User talk:Shearonink/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Shearonink. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Open invitation
You are an excellent editor and I enjoy working with you. I plan on turning these into Good Articles and you are invited to participate if interested. All you have to do is some tweaking of the article you may be interested in (pick one with no date) and nominate GAN, so you become the nominator (and then you can get credit). I'll be glad to resolve most of the reviewer's issues when the review comes up, as since I created the article I am most familiar with it.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I have a proposal for you, if you would be interested. Recently the Finch article failed a GA review. Since then I have completely gone through the article sentence by sentence to make sure the references match the article. I believe it would pass a GA review now. If you would copy edit the article for grammar and style and nominate the article GAN, I will be glad to solve all the issues on a new review when it comes up. You would get credit as the nominator and I would get credit as the creator when the article gets promoted to Good Article. If that sounds attractive, then just do some copy editing and when finished nominate GAN. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
| April 21, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with Environmental focus | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! As this WikiWednesday is just the day before Earth Day, we will have an environmental focus. If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
May 19: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| May 19, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 03:15, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Made changes to article. Thanks for the review! Let me know if anything more is needed! Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 11:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
June 16: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| June 16, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 16:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
| Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Your GA nomination of Mountain Meadows Massacre
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mountain Meadows Massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HeartGlow30797 -- HeartGlow30797 (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
| July 14, 7pm: Virtual Coney Island Meetup + NYC monthly collaboration | |
|---|---|
.jpg) You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly online gathering (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. Instead of our usual "WikiWednesday" Salon, we'll focus on the WikiProject NYC monthly collaboration and this month's subject of Coney Island. And rather than Zoom, we'll meet on a proximity chat virtual Coney Island beach and share over topical articles and collaborations. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abraham Lincoln, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Grove Cemetery.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my recent RFA
I appreciate your support and trust in my recent run for admin. IMHO, the Anita Sarkeesian page is an excellent example of what can happen given time, good sources, and a watchful group of contributors. Thanks for your help. I've had an interesting first few weeks and am learning a lot by being able to better watch (through tools) what admins do. Please call on me if you see making an error, or if you just need help. Thanks again. BusterD (talk) 17:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Sat Aug 14: Wikimania Wiknic NYC
| August 14, 12-5pm: Wikimania Wiknic NYC | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a planned socially-distanced Wiknic ("the picnic anyone can edit") in Brooklyn's Prospect Park to coincide with the virtual Wikimania 2021. For this occasion, and to allow more space as desired, we have individually packed lunches provided by the chapter, and attendees are encouraged to RSVP at Eventbrite and give sandwich/entree orders.
 | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
August 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| August 25, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mountain Meadows Massacre
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mountain Meadows Massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mountain Meadows Massacre
The article Mountain Meadows Massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mountain Meadows Massacre for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mountain Meadows Massacre
The article Mountain Meadows Massacre you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Mountain Meadows Massacre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
September 29: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC
| September 29, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
Upcoming events:
- Prospect Park photo contest, ongoing
- Latinx Art Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, October 6
- Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC in Prospect Park (with WikiProject Craft + WikiConference North America), October 10
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Sunday: Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC (part of WikiConference NA, Oct 8-10)
| Sunday October 10, 12-5pm: Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC (part of WikiConference North America 2021, Oct 8-10) | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a planned socially-distanced Wiknic ("the picnic anyone can edit") in Brooklyn's Prospect Park, being held at the historic Concert Grove Pavilion to coincide with WikiConference North America 2021, which will run virtually from Friday to Sunday. For this occasion, and to allow more space as desired, we have individually packed lunches provided by the chapter, and attendees are encouraged to RSVP at Eventbrite and give sandwich/entree orders.
 | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 17:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Hubert Sevenich for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hubert Sevenich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
MMM is a ga now? Wow
So I just came back from a Wiki-sabatical and see Mountain Meadows Massacre is now at GA status. Wow. I think it was a bit before your time, but that article was a war zone back in the day. At least a dozen or so passionate editors have blocks from that article, and IIRC one or two have been banned. I gave up. I just assumed it would never be stable enough to pass a GAC. But that's the benefits of having fresh eyes on the project. You did what I had given up as impossible, congratulations.Dave (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Moabdave - From time to time I have seen it go through quite a bit of heat/fire/smoke, so yeah, am kind of surprised myself that I was able to get it to GA...such a sad event. I keep on eye on it, try to keep the article stable and free from...whatever trouble might come its way. The verifiable facts are disturbing enough without any sensationalizing or whitewashing needed. Thank you so much for the congrats, glad to see you back around these here parts. Shearonink (talk) 20:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks so much Gerda. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Dec 15: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| December 15, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
| Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. | |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Talk:Dolly Parton archiving
Maybe you forgot, but you're the one who set up the archiving, here: [1]. I didn't look at it too closely but my theory is that it didn't work because you put it inside the WPB template. GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:26, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- GA-RT-22 Ah, so long ago & 2021 just got over with... apologies for my edit summary. Lol, the page gets so little action not sure auto-archiving is/was needed but the reverse is true...auto-archiving will keep up with any possible stale threads when folks aren't around. You're right & thanks for fixing my mistake. Shearonink (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Auto archiving is great, but could you please consider defaulting to longer archive periods? Two minimum threads and 30d archive date make discussion nearly impossible on slower articles since not everyone can be here every 30 days. Short of an extremely busy talk page, most won't be hurt by letting discussions happen over time. That aside, thanks for taking the time to do this kind of maintenance in general. Cheers Strangerpete (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- We should discuss this on the talk page, but I also think the current parameters are way too aggressive. GA-RT-22 (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- @GA-RT-22 Oops, I should clarify I was speaking in general and not specifically just Dolly Parton. After seeing these defaults used on more than a few other talk pages, I thought I'd come here to ask the source to reconsider. Also I'm guessing the original 730 days was intended to be hours; one of the archivers uses that which equates to roughly 30 days, as I understand.
- I've seen plenty of discussions that were unresolved, or unnoticed for years but were still useful or get an answer later. I think think 30 days is arguably harmful if the page isn't near its max size. Strangerpete (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strangerpete & GA-RT-22: I adjusted the auto-archiving and left it at ninety days...3 months. If you two think 90 days is being too aggressive, if you want to keep multiple threads with no replies around for whatever reason, have at it and feel free to change the parameters. Personally I think that 90 days is plenty of time...people happen along, post a question or suggestion and never come back to check or reply. Do I change things in an article if they make sense to me if an anon posts about it? Sure, I do it all the time. Does the anon ever come back and reply? Hardly ever in my experience, be it 30 or 60 or 90 days or whatever. Do named accounts come back or reply to a thread after 30 days? Hardly ever. After 90 days? Never in my experience. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, just not in my experience. But if editorial consensus of the 660 Watchers and interested editors is to have a longer archiving time and to keep multiple threads with no changes for an extended period of time at Talk:Dolly Parton, fine with me. Any further discussion on this matter should take place on the article's talk page. Shearonink (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- I appreciate your consideration, I think 90 days is far more reasonable for any article, thank you.
- As for thread replies, I don't think it matters if the original poster ever returns, other users can pick up the topic, sometimes well later, and I personally see that here constantly. Recent example, on Talk:Morse code someone posted about a discrepancy in September; I didn't see it until end of December. I realized I couldn't address their post directly but it raised another related issue which I put in a new topic. But due to the short archive duration and miniscule minthreadsleft=2, it bumped their legitimate post off talk the same day.
- I guess I'm suggesting that such a short duration maybe should be by consensus first, as a 30 day duration even hinders that discussion on slow articles. I hope you don't take my criticism personally or as an attack, I see your points but just disagree. No need to continue on though, take care! Strangerpete (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- I misread the diff at Dolly Parton that you already had set 90 days, my mistake! I was still looking at the archive settings from other talk pages. My point remains, but I certainly feel the fool for getting my basic facts wrong. Strangerpete (talk) 02:20, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strangerpete: No, 730d was intended to be two years. GA-RT-22 (talk) 01:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strangerpete, GA-RT-22: I am closing this discussion. As I said previously stated, in this thread, on my user talk page, several posts ago...to keep things straight any further discussion about the archiving at Talk:Dolly Parton should take place at that particular talk page. If either of you or anyone wishes to change the archiving length or the number of posts left behind or whatever, be my guest. Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strangerpete & GA-RT-22: I adjusted the auto-archiving and left it at ninety days...3 months. If you two think 90 days is being too aggressive, if you want to keep multiple threads with no replies around for whatever reason, have at it and feel free to change the parameters. Personally I think that 90 days is plenty of time...people happen along, post a question or suggestion and never come back to check or reply. Do I change things in an article if they make sense to me if an anon posts about it? Sure, I do it all the time. Does the anon ever come back and reply? Hardly ever in my experience, be it 30 or 60 or 90 days or whatever. Do named accounts come back or reply to a thread after 30 days? Hardly ever. After 90 days? Never in my experience. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, just not in my experience. But if editorial consensus of the 660 Watchers and interested editors is to have a longer archiving time and to keep multiple threads with no changes for an extended period of time at Talk:Dolly Parton, fine with me. Any further discussion on this matter should take place on the article's talk page. Shearonink (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- We should discuss this on the talk page, but I also think the current parameters are way too aggressive. GA-RT-22 (talk) 00:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Auto archiving is great, but could you please consider defaulting to longer archive periods? Two minimum threads and 30d archive date make discussion nearly impossible on slower articles since not everyone can be here every 30 days. Short of an extremely busy talk page, most won't be hurt by letting discussions happen over time. That aside, thanks for taking the time to do this kind of maintenance in general. Cheers Strangerpete (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Saturday Feb 5: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon (and monthlong campaign)
| February 5, 12-2pm: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a virtual Metropolitan Museum of Art edit-a-thon Saturday afternoon (12-2pm) with partners AfroCROWD and Black Lunch Table. To join the livestream from your computer or smartphone, just watch at this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. Our focus will be on the exhibition Before Yesterday We Could Fly inspired by Seneca Village, and featured art, artists, history and culture of the African diaspora. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! We are also running a Met Afrofuturist chat channel on our Wikimedia NYC Discord server for the whole monthlong campaign.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 05:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community
| Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community | |
|---|---|
|
Hi Wiki-Yorkers, We are reaching out as part of our community-building efforts at Wikimedia NYC. Our regional group is engaged in a strategic planning process to sharpen our strategy for the next three years, and we would like your input. Given your connection to us and your experience with Wikimedia NYC, I would be grateful if you would be willing to share some of your perspectives and insights as we think about our next chapter. Attached is an anonymous survey, which will remain active until February 28. Responses will go directly to Barretto Consulting and the Wikimedia NYC board will receive responses in aggregate and to identify cross-cutting themes. Please take some time to answer it and share your thoughts with us.
Thank you so much. We appreciate all your ideas and community spirit. | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Feb 23: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| February 23, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 19:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
in friendship
 | |
| in friendship |
|---|
Thank you for being around, and your good wishes! - Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics was on the Main page (DYK) and even made the stats. - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:10, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Gerda All good wishes for you as well. Shearonink (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! 2022 began happily with vacation. I uploaded images but stopped at 22 January - click on songs. 30 January means 10 years of Precious. It's also the birthday of a friend, - I'm so happy I mentioned his DYK on his 90th birthday when he was still alive. I have a great singer on DYK whom I heard, Elena Guseva, and wait for a Recent death appearance of Georg Christoph Biller whom I saw in action. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
WP:GAN edit
Shearonink, editing directly on the GAN page doesn't do any good; the bot overwrites the page every 20 minutes, and your edit is already gone.
What you need to do is change the note field in the GA nominee template on the nominated article's talk page; it will then be propagated to the GAN page the next time the bot runs. I thought you'd want to know, so the note says what you want going forward. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset Ah, ok...thanks! I should have remembered/known that. Shearonink (talk) 18:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- The main issue is that I wanted to put the Review Notice underneath the Note/Comment from the Nominator for visual clarity of the timeline - but after checking it sure looks like I can't...that Notice is generated automatically and not directly from the Reviewer(me). Oh well... Shearonink (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Bishop (cave explorer)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stephen Bishop (cave explorer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Bishop (cave explorer)
The article Stephen Bishop (cave explorer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stephen Bishop (cave explorer) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Bishop (cave explorer)
The article Stephen Bishop (cave explorer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stephen Bishop (cave explorer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you CAPTAIN RAJU, thanks also to the WP-Birthday Committee. For some reason this has made me so happy, to have someone, something remember...12 years...wow, it was all such a long time ago. Shearonink (talk) 23:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Stephen Bishop (cave explorer)
Hello! Your submission of Stephen Bishop (cave explorer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ivar the Boneful (talk) 14:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ivar the Boneful Thanks for your DYK? Review. I've adjusted the article, let me know if that is all ok now. Shearonink (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Mar 27: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn
| March 27, 11am-2pm: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering between the local Wikimedia NYC community and visitors from the global Wikimedia Foundation at Sahadi's tent in Brooklyn's Industry City. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
| Online and in-person events | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join us for:
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 13:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
William Goddard (publisher), GA review
Aye Shearonick, First, I saw the notice at the top of your Talk page here, that you are more or less unavailable, but also noticed that you're still up and around. If that's actually the case I was wondering if you would be interested in resuming a GA review for the William Goddard article. It was going along nicely, with all issues addressed, but at the last minute it was failed for reasons that are still a bit unclear to me. — Here is the review in question. — I believe at this point all issues have been addressed, and several improvements have been made to the article. If you're of a mind to, I was hoping you could complete the 'last nine yards'. Been waiting since January 21 for someone to complete the review, but for whatever reasons, no one has. The article has been stable and imo, is ready for another review. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Apr 24: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn
| April 24, 2-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the barbecue area of Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Stephen Bishop (cave explorer)
On 14 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Bishop (cave explorer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stephen Bishop's 1842 map of Mammoth Cave, drawn from memory, was so accurate that it remained in use for more than forty years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stephen Bishop (cave explorer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stephen Bishop (cave explorer)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Apr 27: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| April 27, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
NYC Wiknic, June 26
Hold the date. Meetup/NYC Wiknic in Crotona Park, Sunday June 26.
Watch Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic June 2022 for further details as they become available.
| Wednesday June 8, 11am-5pm: New York Botanical Garden - Environment of the Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners | |
|---|---|
 The LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite the general public of all experience levels to come to the Mertz Library in person and learn how to use Wikipedia! All skill levels welcome at the event! Experienced Wikipedia editors from the Wikimedia New York City chapter will be in attendance and available to help. A one hour training session will be offered at the start of this event covering introductory topics. Attendees familiar with editing Wikipedia can edit off of a worklist focused on the environment of New York City; as well as, a sub-list focused on the environment of the Bronx. The Mertz Library will pull topical media from their collection to assist the editing. --Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) | |
May 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| May 25, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
May 22: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn
| May 22, 12-5pm: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn | |
|---|---|
_(19361753542).jpg) You are invited to join us for a planned outdoor "Hacknic" gathering with the local Wikimedia NYC community at the 10th Avenue Lawn of Brooklyn's Prospect Park. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 02:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
William and Mary
Obviously you are under no obligation to disclose or anything, but simply wondering if you are also a W&M alum? Seems like I run into quite a few on here! If so, then continuing harking upon the gale! ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- No, I am not but thanks for thinking it is possible. I just like keeping an eye out for unverified/poorly-sourced information of all sorts around here, be it hagiography or vandalism or whatever. It's just a mystery to be solved — to either get at a decent source or to delete unverifiable asserted information. Shearonink (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Shearonink: All the same, wonderful to run into ya and thanks for cleaning that section up! ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
DYK for Solomon Hughes (actor)
On 6 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Solomon Hughes (actor), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Solomon Hughes was a Harlem Globetrotter before he played a Laker in film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Solomon Hughes (actor). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Solomon Hughes (actor)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Can I ask for help with editing?
Hi, As an experienced editor, is it possible to ask you for assistance with editing an article? Thanks! Legalife103 (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Legalife103 - Thanks for the vote of confidence but I'm sorry - I really don't have time to do a deep-dive on Colin Singer. Also, if you have a conflict of interest with this person, meaning you know them in real life, or have worked with them etc then per the Wikipedia behavioral guideline of WP:DISCLOSE you should disclose that COI. It is perhaps possible that you could ask at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Singer for the article to be converted to a draft in your userspace so you could work on bringing it up to WP standards for a WP:BLP. Good luck, Shearonink (talk) 01:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
So it's been deleted even though evidence of notability was found with reliable sources? Even though the Mill, a historic building in and of itself, still exists?
sigh.
Anyway, I am requesting that this now soft-deleted content be put into my personal Wikipedia space somewhere, I'd be fine with something along the lines of User:Shearonink/Draft for Klines Mill if that designation is kosher - I'll personally take the content over. I do not understand why it has been even soft-deleted since there was still an ongoing discussion with what I thought was clear evidence of notability but ok... Shearonink (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Done. Placed at Draft:Klines Mill, Virginia with full contribution history. I wish you well with it. Any questions, let me know. SilkTork (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kline's Mill, Virginia has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Out of a sow's ear....
|
Silk Purse Award | |
| The Silk Purse Award is given to Shearonink for rescuing the Kline's Mill, Virginia article, and developing what was seen as a sow's ear into a silk purse. Well done. SilkTork (talk) 08:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC) |
- SilkTork - Awwww, thanks! Muchly appreciated. I just nominated it for a DYK? - see Template:Did you know nominations/Kline's Mill, Virginia. Lol, think I stuffed enough hooks in there? Shearonink (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Kline's Mill, Virginia
On 26 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kline's Mill, Virginia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kline's Mill is a rare surviving example of an Oliver Evans milling system from 1794? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kline's Mill, Virginia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kline's Mill, Virginia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
- Cwmhiraeth - Kline's Mill had around 4500 page-views on its DYK? date...is that enough to add it to the statistics page? I was hopeful it was but I am thinking maybe not... Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know. It is more impressive when you realise that it was only on the main page for 12 hours because we are running two sets a day. You will need to ask at the statistics page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda! Means a lot - hope all is well with you & yours. Shearonink (talk) 08:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, and privately, yes (more on my talk), but not all is well in the world. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda! Means a lot - hope all is well with you & yours. Shearonink (talk) 08:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
The Romany Rye
You recently removed a redlink from Exeter Theatre Royal fire, to the play "The Romany Rye" due to a lack of sources. I had originally taken the same view (and hence had not tried to WL it, which was done by another editor), and i agreed with the reversion, but the idea was annoying me.
It bugged me so much, I went and found some references. In case it is of any passing interest, I've started the article here: The Romany Rye (play)
Hopefully it is well enough cited, but any thoughts welcome. OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 19:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- User:Owain.davies Oh man, I looked and looked and couldn't find a thing! Well-done. Since you've had more success than I did, perhaps you can find info on the various casts. If a notable/well-known/popular/influential/notorious female or male actor was in one of the productions that would help bolster notability. Shearonink (talk) 19:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert Todd Lincoln
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Todd Lincoln you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert Todd Lincoln
The article Robert Todd Lincoln you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Robert Todd Lincoln for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
For fine work rescuing Thomas Johnston (engraver)
|
The Engraver's Award |
| Thank you for your beyond-the-call-of-duty work on Thomas Johns[t]on, the engraver. It is sad to see so many GAs biting the dust; I'm glad at least one now looks likely to survive. By the way that's the engraver Thomas Bewick himself in his tailpiece engraving ... and I think that branch he's holding is about to break ... Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:36, 28 February 2023 (UTC) |
- Awwwww, thank you so much. I felt so badly about this GA. I reviewed it and things slipped past me, as they all slipped past so many of us. Didn't seem right to me that this notable person's article could lose its GA designation - though I do completely understand the why...I think it will retain its present designation. Speaking of engraving, you should see the last source I got my hands on...I actually bought it used but it is basically a pristine copy. Turns out this book is so rare (and I believe it's out of print) that I am hoping to donate it to a local library's reference room. Shearonink (talk) 16:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Great to hear. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
"Who Wrote That?"
Hi. I recently noticed you mentioned a tool called "Who Wrote That?" which sounds useful to work out how much of an article I contributed to (as I can never remember if it's not a substantial contribution). I can't see a page WP:WhoWroteThat and searching for the phrase doesn't bring up anything useful? Am I getting confused? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ritchie333 - It's available as an extension to either Chrome or Firefox and can be found here: -->> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Who_Wrote_That%3F . Shearonink (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll check it out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
In appreciation
|
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
| With thanks for your work at Ramsdell Theatre and Thomas Johnston (engraver) at GAR. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you - greatly appreciated. Shearonink (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Ed Bradley GAN
Hi Shearonink! I made the corrections I could the Ed Bradley GAN if you'd like to take a quick look through them! I really appreciate you doing that. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- M4V3R1CK32 - Update: I spotted one last reference - "Past Winners"/Ref #42 - needs some adjusting and then I'll be able to close out Talk:Ed Bradley/GA2. Shearonink (talk) 15:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have explained what needs to be done at the GA2 page. Shearonink (talk) 04:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert Todd Lincoln
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Todd Lincoln you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 06:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert Todd Lincoln
The article Robert Todd Lincoln you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert Todd Lincoln and Talk:Robert Todd Lincoln/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert Todd Lincoln
The article Robert Todd Lincoln you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Todd Lincoln for comments about the article, and Talk:Robert Todd Lincoln/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 17:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Todd Lincoln
On 20 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Todd Lincoln, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Todd Lincoln (pictured) was saved from possible death by Edwin Booth, whose brother, John Wilkes Booth, assassinated Robert's father, Abraham Lincoln? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Todd Lincoln. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Robert Todd Lincoln), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 20,829 views (1,735.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, good job on the DYK views. You picked a really interesting fact, it seems. I guess the insane coincidence of the entire situation and that fact that one of the most famous Americans in history was involved probably helped. Cessaune [talk] 08:36, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus
Message added 14:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| Thank you FireGolden (talk) 13:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I saw you recently made some copy-edits that improved the lead of Sojourner Truth. There's a discussion on the talk-page (here) concerning a related question; if you were able to weigh in, that would be wonderful. (And if not, no worries!) (Obvi I'm the same human being as the various IP addresses who have taken part in that discussion.) Thanks! 98.233.42.24 (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Five years! |
|---|
I love the inspiring images on your talk, and thought before posting ;) - best wishes for your break! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda. My personal life is fine it's just everything is pretty much all in an uproar at the moment. I usually try to "send out" Wikipedia holiday cards but I don't think I have the bandwidth to do that this year. And thanks as always for Precious. Sometimes it bucks me up in moments of Wikipedia-stress. Shearonink ([[User
 | |
| December: story · music · places |
|---|
- And then you managed to send me a card, - thank you! - Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. Son't miss the doggie in the painting! - I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
.jpg)
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa,
Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia,
here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and
- especially -
that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.
CHEERS!
{{subst:User:Shearonink/Holiday}} to your friends' talk pages.(Sent: 17:57, 23 December 2023 (UTC))
.JPG)