Spazik007

Boy Scout and gays

Hi Spazik007, Scouting is not the same as the BSA and most Scouting organisations have no problem with gays, lesbians and bisexuals. --Egel _Reaction? 08:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

There is a separate article on this, Boy Scouts of America membership controversies, and it's a Featured Article, that you may be interested in. Rlevse 09:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Even if there should be something about the BSA controversy about gays on Boy Scout, although I do not agree that there should, it is not acceptable to have a paragraph that equates "Boy Scout" with "Boy Scouts of America". This is an international page. --Bduke 20:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Boy Scout

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 02:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule violation on Boy Scout

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the three-revert rule on the Boy Scout article ([1], [2], [3], [4]). Kirill Lokshin 03:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Joseph-smith-photo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Joseph-smith-photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 03:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

John Gibson has stated that he is a registered Independent

Please read Bill Maher And Fox's John Gibson On Being A Registered Independent, The CIA Being At War With The Administration And Joe Wilson Was The One Who Outed Valerie Plame. -- Dcflyer 19:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. You currently have three (3) reverts on John Gibson for 05 September 2006. -- Dcflyer 20:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

3RR #2

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. You currently have three (3) reverts on Fox News Channel for 05 September 2006. Isarig 23:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Help with reading

You have 3 reverts on Fox News Channel , and that is what I wrote above: You currently have three (3) reverts on Fox News Channel for 05 September 2006. . The above is known as a "warning". If you vioalte 3RR after being warned, you will be reproted. And also review WP:CIVIL. Isarig 23:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Breech Birth

First you changed it to 'anal area' and now 'buttocks'. Midwives, obstetricians and doctors all call the arrival of the baby in a breech position arriving 'bottom' first. WP uses language that is appropriate for its audience. 'Bottom' is technically correct and thus is acceptable. The article has used the term 'bottom' for years now without any concern. It would be appreciated if you would leave it alone. Maustrauser 00:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Stalking

Wikistalking as you have just done on the Al-Aqsa Intifada page is a very serious offence. Do it again and you will be reported. Isarig 00:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Stalking #2

Please be more careful before you make accusations, such as the one that you made in this edit summary [5]. I had absolutely nothing to do with the reverts on your edits to Fox News Channel and your edits period. I simply added the abbreviation "FNC" to the article. Not much bias there. Also, please familiarize yourself with WP:AGF. -- Dcflyer 01:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for one week for vandalism on various pages. Ral315 (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)