User talk:Snowolf/Archives/201102
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Snowolf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Editor assistance list
Hello. Since your account has recently not been editing very regularly, on the page Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list you name has been moved to a list of editors who are willing to give assistance, but may not always be available. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. You are, of course, welcome to move yourself back to the other list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
User:Snowolf/LO2
User:Snowolf/LO2 is showing up in a lot of article space categories.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 09:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Added template for SuggestBot
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
speedy deletion
You have not explained why Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) fails WP:N criteria, please do that or restore the article. Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) has a notice in the DNB, as noted in the references, they are notable. cygnis insignis 13:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
That is how they are noted in the Dictionary of National Biography, which was in the article. Restore the article and nominate it for deletion, it makes the assertion of notability and is not a valid candidate for speedy deletion. cygnis insignis 14:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- The DNB editor thinks he is notable as an antiquary! the article showed that and so does the abstract, your opinion of this is irrelevant. You seem to indicate he probably is notable, so you know it will pass through AfD, but take the discussion there instead if you want to waste more time on this. cygnis insignis 14:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Reversion
? Did you read my edit summary, or the linked article? The article is engaging in WP:SYNTHESIS. 86.26.60.18 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of page create by me in the name of SIB Infotech
Snowolf
I had created a page for a company SIB Infotech and in that the details put about the company were very minimal and did not suggest any advert or anything like that Also, if you see other pages in that category i.e. the category of "Search Engine Optimization Consultants", you will find the pages of Location3 Media and the Marrion Group which are also company pages. Then why have they not been deleted?
Also, please note that the page which i created was because the category was of Search Engine Optimization Consultants and it suggests that we need to mention something about the individual or organization
Please would request you to remove your comments and help me add my page back
Regards Dhrumil
What the F son?
Here I am trying to educate the internet at large and you come along acting like there's sand trapped in your vagina??
You've got some nerve buddy
Love and hugs
xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.243.100 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 20 February 2011
Image replacement fight on Agoge
Hi Snowolf. I noticed you reverted the edits by Jhdumas as I have and also have issued Jhdumas a warning. He's back at it again, and my watchlist reveal he had put his drawing back into the wonky place on the left side again today. I reverted it (and another, incorrect edit unrelated to him) to its previous condition. Can you look into this? We mere editors have no power in these matters whatsoever -- posting multiple warnings never seems to work. TeamZissou (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I received your reply -- thanks for the quick turnaround! I'll just keep on reverting and explaining why, and hopefully someone with a classical studies degree will eventually join in the discussion. I'll admit the current, accepted image doesn't say much about the Spartan agoge, but the replacement pic Jhdumas keeps trying to put on there depicts a "Hollywood" image, replete with hyper-musculature. TeamZissou (talk) 02:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
I REMEMBER THAT SONG!!!!! / TWISTIN TWISTIN TWISTIN THE NIGHT AWAY
I DO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.121.96 (talk) 02:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sure you do and glad, but it's hardly helpful or constructive to insert it all in caps in an encyclopedia. Sorry, Snowolf How can I help? 02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- DO YOU REMEMBER IT SNOWOLF? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.121.96 (talk) 02:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid not, I don't believe I've ever had occasion to listen to it, sorry. Snowolf How can I help? 02:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- DO YOU REMEMBER IT SNOWOLF? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.121.96 (talk) 02:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
SNOWOLF YOU GOD DAMN VANDAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.121.96 (talk) 02:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
I REMEMBER THAT SONG
F*CK YOU A$SHOLE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.121.96 (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thank you for being golden. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.99.115 (talk) 02:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
GOD DAMMIT I REMEMBER THAT SONG —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.99.115 (talk) 02:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 02:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Hello Snowwolf, i was wondering to know what was your reason for deleting the page i created with title of "Avesta Hojjati"? the article wasn't complete but i guess it had enough prove for it to be real/famous person such as http://i29.tinypic.com/1182613.jpg. so please review this and let me know how i can help to make this page for this young talented Iranian student. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q7x6av (talk • contribs) 15:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Unconstructive?
I was fixing a cite from a book. Have you seen the given link? :S --Dodo (talk) 08:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
About E.volvin
Thanks for correcting my incorrect WP:A7. Article sounds like an interesting dance style - lets see how it develops!--Shirt58 (talk) 12:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, just got your message monement after I added the above. To be honest, I really do dislike the WP:PROD process; it would seem to me somewhat secretive Star Chamber-ish in that its not something a casual user checks, as opposed to more open WP:CSD and WP:AfD processes. I'll tag the article for notability and references, and lets see how it goes from there. Again, thanks for your help and guidance! --Shirt58 (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- On a related note, do you know where I can find the "barnstar of excellent talk page stalking?--Shirt58 (talk) 12:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Came up with the right dough? Bigger dick? I don't know, must have been the best flow.
You're a faggot. 88.241.100.134 (talk) 18:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- If you say so. Have a nice day, Snowolf How can I help? 18:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed I do. Ghostface Killah is the best and most important person in the history of musical expression, and your wikipædophilia pales in comparison with his greatness. 88.241.100.134 (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Help with dealing with a biased user
Hi Snowolf,
User named Sikh-history have been making very biased edits on a number of wiki pages. You can see his talk page for all the examples. He is issuing warnings to my fellow contributors on Labana page and thats what I was trying to remove, when you saw my edit on a talk page. I need your help to avoid sikh-history user from editing Labana page. He does not belong to Labana community and has no business in editing it and pushing his POV.
Can you help?
Editing Deb (file format)
Snowolf, you've reverted a useful revision I made. If you have any problems with the edit, please tell me on my contact page before reverting it.
/* See also */ Removed 4 red links that link to nothing; added a useful link to Jigdo, a tool to compile ISO images from DEB packages
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Someone doesn't know how to use talk pages
Hello, I see you referred to my corrections to teh Koran articles as 'vandalism'. You may not be aware that the correct English spelling is Koran. The spelling, Qu'ran is a corruption of Arabic. Therefore I will be changing these articles back. However I take your point about putting an editing summary and will do so in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmetfahy (talk • contribs)
- I've moved this from your user page. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
HELP
As an admin who is online NOW, could you take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#user:Awikipro spamming his services as a professional editor? This "professional wiki editor" is spamming his services to any and every new account he can find. mass reversion of his "welcome" template for many user talk pages may be needed. WuhWuzDat 08:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you!
Dear Snowolf,
I wanted to thank you so much for all of your help with my situation! I was very touched by everyone's support.
Best Wishes,
Comedybiographer (talk) 07:29, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
P.S. I love the snow wolf photo that you have posted on your user page! :)
Thanks a Lot
Hello, Snowolf. I am Maxwell Derwinee. I am not posting as such, but I assure you, I am. I just wanted to thank you for helping me. I have been a vandal in the past, and, despite not truly helping my situation with my account, you allowed me to stop trying to figure out a way to delete it. I thank you with great meaning. Goodbye.
74.111.171.12 (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)74.111.171.1274.111.171.12 (talk) 19:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello, this is "Thomasbum98" and I made the article about "Pepper and Kad" and please excuse me if you didn't do this, but I had a message saying "The deletion of an article you created, Pepper and Kad, has been proposed for the following reason:
Animated series with no assertion of notability or sources.
You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.
Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Snowolf" I did a lot of editing and made sure the article was in third person, an encyclopedia definition, and added some references. Again, I am sorry if you did report that I assumed that you did because of "Thank you. Snowolf" Have a nice day! Also great job on reporting vandalism! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasbum98 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
I take myself way too seriously
I take myself way too seriously. But hey, when Wikipedia's all I have, I need to focus on SOMETHING. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.109.112 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 February 2011