User talk:TenthAvenueFreezeOut/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:TenthAvenueFreezeOut. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Navigation
- User talk:Theknine2#Archives (List of archives)
Welcome
|
October 2020
Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Circus Starring Britney Spears, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Immaculate Collection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page True Blue. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Madame X Deluxe.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madame X Deluxe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of games included with Windows has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Eyebeller 10:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)CESA Games White Paper
Hello, recently you added certain information in the List of best-selling video games, there you used as reference the CESA Games White Paper, the same that is used in the Super Mario Bros. entry, the reference has been a long time with the [clarification needed] text, so, I wanted to know if you can help find the exact edition of the White Paper in which says that Super Mario Bros. 3 sold 5.4 millions and Super Mario Bros. sold 2.27 millions, or at least the first one since you added that. Thanks and sorry for the bad english. --Dreamer plox (talk) 04:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi there, Dreamer plox! Unfortunately, I do not have the info for the exact edition of CESA Games White Paper, as I had simply combined the sales figures and sources listed in the List of best-selling Game Boy Advance video games page. The k nine 2 (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
File:The Emancipation of Mimi Ultra Platinum.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Emancipation of Mimi Ultra Platinum.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 23:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Back to the Future Part III, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sims 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Back to the Future (soundtrack) into Back to the Future soundtracks. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of EA Play games for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of EA Play games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
GA nomination of Folklore (Taylor Swift album)
Hi! I noticed you recently nominated Folklore (Taylor Swift album) for GA status. While I appreciate that you were bold, I think you should withdraw this, because the outcome will most likely be an automatic fail. The article is currently at 104kb of prose size, which is very, very large for a page. Per WP:SIZERULE, any page above 60kb should probably be split off into separate articles, and articles over 100kb D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 23:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
almost certainly should be divided
. Because of this "limit", it should almost certainly be divided/copy-edited, as almost half of the page is too much information. Criterion 1a of the GA criteria says the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
. While the latter half is true for this article, the former half, especially the first two words "clear" and "concise", has not been met yet. Per WP:GAFAIL, one of the reasons for an immediate failure is if the article is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
, which this is, as explained above. This is why I do not think that you should continue with this nomination, as the article has a snowball's chance in hell of passing. Thanks!
- Doggy54321 (talk · contribs) Hi, thanks for reaching out to me, I have withdrawn the GA nomination. I was not aware of the article size rule for GA, that would affect it being "clear and concise". However, otherwise it's a very in-depth and well written article! Thank you. The k nine 2 (talk) 06:15, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I agree, the article looks good otherwise. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 12:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Doggy54321 (talk · contribs) Hi, sorry for disturbing you, but the prose size that WP:SIZERULE is referring to is readable prose size. Folklore (Taylor Swift album)'s readable prose size is 49kb May need to be divided (likelihood goes up with size)
, according to Prosesize's Page size tool. Hence, the article actually comfortably remains within the limit. As aforementioned, it's a well-written article and deserves to be nominated! Theknine2 (talk) 19:57, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Oops!!! I didn't notice I had somehow checked the wrong bullet point when I was looking at the size 🤦♂️! Super sorry for the inconvenience. I struck my previous comments through. I agree that the article deserves to be nominated, and would appreciate if you continued with the nomination. Sorry again! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:06, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I just came across the fact that you nominated Evermore for GA status too? Upping an article to GA is a lot of work, and I think it would be great if we just concentrate on Folklore now. Let's take one step at a time, there's no hurry. I hope you withdraw the GAN for Evermore! Please consider. Thank You! BawinV (talk) 21:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- BawinV (talk · contribs) Hi, I thought the Evermore (Taylor Swift album) article was equally well written and in-depth, in addition to both articles being so complementary of one another. However, as per your wishes, I have withdrawn the GA nomination for Evermore. Apologies for the inconvenience! Theknine2 (talk) 21:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, please don't apologize, you are very right. Evermore and Folklore are great articles; I did/do my best to keep them at the best quality. I'll take your GANs as compliments. But at the same time, a GA review is a lot of manage, and it has to be done slowly and meticulously. My advice is to be involved in one GAN at a time! Folklore is a year-old already, and its album cycle is pretty much over. Evermore, however, isn't complete, and a lot is yet to come for the album (awards season, 2021 year-end critic/sales lists, a possible documentary, etc). The right thing to do now is to work on Folklore's GAN before moving onto Evermore's (which I'd suggest we do sometime in early 2022). I hope you get my point. Regards. BawinV (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- BawinV (talk · contribs) You made a good point that Evermore is still within its album cycle, and an early 2022 timeline for a GA nomination sounds like a better idea, since Taylor would have moved on to the Red (Taylor's Version) album cycle. Thank you for taking the time to reply! Theknine2 (talk) 21:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, please don't apologize, you are very right. Evermore and Folklore are great articles; I did/do my best to keep them at the best quality. I'll take your GANs as compliments. But at the same time, a GA review is a lot of manage, and it has to be done slowly and meticulously. My advice is to be involved in one GAN at a time! Folklore is a year-old already, and its album cycle is pretty much over. Evermore, however, isn't complete, and a lot is yet to come for the album (awards season, 2021 year-end critic/sales lists, a possible documentary, etc). The right thing to do now is to work on Folklore's GAN before moving onto Evermore's (which I'd suggest we do sometime in early 2022). I hope you get my point. Regards. BawinV (talk) 21:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Red (Taylor's Version) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! BawinV (talk) 10:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Back to the Future: Music from the Motion Picture Soundtrack (placeholder)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Back to the Future: Music from the Motion Picture Soundtrack (placeholder) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ColinBear (talk – contributions) 14:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Moved the images
Hi! I undid your good edit here. Folklore already has lots of images, so it's best if we don't add anymore to it since it's a vast article. Moreover, Dylan and Radiohead were cited as inspiration for only one track each, which can be moved to the respective song's articles. I moved Dylan's image to "Betty". "The Last Great American Dynasty" has enough images already, therefore I don't think Radiohead would fit there, but you could try. Thanks! BawinV (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @BawinV: That's a better idea, thank you! Theknine2 (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sims 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sim. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Folklore (Taylor Swift album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Folklore (Taylor Swift album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Folklore (Taylor Swift album)
The article Folklore (Taylor Swift album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Folklore (Taylor Swift album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Folklore (Taylor Swift album)
The article Folklore (Taylor Swift album) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Folklore (Taylor Swift album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BuySomeApples -- BuySomeApples (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Nice to see another fan of Back to the Future! Prairie Astronomer Contributions 01:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC) |
- @Prairie Astronomer: Thanks! Wishing you godspeed. 🤠 Theknine2 (talk) 01:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims 4
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Sims 4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims 4
The article The Sims 4 you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:The Sims 4 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Expansion packs for The Sims, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spell and Sims.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
A pie for you!
|
Great work! Cornerstonepicker (talk) 07:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Like a Prayer (album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Like a Prayer (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Like a Prayer (album)
The article Like a Prayer (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Like a Prayer (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello @Theknine2:! If you need help with this nomination let me know! :) --Christian (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Chrishm21:, I definitely appreciate all the help I can get, so please feel free to contribute to the GA review, thank you!! Theknine2 (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Like a Prayer (album)
The article Like a Prayer (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Like a Prayer (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your GA nomination of The Sims 4
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Sims 4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 21:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Adding columns in personnel sections
Hi. Not sure you're aware, but per MOS:ALBUM, we should not introduce column markup for less than 20 names. Separating eight names into two columns on Mercurial World is unnecessary. Ss112 04:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Noted, thank you for informing me. Theknine2 (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims 4
The article The Sims 4 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Sims 4 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
The Sims 4
Can you please re-add the stuff pack list and the kit list on The Sims 4 page? 174.207.161.91 (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Why was The Sims 4 Stuff Pack and Kits Removed?
I was searching for info on the newest kits. But on the main the sims 4 page there is no mention of what the stuff pack and kits are. And then i looked in the edit and i saw you removed them, why? There is missing information, half of the game is literally omitted. 2A0E:41A:E686:0:64E6:71DB:B7FB:ABF4 (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- The list of stuff packs and kits can be found at List of The Sims video games. Theknine2 (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Finally Enough Love: 50 Number Ones hasn't been moved (yet) so don't rephrase it
This isn't called for when the article hasn't been moved. If and when it is, then it would be justified to treat the 50 Number Ones edition as apparently not the standard, even if I disagree entirely because all meaning or reason for the album's release would be lost without the 50 Number Ones part not being present. It's celebrating 50 number ones, not 16 abridged tracks. Also, please don't add spaces to headings where they weren't previously—each (unspaced and spaced) is a preferred style, and I intended them not to have spaces when I created the article. It is cosmetic and can be seen as unnecessarily fiddly to make such changes. Thanks. Ss112 04:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Mariah TEOM Digipak-Vinyl.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mariah TEOM Digipak-Vinyl.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Madonna
Hi! I see that your edit [1] to Madonna's article was reverted [2]. I've just restored it [3]. The thing is, there is too much yo-yoing regarding that particular occupation title (been going on for years). Every now and then, an editor adds or removes the hyphen. To me, it’s mostly semantics but a decision must be made on which term to adopt. The consensus years ago was actually for "singer-songwriter," [4] so there is that. Israell (talk) 08:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Israell: Great talk page discussion, didn't know it's been going back and forth for so many years. Thanks for the update! Theknine2 (talk) 15:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims 4
The article The Sims 4 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Sims 4 and Talk:The Sims 4/GA3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zekerocks11 -- Zekerocks11 (talk) 02:42, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Good Article Barnstar
|
The Good Article Barnstar | |
| Congratulations on your Good Article status on The Sims 4! Thanks for your hard work and contributions. Keep it up! Zekerocks11 (talk) 14:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Thank you! You were awesome too, and you did great in your first GA review, congratulations! Theknine2 (talk) 16:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Sims 4
The article The Sims 4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Sims 4 for comments about the article, and Talk:The Sims 4/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zekerocks11 -- Zekerocks11 (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for The Sims 4
On 9 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Sims 4, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Sims 4 by Maxis started as an online multiplayer game, but was transitioned to a single-player experience following the negative launch reception of SimCity in 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Sims 4. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Sims 4), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
A well-deserved barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| A long-overdue thank you for your work on Apple-related articles. Mac (computer) is frankly unrecognizable from the sorry state it was in before we touched it, and I couldn't have done it without you! DFlhb (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
- @DFlhb: It's been wonderful working on the articles with you too, thank you! Theknine2 (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Touch My Body. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
? No text was copied from anywhere in my edits! Theknine2 (talk) 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
script conversion error - URLs to wikilinks inside references
This edit (which I reverted) has multiple conversions of URLs
url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
into wikilinks
url=[[...]]
inside references, causing reference errors to appear. Presumably the script needs updating to exclude such conversions. Mitch Ames (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm just making you aware of the above as this is your area of expertise and I threw it together based on your work on the Back to the Future soundtracks. It's not something I'm knowledgable in, I've made the article just to deal with the fluff spread across 7-8 other ones but if it's something you would be interested in working on, I'm just letting you know it exists. Thank you! Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 15:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Never thought I'd receive a message like this, but it's such an honor, thank you! My article looks way more sparse than yours, so conversely I could use your article as a point of reference, but I'll see if I can contribute. I kind of followed the overall layout used in the "Music of the SaGa series" article when editing, so it may be helpful for you too. Happy editing! Theknine2 (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome, thank you for taking a look at it. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 18:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Madonna - True Blue album cover
Hello Dear,
Hope you are doing well! I just noticed that the standard/original edition of Madonna's True Blue album has been added to iTunes and other streaming platforms, and it contains the cover with text. I was noticing that majority of the online resources also have the cover with text.
Should we change it back to the cover with the text? Curious to know what you think. Thanks, and have a great day :) KARANSUTTA (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
@KARANSUTTA: Hi, thanks for messaging! I am aware of the True Blue cover with text, but the talk page came to a consensus that it should be the cover without text, since that is “as the artist intended”, where Madonna intended for the cover to simply be a floating head without any other text. Have a great day too! Theknine2 (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Theknine2! Per your split of the Criticism of Facebook article in October 2021, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind reviewing and leaving comments in the section I added to its talk page on 4 March 2023 to facilitate a new discussion about a potential move review and splits, merges, and retitle proposals for Meta Platforms family of articles. Thanks! -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'll have a look at it, thanks! Theknine2 (talk) 07:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Updating Richard Chandler (businessman)
Hello, Theknine2. I am reaching out to you to ask for your assistance in updating and improving the Richard Chandler (businessman) article. In accordance with Wiki policy, I have declared my COI and posted an edit request to get input from the editing community. I saw your participation in WP:Singapore and would appreciate your help with making these changes to this Singapore resident and business owner's entry. Thank you for your help. Rob6031 (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)