SummerWithMorons

Archive01

Welcome to the Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books, often referred to as "novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject Novels announcements}} there.
  While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• Planning on starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the coordinators or an experienced member of the project; we will be happy to assist in any way we can. Again, welcome, and we look forward to seeing you around! Sadads (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, our project has begun to fall a little bit behind the collaboration/organization department, would you, as an experienced editor be willing to help us revamp how we deal with issues? The template is a little behind because of this, but it points to some good places:) Do you have anything in particular you would like to do with us? Sadads (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sadads, my main interest is adding inline references.--Sum (talk) 14:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Great!!! We definitely don't have a shortfall of work for you then. Why don't you take a look at our assessment chart and help with some of the Top and High C-class and B class articles then? We certainly don't turn out as many FAs and GAs as we use to, Sadads (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Patriarchy

Hello Sum, please see my response here. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Link spam

Please stop link spamming the Pokemón (subculture) article. I understand it has an orphan tag but that's no grounds for adding to the see also links of articles it has nothing to do with.--Cybermud (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Diplomatic cable listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diplomatic cable. Since you had some involvement with the Diplomatic cable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). __meco (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes I'm interested, thanks for the link.--Sum (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Please see Talk:United_States_diplomatic_cables_leak#Converting_lists_to_prose. I appreciate the stub you created, but it really belongs in the main article for now. Of course, if it gets too large, you should restore the redirect to expand the topic. However, at this point, it belongs in the main article, and we need to focus on creating more prose and less lists. Viriditas (talk) 10:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OVH (2nd nomination). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Spying on United Nations leaders by United States diplomats

Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Whoa, that's cool! Thanks. --Sum (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

New WikiProject Novels initiative

We have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 01:51, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Copwatch

Hello. You recently added material to the Copwatch article. Unfortunately, the claims seem to be sourced to an Italian-language website or newspaper article. Could you please provide a translation for the source, or find an alternate source? Thank you. Factchecker atyourservice (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February

Thank you everyone who participated in the January Collaboration, it was quite a success with 5 new C class articles, 3 stub kills and several articles were removed from our backlogs. In support of the Great Backlog Drive, the WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February is going to help remove backlog candidates in the backlogs related to WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members

Facepalm !

Sorry about reverting you at Sacred cow (idiom). Worked overtime on April Fool's Day 'till I hit the wall. This lousy T-shirt (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem! :-)--Sum (talk) 02:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

BLPs

• Template:BLP others
• Template:BLP removal
• Template:Uw-biog3
• Wikipedia:Libel
• Wikipedia:Attack page
• Wikipedia:No personal attacks

Vinča criticality accident

Hi, you undid this change by me to Criticality accident, saying:

restored, the ref from ilfattoquotidiano clearly says they all died under the transplant operation

Could you please point me to where exactly it says that? It is a very long ticker-style article that spans ten pages. I searched each of them for 'vin' (as part of Vinca, Vinča or similar) but did not find it mentioned anywhere. Even if it does say that ”they died under the transplant operation“, I have difficulty to believe this. Bone marrow is no solid organ, so the ‘operation’ consists of injecting the cells into the blood stream. If patient 1 had immediately died, then patient 2, I doubt they would have proceeded to do the same on patients 3 to 5. I still maintain that every other source says the five victims survived:

1. A review of criticality accidents: “Of the six persons present, one died shortly afterwards, and the other five recovered after severe cases of radiation sickness.”
2. Database of radiological incidents and related events: “All developed severe radiation sickness and one died. The five survivors all received experimental bone marrow transplants, which were rejected in all patients, although before rejection the transplants probably contributed to survival.”
3. Dr. Georges Mathé, Transplant Pioneer, Dies at 88: “One physicist died from especially heavy exposure, and one was relatively unaffected. Dr. Georges Mathé … used the remaining four as guinea pigs in a radical experiment. … For the first time, a human marrow transplant seemed to take, and the physicists survived. It was called the first successful bone marrow transplant not performed on identical twins.”

I assume someone – possibly the Italian paper – read “transplants got rejected” and conjectured “patients died“, which is not a valid deduction. --Chirlu (talk) 13:09, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Chirlu, here is the quote from the orginal article:

il primo trapianto di midollo in Europa è stato fatto proprio a causa di un incidente nucleare, avvenuto negli anni ’50 nella ex-Jugoslavia. In quel caso si tentò l’operazione su alcuni scienziati, ma non si conosceva ancora l’Hla, cioè l”impronta digitale’ che differenzia il midollo di diverse persone e che rende necessario trovare quelle compatibili per il trapianto. Furono quindi trapiantati a caso, e purtroppo morirono tutti”.

The quote is reported in many news outlets, for instance [1] [2], the original link given in March instead seems to be broken. Here is a rush translation:

the first bone marrow transplant in Europe, was exactly done because of a nuclear accident, which happened in the '50s in the former Yugoslavia. In that case the transplant operation was attempted on some scientists, but the HLA was still unknown; the HLA is the "fingerprint" which differentiates the bone marrow of different people, and which makes necessary to find those compatible for the transplant. Therefore they where transplanted randomly, and unfortunately they all died.

--Sum (talk) 13:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

OK, so this source really speaks of “dying”. As far as I understand the wider context, it is a quote from Franco Locatelli, an Italian doctor, from an interview regarding possible health effects of the Fukushima incidents.

Do you think this source is so strong that the claim of fatal outcomes should be upheld in the article, in spite of the other sources contradicting it? --Chirlu (talk) 02:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

The nytimes source is enough for me to change the article and say that the operation was successful and the patients survived, until further sources are found. Still source #2 needs to be clarified when it says "before rejection the transplants probably contributed to survival." And source #1 also does not say that they survived the operation.--Sum (talk) 07:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Navigium Isidis

Are you planning an article on this? I saw the redlink at Argei. Cynwolfe (talk) 02:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah an article on that is long due in the en wiki.--Sum (talk) 11:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

"Paganism"

I wonder whether you've read the article Religion in ancient Rome carefully and taken a look at some of the related material such as Glossary of ancient Roman religion. I'm concerned with how you're using the word Paganism and writing of "Pagan" temples and so on, when no such thing existed in ancient Rome. Cicero wouldn't have known what in the world you were talking about. See also my comments (OK, it's a bit of rant) at Talk:Libanius#Libanius was not a 'pagan'. And see Maijastina Kahlos, Debate and Dialogue: Christian and Pagan Cultures c. 360-430 (Ashgate, 2007), p. 18 online:

"Paganism was never a religion and there were no pagans before Christianity. Christians invented paganism, not only as a term, but also as a system."

Kahlos notes that "these people indeed exist as the category of 'pagans' in Christian discourse" (boldface mine). Kahlos's book uses the word "pagan" in its title, and finds the term necessary for the very reason that the book is framed by a Christian/non-Christian dialectic. The point is that the words "pagan" or "paganism" are anachronistic when applied to traditional forms of religion in antiquity before the rise of Christian hegemony, and do not reflect accurately how the practitioners of those religions viewed their own multifaceted religious lives. Kahlos's remarks on "paganism" are preceded by discussion of why "polytheism" is similarly unhelpful. This is not a matter of being PC and calling people what they called themselves; it's a matter of accuracy, as "Paganism" implies that all the various religions of the Empire — traditional Roman public and domestic religion; mystery religions; Mithraism; Celtic religion as it continued in the Gallo-Roman period; and so on — were all somehow one monolithic thing like Christianity. As an -ism, "Paganism" is the exact opposite of what religion in the Roman Empire was.

Apologies for the lecture, but I see you've been working away on articles that are valuable and relevant to some areas to which I regularly contribute, and I just felt compelled to throw this out for your consideration. Check my user page if you want to see better where I'm coming from on this. Cynwolfe (talk) 23:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SI9Img15AnneMarie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SI9Img15AnneMarie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Palestinian cause

hmm, just querying what exactly made you crate the page? a red link on another apge? i ask b/c i [red]linked numerous pages with that link.(Lihaas (talk) 23:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)).

It was surprising that the article didn't exist before on en.wiki.--Sum (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Ill say...was just too lazy to create pending some deletion requestions but you know what peeps..(Lihaas (talk) 04:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC)).

10 O'Clock Live

Hi. I'm not sure of your intentions, but please only add content to articles, as you did to 10 O'Clock Live, if it relates to the content around it. You addition of a link to political satire made absolutely no sense in context and made the sentence it was added to not make sense itself. Similarly, changing the heading to Political Satire was inappropriate as that is not what the section is about. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ ^(talk) 19:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Alphathon, Please discuss article issues in the specific article talk page.--Sum (talk) 19:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I was just writing a message to you to say the same thing. I have started a discussion thread on the talk page about them, so please take a look and discuss them there before any further edits. Also, try to bear in mind that if you reply to someone on your talk page, they are unlikely to get the message - either leave them a {{talkback}} on their page or write the reply there. It was pretty much luck that I happened to see this. Thanks. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ ^(talk) 20:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Oh, and I get the feeling that I may be coming off a tad aggressive; I can assure you it is not intentional if I am, I'm just having a hard time wording what I want to say without seeming that way. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.θɒn/ ^(talk) 20:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Bellatores (t.) 02:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SI9Img15AnneMarieCrop.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SI9Img15AnneMarieCrop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Paul Krassner

Category:Paul Krassner, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

May 1968 in France

What is wrong with my edit? I removed nothing except redundancy and awkward wording. – Smyth\^talk 09:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Please respond or I will just repeat my change. – Smyth\^talk 21:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Smyth, the removed information was not redundant, and the edit summary only said "ridiculous." If you find it objectionable, move it from the lead to a subsection and add some inline template, but please don't remove sourced material as it is disruptive. Also please give a clarifying edit summary. I apologize for not replying before, but articles talk pages are maybe more approriate and sometimes less annoying.--Sum (talk) 21:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaume Vicens i Vives

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jaume Vicens i Vives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bihco (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao has just removed your rushed deletion request. Are you under caffeine?--Sum (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Pacejka

Please could you provide a better or more detailed ref for the low speed problems? I am not going to sit through a 1 1/4 hour video to check what Brian said. I happen to be modelling stationary parking efforts today and my estimates of the forces involved were with 10% of the measured ones, that is at a speed of 0 kph, on my very first (and hence last) run. Greglocock (talk) 05:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Please use the article talk page for queries about the references.--Sum (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that recent edit-delete this lot if you want. Greglocock (talk) 22:47, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Palestinian cause article

Hi. An article you've edited, Palestinian cause was recently cut back to a stub and then redirected, in these two edits, which I've now reverted. The article needs development and additional cites, but if the editor who made those edits thinks it has no value, and is improper for Wikipedia, then he needs to take it to AfD rather than effecting a unilateral deletion with a redirect, in my opinion. Since it's a new article, and has been edited by only a few contributors so far, I've posted this identical message to each of their talk pages, including that of the editor who made these two edits. Please note the talk-page warning that this article is under ARBPIA restrictions, including the restriction that no editor may make more than one revert in a 24-hour period.  – OhioStandard (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and for restoring the article. I'll follow up on the article talkpage.--Sum (talk) 19:59, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Boycott Amazon

You might want to check out bookdepository for your list of alternatives to Amazon. At least, I'm not aware of them pulling anything underhanded, and they have free international shipping. CüRlyTüRkey^Talk_Contribs 14:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate the advice.--Sum (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

resource request

Hi SummerWithMorons,

I was able to get a scan of the article you requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request a bit earlier than I anticipated. You can find a link to the file at that page. Best, GabrielF (talk) 17:29, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I've just finished downloading it. Many thanks, --Sum (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Just stumbled upon your article on the Web 2.0 Suicide Machine and wanted to say good job, it was an interesting read. Noformation Talk 10:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

RFD "Pro-Palestinian" -> "Israeli–Palestinian conflict"

Hi -- FYI, I submitted a RFD for this redirect. Please see here for details and discussion. Best, —Ireilly ^talk 12:32, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Cultural sensibility for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cultural sensibility is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural sensibility until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Artiquities (talk) 16:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Films relating to Anne Frank

Category:Films relating to Anne Frank, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello SummerWithMorons! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Linguistic prescription

I don't want to just revert you again, but what you have done there doesn't make any sense. It is not just that the quote tag produced a surreal result. My objection to the quote template was not that it appeared in a footnote, but that it should only be used for highlighting a particularly important quote in the middle of a paragraph of text - which COULD sometimes occur in a footnote, but doesn't here. But quite apart from the quote template, your quote itself doesn't make sense. A quote has to illustrate what is being said, and it should be obvious to the reader what you want to communicate by quoting it. This is just a fragment of something - looks like a section heading - which doesn't seem to me to add anything to anybody's understanding, and I can't see why it is there at all. If all you want is a reference for the information in the text, you should stop at the page number. If you want to add a quote which tells us something, you have to give enough context that the reader has some benefit from it. At present your quote just says "Contrasting terms in linguistics", which makes no sense. Which terms is it that you want to show us are contrasting? Which terms does the source say are contrasting? What is it all about? Apart from that, the word "quotation" should not appear here. Just quote marks are enough. As for the entry heading "Descriptivism and prescriptivism", this should come before the page number, and the words "entry for" are then not required. Please fix this quickly, or if you are unsure, put an explanation here of what you want to achieve. Otherwise I will revert again. --Doric Loon (talk) 11:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Discussion moved here.--Sum (talk) 12:16, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Xenophanes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feuerbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Diction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Articulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rebellion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Outsider

Ritual clown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Antisocial

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Satyricon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of School of suspicion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article School of suspicion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School of suspicion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Personal attacks at AfD

Hello, SummerWithMorons. You recently made a personal attack against me and other editors here. Comments like, 'It is clear that those (kids, apparently) proposing the deletion have no idea of what their talking about; neither about this topic or "continental philosophy" in general' and 'If the boys want further "elaboration" to be educated on things they don't know, they should do their homeworks or waste their own time' are perfectly clear violations of WP:NPA. I have thus removed them from the AfD, and will certainly escalate matters if you revert me and restore the personal attacks. I'm actually doing you a favor by removing them, since they don't make you look good and they definitely don't help your case at the AfD. NB, it's fairly amusing that you would suggest that I don't know what I'm talking about and make a spelling mistake ("their" doesn't mean the same thing as "they are"...) in the same sentence. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Parody music

I notice you have editied this article in the past. Now someone wants to hijack the article for academic musical theory as opposed to general interest (at least that is my impression) and s/he and I have a dispute going. (See our mutual reverts of the lead section).I would especially appreciate your opinion. Perhaps you will see in his argument something I am missing - perhaps in trying to write one article on this whole subject in one go I was always being a bit ambitious. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 13:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Centre de recherche sur l'imaginaire

The article Centre de recherche sur l'imaginaire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability, not even through references (single ref is a self-ref)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 20:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of satirical magazines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moskau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Joachim Fischer

Hello. Just letting you know that this disambiguation page, which you created, has been nominated for cleanup - can you help? The reason given is:

are any but the badminton player valid links, per MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION? Disambiguation pages should be indexes of Wikipedia articles, not lists of potentially notable people. Seems, at very least, clear primary.

Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited René Descartes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited Satire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Not a "Black Power salute"

In August 2008 you pointed out that the wiki article 1968 Olympics Black Power salute that the article was incorrectly attributed to Black Power and that the article should be renamed. You currently have the opportunity to vote in favor changing the articles name to something that supports the actual intentions of John Carlos and Tommie Smith. Goto talk:1968 Olympics Black Power salute page "Requested Move" section at the bottom to vote. Xybernauts (talk) 16:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Re. Article, "TV format"

Before you, we had, "In 2009 the article was moved from 'TV program format' to 'Program format', with rationale 'Changed to more accurate terminology.'"

Then, "It seems the most common term is 'TV format,' so I'm retitling/moving the article to that.--Sum (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)"

I wish you had left the title alone, since IMHO, either of the two previous titles was more appropriate for the content of this particular article, since it does indeed discuss *program* formats.

When I searched "TV formats," I was looking for an overview article listing the various TV formats world-wide, i.e., NTSC, PAL, SECOM, to see if there are any others besides these. Although the formats I list each have their own articles, there appears to be none addressing the big picture, as it were, and I'm not well-versed in the technologies to write one myself.

CayugaH2O (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Nancy Reagan

In reference to these edits, please go over them. They need to be proofread, and the references need to be done/redone in the same format as used throughout the article: books are cited in footnotes, their titles and other info is in the "References". This article is an FA, which requires we be extra careful in editing it. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Voting system

You included, some years ago, a reference to Cox 1997, but no bibliographical details. I will remove it until you (or someone else) provide details. 200.219.132.76 (talk) 22:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Carlo Emilio Gadda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Einaudi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Eco reference

You inserted at Umberto Eco a reference to Capozzi 2008. Could you give more details? At least a title and a page number, ideally also a first name, a place, publisher and ISBN. 189.61.26.115 (talk) 02:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Ambrose reference

You inserted at Ambrose a reference to Byfield 2003. Please fill up the details. 189.61.26.69 (talk) 20:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Also Palanque, Gaudemet, King… 189.61.26.69 (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Call stack

I think these additions would have been more appropriate in Stack machine and Register machine themselves. A call stack is not really the same thing as the stack of a stack machine. —Ruud 13:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Aspects of capitalism

Hi SummerWithMorons, There's an WP:NPOV discussion underway on the above-referenced template, which I think you created... Your comments and input to the discussion may be helpful. I like the template & think it has potential for further development... Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

What does "Taboos/Externalties" mean? --OpenFuture (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you and Penbat for your work in improving the Media manipulation template. I (the creator of said template) am a relatively new editor and this is my first template. It's great to see other editors taking my work and making it better. --Andrewaskew (talk) 01:25, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Totality and Infinity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit window changes

Hey Summer. So, you wrote on the Village Pump that the edit window changes were "unilateral, has not been up to a vote, and users are baffled by the absence of a warning about the change. There is no option to keep the previous interface". I wanted to let you know that we're restoring the option to have the edit tools on Thursday (touch wood). I'm slightly confused by the "absence of a warning" comment: did you not see the watchlist notice we put up? Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 20:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

User name

Saw your username for the first time, at least that I can remember. Got a good chuckle out of it. So, I see you spent this past summer with my in-laws. Bgwhite (talk) 07:20, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Persecution by Muslims for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persecution by Muslims is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution by Muslims until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jason from nyc (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Summer

I like your user name, made me smile. I Corrected some minor typos on your user page, I hope you don't mind. The section where I made the corrections is interesting, insightful and informative. I came across your user name while editing Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television. Jerry Mander, the author of Four Arguments, has written an interesting new article on the website of Monthly Review, which drew me to the WP article. Thanks for your work on WP. Regards, IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Projects

I you are adding articles to projects that have little to now relation to the articles. I fail to see how any music genre article is part of the media project. I also fail to see how these are important articles to the projects your are adding them to. Ridernyc (talk) 22:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Projects

I you are adding articles to projects that have little to now relation to the articles. I fail to see how any music genre article is part of the media project. I also fail to see how these are important articles to the projects your are adding them to. Ridernyc (talk) 22:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Template:Positivism

Hello. I have just edited again a template you created. Incidentally, I still believe that the 'contributions' and 'related concepts' parts feature original research. For example the book "Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity" is a critique of ontological realism (in particular) and analytic philosophy (in general); I doubt that the book even ever mentions positivism once. Ontological realists actually oppose positivists (see Mario Bunge's Treatise on Basic Philosophy: VII, Part II), and equating analytic philosophy with positivism is highly misleading. Also, listing capitalism as a related concept/subject is also misleading and borderline original research. Liberal/capitalist theory existed way before the emergence of positivism and only some subschools of continental neoclassical economy were eventually directly affected by positivism. It might be the case that you are confusing scientism with positivism. Finally, calling Popper a reformer of positivism is debatable; while, I personally agree with the assessment, I believe that this claim should be reliably sourced. In general, many "post-positivists" are not "reformers of positivism"; they may actually be analytically-trained opponents of positivist-influenced philosophy (for example, this is the case with Kuhn who has also been labeled as a post-positivist). --Omnipaedista (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Positivism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Harvey

The Two Cultures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Interpretivism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Objectivity (science), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interpretivism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laughter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buster Keaton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Ince (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Szondi test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of András Vargha

The article András Vargha has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 23:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:MediaImpactOnWesternCulture.PNG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:MediaImpactOnWesternCulture.PNG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:58, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:MediaImpactOnWesternCulture.PNG

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:MediaImpactOnWesternCulture.PNG

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

The author does not wish to be mentioned.Sum (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl Seelig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Walser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Condensation (psychology) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Unconscious

Metaphor and metonymy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Unconscious

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mond Crucifixion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Constantinople (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mitteleuropa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adelphi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Epoxy

I don't have a problem with the concept or the reference so much as placement. The concept is too obscure to insert without explaination and the explaination is too extensive for the opening paragraph, which has to simply be about what stand-up comedy is. I'd have no problem with your insertion going anywhere else in the article, in US History or even in Overview. Mdw0 (talk) 02:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Excretion

What definition of excretion are you using to categorize these articles. E.g. I was not aware that pus was an excretion. Do you have a sources for this? Some of the others are also questionable. Drooling is not excretion per se but is a term for a lack of oral continence. Lesion (talk) 17:53, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

For the purpose of categorization I'm taking excretion, dejecta and ejecta as synonyms.--Sum (talk) 00:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Respectfully, I think it may be WP:OR to call pus excretion. Is there a source for this and drooling? Lesion (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:People related to Plato

Category:People related to Plato, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. pbp 22:21, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

You're invited to join WikiProject Women writers!

Hello SummerWithMorons! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi SummerWithMorons! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bradley J. Macdonald

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bradley J. Macdonald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 16:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Deceived Ones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Deceived Ones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deceived Ones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bradley J. Macdonald for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley J. Macdonald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley J. Macdonald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 15:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:John Barth has been nominated for discussion

Category:John Barth, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 13:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Restoration and tolerance of Paganism from Julian until Valens

The article Restoration and tolerance of Paganism from Julian until Valens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unwieldy content fork; discussion five years ago to re-merge or delete received no comment.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~TPW 13:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flight procedure

The article Flight procedure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unambiguous dictionary definition without encyclopedic elaboration.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  06:36, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:People relating to Anne Frank has been nominated for discussion

Category:People relating to Anne Frank, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 15:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Anti-paganism influenced by Saint Ambrose for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anti-paganism influenced by Saint Ambrose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-paganism influenced by Saint Ambrose until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of episodes in Against the Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of episodes in Against the Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of episodes in Against the Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Rank and file labor unions has been nominated for deletion

Category:Rank and file labor unions has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 18:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Stage theories has been nominated for deletion

Category:Stage theories has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 06:32, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

"Patriarchal religion" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Patriarchal religion has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Patriarchal religion until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 03:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Language speaks

The article Language speaks has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Oppressors–oppressed distinction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oppressors–oppressed distinction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oppressors–oppressed distinction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RecardedByzantian (talk) 06:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Language speaks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Language speaks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language speaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)