Steven Weston

Welcome!

Hello, Steven Weston, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  VegaDark 20:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

User Category for Discussion

Hi, I just wanted to know exactly why it's being considered for deletion. I think the people in the category have this userbox:

This user despises vandalism and reverts it with extreme pride.

on their page. There are quite a few of them. Is it beacuse it is too polemical a category? Is it because it has been created and deemed too polemical and thus deleted before? Please, someone, enlighten me.

--Steven Weston 20:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

• I'd be happy to enlighten you. On Wikipedia:User categories for discussion, we've been against two things most of all: categories that create a sense that all responsible users should be members of them, and categories which declare a negative preference and thus cannot be used for collaboration. This category does both: Everybody's supposed to be against vandalism, and no one using it is declaring a preference for anything except an absence of vandalism. That's why it's unanimous that it should be deleted, and why I'm in the process of doing so right now. That make sense? (Please note that the userbox will be untouched, it's just the category that's being deleted.)--Mike Selinker 22:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Yes that's fine. I'll leave it alone hereafter. I guess I should have read Wikipedia:User categories for discussion...--Steven Weston 13:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Personal attack

I've left the anon another warning, let me know if they do it again and I will block them. In the future if this happens, you should leave warnings to them (different warnings can be found at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace) and if they ignore the warnings, report them at WP:AIV and an administrator will block them. VegaDark 20:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Unhelpful changes?

Are you confused? The edits I've made were getting rid of the line "A real model, about 2 1/2 feet (76 cm) in diameter, currently resides in my ass." from the Death Star article and a couple of other similar things. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.68.57 (talk) 20:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC).

• No, I did not put that comment. I tried to undo it from a previous person, somehow the undo malfunctioned, or something. Why would I do such a thing anyway? I attempt to fight vandalism.--Steven Weston 08:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Rugrats Characters page edit

That is actually true information about Drew Pickles check out the Barney Bunch website and look for his biography in it

• This is an encyclopaedia, your comments were not acceptable for an encyclopaedic article. I don't even think that they would be acceptable on an Uncyclopedic article.--Steven Weston 15:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

No point warning schools

I noticed you warned a user recently for vandalism. Sadly, this isn't really worth the trouble in the case of school IPs. Maury 12:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• I know, but I do it anyway.--Steven Weston 12:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Steven Weston! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb^talk 21:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:LogoExample.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LogoExample.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiBirthday

I saw from here that it's been exactly two years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Steven Weston. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Steven Weston. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Steven Weston. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Squareani2.gif

The file File:Squareani2.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)