. --Serols (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I did use the edit summary field. Not sure if you mean something else by comment field and references than that? Dan Eisenberg (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Dan Eisenberg, only "wikipedia is not a newspaper or a list of things" is not enough. Please do not misunderstand me, but prevented more detail misunderstandings - see the history. An entry in the talk-page or a link like this and everyone will understand it. Thank you for your understanding - regards --Serols (talk) 08:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Cramond - Крамонд (стоянка)

It was my mistake, sorry. I agree with deleation of "Крамонд" from en.wikipedia.Thank you.VSL56 (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Once again... still beating me to vandalism. GABHello! 14:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Gene ZEF

I was trying to repair yolandi xissers page, she just wants it removedm thank you. She is not authorizing wiki to have any likeness of her or share any information about her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gene ZEF (talk • contribs) 08:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello Gene ZEF, this is only link-spam and vandalism. --Serols (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

How is that link spam or vandalism? He was merely changing the postion of the external link, rather than adding anything new. 103.6.159.79 (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello 103.6.159.79, thank you for the information. You're right, so I deleted now the link. But the main reason was this edit. For time reasons I have not listed. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Help me

Hi dear, I created this page Tasker (app). This page is not for advertisement. Please help me to complete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zafar24 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I run into you all the time. Seriously, are you a bot or something? Peter Sam Fan 15:09, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Because you thanked me

Because you thanked me

Serols, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! User:ClueBot III (talk)

20:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Peter Sam Fan 15:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Judit Polgár

Was this a misclick? [2] --GRuban (talk) 12:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello GRuban, it wasn´t. The edits from the IP were not ok - 1 and 2. Sorry, but this is in my opinion only vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not defending the other edits, just the one I linked. It's not vandalism, it is the correct thing to do, and I am afraid I repeated the IP's removal of the GA template: it's just not right on the article page, and, I think, wouldn't even be right on the talk page, since I don't think Judit Polgár ever passed Wikipedia:Good articles. --GRuban (talk) 17:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Be careful ;-)

Hi, Serols! I wanted to point out an edit that you reverted and then warned the editor citing vandalism. While the edit is clearly COI (he created the FreeDatamap article himself, which is now tagged for CSD per G11), it isn't blatant vandalism. I just wanted to leave you a message about it. Some editors are huge sticklers when it comes to using rollback without an edit summary; I just don't want it to come back to bite you later. Also, Huggle 3.1.20 has been released (I noticed that you're still using 3.1.19). You might want to grab it if you're interested and want to keep it up-to-date. Anyways, that's my two cents. Thanks for patrolling vandalism, and happy editing! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello ~Oshwah~, thank you for the information. You wrote, it isn't blatant vandalism, but the user is blocked and my edit summary was the warning. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Serols! Ahh, you got me there ;-). Thanks for being diligent and for fighting vandalism. The more people that help do it, the better :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

aliyev

I don't know if you heard what's going on in the region because of aliyev check the news, if wikipedia contains even a shred of justice then my words should not be neglected and one thing is that he and his islamic country rage a meaningless war against my country.

Hello Sabbathbloodness, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a platform for personal opinions. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Reversion

You reverted my edit within seconds. I cannot believe you could have read it and thought about it. I'm not a vandal. I gave a rationale in my edit commentary. Read the crap that I deleted and tell me that it's not trivia. Discuss it on the article talk page if you disagree. 202.81.249.36 (talk) 18:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello 202.81.249.36 , please use the talk-page before deleting sections in an article. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not assume every IP is a vandal. 202.81.249.36 (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello 202.81.249.36 , without Ip´s would Wikipedia not what it is now. This is my opinion. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Very funny. In any case, reverting my edit within a few seconds tells me you are not even trying to consider the issues. 202.81.249.36 (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

I personally agree with Serols in this case. The reversion is not because you are an IP, it is because the edits you made constitute vandalism. Bronze2018 (talk) 19:16, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Have yet another barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I don't suppose you could leave some for me? Bronze2018 (talk) 18:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Mulagori

Hello, regarding your note, I am NOT doing vandalism or disruptive editing, in fact as I have written in my note if you check, I am fixing s per Wikipedia regulations that only those notable names should be added that either have existing Wikipedia articles or dependable/reliable references. I shall now re-edit that page please, hope that is clear thanks. 39.54.178.143 (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Prof Dr Hilda Khan, Pakistan

Hello 39.54.178.143, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi 39.54.178.143, please see WP:NNC for information on notability regulations within article content to ensure you don't remove anything incorrectly. Thanks. Moony22 16:02, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Just an FYI, you were Edit warring on Franco Debono. You could have gotten into a lot of trouble if it had continued any longer! Just Remember the WP:3RR next time, OK? Regards, TF ^{{ Contribs } { Edit Quest! }} 18:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Contribs, why? Warnings and the user is blocked. Where is the edit-war? Regards --Serols (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Reverting

Sorry - trying to make page more like an encyclopedic entry, rather than promotional piece - please see my further thoughts on Red Granite Talk page Fresh1face19 (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Fresh1face19, please use the talk-page before deleting sections in an article. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Albuquerque revert

Hello Serols,

 I believe you have indeed made an honest mistake. No worries! But the Albuquerque International Balloon Fiesta is indeed the largest gathering of hot air balloons, as well as the largest yearly event held in Albuquerque. The current wording doesn't reflect that fact, and signs it of as just another balloon event. Therefore, I believe the edit was indeed constructive, as well as appropriate. In the interest of avoiding an apparent 'edit-war', I will wait a few days before re-reverting, lest for some reason you still have objections.

All the best, Kehkou (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Kehkou: The reversion of this edit was undoubtedly based on the addition of the nickname, "Worst place to live," and the profanity added to the City Council parameter. This is clear vandalism of the page. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your edit appears to have incorporated two previous edits by a vandal IP that had been reverted before your edit. I have re-added the portion of the edit that you apparently intended. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your diligence in reverting vandalism, and I apologize for any confusion. I did indeed notice this in the revision history. Again, thank you.

Happy editing, Kehkou (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not change my edit on Paul Danans Page

I have changed part of a malicious edit & you have reverted it back - This is NOT helpful at all. Please DO NOT do this. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by RocojaLimited (talk • contribs) 14:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello RocojaLimited, pleas note the Wikipedia:External links - no facbook-links and no links in the text. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Removal of the links wouldve made sense - But to put the malicious - nasty comments back was uncalled for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RocojaLimited (talk • contribs) 14:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello RocojaLimited, that was not malicious, but a response to a processing that looked like vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:33, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your reverting vandalism to Chaguanas — Safety Cap (talk) 15:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Alexandrine parakeet

The sections I removed were badly written, not referenced and were not encyclopaedic. Read the talk page to see the issues. If some one wants to restore those sections they need to rewrite them properly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.158.162.164 (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Wanda Landowska

Hi. Can you show me where it is directed that Wikipedians not use links to Amazon.com for reliably sourced & NPOV book information (ISSN/ISBN, etc). Thanks. Quis separabit? 16:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Quis separabit?, see Wikipedia:External links -> Links normally to be avoided -> 5.. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Can we talk about Huggle?

I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)

We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.

To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoniwikimedia.org, or send it to designresearchwikimedia.org:

• Username
• city/time zone
• Best time to talk to you?
• Email where we can reach you
• Please use the subject line: Huggle User Conversations

Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) (talk) 19:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

.

Admiralakbar666 (talk) 15:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Not Vandalism

All Class names should be completely CAPITALIZED, like the VIRGINIA Class. When referring to the USS Virginia, it is not completely capitalized. http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/nssn.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.113.53.162 (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello 74.113.53.162, see here, you deleted the picture by History. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your anti-vandalism work on pages related to Top Model! :D Linguist 111talk 15:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Re: July 2016

I was deleting completely fictional information from the article.

92.23.139.90 (talk) 15:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Mistaken identification?

I was notified that an edit made here had been reverted, but this is not my edit. I appreciate the dedication to anti-vandalism, but I am not responsible for this - I only read Wikipedia, not edit it (but I do use a mobile connection frequently, maybe that's the source of confusion).

172.56.41.87 (talk) 02:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

HG is for vandalism, not your disagreeing with constructive edits

I included an edit summary on why I removed the picture; you just used an anti-vandalism tool and reverted me without an edit summary. Please be more responsible. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The artist's improperly scaled drawing contradicts information in the article and confuses the reader. Please discuss on the talk page if you disagree, but don't tell me that my edit was vandalism. --2600:387:1:809:0:0:0:B1 (talk) 18:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

You deleted an importent picture. Note the size relationship between man and Arthropleura in the picture, this is importent. --Serols (talk) 18:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

So now you're discussing this with me instead of calling me a vandal? Head to the article talk page, that's where articles are discussed. Please include edit summaries when using HG, instead of just labeling edits vandalism because you disagree with them. I'm not a vandal. I'm an irritated teacher. --2600:387:1:809:0:0:0:B1 (talk) 18:58, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but you didn´t look the picture exactly and deleted it 3x - see your comment. This is vandalim for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop it

Stop hounding me. I am only helping Wikipedia by pointing out that rhinos and elephants are the only surviving non-avian dinosaurs toady. No one else has pointed this out. So I added it to some articles only to be reverted by you. Keep in mind that I only added missing details about modern dinosaurs. DinoRhinoMammel (talk) 17:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

As I said on your talk page, you need to provide sources for your extraordinary claims. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:14, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry. I won't add unsourced info again. I thought I could add anything to Wikipedia, but it turns I was wrong. Thanks for telling me. I will leave nowDinoRhinoMammel (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

I think you have understood. --Serols (talk) 18:23, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Crowding oF Fight Card Boxes

When you fail to leave enough vertical space above the fight card box, it crashes into the Event box and causes the Card box lines to fold, creating an eyesore that is difficult to read. Please pay attention to the appearance of your Wiki page and add enough vertical spacing so as to set the Card box well below the perimeter of the Event box. This is just a basic good publishing issue and all readers will appreciate your page batter for its appearance. 2601:342:0:E3D0:DBB:BA8:2E8F:615E (talk) 07:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello 2601:342:0:E3D0:DBB:BA8:2E8F:615E, see here 1 and 2. Sorry and Regards --Serols (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Philippeville

You reverted my change of the Philippeville massacre's to the 'Battle of Phillippeville'. As I said in my comments, there was no battle and to say there was is to be an ideologue and not an historian. Martin Evans, author of 'Algeria: France's undeclared war' refers to it as such on p.140 in a section entitled the Phillippeville Massacre. Alistair Horne, on p.118 of his 'A Savage War of Peace' similarly does so. Why you don't agree I cannot fathom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2gentrs (talk • contribs) 18:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello 2gentrs, the article called Battle of Philippeville not Phillippeville Massacre. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Max Koegel

Hello Serols, Max Koegel was written with oe, not with Umlaut-ö (like Goethe). In 2011 this was shown on the Talk-page, and still Max Koegel is written in German and other wikipedias with oe. The source "Chris Webb et al." is not correct in this question. -- 80.140.254.102 (talk) 19:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Source: Dienstaltersliste der Schutzstaffel der NSDAP 1943 p. 94 http://www.dws-xip.pl/reich/biografie/1943/92.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.140.254.102 (talk) 19:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello 80.140.254.102, you're right. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:09, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

I noticed that a message you recently left to MoRuss95 may have been unduly harsh for a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Please provide explanations in the edit summary on why you've reverted the edits, and it necessary, discuss them with the user on their talkpage (or the article's) —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 16:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Hexafluoride, he deletes 3 times partly large sections without comment, gets me the relevant notes and after the third notice he reacts finally, a little bit late.

And these were also newcomers: 1 2 3 4 5 and so on. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm assuming good faith on MoRuss95's part, especially after his apology on his talkpage. So, I don't see him as a vandal, like the accounts you've mentioned (even if, remember WP:SPADE, and WP:NOSPADE). That being said, MoRuss95 should stop his disruptive editing, and read the guidelines.

Don't take it personally, MoRuss95. We have a way of doing things around here to keep things uniform and credible. Even if you have a source that says the grand jury was false, it has to be reliable and impartial. And you can't delete a properly referenced section, but rather you add the new information below it (or within the text if appropriate). —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 17:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Ashish Khetan

If you continue to revert my edits to reinsert highly defamatory and unsupported statements (WP:AGF / WP:NLT) about Mr. Khaitan, I will have to take this to ANI or to WMF Legal.

1) Can you show me any RS that Ashish is a Christian ?

2) Since when are losing candidates entitled to Infoboxes - does this constitute notability ?

3) Is Ashish the Vice Chairman of Delhi Dialogue Commission ?

Since this is a BLP I am reverting you again. 103.248.246.183 (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello 103.248.246.183, you delete nothing. Please use the talk-page. --Serols (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Before threatening me, please read WP:V,WP:PROVEIT the onus is on you to give me a reliable in-line citation IMMEDIATELY for the following defamations you have RESTORED.

The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution

1) That Ashish Khetan's religion is Christianity.

2) That Ashish Khetan is Vice Chairman of Delhi Dialogue Commission.

Both these statements you restored are highly defamatory about a living political person.103.248.246.183 (talk) 18:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Is Ashish Kketan a Christian ? Wikipedia Says so So stop spreading such libels until you can prove it. 103.248.246.183 (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

The claim of Christianity has been removed. I don't think we need to blank the entire infobox, as the other information appears to be sourced in the body of the article. I wouldn't consider any of the information to be "defamatory" or otherwise constitute a serious BLP violation — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

The vice chairman bit is sourced to this article. clpo13_(talk) 18:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello 103.248.246.183, you deleted the info-box and again, please use the talk-page. --Serols (talk) 18:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Actually the Aam Aadmi Party is prohibited from using the term Delhi Dialogue Commission which is owned by India Against Corruption. Khetan is VC of the Delhi Development and Dialogue Commission and it was rechristened (sic) after the other group protested. See AAP govt rechristens Delhi Dialogue Commission AAP ka Lawyer (talk) 18:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

DNC

Constructive?

How is adding a fact about an on going court case (2:16-cv-00670-EAS-TPK) that the DNC is involved with not constructive to the "Controversies" section of the DNC??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagordon81 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello contribs, I think, I am the wrong person. My revert was this, and that was not constructive from you. --Serols (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I did not realize I had changed trump(it was from a browser extension) but why did you delete my entire post over this? You could have just fixed the two times trump was accidentally changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagordon81 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jagordon81, again, I am the wrong person. I reverted only one edit from you by Democratic National Committee, see here and this edit was vandalism. --Serols (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lambert Ofoegbu

Then why not remove the error message on my article. I have clicked and clicked and clicked this speedy deletion button and yet no response and no one is sending me any replies. is that how to treat your users? I am new to Wikipedia and I may not have met your guidelines. its wise someone talks to me and directs me on what to do and stop threatening me with deletion messages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stunnerggg (talk • contribs) 15:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The page creator added an AfD template even though this article has not been nominated for deletion, so they removed it (which you reverted because I'm sure you thought it was actually nominated for deletion). It was later removed because it's not at AfD. —MRD2014 T C 15:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

They have been removing CSD notices, however, which is not allowed. I've done a bit of work on the article, but there's so little sourcing that it's probably better to start over, preferably as a draft that can be submitted to WP:AFC. clpo13_(talk) 15:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Edits Being Reverted

Hi Serols,

Thank you for your message. Earlier I thought you are doing vandalism, trying to remove my edit. I am new here. Is there anything that I have done wrong that my edits are being reverted?

By the way, I don't know how to use 'Talk' and I used it wrongly just now on your message to me and I emailed you. My apology. Can I revert back to my edits? Looking forward to your advice.

Thank you. Jane Jchong33 (talk) 17:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jane Jchong33, my answer is on your talk-page. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Serols, sorry, I don't know how to use 'Talk'. I created a new session below in order to reach you, sorry if it makes you see my repeated message.

August 2016

Thank you, Serols. Actually, my edits are correct. The name 'Ming Dao' is a given name when he joined entertainment circle. His given name by his parents is Lin Chaozhang, so his surname (family name) is Lin. The name 'Ming Dao' should be used as 'Ming Dao' and not Ming (or Mr.Ming) as Ming is not his surname. Beside that, I put external link to his Weibo page and his company Weibo page, can I do that? I also put link to the existing write-up to relevant pages. Can I revert back to all I have done? Thank you. Jane Jchong33 (talk) 18:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jane Jchong33, no can´t revert, because the name must be identical with the article name. You can create a new site with the new name and a redirect form Ming Dao to the new site, but you need references - without it is not possible. Regards

Hello Jane Jchong33, I hope this was your last revert, please stop this. I don´t want any emails from you. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:08, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, Serols. If you are not happy with the surname being changed to from Ming to Lin (although the fact that Ming is not his surname), then I will change back to Ming as you wish. However, I need to revert back because there are other edits that I have spent quite some times. Hope you understand. Thank you. Jchong33 (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Bobby Murphy (Businessman)

Hello, you reverted the change I made to the page for Bobby Murphy (Businessman), which erroneously claimed that he was the "1st richest person in the world," which is patently false. The citation on that fact clearly states him as being the 1011th richest person in the world, which was the change that I tried to make. You then accused me of vandalism, so my question is: what gives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:195:C102:C00:837:4BF4:A5B8:D8F7 (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello 2601:195:C102:C00:837:4BF4:A5B8:D8F7, sorry, your second edit was correctly. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Wrong CSD tag

You incorrectly tagged as G1 on a non-english article, but G1 won't apply to non-english content. KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 18:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello KGirlTrucker81, I only sent too fast. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

But next time, add the {{Not English}} when you see an non-english article (Using twinkle if you wish). KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 18:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello KGirlTrucker81, one comment would have been enough. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Apparently not, because you've done it again on أندريه كيرتيش. for (;;) (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello for (;;) (talk), Huggle not offer this selection non-english content. There is only possible to use the optional parameter, what I have done. But I don´t know, where your problems are. To create a page in arabic language and writing in the english Wikipedia is G1 -> nonsense. For the admins that was previously ok. --Serols (talk) 08:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:CSD#G1 "...does not cover ... coherent non-English material...". In the article in question a quick check on Google Translate and a comparison with the wiki page that was linked at the bottom of the article showed it was a WP:CSD#A10 copy of André Kertész. If Huggle doesn't do what's required in a situation, then you should use something else for that situation. for (;;) (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello for (;;) (talk) , the page has been deleted, that was in the sense of Wikipedia and I do not want any further comments on this topic, you are not an admin. --Serols (talk) 12:09, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Criminal status of Edward Snowden

The reason that I added such information to the infobox was because there needed to be more information given that it already shows his criminal charges. If you would like to discuss this more, please go to the category "Criminal status of Snowden" under the talk page of the article. In the meantime please avoid engaging in any edit wars. TheBD2000 (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello TheBD2000 (talk), please be careful with what you do. Your talk page shows me that you are about to be reported on this page. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Dancing With The Stars

I put the link there to start out the page for the 23rd season of Dancing With The Stars. I do believe it is constructive cause it contains information to help create the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:81C5:5100:3DE5:69FB:BE20:9710 (talk) 15:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello 2604:2000:81C5:5100:3DE5:69FB:BE20:9710, this is the wrong place for a link. --Serols (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Joschka Fischer

I just wanted do harmonize the titles of the vice chancellors in the info boxes, because this is mess: some are referred to as vice chancellors of west germany (unscientific, "west germany" was never the official name of any german state), (vice) chancellor of the federal republic of germany (ok, but a bit long and not really necessary, because the GDR did not have the office of chancellor) and (vice) chancellor of germany (imho the best). if you don`t agree, please make a better proposition, but I hope, you agree, that some harmonization is nesessary here.2A02:810A:13C0:538C:DD:7B0D:7555:F2F (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello 2A02:810A:13C0:538C:DD:7B0D:7555:F2F, in time Schröder there was no more GDR, but I agree with you, that (vice) chancellor of Germany is the best. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Proselytization and counter-proselytization of Jews

Hi, I saw that there were only resources from the counter-proselytizing side, so I added one from the proselytizing side. I made sub-headings, so that others could add resources, and see the (un)balance. I have moved two more general resources to above the sub-headings. -- 114.248.209.113 (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello 114.248.209.113, one sub-heading and under one link is spam. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

I see. That means I should put more links there? I don't really want to be the one putting the resources there, but I just wanted to be more productive than flagging POV. I'll try to find some other links, such as from Messianic Jews, and add those. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.248.209.113 (talk) 13:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello 114.248.209.113, please let it be. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

I am not a native speaker of English, but Wordnik explains "let it be" as "To leave something to follow its natural course." The article as a whole is somewhat biased, and the "Further readings" section is pure anti-proselytization. Definitely not what Wikipedia should be. The "natural course" of Wikipedia is to have people jump in and correct such biases. How can one let Wikipedia run its natural course by telling people to abstain from doing just that? Or am I misunderstanding you? I added a single resource from the other side, from a group mentioned in the article.

In fact, most of the resources are irrelevant: they are not about (counter-)proselytization, but tools for counter-proselytization. I can understand someone rejecting the whole lot of them. But allowing the one and not the other seems weird. (Maybe they should be moved to a section Examples of materials used in (counter-)proselytization.) -- 114.248.209.113 (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Accusation of vandalism: mxschumacher

1. My edit on software aging was a removal of an incorrect apostrophe on line 30. I don't know where the string "lol" came from in the beginning of the article, I made my edit via the mobile web version. I stand by my edit on line 30, feel free to elaborate why you think I made a mistake here. These are very basic corrections of incorrect spelling / use of grammar.

2. Accusing me of vandalism because of my edit on hunger this edit does not make sense to me. The word "forget" is wrong in the context of the article and renders the sentence gramatically incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mxschumacher (talk • contribs) 13:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mxschumacher, 2. was the result of 1. -> lol. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

AIV reports

On a couple of occasions this morning you have reported a user or IP to AIV immediately after giving them a warning but without any intervening edits. Please don't do this. Either they get a last chance and a warning, or they need to be blocked and get reported. Several of your reports I would action but that the warnings you gave immediately before reporting make it seem unfair. Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 07:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello BethNaught, can you give me the link please, can be only a copy-mistake. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I can give one example[3]. It goes vandalism, vandalism, warning, vandalism, warning, AIV report. Unfortunately, admins are quite used to looking for this sort of thing. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello zzuuzz, thank you for the link. That seems to have been a problem with huggle, but I reported the Ip after the third vandlism-edit. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

The point however is that they had received only one warning at the time they performed the action which would have got them blocked. They were also told that it they didn't stop then they'd get blocked - they did stop, so probably won't get blocked. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 08:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello zzuuzz, I don't understand your problems. BethNaught means I am not fair and you have a problem with two warnings. But fact is, unfair was the IP with three vandalism-edits opposite to the author, who created the article and the Ip is blocked. I believe, my report to AVI was correctly. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

As I said before, they only had one 'level 2' warning at the time of their last edit. They were subsequently reported and blocked without possibly even seeing the 'level 3' warning. Consider this scenario: at 2.00pm a vandal does four vandal edits. At 2.05 a user adds four warnings of increasing severity, one for each edit, to the vandal's talk page and then reports to AIV. If you were an admin, would you block? If not why not? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello zzuuzz, something's going wrong. Anyway you defend the vandalism IP and you imply that the admin, who had blocked this Ip, has not worked thoroughly. Sorry, but this is not a basis for a discussion. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

zzuuzz is not defending the vandal. zzuuzz is saying that, when you notice vandalism, you should either warn the user or report them, not do both, and you should make sure an adequate number of warnings have been issued. Do you not see that it is inappropriate to warn someone, telling them they have a last chance, and then report them, so they do not in fact have a last chance? BethNaught (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello BethNaught, three vandalism-edits are ok for you? No one has asked the IP to do that. We obviously have different opinions about vandalism - I want it to stop. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Why do you not understand what I am saying? Of course you can report a vandal, but if you are reporting them you should not at the same time issue another warning. That's all I'm trying to say. BethNaught (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello BethNaught, last vandalism-edit 07:26, 28 August 2016 - reported 07:32, 28 August. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, and at 7:32 you also issued a warning, which is what I am asking you not to do. BethNaught (talk) 07:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

BethNaught I have no more nerves to discuss. I'm sorry, that I touched the poor vandal IP not with velvet gloves. So what, this is only an article, which made a lot of work: I hope you feel now better. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Khidmat-e-Khalq Foundation

I have evidence of what i wrote

The political party has been proved to be anti state and running a militant wing involved in target killings and hate crimes

http://www.samaa.tv/pakistan/2016/08/sc-moved-for-ban-on-mqm/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.38.233.203 (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Experimental confirmation

Hi! I've seen your recent reversion of my wording at Gravitational time dilation. Please see my reply on that talk page on section Experimental verification. Have you heard of falsifiability and the fact that there is no such thing as experimental confirmation for empirical propositions, only verification of validity?--82.137.11.190 (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your revision to your initial edit.--82.137.11.190 (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello 82.137.11.190, sorry - the word test ist here mostly vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Good to know. I wasn't aware of this possibility.--82.137.11.190 (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Be more careful with your reversions

I've reverted your revert of my spelling correction on You Suck At Photoshop (web series), because the word "suck" is actually spelled "suck", not "sucjk" as your edit would have it. Please don't revert obvious improvements like that. 190.193.133.67 (talk) 15:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello 190.193.133.67, sorry for my mistake, I didn´t saw the article-name. By the word suck in Wikipedia, I have a nervous finger. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Despite your apology, you've apparently reverted my revert of your revert, meanwhile leaving template messages on my user page saying, "Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed". Then you removed your inflammatory messages, and my responses!, from my talk page. This is ridiculous; you are making obviously false accusations and you are edit warring. Please revert your revert, revert your deletion, and leave an apology on my talk page. 190.193.133.67 (talk) 15:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello 190.193.133.67, did it. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

My talk page is still blanked. 190.193.133.67 (talk) 15:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello 190.193.133.67, yes, see here. Regars --Serols (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Nafl prayer

Beat you to the revert! I usually mention WP:PBUH so they understand the why. User talk:90.202.72.223 Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jim1138, I think he has stopped. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

May Peace be upon you! I once went through Wikipedia and cleared out PBUH from 20-30 articles. Got reverted on a couple of accident removals from quotes. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Eugene Lavrenchuk

Not engage in vandalism! 07:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenJJ (talk • contribs)

Hello RenJJ, please do not remove the text module. --Serols (talk) 07:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Arunabh Kumar

I edited out the portion which made it look biased and added sources for the two awards that he received. How is this not constructive? I fail to understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navjotjsingh (talk • contribs) 15:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Navjotjsingh, see here -> tit==Awards and Achievements== . Regards --Serols (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

If you are pointing towards the typo then I was about to fix it but you reverted all my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navjotjsingh (talk • contribs) 15:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Navjotjsingh, such edits are usually vandalism. Use the next one the button Show preview, then this does not happen. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Sorry for the accidental revert - serves me right for editing on my phone. GABgab 14:57, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello GAB, not an issue, something happened. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)